Jump to content
 

NGT6 1315

RMweb Premium
  • Posts

    1,073
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Blog Entries posted by NGT6 1315

  1. NGT6 1315
    Morning all!
     
    Now, own up: Who had dirty thoughts on their mind when you clicked to browse here?
     
    With some idle time available, I remembered how I wanted to finish and post this small article on another piece of motive power for my Spanish section which had found its way to me several weeks ago. So, let's have a look at a Series 316 diesel-electric locomotive as operated by PW and logistics operator Azvi, a company based at Seville.
     
    This locomotive is, to my mind, an excellent example for the diversity of origins of Spanish motive power in Ye Olden Days. It also will go on to show that as in most any other country, motive power retired from the state railway inventory continues to find a second life with private operators and permanent way builders. I needed to consult several different online sources in order to distil a comprehensive piece of information about these locomotives as my impression is that much information about Spanish motive power past and present exists primarily in print, and is not that easily obtained outside of Spain.
     
    Reservations against the strongly authoritarian Franco regime notwithstanding and with the Cold War order asserting itself for the indefinite future, the Western world had come to accept Spain as a strategic partner by the 1950s, which did certainly play a role in the economic upturn taking hold of the country. By that time, the Spanish railway sector had seen innovations like the groundbreaking Talgo coach formations with their independent wheel running gears, at that time powered by custom-built single ended diesel-electric locomotives of American design and assembled by American Car and Foundry, with traction equipment having been provided by General Electric. These four locomotives were initially designated 1T to 4T but redesignated Series 350 in later years.
     
    Aside from these innovative designs which continued to evolve over the following decades, the general task of replacing steam locomotives in all types of service remained as well. As a result, Renfe turned to foreign locomotive builders on various occasions as the domestic industry still had to catch up with a backlog of acquiring knowledge and skills.
     
    To obtain mainline diesel locomotives for general freight work – also to be able to work passenger services if required – Renfe contracted ALCO to build an initial lot of 17 Co’Co’ configured diesel-electric locomotives based on the DL-500 design. Originally designated Series 1600 and later renumbered as Series 316 when standardised, UIC compliant running numbers were introduced in Spain, these locomotives were delivered in 1955 and 1956. Initially concentrated mainly in Andalusia, the last 316s were withdrawn from Renfe service in 1993. In 1957 and 1958, Renfe had also received 24 Series 1800 – later renumbered Series 318 – locomotives which were mostly identical to the 316s but had uprated power. The last 318s were withdrawn in 1994.
     
    Of the 316s, nine were procured and returned to revenue service by various operators, while only one of the 318s was so retained. Specifically, ex-1601 and 1614 were purchased by PW builder and logistics operator Azvi; 1602 and 1610 by VIAS (not to be confused with the German passenger TOC operating in the Rhine-Main area); 1603, 1608 and 1616 by COMSA; 1604 by Portuguese operator NEOPUL; and 1617 and ex-318-009 by TECSA.

    One interesting fact about the 316s and 318s is that in spite of their typical American style body with a prominent nose on one end and flat "rear" end, all locomotives except ex-1615/316-015 – which had been the first to be delivered – were actually double-ended, with a fully equipped cab present on the "flat" end as well. 1615 is also nicknamed "Marilyn", though I understand this nickname having been extended to the entire series and to be related both to their, shall we say, busty appearance and, indeed, suave vibrations.
     
    The overall design is typical for ALCO diesel-electrics of the time, with a 1,327 kW prime mover and attached generator powering nose-suspended DC traction motors. Obviously, UIC buffers and draw gear were provided in lieu of AAR knuckle couplers, with the locomotives also being dually outfitted for vacuum and air brakes as the former type of brake was still used in Spain at the time they were procured. Although they were intended mainly for freight services, they were also outfitted with steam coach heating boilers. They were also outfitted with the typical Spanish lighting clusters, consisting of one large, central light – in this case consisting of two stacked lenses, replaced by a large single sealed beam lens on the 318 – and five marker lights.
     
    Given that the class does enjoy much popularity within the Spanish railfan community, it is probably no surprise that Electrotren came forward with a H0 scale model of it.
     
    Already released in various Renfe guises and with both the original silver livery with green trim stripes, the later dark green livery with yellow stripes and the 1980s/90s era "Taxi" livery of black and yellow, a special edition representing ex-1601, or 316-001, in its current appearance for Azvi was released for Basar Valira, who seem to be a fairly large hobby shop based, of all places, in Andorra. The DC version of it is marketed with reference 2408.

     
    While I'm not directly familiar with the prototype as of yet, the Electrotren model does seem to give a good representation of the "Marilyns." There are not many detailing parts to be attached – in fact, only the air horns and rear view mirrors.
     
     

     
    One thing I especially liked when prepping the model after unboxing it was that two pairs of bufferbeams are provided and can be swapped out easily in one piece – one with coupler cutouts and one without but with brake pipes and faux UIC couplers.
     
    Note that these Spanish ALCO locomotives retained the backlit running number boards typical of American motive power.
     

     
    I do wonder if the rear cab on these locomotives was similarly spacious as the front cab as I would think the gangway door took away some of the available interior space! I imagine it should look interesting running these locomotives with the flat cab in front.
     
     

     
    While looking at the bogies, my impression is that the frames seem to have been deliberately made of thicker plastic so as to give the appearance of broad gauge bogies, although the model is gauged for regular 16.5 mm H0 scale track. Also note there being separate access doors for the front cab and to the engine room.
     
    The braking information lettering is formatted a bit differently on these locomotives. Next to the forward door, there is a table specifying the 316's air braking gear to be based on a Westinghouse type valve with settings G and P, and braking weights of 58 tonnes for "G" and 62 for "P". Next to this, the rhomboid table indicates the maximum running speed of 120 kph.
     
    The table next to the centre door gives further braking gear indications:
     
    Service weight of 110 tonnes, vacuum braking weight of 62 tonnes, no separate indication for towed braking weight, and handbrake weight of 8 tonnes.
     
     

     
     
    Further lettering towards the rear cab includes indications for fuel filler and engine oil drain cock, as well as a table with the locomotive's TSI formatted running number: 93 71 1304 001-1 – highlighting that class numbers within the UIC-TSI system do not necessarily correspond to class numbers existing in the older numbering systems utilised in individual countries.
     
    In my impression, the model's paintwork and lettering is clean and crisp, and with a suitably flat finish that does not look too plasticky.
     
     
     
     

     
    I do wonder if the model could further profit from replacing the various grilles with brass etchings or some such materials from the aftermarket sector… The prominent fan towards Cab 2 is non-moving and perhaps that, too, could be an item for further tweaking? Dangerous thoughts, I know!
     
    And, as usual, a Youtube video for the finishing touch. Thanks for reading!
     

  2. NGT6 1315
    Cheers again, everyone!
     
    This is just to post a selection of photos I took at a publicity event having taken place at Dölitz this morning. This was a symbolic handover of keys for the new NGT10 trams to our driving staff.
     
    Driver instruction for our new rides is scheduled to commence immediately after the upcoming Whitsun weekend, with two days - one for theory and technical aspects, one for driving practice - being planned for each instruction group.
     
    Anyway, I shall mainly let the photos speak for themselves.
     


     

     

     

     

     

     

     
     
     
    The State Minister for Economy, Labour and Transport was also in attendance and got to drive 1002 around the depot with one of our instructors in attendance:
     

     

     

    After that, everyone who wanted got the opportunity for joining a ride to the Märchenwiese loop and back to Dölitz:
     


     

    I felt that 1002 ran very smoothly, and also to sound very much like the NGT12 as the drive units have deliberately been designed to be largely identical to those of the latter for commonality of replacement parts.
     


     
    Finally, our instructor took 1002 back to Heiterblick as fine-tuning procedures are still ongoing to expedite final certification for revenue service. With 1001, 1002 and also 1003 now being available for these final trials, all three cars are made use of to that end.
     

    Thank you once again for reading!
  3. NGT6 1315
    Cheers everyone…
     
    I may have mentioned before that LVB have committed themselves to renewing their tram and bus inventory, which process has begun taking shape by the end of 2016. Concerning our new trams, with the procurement contract having been signed on 26 March, 2015, Polish bus and (more recently) tram builder Solaris had been declared the winning bidder, having proposed a 20-wheel, four-segment articulated vehicle from their Tramino series. Per common practice in Germany, this tram is referred to as NGT10, which quite simply means "low floor articulated unit with ten wheelsets." At present, a total of 41 of these units is intended for procurement until 2020, the goal being withdrawing our Tatras from timetabled service entirely and also displacing the smaller NGT8 trams from the mid-1990s from those lines where they are no longer sufficient due to lack of passenger space.
     
    Let me now first take a bit of a step back to December as on the morning of the 21st, NGT10 1001 was delivered at our Heiterblick Technical Centre. All interested staff had been invited to attend, which especially those of us drivers known to be nerds did in force!
     


     

     
    The oversIze transport carrying 1001 had departed Poznań on 19 December, and since it was permitted to travel at night only, needed to pause near Frankfurt-upon-Oder during the daylight hours of the 20th. Dutch haulier van der Vlist has been contracted for conducting these transfers, there not being too many hauliers equipped for shipping tram vehicles to begin with!
     
    Having reached Leipzig by 2.10 am and entered Heiterblick shortly after 6 am, unloading procedures began by 6.40 am in sharply frosty weather.
     


     
    1001 was first towed inside the workshop for warming up and activation, and eventually rolled back out a few minutes past 8.30 am on what turned out to be a gloriously sunny day.
     


     
    As it was expected that 1001 would commence route and certification tests well ahead of 1002's delivery, the unit was camouflaged as a "test mule". However, 1001 did not leave Heiterblick as of yet due to plan changes, carrying out initial trials within the premises only. It is expected to sortie for actual route trials within the next two weeks at the latest. It is likely that 1002, which was delivered during the night of 8/9 February, will be able to support the mandatory trial and certification period also.
     

    As curiosity and expectations continue to run high among our staff, it was decided to arrange for a walk-on presentation of 1001 this Friday, as 1002 had been dropped off at the Exhibition Centre for the NGT10's first public appearance as part of the House and Garden Fair which began yesterday.
     


     
    For visitors wishing to travel from Angerbrücke, transport was provided in the shape of Solaris Urbino IV 18 14167/L-DE 1019, which belongs to a batch of 25 bendies ordered in July 2016 for replacement of mainly older generation Solaris Urbino standard buses no longer meeting current emission standards. Also, current procurement plans call for increased use of articulated buses rather than standard buses in order to provide additional passenger capacity.
     
     
     

     
    While 1002 was being prepared for its public roll-out at the House and Garden Fair which opened yesterday, 1001 will retain its test mule camouflage for the time being, which I suppose may also offer a bit of additional protection against minor blemishes. With the NGT10s still being intended to replace the non-trailer capable NGT8s and the Tatras on Lines 4 and 10 in the first stage, we changed the destination signage between these two lines during this presentation.
     
     
     

     
    With the stretch of Teslastraße outside the workshops proper being part of the Heiterblick premises operationally, 1001 was taken around the block several times…
     
     
     

     
    …with a Solaris driver in control of the vehicle. From this first ride-along impression, short as it may have been, running characteristics appeared decent enough to me, and I'm looking forward to eventually receiving type rating for the NGT10 myself!
     
     
     

     

     
    Turning another round signed as Line 10!
     
     
     

     
    Coloured LED stripes are provided to inform passengers of doors being unlocked when lit green, or red when being closed. This is a feature also found on several other contemporary light rail stock, such as the TW3000 LRVs for Hanover or the C2 Series underground sets for Munich.
     
    Also note the white LED destination signs, which are presently becoming increasingly popular over the previously common amber displays due to being better legible in bright sunlight.
     
     
     

     
    A feature novel for Leipzig trams is the provision of rear view cameras in lieu of traditional mirrors. Also note the downward facing camera, which we were told is intended to ease judging lateral distance in confined space situations such as those caused by stupidly parked cars.
     
     
     

     
    Inside the cab, a triple split screen will display the external camera images. The third camera is located above Door 6 at the rear end.
     
     
     

     
    Meanwhile, these holding brackets on the forward face of the instrument panel will simplify carrying auxiliary sign plates, as used during scheduled diversions or other events affecting regular services.
     
     
     

     
    What I found especially interesting is that a dashcam will actually be provided in order to augment trip recorder data in the event of traffic accidents with tram involvement. For the time being, these cameras will remain inactive, pending a possible modification of privacy laws which, as I understood, is judged likely to occur in the not-too-distant future.
     
     
     

     
    The auxiliary rear control panel.
     
     
     


     
    The exterior door openers felt agreeably robust to my touch!
     
     
     

     

     
    The Jacobs bogie in the middle of the tram required that hinged skirting panels be provided in order to provide sufficient rotational clearance in tight curves, with the minimum curve radius on our network being 17 m at present.
     
     
     

     
    While the configuration of two parallel windscreen wipers seemed unusual initially and did cause concern regarding sufficient and gap-free coverage, I could ascertain that by moving alternately across the centreline, the wipers will indeed cover the principal viewing angle completely.
     
     
     

     
    Flat LED stripes serve as lateral turn signals.
     
     
     

     
    I also was positively impressed by the large LED lighting panels mounted to the ceiling, almost creating the impression of skylights extending along the entire unit. The interior lighting can be electronically tinted to create a "cool" ambience in summer, and a "warm" one in the cold months.
     
     
     

     

     
    Except for a number of traditional buttons for key functions such as door release and locking, turn signals, point control and troubleshooting (and, of course, power and brake control), all man-machine interaction will be through touch screens. Do note that in addition to the usual central door release and locking circuit, it is possible to open and close every single door individually through the bottom row of soft keys on the central view screen.
     
    My impression was that the touch screens responded quickly and reliably to inputs, and I noticed that audio feedback is being provided by way of suitable "click" sounds.
     
     
     

     
    The controller handle is identical to that on the NGT12, with the handle having to be rotated 90 degrees to the right to serve as the principal deadman switch.
     
    You may notice the smallish microphone to the left of the instrument panel. I was able to ascertain that this microphone provides such good amplification that in order to make announcements or to communicate via radio, it is completely feasible to just speak normally from your regular seating position without having to lean over.
     
     
     

     
    The troubleshooting panel is, broadly, designed to be similar to that of the NGT12, as are the icons used on all mechanical buttons. The key switch for enabling holding brake backup release has yet to be installed, it seems.
     
     
     

     
    As you may be able to judge, the seating position is agreeably high, too!
     
     
     

     
    Seat adjustment is completely electric, with the plan being to provide a chip tag with the ideal seating position for every single driver in order to have the seat set itself automatically. However, manual alterations will still be possible. Furthermore, the seat is both heated and ventilated for additional workplace comfort.
     
    We were also informed of the NGT10 being equipped with "intelligent air conditioning" capable of being programmed with local weather profiles to match cooling and heating output, as well as humidity and ozone content, to long-term meteorological monitoring data in order to provide optimal interior ambience adjustment. The system was also designed with human physiology in mind, meaning both heating and cooling will be provided only to achieve an appropriate temperature differential in order to avoid medical problems. This means that, for example, heating will be provided only up to external temperatures of 16°C, while in hot weather, the difference between outside and interior temperature will be deliberately kept small enough to prevent passengers experiencing circulatory problems.
     
     
     
    I will see to obtaining a few images from 1002 either today or next week for a more complete impression of our new trams, so do keep your eyes open for a follow-up posting in this space!
  4. NGT6 1315
    Hello again!
     
    Having posted a handful of night-time images from the grounds of Dölitz Depot in this entry, I was able to shoot an additional set of images in daylight, and would like to share these with you.
     
    This tram depot opposite the "agra" exhibition centre primarily used for national agricultural exhibitions in the GDR era was originally built and operated by LVB's predecessor GLSt (Große Leipziger Straßenbahn AG), and was first opened in 1900. Originally comprising only two car sheds, the depot was extended with an open stabling area in 1984, and closed for extensive renovation and modernisation works on 30 September, 2013.
     
    With this project now completed, Dölitz went back on line on 23 July this year. Technically, the depot was broadly outfitted like Angerbrücke, now being equipped with an electronic signalling and routing suite which can be either remotely controlled from Angerbrücke during those hours when no supervisor is present locally, or from the local supervision office.
     


     
    Low environmental impact was one key element of the refurbishment programme, meaning the depot facilities recycle as much water as possible and also collect rain water for cleaning purposes. Furthermore, the depot was designed as a precipitation catchment zone in order to assist in preventing flash floods following severe weather events.
     
    The building in the background contains the depot workshops and tram washing facility, while the asphalted surface serves as a reversing zone for buses as well as a stabling area for fire brigades.
     


     
    The newer of the two car sheds originally existing on the depot grounds could be retained and renovated completely. This shed, built in 1912, will serve as a sheltered stabling area for buses which will be based here in the not too distant future, as well as for staff parking spaces.
     


     
    Staff parking is currently possible only in the future bus stabling area for as long as the office containers remain in place for the engineering companies still present for follow-up and finishing works.
     


     
    Trams are stabled on this open surface on the north side of the depot area.
     
     
     

     
    Due to the computerised routing suite, shunting paths need to be requested by keypads such as this example on Signal SR 2.05.
     


     
    The ingress track passes the workshops on the depot's southern rim.
     


     

     

     

     
    A couple of wide views of the tram stabling area which comprises twelve tracks.
     


     
    The passage for buses and personal cars between the workshops and the parking shed.
     
     
     

     
    The standard procedure for depot returns as well as turnaround movements for Line 11E services terminating at Dölitz is to ingress the depot on Track 15 and proceed to Signal S 2.02. Returning services will then be assigned a target track and may proceed only as soon as the signal shows F 1 with the corresponding track number. Meanwhile, Line 11E services usually loop back through Track 6.
     
     
     

     
    Returning trams can also be routed directly into the workshops if required for servicing and washing, with these tracks numbered 13 and 14.
     
     
     

     
    Depot sorties require route requests in a very similar way to the procedure at Angerbrücke. While moving slowly onto the starting line on the respective track, drivers need to press the point setting button for Left in order to sortie for Markkleeberg, or Right for citybound sorties. Acknowledgment will then be provided with the "A" chamber for the relevant track lighting up. As soon as the requested route has been set, the signal underneath will show F 1 plus the track number from which the sortie has been cleared. Multiple sorties from the same track are not permitted, meaning each individual tram must carry out a separate route request.
     
    Note the route request keypad also required for shunting.
     


     
     
     

     
    This is the portico of the original tram shed from 1900 which has been retained in the sortie zone. It has been moved north from the shed's original location by several metres, as the sheds were originally set immediately side by side.
     
     
     

     
    Points in the depot area are generally designed with deep-grooved common crossings as the wheelsets on our tram fleet such as it exists today are equipped with sufficiently wide tyres to permit moving away from flange-bearing points. I understand that unless specific reasons exist for retaining flange-bearing common crossings locally, points which need to be replaced for any possible reason will be exchanged for deep-grooved varieties.
     


     

     
    The track section on Bornaische Straße in the area immediately outside the depot grounds is also part of the electronic routing suite.
     
     
     

     
    Southbound services – whether proceeding to Markkleeberg on Line 11 or returning – as well as citybound services at the Am Eichwinkel stop seen in the background just off the house with cars parked in front – need to observe two signals following each other closely. For southbound services, Signals S 3.14 and 1.03 need to show F 1 (as 3.14 is doing in this photo), with 1.03 also needing to show the track number 92. For services coming from the city and entering the depot, the signal needs to show F 5 (a triangle on its tip) with track numbers 13 or 14 for the workshops, or 15 for a direct ingress.
     
    Northbound Line 11 services require that Signals S 1.02 and 3.16 show F 1, with 1.02 also needing to show the track number 91. Returning services will be shown F 5 plus track numbers 13, 14 or 15 on 1.02, as previously described.
     
     
     

     
    And this was 1231 "Bielefeld" at Dölitz this Tuesday during the dwell time upon having arrived on Line 11E.
     

    Thanks for reading!
  5. NGT6 1315
    Morning all!
     
    I was thinking that I might just as well utilise this blog for also posting trip reports centred on other tram systems aside from my usual front line dispatches, as I felt this approach might be well suited for allowing a comparative view of technical specifics and operational parameters in other cities.
     
    So, may I just start with a photo strip from my recent visit to Frankfurt, where I was also able to try out my new camera which had arrived just the day before we left for our trip!
     
    With roughly 717,000 residents, public transport in Frankfurt must by definition be extensive, and aside from the suburban railway lines (and, by extension, all other regional railway lines touching the city) is mainly based on the light rail lines – for simplicity referred to as underground – on a route length of 65 km as of 2016, and the tram system of roughly the same length. Tram and light rail do have several connecting points and share the main technical parameters except for platform heights and car width.
     

     
    Travelling east on Bruchfeldstraße, S Type tram 222 was working Line 15 from Haardtwaldplatz in Niederrad to Southern Station. These trams are related to our NGT12, also being Bombardier Flexity Classic derivatives.
     
     
     

     
    228 is one of several S Types advertising for the Phantasialand theme park, and is seen here working Line 21 for the Stadium. The S Type trams were procured from 2003 till 2007, providing a 420 kW power output and offering space for 115 seated and 64 + 6 standing passengers.
     

     
    I also took a bit of time for a somewhat more professional look at other technical aspects such as signalling. Point control is, I understand, performed through RF transmission, with two types of point signals existing. This here is the newer variant with just one signal chamber, with the usual "arrowhead" symbols formed by independent line sections. This signal for Point 3803 W 21 can show Straight and Right, with point lock indicated by the base line (at the open end of the arrowhead) lighting up.
     
    By contrast, our point signalling practice in Leipzig is based on the idea that points can be set left or right only, and point lock being indicated by an X symbol (properly referred to as W 0) in the chamber atop those with the arrowhead symbols, which in turn are referred to as W 12 for Right and Locked and W 13 for Left and Locked. Also, here in Leipzig, we only utilise the W 12 and W 13 aspects with base lines, but not the variants without base line which are designated W 2 and W 3 for Right and Left respectively.
     

     
    The older type of point signal used in Frankfurt does look similar to our point signals, with the above exceptions. I noticed points take noticeably longer to set, thereby also yielding a span of at least one second for the point signal to change aspects after point setting. I understand this is deliberate to ensure drivers paying proper attention to point setting.
     
     
     

     
    At Stresemannallee/Gartenstraße, 251, advertising for the city friendship of Frankfurt and Tel Aviv, is waiting for the route while working Line 12 from Rheinlandstraße in Schwanheim to Hugo-Junkers-Straße in Fechenheim.
     
     
     

     
    R Type tram 025 on Line 15 for Southern Station passes 238 on Line 16 for Ginnheim.
     
     
     

     
    231 advertises for Huawei mobile devices and is seen here working Line 17 from Neu-Isenburg to the Rebstock Spa.
     
     
     

     
    The very first of its kind: R Type tram 001 on Line 21 for Mönchhofstraße. These cars were quite innovative when they were first procured in 1993, with a second batch having followed in 1997. Offering a 100% low floor configuration on the strength of independent wheel running gears with eight 50 kW hub motors on the outer running gears, the R Type suffered from poor reliability for many years and required extensive readjustments to obtain acceptable operational stability. These trams were built by Siemens/Duewag, thus having many similarities to our NGT8s in interior appearance and cab design specifically.
     

     
    R Type car 014 was working Line 16 that day. Twenty-six of the R Types have been refurbished by this time, with this refurbishment mainly comprising a new passenger information system and interior styling similar to that of the S Types.
     

     
    S Type 222 was on Line 15 to Haardtwaldplatz. These cars are MU capable, which is usually made use of for Line 20 specials to the Stadium for football matches and other major events there.
     

     
    208 is sitting at the platform at the Neu-Isenburg loop. The tram line terminates at the city limits, though suggestions and encouragements for extending it into Neu-Isenburg proper keep reappearing.
     

     
    The Neu-Isenburg route passes through the forest in the south of Frankfurt. Here, 232 is calling at the Oberschweinstiege stop.
     

     
    The "Cider Express" or "Ebbelwei-Express" in German is a tourist and city tour line worked with suitably refurbished K Type motor cars and k type trailers, originally built from 1949 till 1955 and representing the last four-wheel tram stock procured for Frankfurt. One set is seen here on Diesterwegplatz right outside Southern Station.
     
     
     

     
    At Southern Station, Line 15 reverses in a stub on Hedderichstraße. Here, 227 is moving out of that stub for its next trip to Haardtwaldplatz.
     

     
    R Type 035 is travelling along Brückenstraße on a Line 14 service for Louisa Station.
     
     
     

     
    This is the Haardtwaldplatz loop at the western end of Line 15, with 011 sitting at the arrival point.
     
    On Sunday, I then dedicated some time to revisiting the light rail lines. Having ridden up to Ginnheim on Line 16…
     

     
    …where the pair of U5-50 cars 831/832 was standing by for a trip on Line U1 to Southern Station. This pair of LRVs advertises for the TuS Makkabi sports association.
     
     
     

     
    The "A Route" lines U1, U2, U3, U8 and U9 are supplied by Heddernheim Depot, where numerous LRVs were stabled on this quiet morning. The formation in the middle between the two U5 Type sets is a mixed formation of U4 and U5 Type stock, with these types having been given cross-type compatibility. The U4 car seen here at the head of that formation is 529, with the cab A/C rooftop pods being easily visible.
     
     
     

     
    This pair of U5-25 stock on Line U2 was headed by 630. The U5 Stock cars were ordered in two-cab and back to back single-cab versions, designated U5-25 and U5-50 respectively. These LRVs are Bombardier Flexity Swift derivatives, and therefore distantly related to our NGT12s and Frankfurt's S Type.
     

     
    Two U5 Stock sets passing each other, with 810 leading on the inbound U3 service and 621 trailing on the outbound U1 service.
     
     
     

     
    814 is in the lead on this U8 service travelling inbound from Riedberg.
     

     
    Riedberg is a borough almost entirely developed from scratch, and located in the north of Frankfurt. In addition to Line U8 travelling along the A Route trunk, Line U9 is set up to work the tangential Ginnheim – Nieder-Eschbach relation, and usually booked with single U4 or U5 type cars.
     
     
     

     
    And to round off this photo strip, 819 leads this U8 service for Southern Station, with the reversing stub for U8 services being located further in the background beyond the platforms.
  6. NGT6 1315
    A'noon everyone…
     
    It's been several months since I last got to drive the particular tram which I intend to illustrate in today's post, but now that I did do so during yesterday's shift, I was thinking it might be of interest to you.
     
    With a procurement programme for a new low floor tram – derived from the Solaris Tramino design and per its intended configuration with ten wheelsets designated NGT10 – having been launched last year and a phase-out of our Tatras thus being scheduled to occur in the next couple of years, another modernisation programme first conceived about six years ago focuses on enabling at least part of the NGT8 fleet to be more effectively used on highly frequented lines. These cars had been procured in the mid-1990s when inner-German migration after unification had led to a declining population of Leipzig as a whole, and thus to dwindling ridership numbers. With the city's population and public transport ridership but having markedly increased during the past few years, the NGT8s have since proven to be rather too small for several lines which they need to be booked on, and to have too few doors.
     
    This programme therefore proposes to upgrade at least more than half of our 56 NGT8s for operating with the NB4 trailers. In 2011, 1101 "Johann Sebastian Bach" was therefore rebuilt to serve as a demonstrator and to gather operational experience.
     
    On the whole, this rebuild was eventually deemed worthwhile for further implementation, to which end – according to my information – all NGT8s had been provided with strengthened articulation joints during their last round of revisions so as to facilitate the completion of the trailer upgrade at a later date. Several weeks ago, 1148 "Christian Fürchtegott Gellert" was thus booked as the next NGT8 to receive this upgrade, and has made its first (very short) test ride with trailer 931 on 13 July.
     
    I should also mention that several NB4 trailers to have had new revisions have also been upgraded to be compatible with the NGT8s, so 1101 has inevitably been needed for their post-revision acceptance tests.
     
    In revenue service, 1101 is currently coupled to trailer 917, and with few exceptions usually booked onto Turn 1163. The set is often referred to as the "Secret Weapon" or, occasionally, the "Sacred Cow", just to explain the title for this post!
     
     
     

     
    Here, 1101-917 is seen in the evening sunlight at the Markkleeberg Ost loop. I was delighted to note it has since been outfitted with revised door controls – expected to be provided on all NGT8s – which make the doors much faster to respond and add a closing alarm.
     
     
     


     
    A look at 917 at the aft end, having travelled north to Schkeuditz.
     
     
     

     
    And a look at the NB4 interior. Note the seating bays in the bogie areas. As on our trams proper, there is a shunting control stand at the aft end of each trailer, hidden by a lockable fold-up panel.
     
     
     

     
    While the breakdown towing couplers provided on both ends of all NGT8s are generally folded in and stowed behind the front and rear fairings, the trailer coupler can no longer be so stowed, and like on the Tatras needs to be centred with a retention bar if not used. It's common practice for couplers to be protected with these weatherproof hoods.
     
     
     


     
    In the cab, a second loudspeaker is provided for the emergency intercom from the trailer…
     
     
     

     
    …while the control desk was amended with a pair of buttons for handling calls from this intercom device, and a lighted acknowledgment button for trailer system malfunctions which is seen – slightly out of focus – at the very left edge of the instrument panel.
     
    If this indicator lights up permanently, one of three malfunctions will have occurred – trailer battery charger failure, non-releasing trailer brake, or (in the cold months) a trailer heating failure. The battery charger failure essentially is a "Red Alert" kind of event where all you can do is going CAPE and attempt to reach the nearest stabling area or depot as the trailer brakes will eventually go into undervolt and apply – requiring manual pumping action to release.
     

    As for driving these "NGT8B" sets as they're generally referred to in our working timetables, the trailer's additional weight is, of course, impossible to not notice. Acceleration is reduced rather significantly, especially uphill, and depending on how well any given trailer is adjusted, you will notice a more or less gentle jolt from behind when braking. I would therefore tend to rate these sets as "okay" to handle but not stellar.
     

    Well, so much for the moment. Thanks for reading!
  7. NGT6 1315
    Morning all!
     
    Long time no see on here but now, the engineering works campaign going on this summer yielded a traffic pattern sufficiently out of the usual to merit a blog post. I should also mention I gladly volunteered for this specific service and have been booked on corresponding shifts several times, so I may also amend this post with additional photos!
     
    The engineering project I was referring to concerns track renewal and water piping renewal at Lindenauer Markt and on Kuhturmstraße, scheduled to last from 27 June (meaning they're through the first day already) till and including 10 July. As a result, the western branches to Böhlitz-Ehrenberg and Miltitz of what ordinarily are Lines 7 and 15 plus Line 8's western branch to Grünau-Nord – the line sharing this part of its route with Line 15 – are, effectively, cut off from the rest of the network during this period.
     
    However, our network is still structured such to permit a replacement shuttle service merging said branches of Lines 7 and 15, on the strength of the old Leutzsch Depot still being in existence and workable. This depot had lost its role for regular revenue service in 2001 but as it was never disconnected from the network, has still proven useful for periods of engineering works on several occasions since that time – most importantly during the extensive refurbishment of Angerbrücke Depot which took place from 2003 till 11 June, 2005. During that period, Lines 3, 7, 8, 13 (now integrated with Line 3) and 15 had been supplied by Leutzsch.
     
    For greater clarity, I should like to link this track plan, courtesy of Christian Stade at gleisplanweb.eu and provided under CC-BY-NC-SA licence: Click. This means that, utilising the route through Odermannstraße – which is the small stretch between Demmeringstraße and Lützner Straße, but not highlighted as such in the track plan – we can provide a shuttle service on these two key routes in the west of the city.
     
    The traffic pattern is designed such that a temporary stop has been deployed at the intersection of Odermannstraße and Lützner Straße to allow short connecting walks to the rail replacement bus service to Angerbrücke, where said service connects to the remainder of Lines 7 and 15 on the other side of the engineering section.
     
    Furthermore, trams change back and forth between Lines 7 and 15 accordingly. Eastbound services coming from Miltitz as Line 15 run as "E" services on the stretch from Lindenau, Bushof (which is our principal bus depot) to Odermannstraße and hand off passengers to the bus service at the bus depot, while eastbound services coming from Böhlitz change to Line 15 at Odermannstraße and hand off citybound passengers there.
     

     
    As mentioned in my photo post about the farewell charter for NGT6 prototype 1302, Leutzsch Depot is located on Rathenaustraße in a quiet residential area highlighted by numerous Gründerzeit mansions dating to the late 19th and early 20th century. This would be the depot approach immediately outside the premises, with this area regularly served by Line 67 quarter buses, which reverse through the depot area. The stop seen here also is the final stop served by trams returning to this depot before entering the Home Loop around the old admin building, seen half-hidden by trees to the left.
     
    The points belonging to Leutzsch Depot are all manually set, requiring drivers to pay attention in order to prevent false routings. This is especially true if you should intend to sortie the depot out of tracks 10, 11, 13, 15 and 16, in which case you would enter the Home Loop clockwise and would have to watch how Point 233 – located roughly parallel to where the dark BMW is parked – is set. If it were set to Left, you would, essentially, commence wrong line operation!
     

     
    The Home Loop consists of an inner and outer loop, with only the outer loop being designated for operation at this time.
     

     
    The outbound end of the Home Loop and the tracks going out of the old open stabling area – designated tracks 1 through 7 – which but has had the OHLE removed and is now used only for storing retired Tatra cars.
     
     
     

     
    Looking at Point 233 from the facing end to illustrate the risk for embarrassment involved!
     
     
     

     
    The admin building is, theoretically, still workable, with one floor currently being leased to Deutsche Bahn.
     
     
     

     
    To begin my shift, I then had a pleasant walk of no more than 15 minutes along Rathenaustraße and up to the Rathaus Leutzsch stop where I would then book on.
     

     
    Intersection with Blüthnerstraße and Pfingstweide.
     

     
    In daytime, outbound services to Miltitz have a programmed dwell time of four minutes at Lützner/Merseburger Straße to allow the rail replacement buses – which terminate at Lindenau, Bushof – sufficient time to keep ahead and drop off connecting passengers…
     
     
     

     
    …and inbound services destined to cross over to Line 7 also have four minutes of dwell time at Lindenau, Bushof, where inbound rail replacement buses start their turns.
     
     
     

     
    The pair of 1347 "Zweinaundorf" and 1332 "Leutzsch" at Böhlitz-Ehrenberg – the borough where this terminus is located actually being historically called Gundorf…
     

     
    …and at Miltitz.
     
     
     

     
    The second shift half was conducted on 1338 "Lindenthal" and 1316 "Eutritzsch", with these two cars currently testing a revised door control programming and therefore needing to remain coupled.
     
     
     
    In between, my break took place at the Lindenau bus depot, which I had never been to before.
     

     
    L-IK 280, formerly Car 208, is a Hungarian-built Ikarus 280 type bendy bus from our historic inventory.
     
     
     

     
    12277/L-PW 452 is a Göppel go4city 12E all-electric bus currently being evaluated on Line 89, which due to its routing right through the largely pedestrianised city centre has been the first stomping ground for hybrid buses in Leipzig. Such buses are, obviously, well suited for pollution-sensitive areas where ridership numbers but do not make tram lines viable.
     
    This bus utilises a roof-mounted pantograph for opportunity charging en route, with a corresponding charging station being installed at Connewitz, Kreuz at the southern end of Line 89.
     
     
     

     
    L-NV 1760 is an IFA W 50 L based wrecker also based at Lindenau.
     
     
     

     
    it's also interesting to note that the Lindenau bus depot has, in fact, been a hybrid bus and tram depot originally and also comprised the main repair works up until the opening of Heiterblick in 1927. Buses have been stationed here since 1928.
     

     
    The remaining tracks have been disconnected from the Lützner Straße route since 2008.
     
    Anyway, so much for the moment. Circumstances permitting, I might, as mentioned further up, provide some additional photos of the "Western Shuttle" after my next shifts there. Thanks for reading!
  8. NGT6 1315
    Evening all!
     
    As promised elsewhere on RMweb, I should like to regale you with a selection of photos taken during a special charter which me, several colleagues and a number of public transport enthusiasts from Leipzig and Berlin attended yesterday.
     
    This charter was arranged on the occasion of plans for taking Leoliner 1302 – the second of the two prototypes – out of passenger service this summer and refitting it as our new training car to replace the Tatra T4D car 5001 in this role in order to have a suitable replacement available when the remaining fleet of Tatras will commence retirement. 1302 will most likely be extensively modified for this role, among other things including – as per our information – the removal of Door 1 and conversion of the area above Bogie 1 in the forward body segment into an enclosed, air conditioned saloon for learner drivers and the instructor while on the route.
     
    In addition, 1301 will be withdrawn from passenger service as well, and also be converted in a departmental tram. However, the precise purpose has yet to be decided upon.
     
    Our itinerary covered a sizeable part of our network, starting at Angerbrücke Depot at 8 am on a day of glorious sunshine.
     
     
     

     
    In a sense, this image on the Zeppelin Bridge spanning the Elster Basin could be said to foreshadow 1302's destiny.
     
     
     

     
    It was a quiet morning still when we stopped at Koehlerstraße in the borough of Reudnitz, though we did attract curious looks from passers-by wherever we went. I wonder why!
     

     
    On our way to Stötteritz near the Stötteritz Station stop on Stötteritzer Straße. Can you follow?
     

     
    This location is on Prager Straße, just beyond the Old Exhibition Centre which, as mentioned elsewhere, has been converted into a business and retail park.
     
     
     

     
    Approaching Lößnig, which is the shared terminus of Lines 10 and 16.
     
     
     

     
    This curve from Wiedebachplatz onto Bornaische Straße will be regularly worked in just a couple of weeks when Dölitz Depot goes back on line after its extensive refurbishment. In a sense, the signage on 1302 thus again foreshadows future events.
     
     
     

     
    During their first years in service, 1301 and 1302 were exclusively booked onto Line 11E Wahren-Dölitz, and almost invariably run as a "tract". At that time, these two cars could be combined with either in the lead, though today, it is only possible to couple them with 1302 leading as 1302 has electric control contacts only on the rear coupler and 1301 only on the front coupler.
     
    It's also worth remembering that at the time, the prototypes had conducting couplers, so the trailing car could leave its pantograph down and be fed traction current from the leading car – much like our Tatras are configured.
     
     
     

     
    This was already on Markkleeberg's terrain where the final stretch to the Schillerplatz loop is single-tracked and set in the centre of Bornaische Straße.
     
     
     
     
     

     
    Next, we simulated a short turn around Wiedebachplatz, returning to Connewitz Kreuz along Arno-Nitzsche-Straße and then travelling right up to Schkeuditz.
     
     
     

     
    Of course, the sign on the OHLE mast applies only to the uninitiated!
     
     
     

     
    The Sternburg Mansion in the borough of Lützschena on the very outskirts of Leipzig.
     
     
     

     
    Sure is nice to be out driving when the entire city is in green and bloom! This was at the Exhibition Centre…
     
     
     

     
    …where we simulated a Line 16E service as operated for extra exhibition transport schemes.
     
     
     
     
     

     
    This location on Wittenberger Straße in the borough of Eutritzsch was, in fact, on Line 14's route for years before it was first modified to terminate and reverse through the holding area on Kurt-Schumacher-Straße immediately west of Central Station, and now into a quasi "Circle Line" rounding the city centre and starting and terminating at Plagwitz Station.
     
     
     

     
    At Thekla, we commemorated the one and only Line 9 there ever was.
     
     
     

     
    To the left in the background, you can see one of the two stabling areas of Wittenberger Straße Depot…
     
     
     

     
    …where we rolled in to say hi.
     
     
     

     
    At the Landsberger Straße terminus in the north of Gohlis. Line 56 was one of the night tram lines which, if I'm not mistaken, existed till the second half of the 1990s.
     
     
     

     
    On Lindenthaler Straße just south of Coppiplatz.
     

     
    We then rode out to Miltitz and stopped on Lützner Straße against this colourful mural.
     
     
     

     
    A simulated Line 8 service and a real one!
     
     
     

     
    Concrete slab prefab housing blocks in Miltitz which had most likely been the rage during the GDR era.
     

     
    Leaving the terminus. The destination signage is something of an in-joke as Probstheida is where Lokomotive Leipzig, one of the two best-known local football clubs, have their stadium.
     
     
     

     
    We also paid a visit to the old Leutzsch Depot…
     
     
     

     
    …which is actually located in a rather pleasant area with numerous early-1900s mansions.
     
     
     

     
    Our final jaunt took us out to Grünau and Lausen where we next stopped between Kurt-Kresse-Straße and Herrmann-Meyer-Straße.
     
     
     

     
    Trackage to Grünau is completely grade-separated for an exciting high speed experience!
     
     
     

     
    Passing the parkland along Klingerweg.
     
     
     

     
    And while I personally will completely stay out of the rivalry thing between Lok Leipzig and RB Leipzig, we did take the opportunity of the latter club just having moved up to the German Premier League that day for signing 1302 accordingly.
     
    After that, we returned to Angerbrücke after a long but absolutely fun day out on the rails!
     
    Thanks for looking and do feel free to ask any questions you might have .
  9. NGT6 1315
    Morning all!
     
    I wouldn't want to withhold this little overview for which I took a couple of photos during my shift yesterday, illustrating possible means for how engineering works on tram lines may be safeguarded while keeping traffic flowing.
     
    At present, the Landsberger Straße terminus at the north end of Line 4 is undergoing refurbishment, to which end various temporary signalling measures for road and rail have been put in place. This is made doubly interesting by the fact that this terminus is located at the end of a short stretch of single track, so right now, there are two different but related elements of signalling to be observed.
     
    But, let me regale you with a couple of "general" images first . I spent the first couple of hours on Turn 421, booked with…
     

     
    …1346 "Thonberg" and 1330 "Wiederitzsch", seen here at the arrival point in Stötteritz…
     

     
    …and halfway through the loop as the boarding point was still occupied by the turn ahead of me. Due to the construction work at Landsberger Straße, we have a fairly generous turnaround of 19 minutes at Stötteritz during daytime, and seven at Landsberger Straße, owing to an additional turn having been booked on the line for relief.
     
     
     

     
    Here, I am stood at Landsberger Straße, where, while engineering work is ongoing, the arrival point has been temporarily relocated immediately ahead of the departure point.
     
     
     
    The construction site has been outfitted with a temporary signalling arrangement. However, travelling up to Landsberger Straße, the first important piece of signalling you encounter is at Beyerleinstraße.
     

     
    As I said, the final stretch of route from Beyerleinstraße to the terminus is single-tracked and safeguarded by a Single Track Signalling suite, which I suppose could be a suitable English interpretation of the German term, "Fahrsignalanlage", or "FSA."
     
    The STS suites we use utilise either pantograph head detectors on the OHLE for a route request, or key lock switches – the latter being standard at those termini located at the ends of single-tracked sections. On single track sections on the open line, pan head detectors are used for greater convenience, though these signalling suites can also be equipped with key locks to serve as a backup means of route request.
     
    At Beyerleinstraße, pan head detectors are used for outbound services. The STS screen here shows "Stop" and "Acknowledgment of Route Request."
     
     
     

     
    Later, the screen also showed the letter "F", which is an indication that the road and pedestrian traffic lights co-located with this STS unit have been shut down, as is normal here in the early mornings and in the evenings.
     
     
     

     
    As indicated, the present arrangement at Landsberger Straße requires two important signalling components to be kept in mind simultaneously! First of all, there is the STS suite, which the signal screen suspended from the OHLE is part of. The route request key lock is off image to the right.
     

     
    And there is this temporary signal interlocked with the temporary road traffic lights on the outbound lane, set to a fixed timing pattern. You may depart only if, one, you have a clear STS aspect, and, two, if the temp signal is unlit, as in this case.
     

     
    Here, the temp signal shows "Stop", and changes to the combined aspect of "Stop" and "Await Clear" (the "dot" aspect, set in the lower of the two chambers in this case) immediately prior to turning dark to indicate "Clear."
     
     
     

     
    And there is the temporary set of traffic lights that has been set ahead of the terminus.
     
     
     

     
    Also take note of this automatic swing-away barrier, which is enabled by approaching trams.
     
     
     
    And to round everything off, two nocturnal photos…
     

     
    …of my NGT6 tract prior to depot return, signed as Line 4E for the stretch to Central Station, and there re-signing itself as Line E for Sportforum.
     

     
    And for my second half on Turn 414, I got 1124 "Marianne von Ziegler".
     
     
     
    Thank you for reading and do feel free to ask any questions you might have!
  10. NGT6 1315
    Morning all!
     
    During my shift last night, I felt the situation was ideal for taking a couple of illustrative photos of the practice we refer to as "Interchange Node" or, in German, "Sammelanschluss". I hope you don't mind these being snapshots from my phone, but I believe they will visualise the concept.
     
    During those periods of longer timetable intervals in the late evening and early mornings – especially on Saturdays and Sundays – our traffic pattern on the tram is designed such that every 30 minutes, an interchange node occurs at Central Station. This means that services from the most important lines covering the various major areas of the city meet to allow passengers a seamless transfer. Operationally, this also means that rather than the usual two trams per double platform, up to four trams may occupy each track, with the official arrangement being the following:

    Platform 1: Line 11 – Line 16 – Line 1
    Platform 2: Line 11 – Line 16 – Line 1 – Line 3
    Platform 3: Line 15 – Line 7 – Line 4 – Line 3
    Platform 4: Line 4 – Line 15 – Line 7 – Line 14

     
    However, even though Central Station does offer ample space, some "tweaking", if you will, is inevitable, as I hope I can visualise with the following images:
     
     

     
    Standing at Platform 2 with Turn 1144 for the 11 pm interchange node, note that my tram is actually partly on the pedestrian crossing at the east end of the platforms. This is to allow the following Line 16 and Line 1 services – both with NGT8 cars – to be able to wait with, shall we say, most doors along the platform.
     
     
    Even so, this arrangement also entails that certain lines actually need to stop ahead of the platforms…
     

     
    …in this case, Line 3 services for Knautkleeberg. Note that these, too…
     
     

     
    …need to stop partway on the pedestrian crossing, as does the Line 4 service for Stötteritz over at Platform 4.
     
     
     

     
    At the 12.30 am interchange node…
     
     

     
    …this example shows how, once again, Line 3 for Taucha has to stop ahead of the platform.
     
     
     

     
    And ahead of Platform 4, note this Line 14 service waiting on the last position in the queue.
     
     
    Our regulations for double stops such as Central Station outline that, whenever possible, double departures should be ensured, meaning that two services should attempt to depart simultaneously to clear the platforms for the next services. Furthermore, they say that any services on the third or fourth position – as during the interchange nodes – need to stop anew once they are alongside the relevant platform to ensure a "proper" station call.
     
    Which is to say that as per the lineup outlined above, Line 1 services at Platform 1, Line 1 and 3 services at Platform 2, Line 4 and Line 3 services at Platform 3 and Line 7 and Line 14 services at Platform 4 need to call twice.
     
    It's also common practice for interchange node services to depart only following a starting signal from Control. This can be provided either via radio or through text messages posted on the ITCS terminals, which can read "Depart as scheduled", "Safe trip" or similar, depending on who's at the control desk!
     
     

     
    In this example, my scheduled arrival at Central Station was at 10.53 pm, with departure scheduled to occur in 3.20 minutes. As all services had arrived within the expected time frame, we did depart at 11 pm, as planned.
     
    If any services earmarked for participation in the interchange node are delayed in arrival, one option which Control may invoke is to notify all waiting services of the pending arrival, or to explicitly delay the starting signal until all services scheduled to take part have arrived.
     
    Of course, it is not possible to do so for indefinite lengths of time, so there may be situations where drivers may need to make the seemingly heartless decision in favour of the well of those already aboard and against any dawdling "latecomers" in order to reach the interchange node with at least part of the scheduled dwell time remaining. After all, no-one really gets stranded at night, as beginning at 1.11 am, night buses bridge the gap till tram services resume in the early morning.
     
    It's also advisable that if you are delayed due to, for example, technical reasons or traffic holdups, you should notify Control when your delay is beginning to exceed five minutes as the defined dwell time at Central Station is between five to seven minutes – depending on individual lines. As I mentioned, it is not possible to delay the start signal indefinitely, so in such cases, Control may also decide that you should skip the interchange node, and can define ad-hoc interchanges with at least one of the other participating lines at a different location. Such operational orders are commonly forwarded through text messages to the ITCS terminals, during which process the individual timetables for the relevant services can also be adjusted for the additional dwell time.
     
     
    Well, I believe that's everything I think can be said about this procedure, but do feel free to ask any questions you might have!
  11. NGT6 1315
    Morning, everyone!
     
    Understanding that German steam locos and narrow gauge are subjects keenly followed by numerous RMwebbers, I wouldn't dare withhold a couple of photos which I took on a day trip to the HSB narrow gauge railway yesterday, which my wife has given me/us for my birthday.
    I probably don't need to say that much about the 1,000 mm gauge network in the Harz Mountains which has been operated by Harzer Schmalspurbahnen since 1 February, 1993. Consisting of the Cross Harz Railway ("Harzquerbahn"), Selke Valley Railway and Brocken Railway, the entire system comprises 140.4 km of trackage. And although the majority of services continues to be provided by a fleet of lovingly cared-for steam locomotives, HSB should not be mistaken to be just a museum railway, instead running to regular timetables and indeed contributing to regional passenger traffic in the Harz region.
     
    We began our trip at Wernigerode, which is a town of about 33,500 residents and the place where HSB are headquartered. Along with Nordhausen Nord and Gernrode, the town also comprises one of the three depots, as well as the workshops at Wernigerode Westerntor Station.
     
     

     
    An outbuilding adjacent to the locomotive shed has had a viewing platform set atop which is obviously convenient for enthusiasts! Here, two coach formations had been prepared at the platforms, and connected to steam pre-heating outlets until the locomotives would couple up.
     
     
     

     
    Standard coaching stock on the HSB comprises the KB4ip series of reconstructed bogie coaches, which are steam heated and air braked.
     
     

     

     
    Draw gear consists of central buffers and double screw link couplers with balancing levers.
     
     
     

     
    This would be our train, still waiting for the locomotive to couple up.
     
     

     
    Preparations were going on in the depot grounds, with 99 236 sitting outside the shed and providing steam pre-heating. This is one of eleven Class 99.23 2-10-2 tanks built in the mid-1950s by the Karl Marx Locomotive Works of Babelsberg which form the backbone of HSB's locomotive fleet, with 99 236 (or 99 7236, actually) – works number 134013 – having been built in 1955.
     
     
     

     
    These locomotives were obtained to replace the ageing pre-WW2 and indeed pre-WW1 locomotives which had long been the regular fare for the Harz narrow gauge lines.
     
     

     
    99 7241 was standing by inside the shed, making steam.
     
     
     

     
    Signal box and turntable inside the depot grounds.
     
     

     
    Our locomotive for the special we were booked on was 99 5902, seen here finishing preparations outside the signal box and with a Class 648 DMU departing Wernigerode on the HEX 80222 HarzExpress service for Goslar on the standard gauge line.
     
     

     
    99 7239 was first to emerge from the depot, however – running up for working the timetabled HSB 8925 service to the Brocken.
     
     
     

     
    In time, 99 5902 was making her appearance, too…
     
     

     
    …and coupling up.
     
     

     
    She was built in 1898 and is one of three remaining B'B configured ex-NWE Mallet locomotives later operated by Deutsche Reichsbahn as Class 99.590. NWE, or Nordhausen-Wernigeroder Eisenbahn, was one of the two independent companies (the other company having been Gernrode-Harzgeroder Eisenbahn) which had built the network of metre gauge lines in the Harz, and had been absorbed by Deutsche Reichsbahn on 1 April, 1949.
     
     
     
     

     
    At Drei Annen Hohne, the tiny Mallet needed to take on water, and was duly scrutinised by crowds of enthusiasts and travellers.
     
     

     
    Further up the line at Schierke, we needed to await the HSB 8932 service from Brocken Station…
     
     
     

     
    …which was powered by 99 7247.
     
     

     
     

     
     
     

     
    Upon arrival at Brocken Station, not too far below the mountain's summit of 1,142 m or 3,747 ft, 99 5902 was uncoupled and ran around the coaches.
     
     

     
    The Brocken has a subarctic microclimate, characterised by figures such as an average of 300 days of misty and foggy weather, mean annual temperature of 2.9°C, and a maximum wind speed of 263 kph to have been recorded in 1984. The greatest snow depth to have been recorded on the mountain was 380 cm, in April 1970.
     
     

     
    And it was very windy at the summit indeed, which together with the dense, drifting fog and natural scenery made it easy to comprehend why so many folk tales of mystery and witchcraft developed in areas like these. In fact, one cultural event having taken place on the Brocken for a couple of years now is a rock opera performance of Goethe's "Faust", which I haven't seen myself yet but which I'm sure is an excellent idea and a creative modern adaptation of this cornerstone of literature.
     
     

     
    Back at the station, 99 7241 was running around her coach formation, having arrived with HSB 8920 from Nordhausen Nord and preparing to sortie with HSB 8922 for Drei Annen Hohne…
     
     

     
    …while 99 5902 was sitting and waiting with the windows blanked with stiff tarpaulins.
     
     
     

     
    I rather liked this impression of 99 7241 in dense fog, hissing and steaming like a ghost of steel.
     
     

     
    Back at Drei Annen Hohne during the return to Wernigerode, 99 5902 and 99 7239 at the head of HSB 8904 from Eisfelder Talmühle for Wernigerode needed to replenish water.
     
     

     
    Draw gear, brake and heating lines…
     
     

     

     
    …and the LP and HP engine on our little Mallet.
     
     

     
    I found the idea of having digital passenger information displays concealed like old style departure boards quite intriguing, too!
     
    Night had fallen already as we arrived back at Wernigerode, concluding an enjoyable day out!
     
    Thanks for reading!
  12. NGT6 1315
    Morning all!
     
    For our showcase of contemporary urban transit stock today, I should like to turn our attention to what I think is a particularly iconic and recognisable type of vehicle, namely the TW 2500 (and related TW 2000) Series LRVs as operated on Hanover's light rail system.
     
    With approximately 523,000 residents at the time of writing, Hanover as the state capital of Lower Saxony became a focus of international attention through the EXPO 2000 world fair which as a side effect had spawned various infrastructure development projects in preparation for this event during the 1990s. Also, Hanover has had an extensive tram system which originated in 1872 when the first horse-drawn tramways – initially provided by two competing enterprises – commenced operation. Electrification of the Hanover tram system, which at the time of its maximum expansion comprised a route length of 163 kilometres, was established from 1893 till 1903, with the tram system also including various "interurban" routes to outlying towns and communities such as Sarstedt, Hildesheim or Großburgwedel. The operating company assumed its present shorthand name of "üstra" – correctly written all lowercase – in 1921, the acronym originally referring to the name, "Überlandwerke und Straßenbahnen Hannover" which could be roughly translated as "Interurban Utilities and Tram Company of Hanover." Since 1980, the company's official title has been "üstra Hannoversche Verkehrsbetriebe."
     
    As was the case with numerous German tram systems, the Hanover network contracted drastically during the 1950s and 1960s, meaning that of all interurban routes, only the route to Sarstedt remained in operation. At the same time, newly designed eight-wheel and articulated twelve-wheel Düwag trams began rejuvenating üstra's stock inventory.
     
    In the 1950s, mirroring similar considerations in various other West German cities, plans began being discussed for transforming the existing tram system into a light rail system, commonly referred to in German as a "Stadtbahn." These plans involved the construction of tunnel sections through Hanover's city centre in order to remove mutual interference of rail and road traffic. Political agreements to this end were signed on 23 June 1965, resulting in the eventual construction of three separate but interconnected tunnel routes commonly referred to as A, B and C Route. However, the initial goal of establishing a completely grade-separated urban rail system with four tunnel routes was eventually shelved due to massively overrunning costs, resulting in the evolution of a light rail system with said three tunnel routes and a combination of street-bound and grade-separated overground trackage.
     
    The awarding of the EXPO 2000 fair to Hanover did, as previously mentioned, provide a massive impulse for further expansion and improvement of the Hanover light rail system such as it existed by the early 1990s. As of late 2015, the system comprises a total route length of 127 kilometres, of which 19 kilometres (15%) are tunnel routes, 87 kilometres grade-separated overground trackage (68%), and 21 kilometres (17%) street-bound trackage. The network even extends past the boundaries of Hanover proper, with Line 1 ending in the town of Langenhagen on the northern branch and serving the cities of Laatzen and Sarstedt; Line 3 terminating at Altwarmbüchen in the town of Isernhagen; Line 4 having its terminus in the town of Garbsen; and Line 9 reaching Empelde in the town of Ronnenberg.
     
    The lines, such as they exist at this time, are as follows:
     
    Line 1 – Langenhagen – Alter Flughafen – Niedersachsenring – Vahrenwalder Platz – Central Station – Kröpcke – Aegidientorplatz – Peiner Straße – Bothmerstraße – Laatzen/Eichstraße Station – Laatzen/Zentrum – Laatzen – Rethen – Gleidingen – Heisede – Sarstedt
     
    Line 2 – Alte Heide – Vahrenheider Markt – Niedersachsenring – Vahrenwalder Platz – Central Station – Kröpcke – Aegidientorplatz – Peiner Straße – Bothmerstraße – Laatzen/Eichstraße Station – Laatzen/aquaLaatzium – Rethen
     
    Line 3 – Altwarmbüchen – Paracelsusweg – Noltemeyerbrücke – Vier Grenzen – Lister Platz – Central Station – Kröpcke – Waterloo – Stadionbrücke – Linden Station/Fischerhof – Wallensteinstraße – Mühlenberger Markt – Wettbergen
     
    Line 4 – Garbsen – Leinhausen Station – Herrenhäuser Gärten – Leibniz University – Königsworther Platz – Steintor – Kröpcke – Aegidientorplatz – Marienstraße – Kantplatz – Nackenberg – Karl-Wiechert-Allee Station – Misburger Straße – Medizinische Hochschule – Roderbruch
     
    Line 5 – Stöcken – Leinhausen Station – Herrenhäuser Gärten – Leibniz University – Königsworther Platz – Steintor – Kröpcke – Aegidientorplatz – Marienstraße – Kantplatz – Nackenberg – Großer Hillen – Tiergarten – Anderten
     
    Line 6 – Nordhafen – Nordstadt Station – Christuskirche – Steintor – Kröpcke – Aegidientorplatz – Marienstraße – Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult – Brabeckstraße – Kronsberg – Messe/Ost (EXPO-Plaza)
     
    Line 7 – Misburg – Paracelsusweg – Noltemeyerbrücke – Vier Grenzen – Lister Platz – Central Station – Kröpcke – Waterloo – Stadionbrücke – Linden Station/Fischerhof – Wallensteinstraße – Mühlenberger Markt – Wettbergen
     
    Line 8 – Central Station – Kröpcke – Aegidientorplatz – Peiner Straße – Bothmerstraße – Am Mittelfelde – Messe/Nord
     
    Line 9 – Fasanenkrug – Bothfeld – Noltemeyerbrücke – Vier Grenzen – Lister Platz – Central Station – Kröpcke – Waterloo – Schwarzer Bär – Lindener Marktplatz – Am Soltekampe – Empelde
     
    Line 10 – Ahlem – Brunnenstraße – Leinaustraße – Am Küchengarten – Glocksee – Goetheplatz – Steintor – Central Station – Aegidientorplatz; supplemented by "Short 10" express line with fewer calling points: Ahlem – Brunnenstraße – Leinaustraße – Am Küchengarten – Glocksee – Goetheplatz – Waterloo – Kröpcke – Central Station
     
    Line 11 – Haltenhoffstraße – Christuskirche – Steintor – Kröpcke – Aegidientorplatz – Marienstraße – Hannover Congress Centrum – Zoo
     
    Line 16 (extra line during exhibitions) – Königsworther Platz – Steintor – Kröpcke – Aegidientorplatz – Marienstraße – Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult – Brabeckstraße – Kronsberg – Messe/Ost (EXPO-Plaza)
     
    Line 17 – Aegidientorplatz – Central Station – Steintor – Goetheplatz – Schwarzer Bär – Stadionbrücke – Linden Station/Fischerhof – Wallensteinstraße
     
    Line 18 (extra line during exhibitions) – Central Station – Kröpcke – Aegidientorplatz – Peiner Straße – Bothmerstraße – Am Mittelfelde – Messe/Nord
     
     
    üstra's rolling stock inventory as of November 2015 comprises 144 (out of 260 built) TW 6000 Series LRVs, built by a consortium of Düwag, Linke-Hofmann-Busch, AEG, Siemens and Kiepe from 1974 till 1993; 143 (out of 144 built) TW 2000 and TW 2500 Series LRVs; and most recently, a growing fleet of TW 3000 Series LRVs built by a consortium of Vossloh Kiepe, Alstom and HeiterBlick, which are to replace the remaining TW 6000 units. At this time, an order of 100 is being assembled, with 46 options also contracted for.
     
    The TW 2000 and 2500 Series units were obtained as part of the EXPO 2000 preparations, with deliveries having taken place from 1997 till 2000. These LRVs were built by a consortium of Linke-Hofmann-Busch and Siemens, and were explicitly specified to be built with an aesthetically pleasing exterior, for which British designer Jasper Morrison was contracted.
     
    First presented on the 1997 Hanover Exhibition, these cars were deliberately given a mainly silver livery instead of the traditional lime green, yielding a similar appearance to that of the batch of Mercedes Citaro G articulated buses procured by üstra from 1999 and designed by the late James Irvine. The TW 2000/2500 Series and the Irvine Citaros, of which Leipzig's transport operator LVB also obtained a batch of thirty, are thus aptly nicknamed "Silver Arrows." In both Hanover and Leipzig, these buses are being phased out already, though.
     
     
    1:87 scale models of the TW 2000/2500 and TW 6000 Series LRVs are, once again, available from Halling, and in Germany can be obtained directly from üstra's customer service centre. With several variants being offered for either, the TW 2500 cars are sold only as a pair, with one of the two cars being powered.
     
     

     
    While the TW 2000 cars are double-ended, the TW 2500s are configured as semi-sets to be operated in back-to-back formations. The Halling set as offered by üstra represents the pair of cars 2508 and 2509, and is made in a similar fashion as the more recent Bombardier Flexity Berlin model – with a painted transparent body shell and printed rather than scribed surface details. However, I do stand by my earlier statement that, considering trams and LRVs being more of a niche subject for modelling and modern light rail vehicles usually having fairly smooth bodywork in any case, these models are not at all badly done.
     
     
     

     
    To be able to serve road level stops, the TW 2000/2500 have fold-down access steps underneath all passenger doors, though with the remainder of the Hanover network being expected to be upgraded to high level platforms in order to fulfil accessibility legislation, these will most likely fall out of use in a few years. The TW 3000 sets currently being procured are no longer outfitted thus either.
     
    The fundamental configuration for the TW 2000 and TW 2500 is, essentially, identical, though of course the TW 2000 sets have a second cab attached on the "b" segment in lieu of the gangway provided on the TW 2500.
     
    As on the Flexity Berlin set I presented earlier, I would think the TW 2500 model could yet be upgraded with a few bits and pieces, such as lateral turn signal casings to add a bit of structural detail, or perhaps passenger figures.
     
     

     
    The set comes with a sheet of stickers for the destination signs, cleverly designed to be attached to the inside of the body segments in the appropriate places. The destinations offered are, Line 1, Sarstedt or Langenhagen; Line 4, Roderbruch or Garbsen; Line 8, Hauptbahnhof; and Line E, Messe/Nord. The stickers need to be cut out with a modelling scalpel.
     
     

     
    With rooftop equipment on modern LRVs being typically sparse, the model does represent the cab A/C and passenger space ventilation pods. Also, while the pantographs used on the model appear to be generic Sommerfeldt parts, I did apply a slight improvement already, clipping off the non-prototypical looped contact ends to leave them free-standing, and angling them down more strongly.
     
     

     
    As mentioned further up, the "b" ends on the TW 2500 comprise a gangway with flexible diaphragm. There is a portable auxiliary control panel provided on this end, which is stowed in a cabinet near the gangway when not in use. The TW 2500 pairs are usually split only for depot shunting and for maintenance, or to remove a failed semi-set from the line if necessary. The couplers on the gangwayed end are set at a slightly different height than on the cab ends, however.
     
     
    The TW 2000/2500 are designed as double-articulated cars, with the body segments primarily made of steel and the cab sections made of fibreglass. Each unit has one powered bogie each underneath the "a" and "b" segments, and one fixed two-wheelset running gear underneath the central segment. Propulsion is provided by four asynchronous AC traction motors per unit, in turn controlled through a Siemens SIBAS 32 suite tied into two propulsion control units. As is standard on BOStrab compatible vehicles, the primary mode of braking is the dynamic brake, supported by a holding brake with electro-hydraulic actuation, and magnetic track brakes for emergencies.
     
     
    An overview of the principal characteristics:
     
    Length – TW 2000 (Type 1) 25.82 m, TW 2500 (Type 2) 24.70 m
    Width – 2.65 m; 2.45 m at platform level
    Height – 3.74 m including rooftop equipment
    Floor height – 0.86 m
     
    Bogie wheelbase – 1.80 m
    Wheel diameter – 0.73 m
     
    Service weight – 39.8 tonnes per car
     
    Power output – 400 kW/536 kW continuous; 585 kW/785 hp peak
     
    Design maximum speed – 80 kph
     
    Passenger capacity – 54 seated, 101 standing at 4 persons per square metre.
     
     
    And finally, two interesting videos plus one (roughly) 30-minute report by German TV station NDR about the Hanover light rail system:
     
     

     

     

     
     
    Thanks for reading!
  13. NGT6 1315
    Evening all!
     
    As I'm having a weekend off, I thought I might begin filling this blog with some content, and start with a bit of an illustration of how my decision to re-orient myself professionally for essentially reasons of personal sanity and the preservation thereof – which some of you reading this may already know about in some more detail – took shape over the course of this summer!
     
    The short version is, I had signed up for a posting as a tram driver with our local public transport operator Leipziger Verkehrsbetriebe, starting on 1 June this year. Of course, this meant that, as part of a group of eight, I first need to complete driver training. Here, two weeks of depot service for introduction and three weeks of theoretical instruction were followed by seven weeks of practical driving training, which I successfully concluded with the driving exam on 25 August. This, in turn, was followed by 35 revenue shifts with two senior drivers functioning as operations trainers at my side, the goal here being to further improve driving skills and to learn the finer points of driving with passengers.
     
    So, may I perhaps just offer a collection of photos I took during my driving instruction to give you an overview of what tram operations in this city are like!
     
     

     
    The week from 20 till 24 July was filled with night time driving training, with this time of day offering additional possibilities for practising running with simulated malfunctions. During the night from 21 to 22 July, NGT12 car 1231 "Bielefeld" is seen here during our break in the stabling sidings on Kurt-Schumacher-Straße on the west side of Leipzig Central Station. The through tracks in the background are used by Lines 9, 10, 11 and 16 in revenue service.
     
     

     
    One night before, we had been driving a "tract", meaning a double unit, of NGT6 "Leoliner" cars, and stopped over in the Gerhard-Ellrodt-Straße loop in the borough of Großzschocher, off what is Line 3 in revenue service. Our formation consisted of 1340 "Meusdorf" and 1332 "Leutzsch".
     
     
     

     
    In addition to the 48 production cars, we also continue to operate the two NGT6 prototypes, which were approximated to the production cars during their first revision but are still sufficiently different to the latter to warrant separate instruction. Here, 1301 is seen at the Naunhofer Straße loop at the east end of Line 2.
     
     

     
    We also had taken 1301 to the reversing triangle at Herrmann-Meyer-Straße, off Line 1.
     
     
     

     
    Aboard 1302, one stopover had been at the Meusdorf loop, which is the regular southern end of Line 15 and also served by Line 2 during peak hours. The NGT6 prototypes are not named.
     
     
     

     
    NGT12 car 1215 "Addis Abeba" is seen here in the reversing triangle at Lützschena off the northern branch of Line 11 to the outlying town of Schkeuditz, one of the various auxiliary reversing spots which continue to prove useful in the event of route closures caused by disruptions of any kind, or by engineering works.
     
     
     

     
    Aboard 1205 "Hannover", we had taken a break at the Eutritzsch, Krankenhaus loop off Line 16. This location had – matching the destination signage we put on temporarily for this commemorative photo – indeed been served by Line 14 till 2008, but not with NGT12 cars.
     
     
     

     
    The NGT8 type cars are a typical 1990s design. Here, we had stopped over at the Sellerhausen loop rounding Emmaus Church, driving 1133 "Christian Thomasius" that day.
     
     
     

     
    The single dedicated driver training car in our inventory is 5001, one of the lot of refurbished Tatra T4D-MC cars originally produced by Czechoslovakian builder CKD during the GDR era. Here, we had paid a visit to the Museum Depot in the borough of Möckern, off Georg-Schumann-Straße.
     
     
    As a summarising comment from my point of view, I'd first like to mention that I could not find any fault with the extent and thoroughness of LVB driver training, and would definitely like to commend the dedication demonstrated by everyone involved with our instruction and ops training. I certainly felt well prepared when I passed my driving exam and commenced ops training on 26 August, and even more so when I subsequently completed the latter and could pick up my certification card (or driver's licence, if you will) on 29 October.
     
    I am, of course, happy to answer any questions you might have, of course emphasising that I will take care to apply common sense in everything I write, and reveal no information I might know to be sensitive in any way and which might go significantly beyond information that could be retrieved from openly accessible sources – whether in print or electronic, and however technical in nature – in any case.
     
    My goal, if you will, is to simply illustrate the workings of public transport in general and trams according to German regulations in particular from my personal point of view. To this end, I also elected to make this blog accessible only for registered users as an additional safeguard.
     
    Cheers,
    Dom
  14. NGT6 1315
    Afternoon all!
     
    Always trying to provide a catchy tag line for my blog entries, what came to my mind this time was that the subject of today's entry will be marked by an ever-friendly colour which at this time of year will most certainly be doubly attractive for many of us!
     
    Those of you who may have tapped into the field of urban transport worldwide may be aware of the fact that, after Melbourne and Saint Petersburg, the Berlin tram system is the third-largest in the world, with a total route length of 189.4 kilometres as of late 2015. Opened in 1865 and utilising horse-drawn trams till electrification began in 1881, the network, such as it exists today, has been operated by Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe – today abbreviated BVG – since 1929. It is also worth noting that due to the decades-long division of Berlin during the Cold War and radically different political developments on many levels between former West and East Germany, the Berlin tram system of this day covers mostly former East Berlin only, whereas in old West Berlin, decisions which began to be made in 1954 resulted in the suppression of all tram operations by 1967 in favour of individual traffic, buses and, eventually, the Underground. However, by the 1990s and with Germany having been reunited, the realisation of new potentials of this mode of transport led to gradual refurbishment and evolution of the remaining tram system, which since that time has even begun to slowly expand back into old West Berlin again.
     
    That, of course, really is only a highly abridged summary of what in fact is a very complex and faceted history, which you may, for example, follow up on Wikipedia.
     
    At present, the system comprises 22 individual lines, of which nine were uprated to "Metrotram" status as part of a modernisation scheme introduced in December 2004. To complement the city's extensive suburban railway system, BVG had redrawn much of their tram and bus system to better cover those inner urban areas not within immediate reach of the suburban system, with the so-called Metrotram and Metrobus lines usually providing 24-hour service throughout the year and at 10-minute intervals at daytime and 30 minutest at the longest by night. The non-Metrotram lines serve to cover numerous outlying areas of the city.
     
    As of today, BVG's tram inventory for revenue service consists of 105 single-cab ADtranz GT6N cars and 45 dual-cab GT6N-ZR cars, obtained from 1992 till 2003, and a growing fleet of the new Bombardier Flexity Berlin trams in four different variants. As per the original order, the latter comprise the following numbers:

    24 7-segment, single-cab cars; designated GT8-08ER/F8E; 8000 series running numbers,
    35 5-segment, dual-cab cars; designated GT6-08ZR/F6Z; 4000 series running numbers,
    20 5-segment, single-cab cars; designated GT6-08ER/F6E; 3000 series running numbers,
    20 7-segment, dual-cab cars; designated GT6-08ZR/F8Z; 9000 series running numbers.

    Where GT6-08 and GT8-08 are shorthand for "Articulated Tram (Gelenktriebwagen) with six/eight wheelsets, 2008 design, single/dual cab (Einrichtungs-/Zweirichtungsausführung); while F6E, F6Z, F8E and F8Z are internal BVG designations spelling out as "Flexity car, six/eight wheelsets, single/dual cab (Einrichtungs-/Zweirichtungsausführung)".
     
    Do note that there is not really a uniform type classification system valid across all German tram systems, which I think I will write a few lines about in a separate blog entry!
     
    BVG have also retained an operational reserve of twenty CKD KT4D trams inherited from East Berlin's People-Owned Enterprise Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVB), which are expected to be withdrawn by 2017 when a sufficient number of Flexity trams are available.
     
     
    The first four Flexity Berlin cars, serving as pre-production prototype and evaluation units, were rolled out in 2008 and delivered between September 2008 and January 2009. These four prototypes comprised one example each of the 5- and 7-segment versions with one and two cabs respectively. The BVG board agreed to obtain an initial batch – as described above – on 20 June, 2009, with the first deliveries having commenced on 5 September, 2011. The framework agreement with Bombardier specifies a total of up to 206 cars. In June 2012, 39 additional cars were ordered, bringing the total number ordered as of now to 142 – including the prototypes. Deliveries of these 2nd batch trams commenced the same year.
     
     

     
    F6Z set 4012 at Bornholmer Straße, working Line 50 for Französisch Buchholz, Guyotstraße. Photo by Kurt Rasmussen.
     
     
     

     
    F8E set 8019 at Otto-Braun-Straße/Mollstraße intersection, working Line M4 for Hackescher Markt Suburban Railway Station. This being a single-cab set, note the absence of rear view mirrors on the left hand side. Photo by Kurt Rasmussen.
     

     
     
    Technically, the Flexity Berlin is strongly influenced by the ADtranz Incentro tram – as operated in Nottingham and Nantes – which was added to the Bombardier portfolio when ADtranz was bought up by Bombardier in 2001. Most importantly, the Flexity Berlin is characterised by a 100% low floor configuration and bogies – possibly more properly referred to as running gears – with independent wheels rather than traditional wheelsets. The visual styling was provided by IFS Design and has been nominated for the 2011 German Design Award, and won the 2010 IF Design Award.
     
    With the 5-segment units measuring 30.8 metres in length and the 7-segment sets being 40 metres long, the body width is 2.4 metres, and the height 3.45 metres. The minimum curve radius is 17.25 metres, while service weights range from 37.9 tonnes for the F6E sets to 39.1 tonnes for the F6Z, 50.1 tonnes for the F8E, and 51.5 tonnes for the F8Z.
     
    The 5-segment sets are powered by eight wheel-mounted 50 kW asynchronous AC traction motors, while the 7-segment sets have twelve motors, for a total power rating of 400 and 600 kW respectively. The bogie/running gear underneath the pantograph carrying body segments are unpowered. Wheel diameter is 660 mm when new and floor height 355 mm.
     
    Passenger capacities are:

    60 seated, 129 standing (F6E),
    52 seated, 132 standing (F6Z),
    84 seated, 164 standing (F8E),
    72 seated, 173 standing (F8Z).

    In addition to the larger order by BVG, Strausberger Eisenbahn, operating a small 6.2 kilometre tram route in the town of Strausberg east of Berlin, obtained two 5-segment dual-cab Flexity Berlin sets, which entered service in 2013.
     
     
     
    Now, as for the model…! As I mentioned elsewhere, models of underground sets, LRVs and trams are probably more of a niche subject generally, so a lot of what does exist is available either as kits, as limited run productions, or from small suppliers (or all at once). It may also mean that the overall design of such models tends to be a bit simpler than, for example, railway models from large producers with corresponding design and production facilities, though of course, there appears to be a lot of variation here, too.
     
     
    The Flexity Berlin tram model is produced by Austrian specialty producer Halling. So far, only the 5-segment dual-cab variant has been produced, for distribution both by Halling themselves and by BVG through their merchandising department. Far as I am informed, two versions have been produced so far, representing sets 4002 and 4005. Like the majority of Halling LRV and tram models, the Flexity Berlin model is available both powered and unpowered, and it is possible to equip unpowered models with motor units if desired. For the moment, I personally am quite happy with the unpowered variants!
     

     
    In my impression, Halling models have evolved over the years, though I do not claim to have expert knowledge here. Generally, their models were designed with bodyshells made of transparent plastic painted as appropriate, and with few physical surface details or none at all, which is to say that items like panel lines, door buttons or others were only printed on. Of course, it may be argued that on modern trams in particular, body surfaces are generally smooth and with few raised or recessed structures in any case, so I can, in a way, understand this reasoning.
     
    Halling models usually do come with a smallish but varying number of add-on parts, mainly comprising rear view mirrors and, in many cases, sheets with a variety of adhesive destination signs. Naturally, you might always choose to enhance these models further with your own means, which I may well elect to do at some point as I've noticed a couple of items which might merit addition, such as turn signal casings on the body sides or perhaps cab details…
     
     

     
    BVG elected not to specify MU capability for their Flexities, so the removable parts of the frontal skirts conceal only fold-out emergency towing couplers. Note that the rear view mirrors, as provided, depict the stowed position only. Ordinarily, the right hand mirror on the cab travelling in front will be extended automatically when the corresponding cab is active, while the left hand mirror can be folded out as required. Obviously, drivers will need to ensure sufficient lateral clearance with oncoming trams!
     
     
     

     
    Having mentioned possibly adding turn signal casings further up, I suppose you can see where the lateral turn signals are located. You may also notice that small lateral wipers are provided on the cab side windows to ensure sufficient mirror vision, which is an item us at LVB in Leipzig also have on our low floor trams – though only on the right hand window as we have single cab trams only.
     
     

     
    I figure I might also elect to tweak the pantograph a bit as the head contacts have open run-off ends. The motor unit, should I eventually decide to outfit the model thus, would go on the bogie underneath the 3rd body segment.
     
     

     
    Rooftop equipment on modern trams mostly comprises only casings for traction and auxiliary inverters, as well as A/C modules.
     
     
    Thanks for reading and do watch this space for possible tweaks I might yet apply to this model!
  15. NGT6 1315
    Afternoon all!
     
    Having built up a s0lid baseline motive power inventory for this scenario in recent months (though some additions might yet turn out to be, shall we say, desirable ), I recently devoted some time to investigating likely choices for the freight stock which I'd expect to feature most heavily. My impression of traffic patterns on the Pajares Line so far seems to indicate that a fair share of freight traffic there appears to be steel coil services, so I thought that obtaining some suitable wagons should be among my upper priorities for the next few months.
     
    Mercancías 251-011 Renfe by Juanjo Rodríguez, auf Flickr
     
    Mercancías 251-021 Renfe by Juanjo Rodríguez, auf Flickr
     
    Aside from the Shimmns708 type (including subtypes) wagons with solid sliding hoods, much of the steel coil stock used by Renfe across this line seems to comprise the various iterations of the Shimms type coil carriers (and related subtypes), which are equipped with flexible sliding tarpaulin hoods but can also appear with the end bulkheads and tarps entirely removed. For a broad outline and general specifications of this range of wagons, also seen in the first of the above Flickr photos, I could, for example, refer you to http://www.dybas.de/dybas/gw/gw_s_7/g718.htmlwhich describes the related Shimmns(-tu) 718'' type wagon.
     
    For understanding the plethora of UIC classification codes for wagons, I could refer you to the English Wikipedia article. Sticking with the example of coil carriers we've been looking at, decoding the classification group tells us that this wagon is:

    S – special flat wagon with bogies
    h – for carrying sheet metal coils laid horizontally
    i – with fixed end bulkheads and movable top cover
    mm – loading length greater than 15 m
    (n – maximum load on Class C route greater than 60 tonnes)
    s – certified for 100 kph

    Having found out that suitable H0 scale models providing a generally appropriate representation of these wagons in Renfe guise have been brought forth by Piko and Roco, I went on to find out that the Piko model was currently unavailable and that the most recent iteration of the Roco model was available only in limited quantities and from a small number of those suppliers I am aware of…so piecing together a sufficient number of these wagons would require me to tap into several different sources.
     
    Intending to eventually re-letter these wagons with individual running numbers, and to also treat them to some (hopefully) suitable weathering as per the prototype photos from the "dybas" site, I'm currently awaiting an initial handful of this model:
     
    Roco 67547
     
    …which, come autumn this year, will be supplemented by several of these:
     
    Roco 67314
     
    Roco 67315
     
    Though I suppose that with my not having access to an overview of the precise ranges of running numbers in existence for these wagons on Renfe's inventory (and not yet knowing whether there might be any such roster on the 'web), I might need to "invent" plausible numbers. I suppose that but would be good enough!
  16. NGT6 1315
    Afternoon all!
     
    Our topic for this article shall be a locomotive which – while having been withdrawn from revenue service in reality – appealed to me sufficiently to claim modeller's freedom in order to justify procurement, and which also is, once again, illustrative of the multitude of influences Renfe embraced during its history.
     
    Aiming to speed up replacing the older types of electric locomotives in service at the time and to obtain high-powered locomotives especially for heavy passenger and freight service, Renfe ordered – essentially in parallel – two separate batches of locomotives as the 1980s approached. Already covered in my earlier article "EF66's Big Sister," Mitsubishi, in conjunction with CAF and MACOSA as licensees, provided the thirty Series 251 locomotives as a derivative from the Japanese Class EF66.
    With a similar operational profile in mind, Krauss-Maffei and a consortium of BBC, CAF and La Maquinista Terrestre y Marítima, or MTM for short, proposed a different twelve-wheel mixed traffic electric locomotive which technically can be understood to be distantly related to the Class 120 electric locomotives which at the time were in operational evaluation. Thirty were ordered initially.
     
    250-006 en via 3 de Sant Vicenç esperando via libre para salir hacia Tarragona. by enric436, on Flickr
     
    Papelero en La Gornal by javier-lopez, on Flickr
     
     
    Papelero en Fayón by javier-lopez, on Flickr
     
     
    With the first five of these locomotives, designated Series 250, having been built in Germany and the rest in Spain proper, they were introduced beginning in 1982 and lasting into 1985. As originally configured, they utilised rheostatic power regulation, though a second batch of five 250s – designated Series 250.600 – with thyristor choppers was introduced in 1986, with introduction lasting into 1988. Owing to their significantly different traction control equipment, the 250.600s went through a lengthy operational evaluation phase but were found to not offer sufficiently significant advantages to warrant any additional procurement.
     
    The 250s were originally allocated to the Can Tunis depot in Barcelona, and put to work on both passenger and heavy freight services. Originally designed for a maximum speed of 160 kph, they were restricted to 140 kph in 1988 due to their six-wheel bogies having been found to cause excessive roadbed wear at high speed. However, they were also cleared for working Talgo services at that time.
     
    In the early 1990s, the entire class was relocated to the Fuente de San Luis depot in Valencia, and also soon displaced from passenger workings by the Series 252 locomotives which entered service at the time.
     
    As the first decade of the 21st century ended, the class was put up for withdrawal as maintenance had been found to become increasingly laborious due to difficulty in obtaining spare components. The last revenue workings provided by 250s took place in late April, 2010.
     
    It’s at this point that for my purposes, I would like to invoke artistic freedom and claim that, due to a solid economic upturn having generated a steady increase in rail freight traffic, Renfe had decided to reactivate those 250s it had found to still be in sufficiently good condition, and in fact to modernise these locomotives with thyristor choppers based on those of the 250.600s but incorporating necessary improvements. These refurbished 250s should, as per requirements for the reactivation programme, be fit to remain in service for at least an additional 15 years. While a number of 250s would have been needed to be broken down for spares and some had been found to no longer be in acceptable condition, 24 would have been earmarked for refurbishment.
     
    As originally built, the technical specifications for the 250 could be said to begin with an all-welded, self-supporting body and running frame principally made of steel, with the body’s outline bearing some resemblance to that of the German 120, especially concerning the cab faces. The windscreen is split vertically into two panes, while five head and tail lights are provided on each cab face. The central upper headlight is, again, configured as a two-lens high intensity headlight. The bufferbeams carry standard UIC draw gear, buffers and brake pipes. As the 250s were originally outfitted for air and vacuum train brakes, they used to carry a vacuum brake pipe on each bufferbeam as well, which but was deleted when the last vacuum braked stock on the Spanish railways was phased out of revenue service by the mid-1990s. Access steps are provided on each end of the bufferbeams, as well as tread plates above each buffer, to permit safe access for shunting and maintenance staff. Furthermore, snow ploughs and ETS sockets are attached beneath the bufferbeams.
    Internally, the body is divided into three sections, which would be the cabs and the engine room. The cab interior very closely followed German design practices, with the control desk being especially similar to the Unified Cab principle as originally implemented on the German Class 111 and 120 electrics. As the majority of the Spanish railway system is built for right hand running, except for the lines originally built and operated by the „Norte“ railway which continue left hand running, the cab is, as has long been standard for Spanish motive power, configured for the driver to be seated on the right. Access doors are provided on both sides and open into the cab spaces proper.
     
    The locomotives are not outfitted for MU working and have the usual combination of vigilance control and the ASFA automatic warning system for safety.
     
    The body flanks carry four engine room windows as well as twelve ventilation grilles per side, with eight of the grilles being offset towards Cab 1. The rooftop is split into three panels, with the centre panel carrying two box-shaped, rectangular fairings for the braking rheostat ventilation. The single arm pantographs, which are the common Faiveley AM 18 derivative used on numerous Spanish electric locomotives, are set on the outer panels, with the knuckles facing inwards.
    Power regulation on the basic Series 250 locomotives is made through rheostats and variable series/parallel connection of the double traction motors, while the 250.600s were factory-fitted with thyristor choppers.
    Compressed air reservoirs and a pair of battery boxes are hung underneath the running frame between the bogies. As mentioned further above, vacuum braked freight stock was still widely spread when the 250 was introduced, so the locomotives were dually outfitted with one primary and one auxiliary compressor for the air brake and auxiliary pneumatic circuitry, as well as an ejector pump for the separate vacuum train brake.
     
    The bogies are of a similar design to that used on the German 120s, but with three wheelsets which are held by single-sided lemniscate levers. Helical springs with auxiliary hydraulic dampers are installed at the open ends of the bearing levers to provide primary suspension, while Flexicoil springs, hidden from view by the solebars, provide secondary suspension. There also is one pair of horizontally attached yaw dampers per bogie while traction bars attaching to a pair of low-reaching bearings to the inside of the bogies are provided for force transmission.
    As on the Japanese-designed Series 289, 269 and 251, the bogies are designed with one large central distribution gear and one large BBC-designed double traction motor each, with both motors, designated 6 EDO 8146, having two electrically separated rotors on one shaft. The distribution gears also were configured with two switchable ratios of 3.66:1 and 2.29:1 for freight and passenger service originally.
     
    The locomotives are outfitted with double-sided tread brakes with indirect train brake and direct locomotive shunting brake controllers, acting on all wheelsets and blended with the rheostatic brake.
     
     
     
    Technical characteristics
     
    Length, width and height – 20 m, 3.13 and 4.28 m
    Wheel diamater – 1.25 m
    Service weight – 124 tonnes for basic Series 250; 135 tonnes for 250.600
     
    Configuration – C’C’
     
    Power output – 4,600 kW
     
     
     
    As for models of the 250, there are two choices in H0 scale: Vitrains and Roco. From what I know, either one seems to be a good choice, though I ended up deciding in favour of the Roco due to my experience with their models generally having been very good thus far.
     
    Far as I was able to determine, there have been at least the following releases of Roco's model:
     
    #62410A/B – 250-001 and 250-004 in original blue and yellow livery
    #62412 – 250-601 in "Estrella" livery
    #62418 – 250-013 in yellow and dark grey "Tracción" livery with older "Cargas Renfe" logo on cab sides
    #62420 – 250-011 in yellow and dark grey "Tracción" livery with newer "Mercancías Renfe" logo on cab sides
    #62422 – 250-603 in "Estrella" livery
     
     
    I elected to obtain #62420 as I thought this variant would most closely match the appearance of these locos if they had indeed been returned to revenue service in recent times.
     
     

     
    The 250's visual appearance as a whole is, to my mind, very much typical for the 1980s, and connoisseurs may indeed be able to spot the cues taken from the German Class 120 in the cab area in particular. Overall, the model gives an impression of high fidelity to detail, and is painted and lettered crisply.
     
     
     
     

     
    The add-on parts bag contains a full set of brake pipes and faux couplers, a pair of bufferbeams without cutouts for the coupler pockets, and another set of rear view mirrors in the "extended" position.
     
    The technical lettering on the solebar next to the small running number comprises the following information, from left to right:

    Maximum speed of 140 kph and clearance for speed range "A"
    Distance between bogie pivots of 10.20 m
    Braking data:

    Charmilles brake valve with settings G and P
     
    Braking weights of 84 tonnes on G and 132 tonnes on P

    Service weight of 124.5 tonnes
    Handbrake weight of 30 tonnes

     
     

     
    I suppose properly printing the billboard style running numbers across the ventilation grilles is a challenge in its own right but has, to my mind, been done just right. Note the "Mercancías Renfe" stickers on the right hand cab sides. The Mercancías sector as it exists today was, in fact, formed out of two predecessors: Cargas for general freight and Transporte Combinado.
     
     
     
     

     
    The headlight arrangement on the 250 is quite similar to that on the Japanese-built Series 289 and 269 which preceded the 250.
     
    While the parts bag also contains a pair of vacuum brake pipes, I elected not to attach these as in my imagination, the resurrected 250s would have had all possible remainders of the vacuum braking equipment removed.
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
    The top-down view reveals the arrangement of four independently removable roof panels, with the rooftop equipment being remarkably symmetrical. Note how each pantograph has its own busbar, with the busbars not being physically connected across the entire length of the roof.
     
    Together with the frontal view, this image also illustrates how the horns are installed with a protective fairing ahead of their openings.
     
     
     
    And for the usual closing note, a triple of Youtube videos with 250s hard at work:
     

     
     

     
     

     
     
     
    Thank you for reading!
  17. NGT6 1315
    Morning all!
     
    The locomotive we are going to look at today will probably appear strikingly familiar to anyone following the Japanese railway scene, highlighting the multitude of influences the Spanish railways took on in the post-1945 era.
     
    As indicated previously, the motive power inventory of Renfe in the post-war period was characterised by various procurements from foreign locomotive builders due to an initial lack of independent development capacities for designs matching the established standards of the time. However, to bolster national industry capabilities, many of these procurement contracts made provisions for producing the majority of locomotives from these contracts domestically under licence.
     
    For electric locomotives in particular, Spain approached both French and indeed Japanese locomotive builders, so that a sizeable proportion of the present motive power inventory for freight service in particular is, in fact, derived from contemporary Japanese National Railways types such as the Class EF66 with their Bo’Bo’Bo’ configured chassis, which continues to be typical of numerous Japanese mainline locomotives until this day.
     
    To obtain high power universal locomotives for the heaviest freight and passenger services to exist at the time, Renfe had, once again, contracted Mitsubishi during the late 1970s, specifying a 12-wheel design utilising thyristor choppers for power regulation and therefore yielding superior adhesion and tractive effort. As indicated, the result was closely related to the JNR EF66, and could be understood as a scaled-up, broad gauge version of that class.
     
    With the contract also specifying production under licence by Spanish railway equipment builders CAF (Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles), MACOSA (Material y Construcciones, S.A.), as well as the Spanish sections of General Electric and Westinghouse, thirty Series 251 electrics were produced and delivered from 1982 till 1984. Of these, the first two were assembled by Mitsubishi and shipped to Spain, while the rest were assembled in Spain proper. Initially utilised in a mixed role for passenger and freight work, the class has been summarily assigned to the Renfe freight sector since the early 1990s.
     
    Technical description
     
    Sharing the extravagant visual appearance of the JNR EF66 with split, sloped windscreens, and prominent, angular cab faces with protruding lower headlight fairings, the 251 has an all-welded body and running frame made predominantly of steel, but could be built to greater overall dimensions due to the loading gauge used in Spain being considerably larger than the Japanese. In particular, the 251 could be built with fully vertical body sides, which are tilted inwards at roughly 2/3 height on the EF66 to maintain sufficient topside clearance as per the Japanese loading gauge. On each body side on the 251, four panels with three ventilation grilles and four with two grilles are provided, in a 3-2-2-3-3-2-2-3 arrangement. The three-grille panels also comprise small windows immediately above the grilles.
    Naturally, the class had to be outfitted with UIC compliant draw gear and buffers in lieu of knuckle couplers. Furthermore, the 251 needed to be designed with the large, high intensity central headlight which continues to be typical of Spanish motive power and which is of sufficient importance that as per Section 258, Paragraph 3 of the General Operating Regulations, any locomotive is to be considered unfit for service with a failed high intensity light if it is booked to work any services operating at night, or at daytime if using routes comprising tunnels longer than 300 metres.
     
    Among other European locomotives, the 251 also stands out in that it utilises three four-wheel bogies, which design otherwise was mainly adopted by the Italian railways. The bogies are fundamentally identical to those also used on the Series 289 and 269 locomotives which Renfe procured from 1969 till 1972 and from 1973 till 1985 respectively. In fact, the bogies of the 269 and 251 are designed to be interchangeable. To obtain suitable performance in both passenger and freight traffic, Renfe had specified the bogies used on all these classes to be outfitted with two-gear transmissions. Similar in principle to several French locomotives such as the CC 6500, this allowed a "Low" or "High" transmission ratio to be selected while the locomotive was stationary. Speed limitations were set at 160 kph for "High" and 100 kph for "Low", though the 251s were restricted to 140 kph a few years after introduction owing to high speed stability issues with the centre bogie and to the corresponding gear ratio having turned out not to be ideally suited. With the class now being primarily used for freight work, the gear change capability has, essentially, become irrelevant in any case.
     
    Also mirroring French practice of the time, the bogies were thus designed with only one large traction motor which, technically, consisted of two demi-motors with a common shaft for both rotors. For the Series 251, this yielded a B’B’B’ wheel arrangement. As the locomotive was designed with one rigid running frame rather than an articulated body as, for example, found on Italian "Tri-Bo" designs, the centre bogie can displace laterally for suitable curve running abilities. The bogies, except for the centre one, are bolsterless, utilising helical springs both for primary and secondary suspension. For force transmission, the class utilises a total of six traction bars, with one diagonally offset pair per bogie connecting to the lower corners of the bogie frames and thus continuing the unusual configuration also provided on the 269.
     
    Internally, the 251 differs from the EF66 primarily through it being designed with thyristor choppers for motor regulation, which in Spain were first used for practical evaluation on the small batch of four Series 269.600 electrics. On the 251, two chopper units are provided for each bogie, with one regulating motor tension and the other governing the motor field shunt. All motors are connected in parallel and can also be used for dynamic braking, with brake excitation being provided by the traction choppers and recuperated power being rheostatically dissipated.
    The rheostatic brake is blended with the pneumatic brake, which utilises two-sided tread brake pads acting on all wheelsets. It is worth mentioning that vacuum brakes continued to be used on Spanish passenger stock roughly till the mid-1980s and indeed till the mid-1990s on freight stock, so that until the conversion to full air brake operation, motive power, including the 251, needed to be dually fitted for air and vacuum brake. Following the withdrawal of vacuum-braked stock from revenue service, the relevant equipment on motive power was generally disabled and, usually, removed during maintenance work.
     
    Rooftop equipment is set on three independently removable panels, of which the central panel comprises the braking rheostat fairing. The pantographs used on the 251, as well as the contemporary 269 and 289, are a variant of the French Faiveley AM 18 single arm type.
     
    Auxiliary systems such as ventilation and compressors are powered by a 380 V, three phase AC grid, in turn supplied by two motor-alternators, while low tension auxiliary circuits are supplied by a 72 V circuit with supporting battery.
     
    As delivered, the 251s wore a blue livery with dark grey chassis, and yellow cab face warning panels and trim stripes. The broadside ventilation grilles were blue on 251-001 and 002 originally but aluminium on the remaining locomotives.
    In the early 1990s, the 251 began being repainted in the yellow and dark grey scheme officially known as the "Tracción" livery but colloquially called the "Taxi" livery, where the cab sections and rooftop were yellow and the body sides, grilles included, dark grey. At this time, the locomotives also had the number plates and chromed trim originally attached to the cab faces removed as these items had turned out as being corrosion hot spots. As the only exception, 251-004 has retained its original appearance – including the blue and yellow livery, number plates, and chrome trim – till this day.
    Most recently, the remaining fleet of 29 locomotives has begun adopting the „Operadora“ livery, utilising the „Mercancías“ variant with grey body sides.
     
    Mercancías 251-008 Renfe by The Reeler, on Flickr
     
    251-004 en Avila by TrenSalamanca, on Flickr. Note different ventilation grilles above centre bogie.
     
     
    Due to their high tractive effort of 453 kN, elevated power output of 4,650 kW and low propensity for wheelslip even under heavy load, the 251s are most frequently booked onto block services of steel coil carriers, as well as material supply services for steel works and other heavy industries. They also provide banking services but are not MU capable. Their main areas of operation are the mainlines crossing the mountain ranges in the hinterland of Asturias, Galicia, Cantabria, and Castile and León.
     
     
    Characteristics
     
    Length, width and height – 20.70, 3.19 and 4.28 m
    Wheel diameter – 1,060 mm
    Service weight – 138 tonnes
     
    Power output – 4,650 kW duration, 4,980 kW one-hour peak
    Tractive effort – 453 kN initial, 349 kN duration
     
    Configuration – B’B’B’
     
     
    The model
     
    Being a prominent type of Spanish motive power, the 251 was probably an especially likely candidate for a H0 scale model, which Electrotren first marketed in 2007. As of now, there seem to have been at least six releases in different appearances, which according to my information were the following – references ending in even numbers being for conventional DC, DCC fitted ("D") and DCC sound ("S") fitted versions; those in odd numbers for three rail AC versions without and with digital sound ("S"):
     
     
    #2580/2580D/2581 – 251-001 in original blue and yellow with blue grilles
    #2582/2582D/2583 – 251-006 in original blue and yellow with silver grilles
    #2584/2584D/2584S/2585/2585S – 251-008 in yellow and dark grey "Taxi" livery
    #2586/2586D/2586S/2587/2587S – 251-018 in "Operadora" livery
    #2588/2588D/2588S/2589/2589S – 251-026 in "Taxi" livery
    #2590/2590D/2590S/2591/2591S – 251-014 in "Operadora" livery
     
     
    With one of the goals for this Spanish modelling corner being an illustration of the peaceful coexistence of newer and older liveries which in general still exists on the Spanish railways, I opted for #2588. The locomotive depicted, 251-026, was built by CAF and delivered in 1983, and actually has been repainted in the "Operadora" livery already. I but might save that livery for a possible second 251!
     
    Like all 251s, 251-026 is allocated to the Llanera depot, which is located in the namesake community of about 14,000 inhabitants between Gijón and Oviedo in Asturias.
     
     

     
    The model comes in sturdy cardboard and styrofoam boxing, with a bag of detailing parts containing both a set of cut-off and full length brake pipes, as well as faux couplers and one full and one cut-out snow plough each. The outer bogies are powered from a central motor, while the centre bogie can – as on the prototype – displace laterally. The model weighs 605 grams.
     
     
     
     

     
    The 251's shape keeps reminding me personally of American limousines from the 1960s! You may notice the letter "T" on the lower headlight fairings. Also present on the Series 269 locomotive from my earlier posting as well as other types so configured, this lettering indicates that the locomotive in question has sufficiently dampened buffers for working Talgo stock. Specifically, this was a reference to the variable gauge Talgo IIIRD formations which, together with the domestic Talgo III variant, formed the bulk of that Talgo stock in existence at the time the 251s were introduced.
     
     
     

     
    I suppose the billboard style format for the broadside running numbers was chosen to assist drivers, yard staff and signallers in identifying specific locomotives even at a distance. Note the solebar recess atop the centre bogie which was required to allow the centre bogie to not only rotate but to displace as well, for which purpose the centre bogie was outfitted with a transversal bolster.
     
    Again, notice the offset traction bar attachment consoles behind the second and between the fourth and fifth wheelset counting from Cab 1.
     
     
    The text boxes atop the centre bogie specify the following data, counting from Cab 1:
     
    – Maximum speed of 140 kph
     
    – Service weight of 138 tonnes and handbrake weight of 24 tonnes
     
    – Braking data:
     
    CH-GPR – Charmilles type brake controller valve with settings G, P and R
     
    Braking weights: G 77 tonnes, P 121 tonnes, R 152 tonnes. Again, the dynamic brake is disregarded.
     
     
     

     
    Several 251s have had differently arranged windscreen wipers fitted with pivots above the panes rather than below. Note the vacuum brake pipe immediately next to the coupler, and, again, the traction bar attachment console below the bufferbeam on the driver's side.
     
     
     

     
    Topside equipment is, again, relatively sparse. Note the very short busbars passing into the locomotive's interior very near the pantographs proper, as well as the actuators and associated push rods.
     
     
     
    "Buddy" snapshot with the 269:
     
     
     

     
     
    …and, again, a few Youtube videos. Thank you for your time!
     
     
     

     
     

     
     

  18. NGT6 1315
    Afternoon, everyone…
     
    As you will see, I did not just leave it at merely thinking about hitting the rails with my camera! (Yes, both it and the rails are still in one piece, just to preempt any possible punning… ) I but will admit that the "Plattenbau" housing blocks suggested by the title will not be the single dominant topic, actually.
     
    I first rode out to the sizeable reversing loop at Paunsdorf-Nord in the east of Leipzig. The loop itself, set such that it connects both to Line 8 and to the shared section of Lines 3E and 7, is fairly nondescript really, but does, theoretically, allow for running in circles endlessly! See for yourselves:
     

     
     

     
    Arriving on a Line 7 turn, 1349 "Windorf" and 1334 "Engelsdorf" are seen here across the fairly large empty ground in the middle of the loop, running along Heiterblickallee which bisects one of the larger "Plattenbau" housing areas in Leipzig.
     
    Prior to certain software updates, Leoliner pairs could be formed only of two 1st batch or two 2nd batch cars – the latter most easily recognised by the coloured destination displays – but while that restriction lo longer applies as such, mixed pairs should normally be formed with the 2nd batch car at the head. I'll have to investigate whether there is any technical reason for this or whether it might just be due to LVB wanting the cars with coloured destination displays to be in front!
     
     

     
    As the outer section of the tram route to Taucha is largely single-tracked and allows for a minimum interval of 20 minutes only, every second Line 3 turn – signed as Line 3E for disambiguation – turns south at Portitzer Allee to terminate at the Sommerfeld loop near the "Paunsdorf-Center" shopping mall. Here, 1332 "Leutzsch" is on one of these Sommerfeld turns.
     
     

     
    After that, I rode Line 8 from its eastern end at Paunsdorf-Nord to its western terminus at Grünau-Nord, again in the middle of Plattenbauten. This loop is not that well suited for photography due to the mound in its centre, but 1144 "Erich Kästner" did not evade my camera anyway!
     
     
     

     
    Off Wilhelm-Leuschner-Platz at the southern edge of the city centre, I then captured 1104 "Clara Schumann" on a Line 10 turn…
     
     

     
    …and 1207 "Stuttgart" turning left into Grünewaldstraße on Line 16 against the backdrop of the massive edifice called "Ring-Café" – actually a post-war building on Roßplatz which was completed in 1956. The namesake café with 800 seats in four separate areas was the GDR's largest café at the time.
     
     

     
    A bit down Grünewaldstraße, 1135 "Theodor Körner" is on a Line 9 turn for Markkleeberg.
     
     
     

     
    Looking roughly west along Windmühlenstraße, 1226 "Bremen" on Line 16…
     
     

     
    …and 1154 "August Bebel" on Line 2 for Naunhofer Sraße are seen with the New City Hall – built 1899 till 1905 – forming the background. The New City Hall was built on the site of the Pleißenburg castle and explicitly designed with a prominent tower to evoke the appearance of Pleißenburg's keep.
     
     

     
    And with a typical GDR era housing block off Windmühlenstraße in the background, 1221 "Brno" on Line 16 crosses the Bayrischer Platz intersection…
     
     
     

     
    …while 1117 "Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz" on Line 9 turns right into Arthur-Hoffmann-Straße.
  19. NGT6 1315
    Evening all!
     
    On a photo round I went on today, I devoted some of the time to capturing a few examples of typical tram signals, which I'd also like to follow up with additional sets of examples at later dates as I get to gather them.
     
    But I won't let you jump in at the deep end and would thus like to first provide a few introductory paragraphs!
     
    German trams most commonly run under what could be called visual operating conditions, meaning that cars proceed on sight from one signal to the next, and that no train protection systems as would be present on railways are available. Such systems generally are installed only on grade-separated routes of various light rail networks throughout the country.
     
    That, of course, means drivers must generally observe regular traffic rules on street-bound routes, and trams must be outfitted with the same basic arrangement of headlights, brake lights and turn indicators as automobiles. Obviously, trams must, given their weight, also be outfitted with highly effective brakes to be able to operate safely under these conditions and in the middle of automobiles. This is why they are generally outfitted with magnetic track brakes to allow for very short emergency stopping distances.
     
    Generally, tram and other light rail systems are subject to the regulations laid out in what is colloquially called "BOStrab" in German, which is shorthand for "Bau- und Betriebsordnung für Straßenbahnen" and best translated as "Tram Construction and Operating Ordinance." This is a set of regulations completely separate from the "Eisenbahn-Bau- und Betriebsordnung" (Railway Construction and Operating Ordinance), abbreviated "EBO" and applicable to all "heavy rail" systems in Germany.
     
    Most commonly, rail vehicles comply to only EBO or only BOStrab but not both at the same time. Exceptions to that rule can be found, for example, on the suburban network in the Karlsruhe area or on the Saarbahn network, either of which constitutes a tram-train system. Basically, these tram-trains must therefore, among other parameters, meet railway crashworthiness and impact resistance norms, and be outfitted with wheelsets suitably profiled for both railway and tram track geometries.
     
    Now, as I indicated in the title, this little series of postings will also address other aspects of tram infrastructure where appropriate, which is why I might just begin with this photo...
     
     

     
    Paved-in track is generally built with grooved rails while grade-separated tracks can be built with either Vignoles or grooved rails. On paved-in routes, points therefore differ a bit from regular points, which I'll get back to in a few moments.
     
    In order to increase route capacity at intersections or other key locations, it is now quite common to provide what is commonly called "sorting points." Technically, these are, basically, very long points with the point blades being placed far ahead of the diverging track. Assuming two cars following each other but working different lines, this allows for either car to be properly routed in advance of passing an intersection in order to maximise throughput for each signal cycle.
     
    Taken at the Goerdelerring intersection here in Leipzig, the straight track proceeds into Jahnallee and is used by Lines 3, 4, 7 and 15, while the diverging track turns onto Pfaffendorfer Straße and is for Line 12. Similar sorting points, some even longer, also exist in other locations in the city but some can be photographed safely only aboard trams.
     
     
     
     

     
    While no sensible alternative to grooved rails exists for paved-in track, this type of rail does, technically, entail an increased risk of stones, snow, ice or other materials getting stuck in the grooves. On points in particular, this could result in derailments, so in order to counter this risk, the rail elements utilised for points are fabricated with much shallower grooves.
     
    As you can see in the above photo, also taken at Goerdelerring, this configuration is most prominently evident at the common crossings. Looking closely, you can also spot the stock rail grooves varying in depth in between the common crossings, where they are most shallow. This also means that effectively, the common crossings are flange bearing, so that the wheel flanges rather than the treads carry the car weight. I understand this also has the additional effect of extending the common crossings' lives.
     
    *************
     
    Changing the topic back to signalling, one remark which I think I should make up front is that while the Tram Construction and Operating Ordinance does outline a common framework of guidelines as to the purpose and appearance of tram signals which is valid throughout Germany, the Technical Supervision Authorities ("Technische Aufsichtsbehörden", TAB) in the individual states as well as the operating companies themselves are at liberty to request and implement adaptations to suit specific requirements posed by local conditions which the general BOStrab framework could not cover.
     
    Such individual adaptations which are specific for one particular tram system are outlined in local application guidelines usually designated "DFStrab", spelt out as "Dienstordnung für den Fahrbetrieb – Straßenbahn" and suitably translated as "Operational Tram Service Regulation."
     
     

     
    While, to my knowledge, tram signals outside of Germany tend to look fundamentally similar, I would like to explain them in a bit more detail in any case. This example of a multi-aspect, multi-route signalling cluster is, again, at the Goerdelerring intersection.
     
    Fundamentally, tram signals should be understood largely as pure route signals, as opposed to German railway signals which generally imply specific running speed information as well.
     
    These route signals are generally referred to as "F signals", spelt out as "Fahrsignale" and extended to the individual aspects.
     
    On multi-route junctions such as this one, there is generally one signal screen for each route which can be set from this location, and indeed relevant only to that individual route.
     
    In this example, the three screens for each of the three routes which can be set from here all show F 0, "Stop." Do note that the three screens nearer the camera actually can be understood as distant signals for the actual route signals, one of which you can see beyond the lady which happened to be in view here. These route signals also display F 0.
     
    Also take note of the screen set atop the cluster of three "F" signal screens, and lettered to refer to the points from the first photo, 170. This is, essentially, a point indicator, obviously useful to inform drivers whether the proper route for their turn has indeed been set.
     
    As tram points must no longer be set by way of OHLE current sensing contacts (which were disallowed in the mid-1990s), route setting is now commonly performed automatically through induction-based telemetry with transmitter coils on cars and ground-mounted transceiver coils. These transmitters are tied to the Integrated Onboard Information System – "Integriertes Bordinformationssystem" or "IBIS" in German – so that as a driver, you need to enter the line and turn number through a cab terminal for the car to be properly routed for the duration of the shift.
     
    If, for some reason, the proper route was not set automatically, you can manually set points either by way of corresponding keys on the IBIS terminal or control desk while within transmitting distance of the ground-based transceivers – or by way of a simple lever carried in each cab and actually referred to as a "spear" in operating parlance.
     
    As for the point indicator in the present example, the variety used in Leipzig is, actually, an example for how individual operators may implement modifications to the general BOStrab framework. I'll address this in a few moments!
     
    But, first of all, take note of the "X" symbol lit up at the top of the screen. This is the "W 0" aspect indicating that the points are currently locked in position for the next tram to pass it and that none of the following trams can reset the points until they have been cleared.
     
    Now, looking at the first image in this posting, you will notice that the point in question has a straight branch and a right hand branch. However, the indicator in this example is equipped with aspects for left and right hand branch.
     
    While BOStrab does specify an aspect for the straight branch, LVB have chosen to normally utilise only the aspects for left and right on point indicators, so that in this example, the "left" branch actually refers to the straight route.
    The standard aspect for the straight route would appear as an upward pointing arrowhead.
     
    It is also important to keep in mind that there are actually two variations for each of the point indicator aspects: Without the straight "bar" at the open end of the arrowhead, the point is indicated to not be mechanically locked in position, imposing a 15 kph speed limit.
    When the bar does display, the point is mechanically locked, allowing regular running speed.
     
    This means there are the following point aspects as per BOStrab:
     
    W 1 – straight, not locked
    W 2 – right, not locked
    W 3 – left, not locked
    W 11 – straight, locked
    W 12 – right, locked
    W 13 – left, locked
     
     
    *********
     
    As I mentioned before, the triple route signal cluster in the foreground functions as advance indicators for the upcoming route signals nearer the intersection. Thus, take note of the following photo:
     

     
    Here, a Line 12 working is leaving to turn right onto Pfaffendorfer Straße.
     
    Obviously, tram signals must, where present, be interlocked with traffic lights for road users, so that in this example, the road signals are set such that the route would be clear for trams leaving straight ahead into Jahnallee and to the right. Correspondingly, the foreground signals show "A 2b" at the bottom for the straight and right routes, with A 2b being an "Order to depart."
     
    Likewise, the route signals beyond the pedestrians show "F 1, Proceed Straight" for the straight branch, and "F 2, Proceed Right" for the right hand branch. The point indicator shows "W 12" plus "W 0" to indicate the point is set and locked for the right hand branch.
     
     

     
    Meanwhile, in this view, the advance signal for the straight route shows A 2b corresponding with F 1 on the route signal, while the advance signal for the right branch shows the combination of F 0 and F 4.
     
    The standard definition for F 4 is given as "Expect Stop." By the standard definition, the aspect also does not light up simultaneously with any other F aspect, but many tram operators – if not the majority of them – have redefined this aspect to function similarly to the yellow light in road traffic lights. So, in Leipzig, it is possible to display the combinations of F 0 and F 4 indicating "Expect Proceed", while "Expect Stop" is signalled by displaying F 4 only on the relevant screen.
     
    In total, there are six F aspects:
     
    F 0 – horizontal bar: Stop
    F 1 – vertical bar: Proceed Straight
    F 2 – right diagonal bar: Proceed Right
    F 3 – left diagonal bar: Proceed Left
    F 4 – single dot: Expect Proceed for given direction
    F 5 – triangle pointing downward: Proceed Permissive (Observe Right of Way at location)
     
     
     
    ******
     
    Having spoken about points earlier, let us briefly return to this topic and have a look at this signal board:
     

     
    I am, of course, referring to the black and white plate attached to the OHLE, seen right above the rear end of 1331.
     
    While tram points are frequently designed as variable points to allow running through from the trailing end regardless of position, points which are not thus equipped – such as in this example at the Augustusplatz intersection – are highlighted with a "W 14" board, set to be visible only from the trailing end. So, W 14 indicates "No Trailing Point Movements."
     
     
    ************
     
    Given the narrow curve radii commonly found on tram routes, certain locations may call for special measures to reduce wear and noise. Typically, this would be in the shape of curve greasers, highlighted by the following signal plate:
     

     

     
    …spelt out as "Kurvenschmieranlage." This example would be located at the eastern end of the Wilhelm-Leuschner-Platz stop...
     
     

     
    …while another curve greaser, seen here, is located at the beginning of the grade-separated section just south of Augustusplatz.
     
     
     
    And that would be it for this time. Thanks for reading!
     
    (April 19: Edited for inexplicably jumbled formatting)
  20. NGT6 1315
    Afternoon all (just!)
     
    Today's posting will most certainly highlight the fact that I as a railfan can indeed derive satisfaction from situations which I suppose will be terribly nerve-wracking for John Every-Passenger, and that trams are far from being inflexible!
     
    Engineering work carried out on Georg-Schumann-Straße this week means that until and including 10 April, a fairly intriguing replacement service arrangement had to be set up. Line 11 trams are rerouted to the Line 4 terminus at Landsberger Straße, turning right at the Lindenthaler Straße intersection. Rail replacement buses cover the gap to the Wahren loop, with Line 11 shuttle services running from there to Schkeuditz and back. In spite of copious passenger information on and off the trams, significant numbers of them but seemed to be disoriented this morning…
     
     
     

     
    Anyway: Having walked up Landsberger Straße to the Max-Liebermann-Straße intersection, 1204 "Köln" was rolling down towards the city centre on a Line 11 service for the Connewitz, Klemmstraße terminus…
     
     

     
    …followed by 1141 "Friedrich Nietzsche" doing its usual Übermensch-like service on Line 4.
     
     
     
    Having ridden back to the Lindenthaler Straße/Georg-Schumann-Straße intersection, I took the rail replacement service out to Wahren.
     
     

     
    …where 1341 "Mölkau" and company were waiting on the up track for their next trip to Schkeuditz as Turn 11-71. The fact of Leoliner cars working Line 11 services is unusual enough in its own right.
     
     
    Now, to help you understand the following photos, I should first post a few screenshots from Google Earth, I think.
     
     

     
    The Wahren loop, normally used by Line 10 services, rounds the tree-planted square at the centre of this aerial view. To enter the loop in normal operation, trams turn left at the Linkelstraße intersection, rounding the loop counter-clockwise…
     
     

     
    …similar to how the silver Renault Clio is going in this image. As you can see, the diverging track branches off from the up main track only.
     
     

     
    Similarly, the loop exit connects to the down track only.
     
     

     
    And a view up Linkelstraße to illustrate the loop entry. As you can see, the loop is double-tracked to permit overtaking, if required.
     
     
     
    However, the Schkeuditz-Wahren shuttle services obviously arrived on the down track, so that the only way of entering the loop and returning to the up line…
     
     

     
    …is reversing through the loop. On the inside track, a spare formation of 1337 "Knauthain" and 1321 "Probstheida" is powered down and stabled, while 1311 "Schönefeld" and 1348 "Hänichen" back up, with the driver at the shunting control stand at the rear end of 1311.
     
     
     

     
    Looking at the operation from the loop exit. The orange Volkswagen van belonged to an Operations Director keeping an eye on the shuttle and rail replacement service.
     
     

     
    Having taken the mandatory break, the formation of 1348 and 1311 reversed onto Georg-Schumann-Straße…
     
     
     

     
    …with one of the replacement buses for Lindenthaler Straße emerging from Linkelstraße to the right. Rail replacement services were run mostly with Solaris Urbino 18 LE bendies, like 14146 (L-NV 4146) here.
     
     
     

     
    Soon after that, the next shuttle service came in from Schkeuditz, headed by 1343 "Reudnitz".
     
     
     

     
    After some passenger confusion was remedied, the set, with 1323 "Dölitz" at the rear, began reversing into the loop. Who ever said trams were inflexible?
     
     

     
     
     
     

     
    Interestingly, LVB had also sortied at least one of their "Irvine" styled Mercedes Citaro G bendies, originally designed for public transport operator "üstra" of Hanover on the occasion of the EXPO 2000 fair. The replacement buses, with L-NV 1328 seen in this photo, were obviously signed as Line 11 services.
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
    I then rode up to the Landsberger Straße loop, which this week sees a lot of traffic from Lines 4 and 11! Here, this Tatra Großzug of 2124, 2101 and NB4 trailer 903, booked on Line 11, rounded the loop, exiting it through the left of the two departing tracks. Line 4 services use the right departure track.
     
     
     

     
    To illustrate – Here, 2124 and company exit the loop onto the shortish single-tracked stretch at the top end of the line…
     
     
     

     
    …while 2158 and its trailer emerge from the right departure position just one minute later.
     
     
     

     
    A less common sight on this route, Flexity car 1233 "Augsburg" sorties on a Line 11E service to Connewitz, Klemmstraße…
     
     
     

     
    …followed by 1112 "Seiferts Oscar" on Line 4, representing the standard fare for this route.
     
     
     
    Aside from the complex traffic arrangement on Line 11, Line 10 is affected as well, only serving the southern section from Lößnig to Central Station. Cars reverse through the loop immediately to the west of Central Station…
     

     
    …again illustrated by a Google Earth shot with the loop visible rounding the single house off Kurt-Schumacher-Straße.
     
     
     

     
    Here, 1143 "Robert Schumann" is turning off the main route to enter the loop, signed as an "E" car.
     
     
     

     
    With 1143 visible to the right, 1107 "Hieronymus Lotter" is on its down service to Markkleeberg-West on Line 9…
     
     
     

     
    …followed by the trial formation of 1101 "Johann Sebastian Bach" and trailer 906 on Line 11E. As of now, this is the only NGT8, or Type 36, car to have been made compatible with trailers.
     
     
     
    And this would be it for today. Thanks for reading!
  21. NGT6 1315
    Afternoon all!
     
    Posted the following on Early Risers a few minutes ago, but wouldn't want to keep this set of photos from the rest of RMweb, of course.
     
    I hadn't been able to pay that much attention to trams recently – any part of railfanning, actually – but even so, I was thinking of a couple of spots I might like to revisit now that I have some unexpected time… Forecast predicted increasing cloud cover by about noon and rain to become likely by the afternoon, so I first decided to ride down to Markkleeberg, which is a town of approximately 24,000 residents immediately south of Leipzig. Due to being located in the Leipzig New Lakes District, as the area of now-closed and re-naturalised opencast brown coal mines south of the city is officially called, Markkleeberg has become an attractive place for home builders.
     
    The town also has excellent public transport connections due to being served by the S 2, S 4 and S 5 and S 5X suburban lines, as well as tram lines 9 and 11. Line 9 has its southern terminus in the western part of Markkleeberg, while Line 11 terminates in its east.
     
    As a specialty, Line 9 also comprises the single remaining tram/railway intersection, which is on Rathausstraße:
     

     
    The Markkleeberg Mitte stop, seen in the background, is no longer served by passenger trains, with the Plagwitz-Gaschwitz Railway on which it is located acting as a freight bypass only.
     
    Note how the 15 kV AC railway OHLE is separated from the 600 V DC tram OHLE through double insulation sections to prevent any flashovers. As per the El 2, "Close Circuit Breaker" signal located at the platform access – corresponding to an El 1, "Open Circuit Breaker" signal facing the other way – railway motive power must shut down power and open the circuit breaker in order to coast through the neutral section to eliminate any remaining risk of 15 kV flashovers.
     
     

     
    A view of the crossing arrangement of the two contact wires.
     
     
     

     
    Due to trams having to "hop" over the railway rail heads and strongly relying on the wheel flanges for guidance, speed through this intersection is restricted to 10 kph. Looking closely, you can spot the flange traces across the rail heads as the wheelsets effectively ride on the flanges for a brief moment.
     
     
     

     
    NGT8 car 1145 "Martin Luther" is seen here riding through the intersection. I walked to the Markkleeberg West terminus afterwards and rode Line 9 back to the city, but I'd have imagined the jolting across the intersection to be worse.
     
     
     
    It began clouding over by the time I was back in Leipzig, so I changed my plan a bit…
     
     

     
    …first shooting a couple of photos at Goerdelerring, which is a key junction for the tram lines. Line 12 turns right towards Pfaffendorfer Straße and the zoo – roughly behind the tram on the right track – while Lines 4, 7 and 15 proceed straight along Jahnallee, and Lines 1 and 9 turn left onto Goerdelerring proper. Furthermore, it's a calling point for Line 14 – a circle line from Plagwitz Station running clockwise around the city centre.
     
    Here, NGT8 car 1119 "Kaiser Friedrich III." rides across the major intersection on Line 4 down to Stötteritz. The NGT8 cars are also known as Type 36. –
     
     
     

     
    Contrary to plans made just a couple of years ago, the Tatra T4D-M cars are now set to remain in revenue service until well after 2020. Car 2174 is at the head of a Line 3 service to Taucha, which is a town of about 14,500 residents immediately northeast of Leipzig.
     
    Having mentioned that the NGT8 cars are also known as Type 36 brings me to a bit of nerdy background information! –
     
    Leipzig Transport Authority have an internal type designation system for their tram stock. As per this system, the T4D cars as delivered during the GDR era were called Types 33a and 33b. In the 1990s and early 2000s, the T4Ds were refurbished, but as a cost-cutting measure, only 2101 through 2197 received the full refurbishment package. Among other items, this full refurbishment comprised new bogie frames and enhanced suspension, flange greasers, cab air conditioning, and a static inverter which is set under the prominent rooftop fairing at the aft end. The fully refurbished cars were designated Type 33c internally, and T4D-M1 generally.
     
    2030 through 2099 were initially given a reduced refurbishment to bring them to the standard called T4D-M2, lacking the cab air conditioning and the static inverter. These cars were designated Type 33d. However, 2091 through 2099 did get a smaller static inverter, and were designated Type 33e. By 2002, all Type 33d cars but were retrofitted with static inverters, so all T4D-M2 cars were regrouped as Type 33d.
     
    Still with me? Good, because the story's not finished yet!
     
    More recently, part of the T4D-M fleet was again modified to allow triple formations of motor cars which had not been possible previously.
     
    To that end, cars 2184 through 2195 received a modification to the Integrated Onboard Information System (designated "IBIS" as per its German name) and can now work as intermediate cars in triple formations. These are now designated Type 33i. In addition, cars 2154 through 2165 were modified to work as rear cars in triple formations, which required changes to the holding brake and current transfer conduits. The latter batch are designated Type 33h.
     
    All T4D-M cars can be freely combined for formations up to the traditional "Großzug" of two motor cars and one trailer; however, for a triple formation of motor cars, the rule is that the intermediate car must be a Type 33i and the rear car a Type 33h. The leading car can be any of the existing subtypes.
     
     
    To continue! –
     

     
    The NGT12-LEI cars are designated Type 38 internally. Here, 1228 "Essen" is rolling across the intersection on Line 15…
     
     

     
    …soon followed by Leoliner (Type 37) car 1338 "Lindenthal" and company on Line 7. More precisely, the prototypes are designated plain Type 37, the 1st batch production cars Type 37a, and the 2nd production batch – visually characterised by coloured destination displays – Type 37b.
     
     
     
    I then caught the next Line 14 service and rode to Plagwitz Station as I wanted to catch one of the two Leoliner prototypes which are predominantly found on this line.
     
     

     
    And indeed, 1301 rolled along Karl-Heine-Straße several minutes upon my arrival. The Leoliner prototypes have been refurbished to bring them to a similar standard as the production cars, now featuring coloured LED destination displays.
     
    Initially, the Leoliner cars were designed such that in double formations, the leading car would supply traction power to the rear car and the rear car could run with the pantograph down, similar to the solution adopted for the T4D cars decades earlier. However, the production cars were eventually specified to have foldable couplers to be hidden behind swing-up valances, which could not be built to also supply traction power. The production Leoliners therefore need to run with both pans up.
     
    As the original couplers for the Leoliner prototypes have been put out pf production, the two cars were also modified such that 1301 has a full mechanical/electrical coupler only at the front, while 1302 has this coupler only at the aft end. The rear coupler on 1301 and the front coupler on 1302 now are mechanical couplers only, so that a double formation is now possible only with 1302 at the head.
     
    To visualise what I mean:
     

     
    Rear coupler on 1301…
     
     

     
    ..and the front coupler with weather protection hood.
     
     
    Taken from the platform access at Plagwitz Station at the end of my tour before catching the suburban train home:
     

  22. NGT6 1315
    Afternoon all…
     
    In today's posting, I should like to present a model which took a lot of time and patience to obtain as it has actually been out of production for an extended period of time. Consequently, I had been particularly happy when I had, in fact, been able to obtain an example of Roco's SBB Cargo class Re 421 at my favourite Swiss retailer, Wemoba.
     
     
    Those of you who follow the Swiss railway scene will most likely be aware of the Swiss Federal Railways having begun introducing newly designed electric locomotives with all-bogie configuration in 1946. These Bo'Bo' configured locomotives, designated Re 4/4I, with a 1,900 kW power output, service weight of only 57 tonnes and maximum speed of 125 kph (78 mph), were well suited for working formations of the "Lightweight Steel Stock" coaches introduced in 1937, as well as the post-war Standard Coach I ("Einheitswagen I") stock, but even in MU formation were insufficiently powerful for the increasing train lengths which had become standard by the late 1950s, and not well suited for anything but light passenger service on mountainous lines of which there are many in Switzerland. At the same time, the Co'Co' configured Ae 6/6 electrics which were first presented in 1952 and produced from 1955 till 1966, while powerful and reliable and well suited for difficult route profiles, could not be certified for the "R" speed category due to their long bogie wheelbase and high weight. SBB therefore tendered for an evolved, Bo'Bo' configured locomotive which was to be capable of working at Category R speeds throughout the Swiss railway network.
     
    With the tender having been won by a consortium of the Swiss Locomotive and Machine Works (SLM) of Winterthur, Brown-Boveri of Baden, Oerlikon Machine Works (MFO) of Zurich and Sécheron of Geneva, six prototypes of this new locomotive – preliminarily designated only as "Bo'Bo'" – were rolled out in 1964.
     
    While at that time, certification parameters in Switzerland technically precluded motive power with an axle load of more than 16 tonnes to be approved for Category R speeds, route trials with the "Bo'Bo'" revealed that in spite of their axle load of 20 tonnes their riding dynamics were so favourable that they could be certified for Category R. Consequently, they received the final designation of Re 4/4II, and paved the way for the BLS Ae 4/4II? – an evolved version of the original Ae 4/4 – to be recertified as Re 4/4 shortly afterwards. These locomotives, while not directly related to their SBB equivalents, had been developed during the same period, and therefore provided similar performance characteristics.
     
    Production of the Re 4/4II commenced in 1967, and ended only in 1985 when 276 examples had been built. Until today, these locomotives and the closely related Re 4/4III subtype which will be addressed further down remain an important pillar of the SBB locomotive inventory, and have proven to be highly capable and reliable pieces of motive power.
     
     
    Technical description
     
     
    One item which is immediately obvious when looking at the „Bo-Bo Two“, as drivers still like to refer to these locos, is that they are quite compact, measuring only 14.8, 14.9 or 15.41 metres (48.5, 48.9 and 50.6 ft) in length respectively. The prototypes are the shortest of the lot, with the 1st production batch measuring 14.9 metres and the 2nd and largest batch ending up at 15.41 metres. The body had been thus lengthened after drivers had complained of a lack of leg space. This difference is easily visible when looking at the locomotives from the side, as the cab faces are noticeably more raked back on the 2nd batch, which began with 11156.
     
    On all three batches, the body is a self-supporting welded steel assembly consisting of the running frame, fronts, sides and the roof as the principal subassemblies. The roof also comprises three removable aluminium sections for better access and removal of large components. Three windows are present on both body flanks, while the ventilation grilles have been placed along the edge of the roof in order to reduce the amount of dirt being drawn into the engine room. Beginning with locomotive 11107, impact absorbers were installed behind the buffers in order to prevent the body from being deformed in light collisions at shunting speeds – the body itself being capable of withstanding a pressure of 200 tonnes without permanent damage. There is a Z-shaped corridor through the engine room connecting both cabs. On the bottom of the running frame, protective skirts are attached below the bufferbeams, while the frameside attachment bearings for the traction bars are located both ahead and inside of the bogies.
     
    The bogie frames are welded assemblies consisting of two longitudinal and two transversal end beams, the latter of which are cast metal pieces. The primary stage suspension is provided by helical springs between the bogie frame and the axle bearings, with hydraulic motion dampers being provided and the wheelsets in turn being held in double roller bearings. The wheelsets are also allowed some degree of sideplay for better curve running, being able to be displaced by 10 millimetres to either side, with springs located inside the axle boxes providing a centring effect of 2,000 kilograms.
    The secondary suspension assembly consists of two sets of three concentric helical springs per bogie – one on either side – with the upper ends being attached to a transversal beam on the underside of the running frame and the lower ends being attached to a transversal beam suspended below the bogie. This, in turn, is attached to the bogie frame by a set of vertical levers on either side, with additional transversal levers inside the bogie absorbing lateral forces and motion.
     
    The two traction motors per bogie are mounted in a separate block casing which is attached to the bogie frame at the outer ends. Power transmission to the wheelsets is accomplished through a single-sided BBC type quill drive, with the gear ratio being 1/2.64 on the Re 4/4II and 1/3.11 on the Re 4/4III.
     
    As previously indicated, traction bars are used to transmit tractive effort to the body. These bars are attached to a pair of bearings near the centre of the bogie on the underside of the traction motor block, and guided around the lower edges of the motor block by roller bearings, then to continue to the body attachment points which are located on pedestals behind the frontside skirts and immediately on the bottom of the frame between the bogies. There also is an inter-bogie coupler mechanism to allow both bogies to be more accurately steered through curved track.
     
    The braking gear consists of two pneumatic cylinders per bogie, acting on two pairs of tread brake pads per wheelset.
     
    On the bufferbeams, standard UIC couplers are provided, as are the usual pipes for the indirect pneumatic brake. In addition, there is a pair of pipes related to the direct brake circuit, allowing for locos coupled in a MU formation to be directly braked as a unit while shunting. Of course, ETS sockets are present as well, as are sockets for the MU and UIC jumper cables. The Re 4/4II and Re 4/4III types are both fitted for push-pull operation as well, but the Re 4/4III is not permitted to be thus operated due to the different gear ratio and correspondingly higher forces having been determined to increase the risk of derailing a pushed train.
     
    Eight Re 4/4IIs were specially fitted for the so-called “Swiss Express” formations which were used on the Geneva – St. Gallen services between 1974 and 1982. These were composed of the EW III (EW meaning “Einheitswagen” or “Standard Coach”) coaches. Ther EW III coaches were initially intended to be equipped with a tilting mechanism, which but was never enabled in regular service. These formations were not normally uncoupled except for removing individual coaches for repairs, for which reason the outermost coaches were designed as dedicated end coaches with no outer gangway doors. These end coaches were also fitted with knuckle couplers on either ends for shorter turnaround times at termini, requiring that a number of Re 4/4IIs be identically fitted. Eight 1st batch locomotives – 11103, 11106, 11108, 11109, 11112, 11113, 11133 and 11141 – were chosen for this refit and were given extended bufferbeams with knuckle couplers, as well as the same livery as the EW III coaches, which was orange/light grey/orange in three broad horizontal stripes. This refit but restricted these eight locomotives to working EW III formations only, as no other coaches were ever similarly outfitted with knuckle couplers.
     
    In 1982, the “Swiss Express” formations were rebranded as normal InterCity workings, and both the coaches and the eight Re 4/4IIs were fitted with UIC couplers. Also, seven 2nd class EW III coaches were rebuilt into driving trailers, eliminating the need for loco changes.
     
    The EW III sets were sold to BLS in 2004, along with a number of Re 4/4IIs. The coaches are now used on regional express services in the Berne/Lucerne area, and can also be found coupled to the powerful class Re 465 locomotives.
     
    Another important version which was created only in recent years are the SBB Cargo locomotives Re 421 371 through 381 and 383 through 397. This batch is fitted with a 1,950 mm Schunk WBL 85 pantograph and the German PZB and LZB train protection systems, enabling them for operation in Germany. However, as the German Federal Railway Authority had requested a full set of certifications for the spoked wheels to be able to withstand 140 kph running, the Re 421s are restricted to 120 kph on the German network as SBB Cargo determined 120 kph were sufficient for the freight services these locomotives were to provide primarily.
    Several years earlier, 11195 through 11200 had been outfitted with a specially designed 1,950 mm pantograph, which allowed these six locos to work into Lindau and Bregenz on the shore of Lake Constance on international services. However, they were not fitted with the PZB train protection system as used in Austria and Germany, and were issued a restricted certification valid only for those lines connecting Switzerland, Bregenz and Lindau. When the Re 421 type was created, these locomotives took over the cross-border services in the Lake Constance area as well, following which 11195 through 11200 were rebuilt as normal Re 4/4IIs.
     
    As for the electrical part, the Re 4/4II and Re 4/4III are classical single phase AC locos, using tap changers for power control. The first thing to be considered here is how the 1st batch locomotives were initially fitted with a single BBC 350/2 type diamond pantograph on the Cab 1 end, while the 2nd batch ones were fitted with a pair of BBC ESa 06-2500, 22-2500, ESaD 22-2500 or EKa 05-2560 type single arm pans located over both cabs. The remaining roofside equipment includes the air blast circuit breaker which is located in the centre section, and has a cutoff switch added which is to be used when earthing is required. Some 1st batch locos were refitted with a single ESa 06 pantographs in later years.
     
    The transformer, located centrally in the locomotive room, has output taps for the traction motors as well as the ETS and auxiliary circuits, providing 4,000, 500 and 80 kVA respectively. The tap changer, designed as an “up/down” impulse type, is located on the primary side of the transformer in order to limit current load, and has 32 notches which are switched by way of a pneumatic motor with four cylinders. The traction motors are connected in parallel, have ten poles and feature a continuous shaft power output of 1,113 kW, at a rated continuous current of 2,300 A, continuous tension of 525 V and speed of 1,200 rpm.
     
    The auxiliary equipment, which is connected to the 240 V circuit, includes two traction motor ventilation blowers, the compressor, a 36 V static inverter for the battery charging circuit, the transformer coolant oil pump, cab heating and a OHLE voltage sensing device. The ETS circuit is fed with 1,000 V. The traction motor blowers have two speed settings, with the “low” setting being active at speeds up to 30 kph and as long as the tap changer is not beyond Notch 5.
     
    The locomotives are also fitted with a regenerative electrodynamic brake which was designed around the requirement of being able to maintain speed while descending the southern ramp of the Gotthard Railway at the head of a 400 tonnes train for a duration of about 40 minutes, unassisted by the pneumatic brake.
     
    The cabs feature a control desk located on the left side, as is the case on most Swiss-built locomotives. They were designed around a new control concept first tested on the class RBe 4/4 EMUs 1401 through 1406, with the “steering wheel” style power controller used up till the Ae 6/6 having been replaced by a horizontally moving lever which was placed on the driver's right-hand side. The indirect and direct brake valves – which are Oerlikon FV4a and FD1 types – are located to the left, with most other control switches and indicator lamps being located in front of the driver’s position. The speedometer, brake gauges, voltmeters and ammeters are located in and above the upper plane of the control desk, in this order when looking left to right.
    One thing which should be mentioned in this context is that 11299 through 11304 were fitted with a Swiss variant of the LZB cab signalling system for evaluating purposes, though this system was never introduced to the Swiss railways on a large scale and, in fact, eventually dismantled after the trial phase ended. These six locomotives – plus 11305 through 11349 and 11371 through 11397 – feature a ribbon-style speedometer. Today, all Re 4/4IIs are equipped with the Integra-Signum and ZUB 121 train protection systems, and have also begun to be refitted with ETCS onboard units emulating Integra-Signum and ZUB 121 functionality.
     
    The Re 4/4II, geared for a top speed of 140 kph (87 mph) and initial tractive effort of 255 kN (57,326 lbf), was supplemented by an additional variant which was designed to offer higher overall tractive effort for heavy passenger and freight workings across the Gotthard and Lötschberg lines. This type was created in 1966 when Südostbahn, one of the larger private operators in Switzerland at the time, ordered a single Re 4/4II locomotive geared for a top speed of 125 kph (78 mph) and tractive effort of 280 kN (62,946 lbf). This variant piqued SBB's interest and led to a subsequent order of twenty such locomotives, designated Re 4/4III.
    Three of the SBB Re 4/4IIIs were sold to Südostbahn between 1983 and 1985 but bought back from 1994 till 1996 in exchange for the four Re 4/4IV locomotives, which unlike the Re 4/4III were able to work push-pull trains with no restrictions.
     
    At present, the Re 4/4IIs are also known by the UIC-compliant designation of Re 420 – and Re 421 for those locomotives outfitted for Germany – while the Re 4/4IIIs are also designated Re 430.
     
     
    Technical specifications (Re 421 only)
     
    Length, width and height – 15.41 m, 2.97 and 4.5 m/50.6, 9.7 and 14.8 ft
    Service weight – 85 tonnes/83.7 long tons
     
    Power output – 4,700 kW/6,303 hp
    Initial tractive effort – 255 kN
     
    Maximum speed – 140 kph in Switzerland, 120 kph in Germany/87 and 75 mph
     
     
     
    The model
     
    ?A variant of Roco's newly tooled long-bodied Re 4/4II model, the Re 421 was marketed with catalogue no. #72404, representing 421 387 as she appeared roughly around 2009. This model is nicely detailed and gives an excellent impression of the rugged yet understatedly elegant appearance of these slightly diminutive but powerful electrics.
     
     
     
     

     
    ?The Re 421 is outfitted with a Schunk WBL85/15 pantograph on Cab 1, carrying a 1,950 mm head for compatibility with the German OHLE. Interestingly, those Re 420s refurbished for domestic passenger services as part of the "LION" programme are outfitted with the same pantographs with a 1,450 mm head, which have been recovered from the Re 460s which in turn are being outfitted with Faiveley AX pantographs for better high-speed running properties.
    Furthermore, the Re 421s needed to be equipped with additional radio antennas for Germany, which are represented on the model also.
     
     
     

     
    Beginning in the late 1980s, the Re 4/4II and Re 4/4III were refitted with sealed-beam combined head and tail lights in lieu of the original, round lower headlights. The Re 6/6s were thus refitted also. In this view, you will also get an impression of the characteristic cab face design which is typical of these classes, and which is also evident on Rhätische Bahn's Ge 4/4II metre gauge electric locomotives.
     
     
     
     

     
    ?One single broadside photo should be sufficient here as the Re 421 really is quite compact. The lettering on the Cab 1 flank comprises the braking weights, giving different figures for Switzerland in the left column and for Germany in the right column:
     
    Switzerland:
     
    R 100 t
    P/V 72 t
    G/M 72 t
     
    Germany:
     
    R 95 t
    P 68 t
    G 64 t
     
    Handbrake 2x 14 t (for either country)
     
    The service weight is indicated as 85 tonnes and the revision indicated on the Cab 2 flank is dated to have been completed on 24 December, 2004, at the Bellinzona workshops.
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
    The pantograph on Cab 2 is a finely detailed representation of the ESa 06 series pantograph provided on the Re 4/4II. Also note the air blast circuit breaker being located between the second and third rooftop fairing, and the voltage sensing device and whistle between the first and second fairing.
     
     
    And of course, this article would not be complete without a few Youtube videos with Re 421s at work. Thank you for your time!
     
     

     

     

  23. NGT6 1315
    Afternoon all...
     
    While I am still recovering, I keep telling myself that spending time outside and for things which to people like us on here will most certainly be highly agreeable. Consequently, I again have a series of photos from two spotting rounds to my favourite freight spotting location at Thekla Station which I have been on yesterday and today.
     
     

     
    Yesterday, rail traffic was still in the middle of getting under way after the large scale strike of last week, also necessitating several positioning moves. Thus, 232 255 of DB Schenker – sans logos – was stopping briefly ahead of the "F" westbound intermediate signal on the way for her next services.
     
     
     

     
    Likewise, 155 104 was travelling light in the morning sunlight.
     
     

     
    Meanwhile, 155 080 – which we'll see again in a few moments – was working a rake of Hcceerrs330 type articulated car carriers.
     

     
    Visibly derived from the class 798 railbus, 701 167 was performing an OHLE inspection run. As this is a diesel car, the pantograph only serves as a measuring sensor.
     
     

     
    Pressnitztalbahn also are a fairly common sight in East Germany, and represented here by 293 046 at the head of a mixed freight service which also included a track crew accommodation car derived from an ex-DR passenger coach.
     

     
    The lot of ex-DB V 90 series shunters were also busy getting freight trains to their mainline motive power. Here, 294 895 – which I actually observed several times that day – is pulling a formation of container carriers on a trip service.
     
     
     

     
    Performing an ECS service, 650 538 of Mitteldeutsche Regiobahn – signed for a stopping service to Bad Lausick – was running towards Engelsdorf.
     
     
     

     
    A locomotive I have in my H0 scale fleet but earmarked for a different purpose, 182 595 of MRCE Dispolok – one of only a handful of locomotives still wearing the old Dispolok livery – was working a container service.
     
     

     
    As previously mentioned, 155 080 returned light after having dropped her car carriers elsewhere.
     
     

     
    185 304 was pulling a formation of Ermewa gas tankers...
     
     

     
    …and 185 009 heading the regular PKP coal service.

     
    And the last snapshot for yesterday had been 185 196 at the head of a mixed formation of chemical and gas tankers.
     
     
    _________
     
     
    Having noticed before that Leipzig Northern Station is not too bad a spotting location either, I decided to try my luck there on my way to Thekla this morning.
     

     
    Demonstrating that even a highly standardised series of EMUs such as the Bombardier Talent 2 has lots of variety in the details, this photo shows 442 210 on the RE 18454 service from Cottbus to Leipzig Central Station approaching, and one of the Central German Suburban System's 1442.1s, of which I missed to write down the exact running number, departing on the S 37614 service to Leipzig Trade Fair Centre Station.
     
     

     
    I have been noticing how an extraordinarily high number of suburban 1442s seem to have been hit by atrocious graffiti at present. I suppose the scrotes will make much use of the long autumn nights for their questionable hobby… In any case, 1442 102, working the S 37417 service from Thekla Station to Geithain, was one of the reasonably clean examples.
     

     
    Running a few minutes late, ICE 1627 from Berlin Central Station to Munich Central Station was crossing over to the western station approach, and taking advantage of this section being equipped for full bidirectional running.
     
     

     
    A surprise sighting was this PW inspection service with DB Systemtechnik's 182 506 at the tail. I wish there were models – even kits – of these measuring coaches...
     
     

     
    Due to competition by intercity buses which have been allowed in Germany for about a year now, the InterConnex services provided by what is now Veolia will cease with the December timetable change. Here, 146 520 is swooping through Northern Station at the head of X 68902 from Berlin Gesundbrunnen Station.
     
     

     
    Again on the left track due to bidirectional running, 1442 208 was approaching on the S 37419 service from Eilenburg to Borna.
     
     
     

     
    The first spotting to be made at Thekla this morning was 185 524 of Alpha Trains on lease to ITL.
     
     
     

     
    189 932 of MRCE Dispolok is currently on lease to Captrain, and seen here heading a mixed freight service.
     
     
     

     
    All alone in the morning mist, 185 201 was repositioning herself.
     
     
     

     
    The silver ES 64 U2 series locos of HUPAC are a fairly rare sight. Here, 182 600, or ES 64 U2-100, is crossing over to the Cottbus bypass with an intermodal service.
     
     
     

     
    152 127 was repositioning herself also.
     
     
     

     
    With a resounding horn blast as a greeting, 145 069 sped through with a long formation of empty car carriers.
     
     

     
    ?There still are a handful of freight services provided by the 101s. Here, 101 122 was taking a break from her usual IC services and running east with a mixed freight formation.
     
     
     

     
    The sun slowly struggled to burn through as the morning passed, shedding light on 145 023 and her freight train.
     
     

     
    A popular spotting subject since her roll-out in December 2013, 110 043 of Pressnitztalbahn is actually 110 511, formerly the works locomotive of Deutsche Bahn's Dessau workshops. This locomotive is wearing a promotional livery for National Express which in my opinion looks like a blend of the original dark blue Deutsche Bundesbahn livery for express locomotives and British Rail's late InterCity livery. Note that the locomotive has been outfitted with LED lighting also.
     
     

     
    Also on her way to get some freight haulage, 285 109 of CBRail is on extended lease to ITL.
     
     
     

     
     
    A different V 90 for a change, 294 889 was running towards Engelsdorf.
     
     
    Thank you for looking!
  24. NGT6 1315
    Morning all!
     
    In today’s loco profile, you will learn a bit more about a locomotive which at the time of its roll-out could be said to have been the pride and joy of the German railway industry. Even though it was eventually built in 60 examples only, the class 120 electric definitely contributed much to the breakthrough of three-phase AC traction.
     
    The rationale behind the 120’s development was that Deutsche Bundesbahn were intending to supplement their fleet of class 103 express passenger locomotives and class 151 heavy freight locomotives, both Co’Co’ configured but designed with specific roles in mind, with a Bo’Bo’ configured universal locomotive capable of handling either role equally well.
     
    To obtain this kind of universal, mixed traffic locomotive, Deutsche Bundesbahn were willing to put asynchronous AC motors and electronically controlled, semiconductor-based inverters to the test. This decision was made based on the experience gained during a test campaign involving 202 002, one of three prototype diesel-electric locomotives with asynchronous AC traction built by Henschel and BBC in 1971 and 1973. In 1974, 202 002 had been rebuilt as a testbed and permanently coupled with an adapted BDnrf740.2 driving trailer. In this configuration, 202 002 had had its prime mover and generator removed, while the driving trailer was outfitted with a transformer and pantograph, so that 202 002 essentially simulated a fully electric locomotive.
     
    As this trial, which lasted into 1975, demonstrated that a hypothetical asynchronous AC electric could indeed handle almost the complete spectrum of train services offered by Deutsche Bundesbahn at the time, the railway contracted a consortium of BBC – providing the electrical components – and Krauss-Maffei, Krupp and Henschel in 1976 to develop and build a pre-production series of five such locomotives. This development was paralleled by coal mining enterprise Ruhrkohle AG obtaining six Henschel E 1200 series, centre-cab electric freight and shunting locomotives, which were similarly based on asynchronous AC propulsion. With these locomotives fully satisfying all expectations, the consortium for what would become the class 120 locomotive had a broad basis of experience to work from.
     
    As the first of the five pre-production locomotives, 120 001 was handed to Deutsche Bundesbahn on 14 May, 1979, with the four remaining locomotives following till January 1980. Initially, 120 001 through 004 were approved for only 160 kph, while 120 005 was certified for the targeted maximum speed of 200 kph later. The locomotives were rebuilt with various modifications during their evaluation, among these being optimised transformers. It is also worth noting that the power units for the class 401 and 402 1st and 2nd generation ICE sets, which began entering service by the end of the 1980s, are closely related to the 120.
    Of these five locomotives, 120 005 stood out by having a slightly differently designed body with a lower frontside waist line, and initially with additional rooftop fairings as well.
     
    On 13 August, 1980, 120 002 set a new world speed record of 231 kph for motive power with asynchronous AC propulsion. During the official two-day presentation in 1984, 120 001 pushed the limit even further to 265 kph, pulling a 250 tonnes train. One year later, 120 001 was further upgraded to allow for a maximum speed of 280 kph.
    Several other types of motive power from the Bundesbahn era picked up cues from the 120’s general visual appearance, such as the class 240 diesel-electric prototype, class 628 DMU, and the driving trailers for the „x“ Stock suburban coaches.
     
    Also in 1984, Deutsche Bundesbahn ordered a total of sixty production locomotives, which became known as class 120.1 and included a number of modifications developed out of the experience gathered during the prototype evaluation phase. This order had a total value of 380 million Deutsche Mark. The production locos were lacking the back-up rheostatic brake, as the regenerative brake had been found to be quite sufficient and reliable.
     
    Deliveries lasted into 1989, with the 120.1s usually being diagrammed onto InterCity and InterRegio workings by day and onto fast freight services by night. 120 137 through 160 were outfitted with a modified gear ratio, which increased tractive effort at high speeds, though at the cost of reduced tractive effort at lower speeds.
     
    Following the formation of Deutsche Bahn, the 120.1s were summarily allocated to the Fernverkehr sector, whose responsibility covers long distance passenger traffic. The five pre-production locomotives, commonly referred to as class 120.0, but were mainly relegated to departmental work, usually diagrammed onto inspection and measuring services or used for stock trial and certification services. They were thus reclassified as class 752 locomotives, which designation they retained for many years.
     
    In addition, 120 004 and 005 were outfitted as component and technology demonstrators for ABB Henschel, then one of the contestants and eventually the winner for that contract which brought forth the class 101 electric locomotives. These locomotives served as testbeds for inverters and bogies intended to be used on the 101. 120 004 is often referred to as the de-facto class 101 prototype as it had been most extensively rebuilt.
     
    None of the 120.0s remain in service, with 120 001 having been totalled in an accident in 2004, and 120 002 having been broken up as well. 120 003 has found a place at the Nuremberg Transport Museum’s Bahnpark Augsburg complex. 120 004 is now owned by the DB Museum in Koblenz, while 120 005 is part of the Weimar Railway Museum’s collection.
     
    Presently, 49 locomotives remain in DB Fernverkehr service, and continue working mainly InterCity services. Like the 101s, the 120s but can also be seen working a handful of freight services in between passenger turns. 120 158 has been withdrawn to serve as a spares donor. Eight locomotives – 120 116, 129, 107, 128, 121, 117, 136 and 139 – have been passed to DB Regio, and been outfitted with expanded passenger information equipment. These locomotives are now referred to as class 120.2, and numbered 120 201 through 208. Five of them are permanently in use on the Hamburg-Rostock RegionalExpress line, which is also known as „Hanse-Express.“ The other three locomotives were originally intended to augment DB Regio’s Westphalian sector, but after having suffered repeated malfunctions there were earmarked as reserves for the Hanse-Express service.
     
    Finally, 120 153 and 160 were passed to DB Systemtechnik, and redesigned 120 501 and 502. These locomotives are commonly used for inspection and measuring services, and have most recently been repainted in a bright yellow livery to highlight their new role.
     
    In 2005, DB AutoZug had obtained several 120s for their Motorail and sleeper services, which but were soon returned to DB Fernverkehr. As an interesting note, those locos detached to DB AutoZug were intended to be redesignated as class 121, but only 120 113 was ever thus numbered. In the final years of Deutsche Bundesbahn, it was planned that a future universal follow-up locomotive to the 120 should be designated class 121, but the fact of the different Deutsche Bahn sectors created in 1994 favouring motive power tailored to their specific requirements rendered moot any further attempts to obtain universal, mixed traffic locomotives as the 120 had been.
     
    Technical description
     
    The 120 pioneered various design innovations not seen on any previous electric locomotive to have been developed, though most of these innovations are not immediately visible.
     
    The body is an all-welded, self-supporting assembly set atop the fully welded running frame and with single-piece, non-reinforced engine room sides. It consists of the pressure-strengthened cabs with integral roof sections, and the engine room proper, with the roof being split into four separate panels. As a novelty, the 120 was designed such that all inverter and equipment cabinets were set along either side of the engine room, leaving a straight, uninterrupted central corridor between the cabs. As on later electric locomotives, the transformer was designed such that it could be hung below the engine room floor, with the traction inverters being set immediately atop.
    The cab layout follows the Deutsche Bundesbahn Standard Cab design first implemented on the class 111 electrics, there originally called „Integrated Cab.” This layout was also utilised on the Bxf796 driving trailers for the „x” Type suburban stock, and on the ICE 1 and 2 power units. With further modifications, this design has become the de-facto standard on the majority of German-built mainline locomotives, especially the Bombardier TRAXX and Siemens Eurosprinter, Eurorunner and Vectron series. It combines a flat control desk with a tilted triple display plane set in between the windscreen and the driver’s seating position. Power and brake controllers are within easy reach of the driver’s left and right hand respectively.
     
    The bogies are fully welded as well, and were designed with a conventional pivot pin with low-set, annular rubber dampened bearing and two sets of three Flexicoil springs per side to serve as secondary suspension. The wheelsets with Monobloc wheels are attached by way of lemniscate levers and held in roller bearings, with springs and auxiliary motion dampers serving as primary suspension. Power transmission is made through a BBC quill drive with single-sided reduction gear and fully suspended, low-hung, four pole asynchronous AC traction motors.
     
    Electrical equipment comprises the underfloor transformer with two traction taps and one auxiliary tap, and the two sets of traction inverters, with each pair of inverters feeding one bogie. These inverters work with an intermediate DC link at a working tension of 2,800 V, and provide an three-phase AC output of 0 to 2,200 V at 0.4 to 150 Hz. They can also work in regenerative braking mode, feeding back the usual 15,000 Hz at 16.7 Hz. Power pickup is made through a pair of SBS 80 type single arm pantographs, which are an evolved, lighter version of the proven SBS 65 pantograph widely used on the class 103 and 111 locomotives and others.
     
    The auxiliary electric circuits were, as a further innovation, also configured for asynchronous AC. They are fed through three auxiliary inverters. Auxiliary inverters 1 and 2 provide variable-frequency AC and power the motor blowers for the corresponding bogie, as well as one of the two transformer coolant blowers. Auxiliary inverter 3 provides fixed-frequency AC and supplies the transformer coolant pumps, compressor and other fixed-frequency devices.
     
    Braking gear on the 120 comprises the pneumatic brake, which is configured as a tread brake and based on a unified Knorr brake controller with settings G, P and R, plus direct shunting brake controller and spring-loaded parking brake units. The pneumatic brake is blended with the regenerative brake, which is prioritised over most of the locomotive’s speed range. It was also amended with a tread cleaning setting where the brake pads are applied at a pressure of 0.25 bar to enhance adhesion in poor weather conditions.
     
    Safety equipment comprises an alerter, as well as a combined PZB train protection and LZB cab signalling suite. Furthermore, the 120 is outfitted for ECP brake controls and emergency brake override, or „Notbremsüberbrückung” (NBÜ) in German railway terminology.
    For workload relief, the 120 also has automatic power and brake control, called „Automatische Fahr- und Bremssteuerung” (AFB) in German. This system is integrated with LZB, allowing the locomotive to operate semi-automatically on lines such equipped as AFB will pick up target speed and braking distance commands from LZB. Finally, it is worth mentioning that the 120 is outfitted for TDM double traction and push-pull controls, making it compatible with the Bpmdzf and Bimdzf type driving trailers used on InterCity formations, and, technically, all other driving trailers such equipped.
     
     
    Technical specifications
     
    Overall length, width and height – 19.20, 2.95 and 4.25 m (63, 9.7 and 14 ft)
    Service weight – 84 tonnes (82.7 long tons)
     
    Continuous power output – 5,600 kW/7,510 hp
    Initial tractive effort – 340 kN for 120 101 through 136, 290 kN for 120 137 through 160
    Maximum operating speed – 200 kph (125 mph)
     
     
    The model
     
    It is interesting to note that for many years, there had not been any really good H0 scale model of this signature Deutsche Bundesbahn locomotive. While there had been more or less acceptable offerings by Trix and Märklin (rather lacking in fine detail and with outdated "pancake" motors but generally well proportioned) on one hand and by Fleischmann (well proportioned but with a horizontally split body marked by an ugly split line) on the other, Lima had also come forward with a 120 in the early 1990s. I but understand this model, while generally good-looking, was, like the majority of Lima models of the time, something of a half-done affair, especially where production quality and choice of materials had been concerned.
    In 2013, Italian producer ACME then came to the rescue by offering a newly tooled series of class 120s, comprising both the pre-production 120.0 variant and various different iterations of the 120.1 and even the 120.2 of DB Regio. This model was, in my understanding, much acclaimed and featured ACME’s usual high level of detailing, fine paintwork and lettering, and even a cast metal body.
     
    The releases brought forth thus far include these references:
     
    60360 – 120 001 in original „TEE” livery with single rooftop busbar and original SBS 80 pantograph variant
    60370 – 120 112 in oriental red
    60376 – 120 141 in traffic red and with additional frontside grab rails
    60379 – 120 208 as utilised by DB Regio
     
    In addition, two more variants have been announced:
     
    60378 – 120 151 with promotional livery for ZDF Television
    70075 – Package of 120 502 and matching Dms322 type baggage van as used by DB Netze for measuring and inspection workings
     
     
     
    I myself decided to obtain 60370, as in my impression, the oriental red livery remains the most typical scheme for this class. However, I also decided to „redate” the model, under the assumption of 120 112 having retained the oriental red livery much longer than it actually has – making it something of an „Last Mohican” of the class, as only a handful of 120s have retained the oriental red livery to this date.
     
     
     

     
    With its angular, unadorned body, the 120 is, in my opinion, a typical piece of 1980s industrial design. In my impression, ACME have done an excellent job at capturing the look and feel of this milestone of electric locomotive design. In many ways, I believe the 120 is their best model to date, offering excellent detail as well as mindfulness for operational requirements, shall we say.
     
     
     

     
    The cab faces are marked by the typical, small Bundesbahn style headlights and large, rectangular windscreen with two panes. Originally, the windscreen wipers, provided as photo-etched parts on the model, rested horizontally at the bottom of the windscreens, but were later changed to a vertical resting position.
    The model has sprung buffers and coupler pockets with extension mechanism.
     
    As you may notice, I put on DB AG logos atop the Deutsche Bundesbahn logos provided out of the box. The warning "bib" on the oriental red 120s appeared in two varieties: Originally, this panel reached up to the lower edge of the windscreens, and was later changed to end roughly at the top edge of the centre headlight. However, both varieties continued to exist in parallel.
     
     
     

     
    I am also quite taken by the bogies’ appearance, and that of the wheelsets in particular. Out of the box, the model is equipped with cab access ladders attached to the bogies, but is also provided with a second set of ladders which may be glued into recesses on the inside of the body in lieu of the bogie-mounted ladders. I suppose these body-mounted ladders are only viable for very large curve radii – and for display cabinets.
    The lettering here on the Cab 1 side mainly comprises the braking weights table, reading as follows:
     
    R+E160175 tonnes
    R+E 165 tonnes
    P+E 150 tonnes
    R 115 tonnes
    P 80 tonnes
    G 58 tonnes
     
    I also treated the model to a hypothetical revision date, reading 18 January, 2008, at the Dessau workshops.
     
     
     

     
    As you can see, I also lettered the model with EVN running numbers, in this case reading 91 80 6 120 112-8 D-DB. The default lettering was easily removed with a piece of 5,000 grade sand paper.
     
     
     
     

     
    The rooftop is nicely appointed with fine detail as well. Note the fairly intricate busbar layout, and the delicate yet functional representations of the SBS 80 pantographs.
     
     
    And as usual, I should like to link to a couple of Youtube videos showing 120s at work…
     
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BNZeliA-x8
     
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOfjUPxMKRg
     
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIywhVLJlpw
     
     
     
    Thanks for reading and I hope you liked this article!
  25. NGT6 1315
    Morning all!
     
    Followers of the Continental modelling scene may have registered that a few months ago, Roco has begun releasing a series of re-tooled Deutsche Bundesbahn class 103 electrics, adding several much-wanted enhancements to this model which had first been offered in 1977. It might not be surprising that when I was able to obtain one as a real bargain recently, I could not resist. Therefore, today's focus will be on what I assume most railfans will agree on being the? signature Deutsche Bundesbahn electric locomotive, and possibly the pinnacle of conventional single-phase AC locomotive development.
     
    The 103's history can be traced back into the early 1950s when Deutsche Bundesbahn were rebuilding the German rail network and working towards restoring express passenger services which had already reached a high level of sophistication before 1939.
     
    In these early years, pre-war electrics such as the class E 18 1'Do1' locomotives were used for top-tier „D“ (Durchgangszug) and „F“ (Fernschnellzug) passenger services, as were the four class E 19 locomotives which had been a more powerful evolution from the E 18. Of course, the latest express steam locos like the class 01 and 01.10 4-6-2s as well as the emerging generation of diesel-hydraulics like the V 200 type also took their share in express passenger traffic as electrification was by far not as widely spread as it is today.
    Yet even then, plans were made to increase top speeds beyond the 160 kph which had been the de-facto maximum at the time. One suggestion discussed in this context had been putting the E 19 back in production, as this class had been approved for 180 kph originally. However, they also had proven to be unable to meet the 1,000 metre baseline braking distance mandated by German railway construction and operating rules from that speed, meaning a more advanced design was a definite must. One of these was a concept called E 01 at the time, describing a twelve-wheel locomotive with a top speed of 180 kph and a power output of 5,000 kW, which but was not pursued any further and therefore not elaborated in great detail initially.
     
    In the early 1960s, the newly built class E 10 and E 10.12 Bo'Bo' locomotives began taking over national and international express services, including the prestigious TEE services. At the same time, Deutsche Bundesbahn began reconsidering the E 01 concept, modifying it such that it mandated a top speed of 200 kph and an axle load of 18 tonnes. Following a formal request for proposals, Krupp and AEG presented plans for (1Bo)(Bo1) and (A1A)(A1A) configured locos with four 1,250 kW traction motors, while Henschel proposed a Co'Co' configured design which was eventually chosen as the basis for the new locomotive. The Siemens-Schuckert Works were contracted to develop the electrical equipment.
     
    Several components for the new locomotives which had been designated class E 03 in the meantime were subsequently tested on locomotives E 10 299 and 300 - the former being fitted with a Henschel-designed quill drive, the latter with a differently designed quill drive from SSW. A series of test runs was subsequently carried out between Bamberg and Forchheim in order to gather additional data on OHLE, permanent way, suspension and drivetrain design for high speeds. However, as the two modified E 10s could not provide any conclusive data as to which of the two quill drives was actually better, two of the four E 03 prototypes each were ordered with either drive. Later tests with these prototypes would then result in the SSW drive being picked for the production E 03s.
     
    The first E 03 to be completed was E 03 002 which was handed to the Bundesbahn on 11 February 1965 at the Henschel works in Kassel, which are now a Bombardier plant. However, it was fitted with E 03 001's number plates for publicity reasons. The real E 03 001 was completed in March, with E 03 003 and 004 following till June. All four locomotives were presented at the June 1965 International Transport Fair (Internationale Verkehrsausstellung, IVA) in Munich, there being referred to not as mere express locomotives, but rather as „high speed locomotives“ - which is how I personally would translate the German terms „Schnellzuglokomotive“ and „Schnellfahrlokomotive“ in this context. During the fair, two of the four locos were always in operation, having been diagrammed onto demonstration services between Munich and Augsburg. These special workings had the reporting numbers D 10/D 11 and D 12/D 13 respectively and operated at 200 kph following a special permit by the Ministry of Transport. E 03 003 remained a static exhibit as her traction motors had been removed to serve as spares, and the third locomotive was held on standby as a backup. The reason for this was that the traction motors in particular had not been fully tested yet and required a large amount of care during that early stage. However, a total number of 347 200 kph runs could be successfully completed during the Transport Fair, proving that such speeds were indeed viable in everyday operation.
     
    After the fair the four E 03 prototypes were put in scheduled service on trains outbound from Munich, including several services to Stuttgart which had to travel across the Geislinger Steige with its 2.25% gradient. These revealed the locos to quickly overheat, requiring modifications to the engine room ventilation pattern. From the winter of 1974, the E 03 prototypes – now having been redesignated 103 001 through 004 – were allocated to the Eidelstedt depot in Hamburg, then to work semi-fast express and occasional stopping services in northern Germany. In 1979 they were then relegated to departmental duties. In this role, they were based at Minden and Munich and assigned to empty stock services, LZB cab signalling monitoring and OHLE inspection duties, and also assisted in trials for new rolling stock. 103 003, then redesignated 750 002 to highlight its departmental role, took part in the trials for the new class 120 electrics as well as the ICE 1 power units, often serving as a load simulation locomotive owing to her powerful electrodynamic brake. The last E 03 prototype to have been retired was 750 001, originally known as 103 001, leaving revenue service in 1997.
     
    The production 103s were specified with even higher performance, being required to be able to haul a 480 tonnes train at 200 kph – as opposed to 300 tonnes for the prototypes – and 800 tonnes at 160 kph. To that end, both the transformer and traction motors were uprated, and engine room ventilation was improved with a second row of grilles on both body sides. The motors were designed with improved insulation and collectors. Beginning with 103 216, the body was lengthened by a total of 70 cm (27.5 in), so as to provide more spacious cabs for additional driver comfort. 103 109 was the first production locomotive to be delivered, having been handed over on 27 May 1970 and accepted on 8 September that same year. In fact, all 103s were given both a preliminary and a final certificate of acceptance, so as to be able to carry out any necessary last minute fixes on manufacturer's expense. The last loco to be accepted by Deutsche Bundesbahn was 103 245 which was handed over on 11 July 1974.
    Over the delivery period and in subsequent years, the 103s were given several major and minor improvements, such as improved wheelset suspension, rotational dampers and new SBS 65 type pantographs.
    Even from today's perspective and with three-phase AC electrics having taken her place in regular service, the 103 offers outstanding performance, with a power/weight ratio of 15.6 kilogrammes (34.4 lbs) per kilowatt, continuous power output of 7,440 kW and short-term maximum output of 10,400 kW – the latter having but been limited to 9,000 kW in later years to reduce thermal load.
     
    In addition, the 103 featured two selectable transformer output settings. On the “High” setting, the transformer provided a maximum output voltage of 612 V instead of 501 V up to a speed of 140 kph. With this setting enabled, the 103 provided a short-time peak output of 12,000 kW. However, this switch was disabled in later years to avoid overheating, much to the dismay of many drivers who had come to appreciate the extra power with the longer and heavier 1st and 2nd class IC sets introduced in 1979. Originally, German InterCity services had been all-1st class, and much shorter. The transformer switch was informally known as „Reheat“, „Hamburg Hammer“ or quite simply „Booster“.
     
    The loco's initial tractive effort up to a speed of 120 kph (or 140 when the transformer output selector was still active) is 312 kN, and it had no problems pulling 400 tonnes at 200 kph on even track, or 300 tonnes on a 0.5% gradient. After the introduction of 1st and 2nd class IC services it frequently pulled 600 tonnes at 200 kph, which of course contributed to the locomotives suffering from increased wear and subsequent malfunctions. Disabling the “Reheat” switch did improve the overall reliability of the class and thus timetable stability, as this measure also reduced the numbers of failed traction motors. The problem with this kind of failure was not only the lack of about 17% of total tractive effort per disabled motor, but also the requirement of completely disabling the dynamic brake for the bogie with failed traction motors. This meant reducing the loco's total dynamic braking effort by half, which could lead to either reduced top speeds or to longer deceleration. In the event that both bogies should have at least one failed motor, the dynamic brake would be unavailable entirely.
     
    The loco's body and frame are fully welded, the frame carrying the complete electrical equipment and being set on top of the six-wheel bogies. The body consists of the two welded steel cab sections and three non-carrying aluminium hoods over the locomotive room, the latter of which can be removed separately to facilitate access to and maintenance of on-board equipment. This layout was also chosen for the class 151 freight locos as well as the class 181.2 dual system locos which were introduced in the early 1970s.
    The aerodynamic shape of the cab sections resulted in the cabs being somewhat cramped inside, which was why the last 29 locomotives were built with larger cabs, extended by 35 cm (13.75 in) each. In addition, the cabs were outfitted with air conditioning units as the traction motors immediately below them radiated a large amount of heat. However, follow-up research in later years showed that while the 103's unique and undeniably attractive shape did offer good aerodynamical properties for the head of the train, the rounded cab fronts actually produced excessive drag when the locomotive was coupled to a train, as the gap between the locomotive and the first coach resulted in the formation of significant turbulence. Reducing this drag thus was one of the criteria applied to later locomotives such as the class 101 electrics which were introduced in the second half of the 1990s, resulting in the vertically cambered cab fronts seen on these as well as several related types of locomotives.
     
    The bogies feature central wheelsets with eight millimetres of lateral displacement, with the axleboxes being supported by rubber-suspended levers, helical springs and hydraulic shock absorbers. All locomotives from 103 216 onwards were also fitted with rotational dampers at the factory, which were eventually refitted to earlier 103s as well. The traction motors are suspended from the bogie frames, and traction bars serve for force transmission.
    The 103’s electrical components are built around the transformer, which is oil-cooled and provides a 6,250 kVA traction output. The high-tension, thyristor-assisted tap changer has 40 power notches, and aside from its standard pre-selection operating mode can also function in an emergency impulse controller mode.
    The single-phase AC type WB 368/17f traction motors have twelve poles, forced ventilation and a maximum speed of 1,525 rpm, weighing 3.5 tonnes each and providing a continuous power output of 1,240 kW.
     
    As previously mentioned, the motors can also operate in dynamic braking mode. This brake is self-excited and thus independent of overhead tension. The dynamic brake is rheostatic and has two cooling towers with braking rheostats. The electrodynamic brake has a maximum power of 9,800 kW and a continuous rated power of 4,800 kW, with a maximum braking effort of 180 kN from 200 to 40 kph. Additionally, the 103 has a graduated, indirect pneumatic brake with tread brakes on all wheels. It is blended with the electric brake and also comprises direct shunting brake control. The locos are fitted for ECP and emergency brake override.
    On the roof, two cutoff switches, an air blast circuit breaker and voltage sensing device are provided, as well as two pantographs. The latter in particular were an important item for this class, due to the high speed the locomotive was meant to achieve. Originally, the 103s were fitted with DBS 54a type diamond pantographs with Wanisch heads, which but proved to be very prone to tangling with the overhead wires at high speeds and often caused extensive OHLE damage. From 1976, the 103s were thus refitted with SBS 65 single arm pans, many of which were actually “borrowed“ from newly produced class 111 locomotives. These were then outfitted with DBS 54a pans – though with standard Dotzler heads – in exchange, as these locos had a top speed of 150 kph initially and were uprated to 160 kph in later years, which was still well within limits for the DBS 54a type.
     
    For safety equipment, the 103 has a combined LZB/PZB cab signalling and train protection suite as well as an alerter. This class was one of the few initially fitted with an early LZB type developed by Siemens and designated LZB 100, which but was later replaced by the microprocessor-controlled LZB/I 80.
     
    The 103 also proved to be well suited for various kinds of departmental purposes, which is why several locos were treated to various experimental modifications over the years. The first notable trials involving a production 103 took place in the early 1970s when 103 118 was fitted with modified gearboxes and cleared for a top speed of 265 kph. She actually set a new speed record on 12 September 1973, recording 252.9 kph between Gütersloh and Neubeckum on the Hamm-Minden Railway which had been declared a preferred test route by Deutsche Bundesbahn earlier that year. On the same line, 103 003 pushed the limit to 283 kph on 14 June 1985, becoming Germany's fastest loco until her record was broken by the class 127 “Eurosprinter” prototype on 6 August 1993, which reset it at 310 kph.
    Beginning in July 1986, locomotives 103 001, 003, 004, 107 and 154 were assigned to trials and measuring services in preparation for the opening of the Hanover-Würzburg high speed line. Between 15 July and 8 August they conducted certification trials between Burgsinn and the Hohe Wart crossover at speeds up to 280 kph, and subsequently proceeded to test new high speed pantographs together with 120 001. The remainder of the campaign on the Hanover-Würzburg HSL was then spent with gathering aerodynamic data for future high speed rolling stock designs. In 1988, 103 003 was refitted with her original gearboxes for 200 kph.
    In 1989, 103 222 was fitted with the bogies originally used on 103 118. The locomotive was subsequently given an extended certification for 280 kph and redesignated as 750. She had her original number restored in May 2005, but retains her modified bogies and 280 kph top speed.
     
    The 103 had been designed with premium passenger express services in mind, and initially worked many of the then all-1st class InterCity trains which were first introduced in 1971, as well as the even more luxurious Trans Europ Express trains from 1972 onwards. They could also be seen working fast overnight mail trains. In addition, they worked a handful of semi-fast and stopping services and even a few freight trains, although freight trains were not really what the locomotive was designed for. In July 1972, locomotive 103 157 recorded a one-month mileage of 50,251 kilometres, with the monthly average amounting to between 35,000 and 42,000 kilometres.
    Almost all trains worked by 103s during the early years were reasonably short and light, leaving the locomotives with sufficient power reserves. This, however, changed when the InterCity concept was changed in 1979 to include 2nd class coaches as well, resulting in significantly longer and heavier trains with eleven or more coaches which placed considerable strain even on an locomotive as powerful as the 103.
     
    In the meantime, 103 106 had been lost in the Rheinweiler accident of 21 July 1971, which was caused by a malfunction of the AFB speed control device. Having been under LZB control on this section of the line, the locomotive had automatically accelerated to 140 rather than the mandated 120 kph, making it impossible for the driver to manually slow down to the 70 kph limit just north of Rheinweiler in time and resulting in the locomotive derailing and taking her train down the embankment. 24 persons were killed and approximately 130 were injured in the incident.
     
    Eventually, the heavier two-class IC services began to take their toll on the 103, though those trains which were not timetabled for 200 kph were reassigned to class 110, 111 and 112 locomotives. The average daily mileage for the 103 amounted to 1,400 kilometres by 1985. In 1988, the first new class 120 locos entered service, beginning to take over some services from the 103. The 120 offered the advantage of having pressure-strengthened cabs which had been declared mandatory for the newly built German HSLs. By that time, up to 30% of the 103 fleet was out of service for maintenance at any time, indicating the severity of the strain having been placed on the locomotives over the preceding years. In 1991, the new ICE services were first introduced, beginning to replace a considerable number of what had been IC services originally. On the other hand, many 103s did find new work after German reunification, beginning to serve the newly established eastern states where no ICE services were available yet. Also in 1991, 103 101 was repainted in a white and yellow Lufthansa style livery as she was assigned to working the Lufthansa Airport Express service between Frankfurt Airport and Cologne, Bonn, Koblenz, Nuremberg, Würzburg and Aschaffenburg along with a number of similarly repainted 111s. These trains were interesting in actually being given Lufthansa flight numbers in addition to their train reporting numbers. This concept lives on in today's AIRail system, where certain ICE services have taken over this role and appear as “flights” in Lufthansa's booking system. On these trains, parts of the seating are always reserved for Lufthansa passengers and unavailable for railway ticket holders.
     
    The condition of a growing number of 103s continued to deteriorate in the early 1990s, expanding to such serious things as cracked bogie frames. The situation was compounded by Deutsche Bundesbahn's decision to stretch maintenance cycles even further as a cost-cutting measure, leading to locomotives being kept in service until they were, in fact, disabled by a major malfunction. Several 103s were even limited to 160 kph due to worsening riding characteristics, and the AFB speed control device was eventually disabled on all locomotives as it was found the frequent occurrence of the tap changer switching back and forth between any two notches in order to maintain a selected speed often led to tap changer failures.
    Realising the 103 was on a downward slope, newly created Deutsche Bahn eventually chose to procure the new class 101 electrics. Thus the 103 was frequently relegated to working InterRegio and semi-fast express services during her last years in service. The locos also occasionally worked regional trains, but the lack of push-pull controls meant their utility in this role was limited. Also, the higher number of stops and associated braking and accelerating phases did not do them any good either.
     
    In the wake of the ICE disaster at Eschede on 3 June 1998 the 103 fleet was again called upon to handle a large number of replacement IC services as all ICE 1 sets were taken out of service and underwent extensive checks. Also, they handled a significant portion of the extra services put into circulation on the occasion of the EXPO 2000 world fair in Hanover.
    These allocations turned out to be the last hurray for the 103, and only a few locomotives remained in the DB inventory by 2003. They were most frequently used for ECS workings and charters in their final period of revenue service. 103 184 was the last such locomotive to work a scheduled IC service in August 2003, much to the disappointment of many railfans.
    At the time of writing, 103 113, 184, 235 and 245 are still part of Deutsche Bahn’s active inventory, while 103 132 is currently inactive and used as a spares donor. A few years ago, 103 184 had been outfitted with a 1,450 mm head on Pantograph 1, enabling the locomotive to operate in Switzerland where it could be seen working charters. As the 103 is not equipped with any Swiss train protection systems, these workings required the presence of a Swiss driver for route knowledge and observation.
    103 222 had long been assigned to the DB Research and Technology Centre at Minden and used for permanent way inspection and measuring services, but has been sold to Railadventure recently and is expected to be given a new revision soon. In this role, it was replaced by 182 506, which Deutsche Bahn had procured from the MRCE Dispolok locomotive fleet.
    103 113 re-entered service after a full revision was made in 2011, and along with 103 235 is at present diagrammed onto the pair of IC 118 and 119 (Stuttgart – Münster and back), and onto IC 2099 (Frankfurt – Stuttgart) and 2316 (Stuttgart-Wiesbaden). 103 245 can be most frequently seen on the pair of IC 2201/2301 and 2206 between Nuremberg and Munich.
    Between August 2010 and December 2012, 103 184 worked the pairs of IC 1806 and 1817 (Cologne – Hamburg-Altona) and IC 2410 and 2417 (Cologne – Flensburg), which as part of the 175th anniversary of German railways were formed of preserved IC stock in 1979 condition.
    As 103 235’s revision is about to expire, plans are being discussed for reactivating 103 220. This locomotive is currently stored at Deutsche Bahn’s museum at Koblenz, and has retained the colourful “Tourism Train” livery.
    In addition, 103 226 is in operational condition and on loan to the “Lokomotiv-Club 103“ association. However, it is not allowed to work any trains according to its lease contract. Aside from these, E 03 001, 103 002, 004, 101, 136, 167, 197 and 224 have been preserved in various conditions.
     
    Technical specifications
     
    Length, width and height – 19.50 or 20.20 m, 3.09 m, 4.49 m/64 or 66.3 ft, 10.1 ft, 14.7 ft
    Service weight – 116 t/114.1 long tons
     
    Bogie wheelbase – 2x 2.25 m/7.4 ft
    Wheel diameter – 1.25 m/49.2 in
    Minimum curve radius – 140 m/4.6 chains
     
    Short-term maximum power output – 10,400 kW or 9,000 kW/13,946 or 12,069 hp
    One-hour power output – 7,780 kW/10,433 hp at 181 kph/112 mph
    Continuous power output – 7,440 kW/9,977 hp at 191 kph/119 mph
     
    Maximum speed – 200 kph/125 mph
    Maximum tractive effort – 312 kN
    Power/weight ratio – 64.14 kW/tonne
     
     
     
    The model
     
    Roco's 103 is one of their longest-running models, with the first variants having been released in 1977 originally. While the model had seen a couple of interim upgrades during the last 37 years, modellers long waited in vain for a model representing the 103 as she appeared from about the late 1970s as by that time, the locomotives had been amended with additional grab rails, tread plates and access ladders on their cab faces.
     
    By the turn of 2013, Roco therefore announced another re-tooling to address these issues exactly. Furthermore, the new 103 variants announced for release during 2014 were promised to feature various photo-etched detailing parts such as rooftop grilles, windscreen wipers, and chromed headlight rims, as well as fine scale wheelsets and coupler extension mechanisms. The following variants were announced, or indeed released by now – second references where indicated being DCC sound fitted:

    72306/72307 – 103 225 (long cab), TEE livery with grey solebar and buffer fairings
    72308/72309 – 103 220 (long cab), "Tourism Train" livery
    72311 – 103 200 (short cab), TEE livery with grey solebar and buffer fairings, model outfitted with RF video camera
    72312 – 103 245 (long cab), TEE livery with grey solebar and buffer fairings, standard DCC sound
    72313/72314 – 103 113 (short cab), TEE livery with red solebar


     
    May I introduce you to a stunning blonde? Actually, many German railfans do refer to the TEE liveried 103s as such, so go figure…
     
    This model represents 103 113 as she appears following her reactivation, and is therefore lettered with the last revision dating from 11 May, 2012, and carried out at the Dessau workshops – abbreviated "LDX". However, I suppose modellers could easily backdate the model's lettering to Epoch IV as the livery itself would be the same. 103 113 was built by Henschel in 1970 with works number 31431.
     
    Needless to say, I did treat the model to a few improvements of my own, which I'll be calling out along with the next photos.
     
     

     
    As they corroded easily and were quickly damaged especially by falling pieces of ice in winter, the frontside skirts were removed during the early 1980s. Similarly, the buffer fairings were also removed from the majority of the 103s by the end of the 20th century. You can also see how the body is split into three independently removable sections.
     
     
     
     

     
    On the Cab 2 end, the technical lettering comprises indications for the braking gear (KE-GPR-EmZ), zero speed door locking (TB 0), ECP brake equipment, revision date, ownership (DB Fernverkehr AG) and depot allocation – interestingly in the Deutsche Bundesbahn format as "BD (Bundesbahn Directorate) Frankfurt (M)", Bw Frankfurt (M) 1" – , service weight (116 t), and the braking weights table:
     
    R+E160232 t
    R+E 206 t
    P+E 156 t
    R 150 t
    P 100 t
    G 85 t
    Handbrake 2x 13 t
     
    Also note the ladder on the right hand buffer and the tread plate, as well as the grab rail on the cab face.
     
     
     

     
    As for my own mods: I touched up the wiper blade holders with aluminium paint and the brake pipe valve levers with red…
     
     
     
     

     
    …and the pantograph head ends with some light grey.
     
    Furthermore, I amended the busbar with my usual set of sectional wire connectors, also touching up the busbar attachment clamps and the circuit breaker casing with red, and the pantograph actuator rod bellows with black.
     
     
    And again, a handful of Youtube videos:
     
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ph26xpcl1JI
     

     

     
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYKDYwoemrM
     
     
    Thanks for reading!
×
×
  • Create New...