-
Posts
19,282 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
34
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Exhibition Layout Details
Store
Blog Comments posted by Captain Kernow
-
-
Nice solution to the problem, Al. You are in good company with the wiper pick-ups acting directly onto the railhead - the great Baron von Harrap also uses them on his P87 layouts!
- 2
-
Hi Al - with regard to the signal box, if you want a smaller one, it may be that Larry Goddard still has this little beauty for sale - https://www.westernthunder.co.uk/threads/4mm-gwr-signal-box.11545/
Sorry, just realised you're doing this in 'N'! Such is the quality of the work, you had me fooled!
- 1
- 1
-
Fantastic modelling and storytelling, Dave!
- 1
- 1
-
40 minutes ago, Mikkel said:
Fancy a P4 version? That would be the ultimate madness!
If the loco concerned survived into the BR period and wore black livery, early crest and a smoke box number plate, I think I would definitely go for one, especially if a new RTR release that could be easily converted to P4, or perhaps a well-built and excellently-running kit that someone had advertised.
I would love to do my own conversion, of course, but it would be so far down the queue of other projects, that I don't know when (if ever), if would be completed!
- 4
-
Mikkel - that is just spectacular!
- 1
- 2
- 1
-
Looking very good, Andrew. Best wishes for Christmas from me too!
- 1
-
Mr Johnster, sir, before you file down the insides of the brass bearings, my advice would be to:
i) turn the frames so that the outside is resting on the bench, put some flux right round between the brass bearing and the N/S frames and apply the iron, letting the solder flow right round the circumference of each bearing
ii) when that is done, cut most of the protruding bearing off with a file-toothed piercing saw and then clean with with a file
iii) gently reaming out any brass flash from the inner face of the bearings
iv) after the above, take a drill bill larger than 1/8 of an inch, in your fingers only, and twirl around both sides of the cleaned up bearings. You only need to do this a little, but it should create a small channel on both sides of the bearing, to aid putting the axles in and then lubrication.
Good luck!
- 2
- 1
-
Lovely to see more of this layout again, Andrew.
- 1
-
You've captured the atmosphere of both GW and S&D very well, Al. It's a pleasure to look at these pictures.
- 2
- 1
-
This is just fabulous, Al.
Also, is there a thread on the 'N' gauge stuff you 'casually mention' above?! 😀
- 1
-
Thanks Mark.
They are very nice things but for me, come under the category of 'want' rather than 'need!'
-
That's very nice, Mark. Out of interest, what are the Wickham trolleys like for electrical pick-up reliability, please?
- 1
- 1
-
Merry Christmas Dave!
- 1
-
On 25/08/2021 at 09:40, Dickon said:
Edit: The minimum size was 300mm square.
That sounds about right and although I've seen plenty of them in real life when at work, I don't think I've ever seen one more than about a foot square (so 300mm is about right).
Your tiny arch seems to be something that was originally built for another purpose and was subsequently used for railway purposes when the yard etc. expanded.
Your 'Engines must not pass this point' sign notwithstanding, you should still have a Limited Clearance sign in place on one of the vertical faces adjacent to the small arch.
- 1
-
Although I'm not familiar with the other layouts at the show, I've very glad to see your fantastic layout winning the trophy, Dave, very well-deserved.
- 1
- 1
-
Oh, and is there any more on the technique for using watercolour pencils, please? (or should it be 'Watercolour', with a capital 'W?')
-
It's all very impressive, but those curved buttress walls are particularly good!
-
Given that the goods yard is probably only going to be shunted by Down trains (ie. where the loco will already be at the correct end and can shunt using the headshunt), you would probably need a ground or shunt signal under the stop signal outside the signalbox, to authorise the movement onto the Single Line and also an advanced starter to properly protect the Single Line, if this is a regular movement.
Without the above measures, you would need to obtain a 'Line Clear' from the box in advance (in the Down direction) and exchange the appropriate bell codes, authorising you to occupy the Single Line for shunting purposes.
Similarly, if an up goods train is to serve the yard and run round in the station, the above arrangements would also be used. In such circumstances, you would either have to have a similar arrangement in the Up direction, unless again, you obtain the appropriate authorisation in accordance with the Rules & Regulations from the Up direction box in advance, for the loco to occupy the Single Line for shunting purposes.
The 'Rules & Regulations' option is probably ideal if (i) traffic levels are relatively light and (ii) you don't want to build any more signals than you absolutely have to!
- 1
-
Link working fine now, thanks.
All looking rather nice. Did you have any issues with balancing the loco, Robin? (it being a 4-4-0).
-
That all looks like a lot of fun and some nice modelling there. Where did your group actually hold this meeting, please?
-
Just superb, Robin!
-
Superb results indeed, well done!
This new technology is incredible and old farts like me can only look on in amazement at what can be achieved.
Your point about etching brass etc. back in the 1970s and comparing that to 3D printing today is a valid one, but on the other hand, we each of us grow up and form the basis of our modelling skills in a certain 'era'. In many terms, I think that this then defines our 'modelling comfort zone'.
As such, I am comfortable to built an etched kit that someone else has produced although I know that I don't have the skills to master even the old-fashioned (pre-computer) way of producing the master artwork (having seen a friend successfully master this back in the 1970s).
I haven't yet built any kits where 3D printing is a major component, the opportunity or need hasn't yet arisen, but presumably superglue is indicated as the most suitable adhesive (5 minute epoxy is more in my comfort zone).
As for mastering the software required for CAD or even things like Templot, my personal modelling time is relatively limited and coupled with a basic inability to readily grasp computer and software related matters, I know that I would begrudge the time needed to learn and achieve anything meaningful in these fields, so I have had to accept that I must leave this 'brave new world' to others and perhaps grovelling ask for any related assistance, as and when I might need it.
Good luck with the project!
-
I like this very much, Andrew. Nice size of baseboard too!
You are brave tackling the CSBs! Have you done any before? I just can't get my mind round the science behind them!
And as for the impossibility of converting the Kernow/DJM model to EM or P4, well, that does seem to be the way some manufacturers are going, although the Hattons/DJM 14XX is do-able. John F (Re6/6) has been converting one of the Rapido 16XXs to P4 and although he would say it's been relatively straightforward, I still maintain that the design of the loco has made it far, far too complicated and awkward, whereas it's Bachmann contemporary - the 94XX, looks pretty straightforward to me.
-
Paynestown was always a favourite for me, too. Looking forward to seeing how your new version progresses.
The South Wales valleys are just so addictive!
- 1
A new-old pannier for Bethesda Sidings
in Engine Wood
A blog by Captain Kernow in RMweb Blogs
Posted
More info on the work done on the second pannier can now be found here, on my Workbench thread -