-
Posts
5,879 -
Joined
-
Days Won
8
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Exhibition Layout Details
Store
Blog Comments posted by Ruston
-
-
15 hours ago, Covkid said:
Is this a Judith Edge kit Dave ?
Thought Charlie might have got it from Round Oak !!!
Very nice
It is indeed a JE kit. I wanted to do it as a Round Oak loco, but the all-over stripes were just a bit too much for me and I chickened out of attempting them!
- 1
-
This is superb! I don't see any pickups though and I can see that it's going to be very difficult to fit them to such open bar frames. Or are they going on the tender only?
-
30 minutes ago, Regularity said:
Well, read the OP and respond to the intentions of the builder, as I did.
Alright, there's no need to be so obtuse.
-
13 hours ago, Regularity said:
Wouldn’t that defeat the object of the kit, which is to show the wooden framework?
Perhaps but then it would still be visible as shadow underneath with light coming through it, just as it does on the real thing. It's obviously not possible on normal plastic models so I think it would be great.
-
16 hours ago, down the sdjr said:
I like the unhappy face chalked on the front right side buffer. Or is that just a trick of the light.
It does indeed have a face chalked on the buffer.
- 1
-
9 hours ago, Neil Phillips said:
According to their website, built 1952 in Derby
That can't be right. Thomas Hill never built anything in Derby. The works was at Kilnhurst, on the former GC line, between Mexborough and Rotherham. I would also doubt that build date. AFAIK. Hill's didn't build any locomotives until the 1960s.
-
57 minutes ago, decauville1126 said:
One of the best examples I've seen Dave! Thought it was an 11-ton one that they bought unless it came with 3 tons of ballast to weigh in. Love the narrative.
Typo. Thanks for pointing it out.
-
1 hour ago, Dungrange said:
What I would like to see is a well crafted original post followed by a number of well crafted or at least relevant follow on posts that add to the conversation or body of information.
Do we click the craftsmanship/clever button for those?
-
37 minutes ago, Compound2632 said:
I agree with the above post...
Me too (And I also agree with the post below this one).
- 1
-
4 hours ago, Knuckles said:
OP must vehemently but respectfully disagree. I’m drawing from my personal pool of experience since circa 2006 on various platforms so I know what I’m on about, at least in my experiential reality of what has happened; you may have had a different experience.
My experience is that my threads never get a great deal of conversation. I don't know if that's because the subject matter isn't mainstream, or because my posting style is boring.
It's most likely the latter because I can look around various layout or workbench threads here on rmweb and find some that have dozens of replies each week but contain very little actual modelling by their originators.
- 2
-
I wonder if the OP remembers, many years ago, a thread on this very forum where people moaned about how folks would post "me too" in response to someone saying how they liked something. That was before the like etc. buttons were added and you'd get a whole list of people saying nothing worthwhile but who were showing their appreciation for the poster's work and them having taken the time to post it. You can't please everyone...
The OP's argument here is that these buttons are taking away conversation but I don't think that's true. I don't think that if those buttons were taken away that my threads would be full of conversation; I just think that they would be still as empty but I would have no idea if anyone appreciated anything I was posting and so I wouldn't bother posting them at all.
- 1
- 4
- 1
-
I like the idea.
- 1
-
Ah, Cap'n! You can still change your track layout if you use PVA glue. Just wet the ballast thoroughly and the whole of the ballast and glue holding the track down disintegrates so track can be removed. In some ways it's better than prising out buried track pins, or the risk of missing a pin and having it pull the sleepers off rails as you attempt to lift the track.
-
What's the red saddle tank?
-
The first time I tried to get one of these units into a locomotive was with steel bevel gears but it wasn't a success. I can't take any credit for the idea of using plastic gears; that's all down to Geoff Helliwell and his article in April 2018 Railway Modeller, where he shows his use of N20 motor/gearboxes with plastic gears.
-
How are you going to arrange the final drive from the N20 to the axle?
Edit: answer in part 2!
The 3mm output shaft on the gearbox will have a cut down plastic spur gear on it. The spur gear is a push-fit on the shaft. I will turn a brass carrier for the plastic crown wheel, which will be cross-drilled to take a 12BA screw to hold the carrier to the locomotive axle. There should be space to allow the crown wheel to be disengaged, by loosening the carrier and sliding it out of mesh, so that the locomotive axle can rotate whilst fitting up the motion.
-
You were wise enough not to take in in part-ex for the Bagnall book! ;-)
-
What type of Simplex is this? If it's the 20HP type, as built for the WDLR, it wouldn't have had a horn like the one in your sound clip. More likely a plunger-operated Klaxon. It it's the later types, such as the plate frame 20/28HP types, it should have a whistle that worked off the exhaust.
I don't know what's in the videos that have been posted as I can't view them on my computer.
-
The HL version really is a lovely thing though. http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/90024-the-mill/?p=1693187 and http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/107704-high-level-question/?p=2198565
-
Actually, the whole thing could be a waste of possibly a decent wheel set.
I'm told by someone older and wiser than I that they are most definitely not decent wheelsets. They do look good but, apparently, aluminium wheels were about as much use as a chocolate teapot. They would spark, arc and gather more crud than anything.
-
I'm sure there were but they didn't have an alternative. I considered converting it to the industrial version but then again the amount of time and effort to bring it up to scratch isn't worth it when High Level do a proper job in etched brass.
That ogee-shaped tank could come in useful as part of a scratchbuild for either an early Barclay, or a Yorkshire, and the smokebox casting is quite interesting. I have plans for that as the front of a grounded ex-locomotive boiler that would be powering a pugmill at a brickworks.
-
I'm certain Arthur Negus wouldn't be able to value that with any real commitment!
Well, he's a bit out of touch with the market, what with having run down the curtain and joined the choir invisible.
-
You're sort of correct about printing white. My Canon MG2150 inkjet printer can't but I think there are some inkjets that now can print white, but I don't know any more than that. There are other types of printer that can print white but they're very expensive.
Anyway, the experiment with the wagons had mixed results. On one I had printed and fitted the entire side as one piece - thinking that it would settle into all the raised detail, as happens with aricraft decals, but the film is much thicker and it wouldn't settle right down.
The other coal wagon had the pieces fitted seperately, which meant only small areas of the strapping and the drop door chains were covered as far as raised detail goes and so it didn't show as much but the only real success was with the stone wagon, where the decal was fitted only on the flat planks.
-
I have seen the G3 version and it is impressive. I've often thought about building one, just to sit on a shelf. I don't have the space to build anything for it to run on.
Ruston & Hornsby 165DE (1st)
in The locomotive history of Charlie Strong's yard.
A blog by Ruston in RMweb Blogs
Posted
The IRS records officer concerned says he actually meant Keele. 😄