Jump to content

ArthurK

Members
  • Content Count

    1,081
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

ArthurK last won the day on August 26 2014

ArthurK had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

2,113 Excellent

5 Followers

Profile Information

  • Location
    Lancashire
  • Interests
    LNER (especially NER) Kit/scratch building and etched NER loco design of types not yet available from other sources. To date J77, J73, J24, Q5 and B15. In the pieline Tennant 2-4-0 and NER Bow end Coaches.
    No age given but I saw Silver Jubilee and Coronation.

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Must have done something wrong. All my early scratchbuilt models were built without any newfangled jigs, but this was fifty years ago. A chassis were built from half inch brass channel all of 1/16" thick. My drill was a hand-drill clamped to a board . The chassis was carefully marked the drilled by pushing the chassis with a block of 3"X4" timber with the left hand whilst turning the drill with the right. Once the first side of the channel had been drilled it was carefully aligned before continuing to drill the second side. Coupling rods marked and drilled undersized then adjusted to fit. In defence of such crudity I always succeeded in getting them to run well. Yes, times have changed. I now use jig(Eileen's) but all my recent modelling is compensated and in P4 which requires a bit more sophistication. ArthurK
  2. ArthurK

    Q6

    The thing often overlooked is the fact that most of the Q6s were built with Schmidt superheaters. These were the favoured option of the NER. These did not have the Gresley vacuum valve behind the chimney but had a manually operated valve on the left side of the smokebox. This arrangement continued well into the 1930s and only changed when the superheaters were replaced by the Robinson style on new boilers. If you are returning your model to the NER period then some carried pyrometers to record superheater temperatures. these were visible on the left shoulder of the smokebox. A pipe dropped from here to below the handrail the horizontally to the cab. ArthurK
  3. I form the flares in all my NER tenders and supply these with my kits. I was doing so many I made a special tool to help. This consists of a piece of thick walled brass (1/8th ID) tube filed down to half its diameter the flare is placed in that. Then with a piece of 1/8th silver steel on top the whole is squashed in a vice. ArthurK
  4. The Tennant in the photos above has now received the attentions of Paul Moore who has added a magnificent paint job. I am sure that David is delighted with the results.
  5. The DJH D20 tender in very poor in detail and accuracy. First no 3940 gallon tenders (which ran with the D20s) ever had the later style of outside frames with oval frame cut-outs. That style appear under Raven's guidance. The 3940 tenders had the near semi-circular cut-outs. There was also a similar (though smaller) cut at the front and rear. Next, the tender running plate was only 8' wide. The loco running plate was 8' 6". I am not sure if DJH got that right. Best to check. I made that mistake when I made the masters for the Chiver's kit. The upper tank detail is not good. The motorising and balance of a 4-4-0 is always a problem but with a little extra trouble it can be easily overcome (but, dare I say it?) it requires compensation. I use simple compensation beams on the driving axles and a fully compensated bogie. The latter has no vertical movement. Add as much weight as possible behind the leading driver but keep the centre of gravity ahead that axle. The ensures that the bogie carries some of the loco weight, as it should. Another problem with the D20 is that the bogie had 4' 0" wheels (as did the tender). Most will elect to fit under-size wheels with frames cutaway to clear them but this does cause a big difference the the appearance of the front end. My solution was to bend the front frames in sufficient to get a OO model around curves of roughly 30"l. Even with this approach it is necessary to remove material from the underside of a cast footplate to clear "near-scale" diameter wheels. I am pleased to see that DJH are now providing the longer smokebox ArthurK
  6. NORTHEASTERN KITS I find it difficult to believe that it is nearly twelve years since I Issued my first kit in August 2008. That was a J73 and was closely followed by a J24. There was also the Fletcher cab J77. The were a number of dimensional errors on the last of these simply because I relied on a weights diagram which was all that I could find at that time. Today the preferred source of data are the works GAs. Initially these came from the Oxford Publishing lists in the National Railway Museum collection held at York. Later I found another list of the Darlington Works drawings. In the latter I found the drawings for the tanks and cab of both the Fletcher and the Worsdell J77 (NER290). They proved to me that reliance on the weights diagrams was not the way forward.The J77 was updated and kits for both versions designed. This brings me to the main purpose of this posting. I have often wondered just how many of my kits are packed away in drawers and placed on the “to do” list. It is always a pleasure to receive photographs of their builds, complete or otherwise so it gives me great pleasure to show some of the results. The models below were built by David Berner, who models the NER period. The two in green livery were painted be Paul Moore. The first is the Class W Next the T 0-8-0 Finally, the 1463 Class, better known as the Tennant 2-4-0 I am afraid that old age has caught up on me and I now refer to myself an “fumble fingers”. Trying to put a wire through a 4mm handrail knob is a mighty challenge! However, I am still able to use the computer so designing these kits will carry on as long as I am able to do it. Just to whet your appetite the next in line is the J25 (NER P1) I have the etches for that, so I had better start packing them. Waiting in the wings are Q7 (T3) and C6 (V&V09). I am also planning a F8 (A). ArthurK
  7. sorry, no. My smokebox design is a bit unconventional. I doubt if you would get it to fit without a lot of trouble. Arthur
  8. NORTHEASTERN Kits TENNANT 2-4-0 The latest batch of twelve are being packed ready for delivery. I have names against eleven of these. They will shortly be receiving an Email or PM . If you want the last one send me a PM, there may not be a further batch. Arthurk
  9. ArthurK

    Bachmann J72

    Here is a J72 in departmental guise at Tyne Dock, BR built with straight ejector pipe. Note the support from the tank. 58 was set aside for preservation but didn't make it. ArthurK
  10. ArthurK

    Bachmann J72

    The J72s were a mix. Most were intended for shunting duties. The GA describes it as a ''shuntjng tank'. and as such had no requirement train brakes. A few were selected for pilot duties. These were required to move passenger stock and were fitted with vacuum ejectors hence the additional pipe on the left. There were variations in running this pipe from cab to smokebox. Some hugged the boiler until it neared the smokebox these had a severe kink, then a second bend into the smokebox. The smaller pipe from the firebox fed steam to the Dreadnought injector in the cab. One further comment, not all the BR built locos had vacuum ejectors fitted. ArthurK
  11. ArthurK

    Bachmann J72

    Why would anyone want to put a kink in the blower pipe? On every J72 photo that I have looked at it is straight. This pipe carried a rod from the cab to the cab to the valve. Any kink(s) would make the hand-wheel in the cab difficult, if not impossible, to turn. All the bits that you are suggesting copying are all available from existing suppliers why not buy them. ArthurK
  12. Thanks for that Steve. Things are looking up a bit. I hope to get things moving more quickly in the New Year. A merry Xmas and a happy New Year to all. ArthurK
  13. Northeastern Kits A very merry Xmas to everyone An update As many of you will know my health suffered a setback in October so disrupting my schedules. Those expecting the Tennant 2-4-0 will have to wait a little longer, but I hope to clear all of these in January. In the packing stage are three Q5s (all reserved) and a new batch of D20s. In January/ February I hope to begin deliveries of the J25 (there is a long list for this). The Q7 has been two steps forward one step back but it is progressing. The C6 is on hold. It requires new castings for the trailing axle springs (two lengths) and new tender spring dampers; also chimney safety valve covers etc. I hope to squeeze in another project which uses existing castings. For immediate delivery I have just one NER ‘W’ Class 4-6-0T and one Fletcher cab J77 On another thread modellers are discussing the conversion Bachmann J72 to the short bunker version with drastic surgery at the rear. Why go to all that trouble when I have two of those for immediate delivery! I also have one of the long bunker available. ArthurK
  14. ArthurK

    Bachmann J72

    Further to my comments earlier, one thing which appears to have been overlooked in conversions from long to short bunker is that the first twenty engines (those with short bunkers) were fitted with steel plate buffer beams (front and back). In most cases the front beam had a wooden baulk and an extra steel plate added (the footplate was not extended). The rear rarely (if ever) had this change and retained the steel plate throughout the lives. The Newcastle pilot was in this condition as 68680 in its final days. That means a hunk of plastic to remove whilst leaving the footplate intact! ArthurK
  15. ArthurK

    Bachmann J72

    When the longer coal bunker was added to the NER E1 (edited) class (later J72) the frames were not extended. They remained at twenty five feet. The only change at the rear was to add a wooden baulk behind the rear buffer beam. This, together with an additional steel plate added 5 3/8" to the length. The bunker was extended by this same amount. It then overhung beyond the actual frames. The footplate on the original E projected eight inches beyond the buffer beam, more than enough to accommodate the additional bunker length. ArthurK
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.