Jump to content
 

WillCav

Members
  • Posts

    330
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by WillCav

  1. Thanks to all who replied to this query.  I now feel I understand a lot more about inspection pit p-way.

     

    The picture with the 66XX allowed me to judge 3.5 chairs between the middle and rear drivers (8ft) giving 2ft3" or 9mm between chairs.

     

    I have also found some pictures of the actual depot pits allowing me to identify the components from the pictures and info posted here.

     

    It all looks like bullhead rails with bridge rail chairs with the keys on the outside (like normal).  Looking at the C&L finescale website, I need the GWR 2 diagonal bolt L1 chairs - but I can't find anyone who does these on their own? Any ideas as I will need about 1,000 of them!

     

    Thanks again

     

    Will

  2. Hi all,

     

    I need to build a GWR engine shed with inspection pits both inside and outside the shed.

     

    The original part of the shed was built in 1908 so I'm assuming bullhead rail. 

     

    An extension of two additional roads was added in 1943 - would this still be bullhead or would flat bottomed rail be more likely here?

     

    For the bullhead rail pits, would the chairs be rotated round so the keys are more accessible?

     

    Also what would be the typical chair to chair distance?

     

    Many thanks

     

    Will

  3. 1 hour ago, Lacathedrale said:

     

    image.png.ca344620586ae1678a3d0fff314b4ca5.png

    I agree with Grosvenor that 1 & 7 would be worked as a crossover together.

     

    My only other suggestion is that I would swap the normal direction of 4 & 5 crossovers (and possibly 8).

     

    Many signalboxes were rated according to the number of lever moves for a typical shift.  The frames were often designed to minimise lever pulls and thus signaller pay. Levers are also returned into the frame after each movement.

     

    Will

    • Agree 1
  4. There are a couple of things I would add to the signalling mix:

     

    1) Junction Indicators would be very unlikely to be 'feathers' due to the low speeds and routes into terminal platforms.  The terminal platform starters would definitely not be 'feathers'.  Standard Indicators showing all main routes as a letter/platform number would likely be provided.

     

    2) The junction signal on approach to the two sidings will ideally need to have a signalling overlap clear of the points - ideally 180m (1.2m, 4ft) but could be compressed.  If the overlap goes through the points, you can't run a train into/out of the sidings when another train is approaching on the Main line.

     

    As has already been said - no green leading to buffers following Moorgate.  One thing seldom modelled is a three aspect signal head with green blanked-out.

     

    Regards

     

    Will

  5. Hi all,

    I'm planning a layout based on a real location where there was a turntable at the next station that was 55ft diameter.

    I know that the larger GWR 4-6-0s and 2-8-0s would be too long but at 7800 Manor at just over 52ft would fit but would be very close to the edge.

    Is there a maximum Engine length that would be allowed on the turntable?

    Thanks

    Will

  6. Thanks to the new number from Hal, and adding detail from my books, we get the following. 

     

    W8

    Lot L758 26xxx + 26392-438 (100)

    26001 (Atkins 567 and Russell GW Wagons Appendix 211) roof ribs visible and slots in end when built

    L859 26xxx + 26439-50 (50)

    No pictures found yet

    L879 103001-300 (300)

    103141 (Russell GW Wagons 48) &

    103168 (Russell GW Wagons Appendix 213) both plain roofs and slots in ends removed in later years 

    L961 106301-450 (150)

    No pictures found yet

    L980 106551-600 (100)

    106564 plain roof and no slots in the ends in later years

     

    W10

    L922  106001-300 (300 until 1939 then 170) - 106026 (Atkins 568) plain roofs, no end slots when built.

    Unfortunately, the 130 converted to Y10 were seemingly random within the number series but Atkins has five Y10 numbers to avoid if you're modelling post 1939.

     

    Thanks

     

    Will

    • Informative/Useful 1
  7. 1 hour ago, Hal Nail said:

     

    Probably explains why there are nowhere near as many images knocking about as you usually get!

     

    The acquired wagons of British Railways vol 4 shows W8 W68442 in the 50s with no ribs. Rest of my wagon specific books haven't got anything.

     

    I've just had a look in Atkins Beard etc and it shows the W8s all being in the 26xxx, 103xxx and 106xxx ranges.  68442 appears in the earlier W5 list. I haven't got the book you mentioned, is the roof an earlier flatter profile or like a regular Mink?

    Thanks

     

    Will

  8. Thanks Hal, Miss P and Jason for your replies.

     

    I've had another look through my books and it looks like:

     

    W8

    Lot L758 (100) - roof ribs visible and slots in end when built

    L859 (50) - ?

    L879 (300) - plain roofs in later photos and slots in ends removed

    L961 (150) - ?

    L980 (100) - ?

     

    W10

    L922 (300 until 1939 then 170) - plain roofs

     

    Unfortunately, only one W8 survives and I think only the framing skeleton exists.

     

    No W10s were preserved but 130 were converted to Y10s and some bodies still exist - with plain roofs.

     

    Thanks

     

    Will

  9. Hi all,

     

    I've just managed to get hold of a number of Cooper Craft W1/5 cattle truck kits.  I'm planning to alter the ends, buffers and underframes to make some later W8 and W10 types.

     

    Does anyone know what the roofs were like? Did they have the metal bands or were they plain?

     

    Many thanks in advance

     

    Will

  10. 22 minutes ago, Mike_Walker said:

    Which is exactly what I was taught but I know of at least one exception.

     

    Unless it's been altered in the last couple of years, signal ME137 approaching High Wycombe displays a flashing single yellow when ME139 is showing a yellow main aspect and position 1 route indicator to take you into the bay platform.  Always caused a comment from drivers.

     

    Mike,

     

    What I should have said is that we're not allowed to do that for a new design.  There are lots of weird and wonderful arrangements that were put in at different times and regional variations.

     

    I also should have said that a junction signal can have different junction signalling methods on different routes.

    Eg.

    MAR with a standard indicator to a bay and MAY-FA with a feather to a different through line.

     

    Will

    • Agree 2
  11. There are five forms of modern junction signalling. In order of speed (slowest first)

     

    1. MAR (Main aspect Approach released from Red)

    4 aspect sequence is:

    G - YY - Y - R stepping up to Y/YY/G with feather/standard indicator as appropriate.

     

    2. MAY (Main aspect Approach released from Yellow)

    Sequence is G - G - YY - Y with route indicator 

    This is rare / non-existent on the Western where I work

     

    3. MAY-FA (Main aspect Approach released from Yellow with Flashing Aspects)

    Sequence is G - FYY - FY - Y with route indicator stepping up appropriate on Approach.

    If the FYY  signal displays a route indication for a previous junction then the Sequence would be G - YY+route indication - FY - Y with route indication.

    If the signal beyond the junction is at red then Colwich controls are generally implemented- the junction signalling is restricted down to MAR.

    Flashing aspects and/or feathers are not permitted into bay lines. 

     

    4. MAY-SD (Main aspects Approach released from Yellow with Splitting Distant)

    Aspect Sequence is pretty complex with double headed signal(s) approaching the junction.

     

    5. MAF (Main Aspect Free) no Approach control where divergent line is within 10mph of main line.

     

    Hope this helps a bit!

     

    Will (signal design engineer by trade)

    • Like 1
    • Informative/Useful 3
    • Round of applause 1
  12. If you're thinking of making a GWR route indicator, they were capable of showing four routes in real life (eg Cheltenham Malvern Road West SB).

     

    Wizard Models do a working 4mm version as part of item S0015 - but only for two indications. You might be able to use the two lots of parts to get the four you need but it would be very fiddly.

     

    Good luck if you try it!

     

    Will

    • Like 1
  13. Many mechanical signal boxes had multiple home signals with one distant signal at breaking distance from the first home signal for each approach.

     

    If the calculated distant signal position was just beyond the previous box's last signal, then a post with a home and distant would be provided - operated by separate signallers and "slotted" to prevent the distant showing clear when the home is at danger. In that situation, the distant signal will clear when the home signal is cleared.

     

    If the distant position is on approach to the previous box's last signal then multiple distants would be provided.

     

    Multiple distants can be provided on the same signal as a splitting distant but that is a totally different scenario not applicable to your terminus.

     

    Michael Hodgeson is right that any distant is likely to be offstage.

     

    Will

  14. 18 minutes ago, Cwmtwrch said:

    GWR 10T coal wagons were built for loco coal traffic to small sheds with just one or two locos. The OP suggests N19, and it does look like a round corner type, which would be consistent with that. It's difficult to say more without seeing more of the wagon. GW Loco Dept wagons were usually black, as far as I know. It's definitely not a traffic coal wagon, as the GW didn't have any that size. 

    The wagon number is listed under diagram N13 in the GW wagons book by Atkins, Beard etc.  If it is an N13 then it is over 40 years old in the OP's photo.

    As for the colour of GW loco coal wagons - some say dark grey and some say black.

    Will

    • Agree 1
  15. 36 minutes ago, craneman said:

    I have never yet seen any photos of the Ruscombe incident that have shown the support vehicles for the breakdown train (other than the jib runner), only those used for carrying debris. I think that the Hydra in your photos is the same diagram as the one converted for the tackle wagon, but obviously lacks the conversion.

     

     

    The wagon in the photo with most of a hopper wagon on is GWR no 42270. It is a diagram G13 wagon with earlier style curved frames.

    The G19 has frames with straight edges.

    Will

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  16. As for how they are created, they are used by the timetable planners - both in Network Rail and in the Train operating companies. They are shown in Working Timetables (WTTs) and in the train running systems. The signallers' information displays show them in a similar way to the Internet information.

     

    Will

  17. The headcode consists of three parts:

     

    First digit is train class

    1 express passenger

    2 ordinary passenger 

    4, 6, 7 & 8 are freight

    5 in empty stock

     

    Second is a letter for destination

    E to Eastern region

    V to Western

    S to Scotland

    M to Midland

    O to Southern

    Other letters used for within a region.

     

    Third and fourth are unique identifiers to differentiate different trains and routings

     

    Hope this helps

     

    Will

     

    • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...