Jump to content

SouthernRegionSteam

Members
  • Content Count

    1,085
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

SouthernRegionSteam last won the day on April 8 2010

SouthernRegionSteam had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,847 Excellent

3 Followers

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.studiojamming.com

Profile Information

  • Location
    The New Forest
  • Interests
    Anything Southern Region based!
    I model mainly in 009, but also in OO.

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Something I did with those sheets was to cut off some of the outside setts/cobbles and cover the edge in plaster/DAS air drying clay as you had planned. I surmised that over time the surfaces would get renewed time and time again, and cobbles/setts would be displaced or filled in with tarmac or concrete. A bit late now, but you could also notch out alternate setts to give a slightly more natural join between the sheets. As always, I'm really enjoying following along, Stu! Glad you found a home for your BRM challenge entry, too.
  2. Following on from the last entry, I must first thank the contributors for giving me ideas and offering suggestions! This post won't really feature any solid plans, but will give an idea of avenues I could take, and inspiration I can use on my quest for a new layout (or two!)... TL,DR: The next layout will likely be set around RAF Calshot/Fawley refinery/Lepe/Southampton Waterside (although I haven't totally ruled out the IoW yet!) I'd like either a combined OO and 009 layout, or one of each connected by mutual fiddle yard I can't decide whether to have: modular, double-sided, multiple self-contained layouts, or something else... I must design for what will fit in my small car - no board longer than 4ft, preferably no wider than a normal interior door frame, although I'll stretch to 3ft if necessary. Either way I'd like something both unique, and fun to operate! I know there's a lot of text here, but if nothing else, do take a look at the photos and renders as they'll give a good overview of my ideas. And now, the long version... I thought planning my next layout would be relatively easy, but I've been giving it a lot of thought over the past two weeks (with many hours spent doodling and playing with 3D models in an effort to squeeze real locations into a minimum space), but the designs kept getting larger and more complex, and I kept finding interesting sites nearby that are crying out to be modelled. Either way, I'm certainly no closer to something that I'm totally happy with! Regardless of whatever ends up being built, I feel relatively confident in saying that it will be inspired by areas surrounding (and including) Calshot; I'm of course a sucker for coastal scenes, but there are also a lot of very interesting areas to be inspired by here. Not only are there quaint seaside locations, but they are intermingled by some pretty serious industrial sites! I guess in the real world we'd call this contrast an eyesore, but in model form it creates intrigue. SECTION 1: The narrow gauge (009) My first thoughts naturally turned to a layout based on Calshot, Ashlett Creek, and Fawley. The idea (ha!) was to keep things small, and produce 3 small boards; each capable of being a standalone layout if I didn't have room to set them all up in one go. However, my best intentions were sidetracked even at this very early stage by the idea of a standard gauge circle of track, which in turn set each module to be 762mm wide; a little too wide, really. For some reason I kept this size going for a long time despite never adding any OO gauge in the designs! Let's take a look anyway: Above: A lot is going on in this screenshot, but it shows a few progressions of ideas. The bottom-most doughnut would is a simple non-scenic test track featuring a 3rd radius circle of 009, plus 3rd and 4th radius circles of OO gauge track. Above that, we have a 3-part circular layout featuring two scenic, and one non-scenic boards. Next up, the middle pair of designs show the same diameter circle, but with an elongated egg-shaped section comprising of two larger scenic boards (with the rest non-scenic). Finally, the top right set shows a fully "presented" version of that idea, with one board (Ashlett Creek) mocked up as an additional scenic module. Let's take a closer look at that one board: Above: Using rough dimensions from Google Earth, I mocked up the two main structures; the tidal mill, and the pub "The Jolly Sailor"; both of which were partially built on Old AGWI Rd. To form a continuous run, a non-prototypical spur is run behind some trees on the edge of the mill pond (at the rear). I've always said Ashlett Creek would make a very attractive scene with very few modifications, and indeed it would easily stand by itself as an exhibitable layout (although with only two sidings, perhaps three if you count the rear spur; not exactly a thrilling layout to operate!). Above: The tidal mill at Ashlett Creek is a very dominant building. Looks like I've modelled it a little too small (height wise), but the general atmosphere is there. Note the quay, which once had a standard gauge steam crane to offload barges brought from Eling Wharf. These materials were things like sheet metal, and concrete piles; all used in the construction of the oil refinery a mile or so away. Two narrow gauge tracks also terminated here from the refinery for the same purpose. Above: Just to the left of the mill is The Jolly Sailor. I already started a model of this when I was building Old AGWI Rd. The old narrow gauge railway ran to the right of the pub. As you can see, it's a very modellable location, and needs little in the form of compression. I'll likely leave off a few of the later extensions to the pub though! Above: Another look at the Ashlett Creek module, but this time with a slight modification shown on the right hand version; the backscene height (and thus also the pelmet height) has been dropped to see how low I can get away with it being. I'd say this is the absolute minimum, coming in at 200mm from baseboard edge (at pub height) to the bottom of the pelmet; that's 150mm less than the left hand version. The overall effect is interesting, whilst it might make it look somewhat cramped with the lower headroom, the layout certainly appears a lot wider. As noted, I think I misjudged the height of the mill, so this may actually turn out to be too low... Either way, I usually prefer a tall backscene as it makes you feel more involved in the scene, by completely removing everything outside of the scene itself. In reality, a pelmet this low will be an issue unless the layout is shown at eye-level, which of course is unfair at exhibitions as it stops children or people in wheelchairs seeing the layout. Typically, a lot of exhibition layouts have relatively short backscenes with a gap until the lighting pelmet (i.e. the pelmet is located higher above); particularly layouts operated from the rear. Unfortunately this isn't good when it comes to photography for obvious reasons! Fortunately, I prefer to operate layouts from the front or side so that I can also engage with the audience; so a tall backscene presents few problems. This does make the layouts considerably bulkier though, which is why I don't permanently attach my backscenes and lighting rigs/pelmets. Above: Using the exact same 762mm x 762mm board size, I've also shown how I can condense Calshot to form a second module. I've just noticed the hangar is too far left and covers the track, but you get the point; it fits in nicely. Whilst the small spit was covered in hangars and workshops, there were also plenty of places to "park" seaplanes, so I've tried to keep it feeling relatively open, and only model the hangar in low relief (as on the original two Calshot layouts). I usually avoid half-relief structures unless they can be well camouflaged, but with structures this big, you'd be looking at a large baseboard otherwise; and this is the smallest hangar! Note the two small structures either side of the hangar that will be used to try and hide the exits; both are prototypical. Above: The hangar and small rightmost building on the render can be seen here in a photo I took back in 2009. The little cottage was built in I think 1900 as a coastguard building, and was eventually incorporated into the seaplane base here as a store and medical building. The hangar dates from 1913, and is of a "Belfast Lattice Truss" type (a barrel ceiling supported by a wooden lattice truss). To the left were a myriad of warehouses, a powerhouse, and more ancillary structures. Note the name given to the hangar; all the main buildings here had names assigned to them to celebrate prominent figures, and their involvement in RAF Calshot. Above: I visited the spit again in 2010. On this trip I even took a look inside the old castle. At one stage the castle accrued several ugly additions to its roof; not least a coastguard room and weather tower. These have long since been removed and the new coastguard tower seen in the background is the modern replacement. The view from the top of the castle is rather nice, but I bet the view from the coastguard tower is even more impressive! I'd love to keep my model of the castle and incorporate it, but it's such a huge structure that it would take up an entire layout by itself; especially with the moat as well! Above: Something I haven't modelled before is "Top Camp" - the accommodation camp at Eaglehurst, which the narrow gauge railway at Calshot ran from. I knew that I didn't want a large scene for this as practically all the buildings are the same style, but one photo inspired me in particular; this showed a store and the 3-road engine shed. Outside the shed were two wagon turntables which were used to shunt rations over to the cookhouse adjoining the various mess halls. This 45 degree (instead of 90 degree) module is much smaller at around 300mm x 500mm; including large curves that cut off most of the corners. The track curves do look a little on the harsh side though, so will need checking if a module like this is built! Another thing to bear in mind is that any continuous loop would have to go behind, as this is a dead-end module. Above: Most of "Top Camp" was demolished, but there are a few buildings to have survived. Here's St George's Church; a stones throw away from the original loco shed; and shows the typical construction style of these buildings. The surrounding land has now been turned into a cemetery. The old officers mess (off-shot to the left) was turned into a pub after the RAF base closed (which was later known as The Flying Boat Inn). Unfortunately, it closed due to low demand in the mid 90s, and burned down in 2001. Above: Eventually I realised that 762mm would be too wide to fit through most doorways, so I came up with some reduced size "standardised" modules; one of 500mm x 500mm, and one of 600mm x 600mm. Again, these have 90 degree curves on the front edge, and are curved halfway along the other two sides to form a sweeping backdrop. Here you can see my attempt to fit Ashlett Creek in. It's a little tight on the 500mm module, but perfectly achievable on the 600mm one! However... then I realised a problem (a.k.a the problems with circular/double/multi-sided layouts) ...is a circular layout/double-sided layout really "fit" for exhibitions? Unless you've got a very small layout that can sit on a table (ala Ted Polet's Nixnie - an excellent example of how to do a double-sided layout), or you're on the very end of an aisle/have space all around the exhibit (which is extremely unlikely at shows unless you're put into a small room on your own); probably not! These layouts are a lot of fun (especially for children who like to follow the trains around), but sadly there's a reason most layouts are rectangular, and typically have one viewing side. Double-sided layouts in particular are really interesting, but I find harder to pull off effectively in an exhibition scene. Above: Eventually I realised a problem with these 90 and 45 degree corner sections, regardless of size. Can you see what it is? Look towards the left side and you'll see that the jetty is halfway in front of the backscene, and therefore half off it; that's a photographers' nightmare! Our eyes may be good at filtering out backgrounds, but cameras most certainly won't be. This is a big no-no in my books (and is exactly what Old AGWI Rd suffered from). The problem with "missing" backscenes around curved layouts is not something I often see mentioned in the railway modelling "circle" (pun not intended!); and it results in it being incredibly hard to photograph more than a small section of the scene in one go without there being a missing backscene somewhere in the shot. I've seen many an exhibition layout "ruined" by either the lack of a backscene entirely, or the inability to frame a photo in the way I'd like due to the curvature. A double sided layout where the two sides have full-wrap around backscenes, and the curve is hidden off-stage (and thus are more akin to two separate layouts) would solve this problem, but then you lose the nice "flow". Ted's first solution for Nixnie was to purposefully create one significant feature (a wooden trestle) on the curved end piece to force the viewer to look mostly from this one angle on the curved section. The other way Ted reduced the problem was by planting a large amount of trees in strategic places; mostly behind the trestle to hide the backscene edge, but also on the corners of the board so that you can still get some oblique angles with a background of trees rather than people! You'll never get it perfect, but Ted's methods are both really effective and also subtle ways of doing it if you are determined to have a curved section. Despite having just moaned about layouts with curved edges, the "problem" is that I don't like square/rectangular boards! Yes, you can call me a hypocrite now! I typically find it more natural to let the scenery more or less dictate the shape of the board; or failing that, to curve the edges substantially as seen above to give more flow. The problem is not only is it more difficult to build and store the boards, but you end up making those unintentionally unflattering angles for photography as already mentioned. Even my layout Sandy Shores suffers from that to some degree, but I've tried to set the important features towards the middle or rear of the layout to help offset this. As with all railway modelling, compromises are therefore the name of the game, and whilst I'd love to have all manner of whacky board shapes, it's probably best if I compromise on board shape if I am to get some decent photos by the end of it! Here's a slightly more subtle curve that may work a bit better (although obviously still leaves potential for some angles to have a partially missing backdrop): Above: This is where the designs got bigger again, but this time not in width, but in length. 900mm (3ft) x 400mm (1.3ft) is still perfectly manageable though, and would easily fit in my car. (It's about a foot less than Sandy Shores in length). This means that we now lose the nicely flowing circular layout, and end up with what is essentially a rectangular box, presumably with a hinged or removable fiddle yard behind. The end of the jetty is perhaps a little close to the board edge for my liking (taking photos of it would be hard), but other than that it's a lot better. It goes to show that there's a lot to take into account with layout design, likely more than you would initially think (and I include myself in that category, as I totally forgot the amount involved, too!). SECTION 2: The standard gauge Even though every layout except Sandy Shores has had some OO, none of it has been operational since 2011 or thereabouts. That means that none of my standard gauge locomotives have even turned a wheel for 9 years! I started off thinking about a layout (preferably with a circle of track) that I could finally give them a good run on... ...however, realising that even a third radius of OO track was not only unrealistic (i.e. too sharp), but also very large, I'm leaning towards a 4 board stack-able "roundy-roundy" test track for this purpose. To satisfy my cravings to shunt goods stock, I'd have another layout either on its own, or as part of the narrow gauge layout. With regards to the round test track, I haven't thought about many specifics, other than it likely having an inner circle of 009, and one circle of 3rd (+ maybe also a 4th) radius OO track. This really needs to be as slim as possible, hence the idea of splitting it into four, and stacking the boards for storage. In reality, the depth of the boards needn't be more than some 35mm PSE and 9mm plywood; much less than my default 100mm as shown in the earlier renders. Of course, a circle of track is not exactly fun to operate; hence the idea for a separate shunting layout. This train of thought (if you'll excuse the pun) wasn't helped by suggestions of a standard gauge terminus in a sort of Isle of Wight guise. I must say, the idea of an O2 along with some nice old coaching stock still being used on a BR branch line very much appeals to me! Of course, that is a possibility, but in actual fact the tipping point was re-reading a few books on the various railway systems along the Waterside*... * The Waterside, Southampton. Not marked on any maps, but is a local name given to the west side of Southampton Water; so the section of coastline from Eling to Calshot. First, A Brief History Lesson To cut a very long story short, the original plans for a standard gauge railway along the Waterside proposed a line from Totton to Lepe/Stone Point - a farmhouse on the coast in the absolute middle of nowhere! The reason? Well, the original somewhat optimistic idea was to tunnel a railway underneath the Solent to Cowes, on the Isle of Wight (only 2.5 miles away, compared to 11.5 miles from Southampton). This idea fell by the wayside, eventually, but not before more plans were drawn up for a 470 yard pier at Stone Point for Steamer services to the IoW and Channel Islands. After many, many years, a plethora of plans, land purchases, test drilling, and a bitter rivalry between the LSWR and the SM&AR/M&SWJ; it was the LSWR who ended up getting a line, but not to Lepe/Stone Point, but to Fawley oil refinery, which was, at the time, under construction. This was said to be the terminus... "for now", as there was consideration being given to extend to Calshot; which is partly why both of my versions of Calshot had standard gauge track. Clearly, the LSWR never got over the threat of the M&SWJ building a line to the IoW, and potentially taking their lucrative custom... which is strange considering by this point: The tunnel idea had long been branded unworkable A pier at Stone Point would've been relatively un-sheltered and thus not really suitable for steamers The LSWRs' own steamer and IoW rail services were in full swing Any line would feasibly have to join up with the LSWRs' own line at Totton, and thus would be subject to their terms and charges The M&SWJ had already filed for bankruptcy! Anyway, the point is, that gives me a lot of scope for some "realistic" alternative history for the Waterside area, and further west to Lepe. Above: With the idea in my head sown, I set about making a few variations on the Lepe/Stone Point theme, albeit without a 470 yard pier because that would equate to a 5.6m long baseboard, minimum! The design shown is large, but still narrower than Sandy Shores. Note the Artitec HOe ferry (with the track removed as it's purely used for cars), and the station canopies which are a representation of those once found at Lymington Pier. Yes, that's a small lighthouse on the hill, as well as 4 coastguard houses, and in the foreground, the "watch house". The latter was used to look out for smugglers trying to navigate the Beaulieu river! The coastguard houses are very pretty, their walls being covered in multi-toned slates; something you don't often see in this part of the UK: Above: As mentioned, Lepe is a pretty beautiful hamlet. There's not much room between the houses and watch house, so any plan would need to be single track; and even then I think it's a little optimistic! In reality, the railway would be much further to the right, and definitely wouldn't go behind the watch house; but I can't not have these beautiful buildings on scene! There's just one slight problem with this plan, and is one that all my OO gauge layouts have faced; there simply isn't enough length before the station to make passenger services entertaining to run! In fact, that also applies to Sandy Shores; the platform is immediately after the scenic entrance. Assuming I did build such a scene, goods would definitely account for most of the traffic on the line. I'd likely treat the layout as an inglenook (perhaps including the platform line, which I suppose could double up as a freight loading platform) to make things more interesting. Rolling stock would be a variety of 4-wheeled wagons, and whilst 4 wheel coaches would be nice, perhaps the Hornby Push/Pull Maunsell set would be more useful given the later period I intend to model (40s-60s) That said, there's not a lot of length to accommodate a passenger train, so maybe a single coach is all that is required (I've got my eye on this Maunsell ex LSWR 58ft comp). Motive power wise, The B4 tank and USA tank are particularly strong contenders, and maybe the O2 and a Southern Terrier as well. Thankfully, there are also a few in my existing collection that would suit; notably the Q1 (albeit a bit on the long side), the BR standard class 2, and BR class 03/04 diesel. Everything else I really ought to sell! SECTION 3: Where to now? Well, it always helps to start off with a list of constraints; perhaps that's what I should've done first instead of leaping into condensing real life locations into random board shapes and sizes! I've not been at home for the past 2 weeks, so haven't had access to the track that I'd rescued from Old AGWI Rd, but that, along with some cardboard mock ups, will be a good way to go about planning in earnest from here on out. Above: I'm currently leaning towards the idea of two self contained but join-able (via a central traverser fiddle yard) layouts; one depicting an alternate history of Lepe, and the other a mild alt-history of Calshot. Time will tell if that's what I end up building though! Ideally, I'd have more room for the standard gauge layout, but I'm trying to downsize here; plus, all boards would have to fit in my tiny car in one go... Of course, there are plenty of other inspirational scenes! From Hythe pier head: ...to places like Poole Quay, Hamworthy Quay, So'ton Docks, Lymington Pier, the IoW stations... the list goes on! Well done if you made it to the end; there was certainly a lot to trawl through, for which I apologise. Any comments or suggestions are wilfully received, as always!
  3. Yup... join the club; I know exactly your predicament: (A genuine photo of my desk not 5 minutes ago!) I think we have a problem on our hands...
  4. Indeed, Rob! I must admit, I've had little interest in pre-grouping scenarios before now, but the trip to the IoW was certainly an eye-opener, at least with regards to rolling stock. That said, I still would rather keep things between 40s-60s, I like the idea of old stock clinging on for dear life on branch lines that are becoming more and more run-down. And besides, most of my existing stock better suits that timeframe anyway. It has become your sort of signature theme, hasn't it! There's definitely nothing wrong with that though, and it's a setting I find very atmospheric; moreso than everything being clean and tidy! That said, I'd love to see you tackle something pre-grouping; a light railway scenario would be right up your street, and really suit your modelling style down to a tee. I've always fancied a Co. Stephens-esque line; somewhat ramshackle, quirky, and using old mismatched stock! If you were to do it, it means I wouldn't have to
  5. Absolutely, I tend to find shunting goods more fun than operating a passenger shuttle service, although I've also been looking at those Hatton's Genesis coaches! Very, very tempting, even if they are "generic"; not that I've ever cared for accuracy or detailing! Actually, I might as well post my full stock list research, which are posted more or less ranked in order of most to least likely to be bought (the push/pull set would be lovely, but two bogie coaches would sadly take up half the layout by themselves!): Locos: B4 Dock Tank (Dapol) (SR black) USA Tank (Model Rail) (SR black) Terrier "Cowes" (Hornby) (SR Maunsell green) O2 Tank (Kernow) (SR black) Coaching stock: Maunsell rebuilt exLSWR 48ft comp (Hornby) Hattons "Project Genesis" 4 wheeled coaches (Hattons) (SR Olive green) Maunsell push/pull set 619 (Hornby) IoW LBSCR 4 wheel coaches (Smallbrook Studio) I already have a Q1, and a BR standard class 2 tank to compliment the above; along with a motley assortment of wagons! I'll explain a brief history next blog entry, but Lepe was supposed to, at first, join a rail tunnel to meet up with Cowes. Latterly that turned into the idea of a 470ft pier for steamer services to the IoW and Channel Islands (and further afield), although neither solutions were ever built. The LSWR eventually built the line as it stands today to Fawley Oil Refinery. Edit: Just noticed what you wrote was slightly tongue-in-cheek. I see what you're going for now! Absolutely, it really is a careful balancing act with a space this small. That's partly why I chose the smaller of the two Artitec ferries, if any. A narrow gauge feeder line onto the ferry itself wouldn't really make any sense now that I think about it; although I suppose an extension to the RAF Calshot narrow gauge railway could've been built to Lepe; albeit with a heap of wishful thinking!
  6. It really is an attractive idea (I do love your plans for Shalfleet Quay), and I'm torn on what idea(s) to take further. As an aside, whilst coming up with potential names for the project, I even mashed together Calshot and Cowes to form Coweshot; although I doubt the name will be used! Anyway, two weeks have already been spent mulling over options, and I'm no nearer to working out what I want! The appeal of the IoW and branch lines like Hayling Island are the shorter and older (therefore more interesting!) stock that lasted on them far longer than anywhere else on the mainland. That also goes for more industrial freight areas like Southampton Docks and such with their diminutive B4 tank locos (I really must get one!). So'ton Docks is inspiring, but urban isn't really my style (and besides, Graham Muspratt's Canute Road Quay fulfils that nicely); a crampt more rural wharf however could work in my favour. I'm also keen to have a bit of narrow gauge, as was my original intention with the new layout; and particularly Calshot based! I suspect what might end up happening is two separate layouts; one being Calshot, and the other an alternative history for Lepe. I like the idea of an Artitec ferry (the HOe version as it's smaller!); I could either leave the rails in place on the ferry, or remove them and just have it for cars. Potentially, leaving them in place could allow both narrow and standard gauge to be included on the Lepe layout. Lepe I was going to save this for a future blog entry, but might as well post them here for the time being: Above: To give a flavour of Lepe, here are the coastguard houses and watch house; all very pretty! Above: Two of my initial ideas for the dual module layout of Calshot and Lepe. Both have positives, but both have flaws (for starters these are not scale drawings, so will be optimistic with regards to what I can fit on 4ft max boards!). Both plans use a fair amount of modellers' license; especially Lepe. Oh, and there will also be a lighthouse at Lepe, as per the one built circa 2000: My biggest problem is the space required to make it look plausible/fit in the standard gauge. I want to avoid large boards, and especially board joins where possible; which puts maximum size (that will fit in my car at least) at 4ft x 3ft; the same as Calshot MkII. Even that's a little big for carrying through doors, so 3ft x 2ft would be better! Fine for NG, a little limiting if you want a SG station, no matter how short the coaches are. There's also the problem that all my layouts have had; it's no fun to run a passenger service if the station is right by the scenic entrance/exit because the layout is so short! An IoW station is a nice idea with those gorgeous 4 wheeled coaches, but a focus on freight will make the most of the limited space. I suppose the traverser could act as half a run-around loop to save space, but would obviously make the scenic hole twice as big at least! The other problem being that the more I look for inspiration, the more locations I wish I had space to feature a little bit of: RAF Calshot (NG) Lepe Ashlett Creek (NG) - Including a large mill and standard gauge travelling crane Hythe Pier (NG) - Not much operational potential, but I love the pierhead overall roof in particular! Lymington Pier (SG) - Used for the basis of my fictional station at Lepe, earlier. Alderney Breakwater/Holyhead Breakwater railways (SG) (These are similar in theme, so I've bunged them together) Industrial: Fawley Oil Refinery (SG/NG) So'ton Docks (B4 and USA tank locos!) No doubt there are more I have forgotten about, but now that I look at the list; most inspiration occurs where there's a sea and railway in close proximity!
  7. You're right; it's not a million miles away, but a lot of modeller's license would be needed to shift them 2 miles (well, just under) closer. Calshot is definitely calling to me the strongest... but... I don't tend to accrue a large amount of stock... but I've wanted a push/pull set for as long as I can remember! I'm also keen to get my hands on an O2, as well as the IoW liveried "Terrier" (I've had the K&ESR's "Bodiam" for a long, long time!), and finally a USA tank (often found around Southampton, so it's actually pretty suitable here). Oh the temptations... I've bookmarked some links for further research Now that I think about it, I can't even remember the last time I bought a OO locomotive! Blimey, that would be a challenge and a half; especially to get it working... it's funny you mention Langstone/Hayling Island, as I've been eyeing up that wooden bridge since I was a kid: Above: This was a 3D model (one of my first ones IIRC) of the Langstone bridge that I made a long, long time ago! Oh, and look what I just found; one of my first sketches of the original Calshot MkI, back in 2008?: Must keep the layout small. Must keep the layout small. Must keep the layout small. Must keep th...
  8. You're putting "bad" thoughts into my head, Rob... especially as I thoroughly enjoyed my trip to the IoW Steam Railway a few years back! I do like the idea, and a car ferry ala Mr York's Keyhaven would be rather nice... perhaps an alternate history for Calshot Spit then... hmm... it would definitely still need narrow gauge though. Another thing to consider, thank you! If nothing else, I can see that some 4 wheeled/older style coaching stock would be fantastic along with an O2 class.
  9. ...but they will be replaced with something brand new! For those that haven't seen my external blog, or posts on NGRM-online, after having had a huge clear out, I decided that now was the time to start afresh. Don't worry though, Sandy Shores is safe! This relates to the two previous layouts: Calshot (MkII), and Old AGWI Rd. Calshot MkII was (rather obviously) the successor to the MkI version; my first "proper" model railway. Here it is in all its' glory back in 2010 (before I ruined it and the backscene with the 12 day extension build!): Above: The last appearance of the un-extended version of Calshot MkII was at the Brockenhurst Open Day in 2010. As you can see, it looked pretty smart, even if it was in an unfinished state! The extension (nicknamed "Operation: Mirror Image"!), back in April 2011, doubled the size of the layout. It was built in a record 12 days, and to all intents and purposes, certainly looked that way; especially with the lack of a backscene and easily visible fiddle yard. The main reason for the addition was to allow the narrow gauge to be a circular loop, so that I could always have something running whilst I shunted the standard gauge section. It certainly achieved that, but that's about it! I was never happy with it, and as a direct result, both boards were left in the dusty garage for 9 or 10 years. Above: Calshot didn't fare too well from its dusty non-adventure! The track wasn't too bad, but I'll admit I wasn't too careful ripping it up, so all the narrow gauge stuff went in the bin (except the points, I think, although we'll see if they're worth trying to clean up). The only wood I saved was a little of the lattice frame at the back, and ply base itself. The rest was beaten up with a hammer. Structures were mainly in disrepair to begin with, although the hangar and maybe (big maybe!) the castle are salvagable with a lot of remedial work need later on. Somewhen during that time, two further layouts were started; The Old Road (a hugely overambitious standard gauge layout based on my once-local line), and Old AGWI Rd; a layout based on Fawley Oil Refinery, near Calshot funnily enough! The Old Road didn't last long when I noticed that I'd never have the room to put it up (it filled up our entire front garden!), and in fact I still have the boxes of Code 100 flexi track in boxes virtually unused! I also kept most of the buildings (although I doubt they'll get used again, so maybe I need a rethink there, too!). Above: Old AGWI Rd almost had its trackwork completed, with the exception of the standard gauge and fiddle yard. Here we see two of the four boards; the central triangular one (with the large shells of the power house evident), and the workshop area (complete with the aerial ropeway shed and dual gauge loco shed. Old AGWI Rd progressed to the track laying stage, but I decided to take what I thought would be a 6 month break at most doing a diorama to test scenic techniques. We all know now that it turned into Sandy Shores; my proudest achievement in terms of railway modelling! Since then, the layout sat under a bed (so, for 5 years), and upon digging it out last week I noticed a myriad of problems with it. Long story short I decided that this was the time to boldly start afresh. And I'm glad I did, because the more I took apart, but more I noticed some serious problems! This was also true of Calshot, so both layouts were scrapped; most of the components from Old AGWI Rd were saved, but the majority of those on Calshot weren't. It took four days in total, but the time and effort spent being careful with Old AGWI Rd means that I can now reuse virtually all of the track, and most of the woodwork: Above: All the point motors, points, and the vast majority of the track was saved on Old AGWI Rd. Note that I've also kept all the wiring (and sorted it into bundles), every single screw, every electrical connector block... basically anything I thought I could get away with salvaging! That should reduce costs on the next project. Above: The pile of wood from Old AGWI Rd. Not everything was saved, but the vast majority was! So, what now you may ask? Well, of course there "has" to be a replacement for both layouts; especially now that Sandy Shores is finally nearing completion! The question is what? Well. As of yet I have no plans, other than I would like to revisit Calshot a third time; yes, really! What can I say? I'm a sucker for coastal scenes, and it's a really interesting prototype to boot. I'd also like a tiny bit (but not too much) of the oil refinery, so maybe I'll end up with a serious of modular layouts? Time will tell, but I will of course share all my thoughts, musings, and sketches as I come up with ideas. Either way, the design(s) need to be small, easily storable/portable, and unique... ...so watch this space! Of course, if you have any comments, suggestions, or anything for that matter; do post below in the comments!
  10. Despite the lengthy list of appearances both at exhibitions and in railway magazines, somehow the WoR virtual show was the first time I'd seen the layout (I did write a paragraph about the layout on my external blog, if you're interested). Needless to say I'm in awe. There's so much exceptional modelling going on here. Of course, I'm naturally biased by the theme, but the execution is superb. The buildings in particular are really "something else!"; it's a layout I'd definitely love to see one day. You very much deserve all the accolades that you've received.
  11. Should still be in the same location; works for me at least: https://www.world-of-railways.co.uk/virtual-exhibition-layouts/
  12. Just finished writing up my thoughts from the event. It's a little on the long side; and that's even after an effort to condense it to only 5 of my personal favourite layout appearances... Reflecting on the World of Railways Virtual Exhibition Now I had better get on and finish the farm diorama article ready for the September edition of BRM!
  13. Thank you, Stu! I could have made it a bit longer given that I had 5 days of footage, but I think I picked the funniest moments; the rest was just me swearing at the sun as it blinded me! Sorry to hear that some are intent of spoiling it for the rest of us; such is the way of the anonymity of the internet, I guess! As I've said previously, the amount of effort that goes into putting on an event like this is immense; I don't think anyone can truly appreciate it if you haven't had to do something similar yourself. My only "problems" with the event were that: I was too busy making content to watch everything I have no photos to add to my report on the event; as it was a virtual show!
  14. For now, it seems all the videos from Phil's layout build are on the highlight section of the WoR website: https://www.world-of-railways.co.uk/wor/virtual-exhibition-highlights/day-2/?Query=&CategoryId=315 Obviously I can't answer how long they'll be on there, but the videos are easy to digest and get through in a short amount of time. I certainly enjoyed following along!
  15. Just had my tea and cake after finally having finished my last video. It seems I may be treading on Andy's toes with the subject of it, but hopefully there'll be enough difference to warrant the video. As you can see; after having had a spare 20mins to complete yesterdays puzzle, I had a go at today's one, too. Just a little over the allotted time though. So close, yet so far! I'm currently crossing my fingers that the video renders nicely, and that I haven't messed anything up in it. It's an hour+ to render it; so I don't want to have to start over!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.