Jump to content
 

SRman

Members
  • Posts

    7,450
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by SRman

  1. 3 hours ago, Kirby Uncoupler said:

    Hi Everyone,

       I have made some alterations to two of my Accura TSOs (how very dare I), first I have repainted the roofs into matt grey (Humbrol 67), and secondly I have repainted the underframes and bogies into pre-1978 brown. I used Humbrol 160, but it varied and was most obvious on clean ex-works stock. The brown would weather and get dirty, the later black u/fs could weather and look grey.

     

    20240421_211535.jpg.68d1d85cdc9f2ddb268372edbf96a777.jpg

     

       Accurascale have very kindly provided three versions of the blue-grey livery, (a) Without IC slogans (1968-74ish), (b) With IC slogans (1970-NSE 1986+), and (c) With NSE lettering (1986+), the application of the IC slogans appears to have been a long drawn out process, perhaps awaiting works overhauls? 

     

    ... snipped ...

     

                                                         Cheers, Brian.

     

     

    If you take the Mk 2C coaches to come, you can add Scotrail and Inter-City Scotrail brandings. The only variation I can't see is blue/grey with InterCity branding (no hyphen). 

    All credit to Accurascale for being thorough.

  2. 2 hours ago, Ozexpatriate said:

    Yes. Graham Chapman's assessment of Aussie homophobia was not far from the mark - University of Woolloomooloo Philosophy Department rules. (Mind you I don't think the UK was that different.) 

     

    Hollywood Squares was similar to Blankety-Blanks* in terms of double-entendres but Paul Lynde was the centre square. (People may remember Paul Lynde from Bewitched where he played Uncle Arthur.) In his case the campy humour was self-deprecating.

     

    * Originally in the US in 1975 and aired first in Australia in 1977. Blankety-Blanks was a repackaged version of Match Game (originally NBC-1962). There had been a rebooted version of Match Game on ABC (2016-2021) hosted by Alec Baldwin.  The run ended with Baldwin's "legal" troubles.

     

    To be fair, Graham Kennedy who hosted Blankety Blanks was gay, himself.

    • Like 2
  3. A couple more photos of the backscenes: one a more overall view of the room, the other the end piece I added this morning. I was working single-handed this morning as my wife has gone to her quilting group, and the alignment slipped slightly. there are only four screws involved, but I needed a break, so straightening it up can wait a little longer. The apparent shadow in the back corner in the first photo is actually caused by the angle it slopes away from the camera as the right-hand scene is actually curved to clear the window sills and curtains.

     

    20240418_081838_correctedperspective.jpg.920deef49c322d627f721d3009ad4492.jpg

     

    20240419_110410.jpg.b92dd46ffb9acc9e82859e441a5a861e.jpg

     

     

     

    • Like 4
  4. Most of the sugar cube speakers are 8 ohm impedance. The LokSounds do have some tolerance, with ESU listing the acceptable impedance as being between 4 and 32 ohms.

     

    All the usual sound files are locked to a decoder so cannot be copied, but the functions are not locked and can be remapped at will. I have been doing this remapping to many of my previously fitted sound decoders to try to bring the most used functions into line with each other.

     

  5. 12 minutes ago, smt009 said:

     

    I need to work out how best to do this. A quick look at postal rates for Australia tells me I'll need to charge between £4 and £11.50 depending on weight and whether economy or standard delivery is used.

     

    If you want to drop me an email at stuart@stmodels.co.uk for what you want I can work it out manually and send you an invoice.

     

    Stuart

     

    Thanks Stuart. 

    I could certainly use a bit of the Southern fencing, and maybe a few other bits and bobs. I'll make up the list in the next few days and get back to you. The postage sounds about normal for small items to Oz. 👍

  6. Still with the upcoming BRMA meeting on Saturday 20th in mind, I decided that I must add the backscenes along the western side of the layout. With assistance from Mrs SRman, and a little bit of swearing, I turned the train room into a shambles for a while! I did succeed in getting them into place, and am quite pleased with the effect. I did also manage to scuff a part of it as I manoeuvred the boards into place in the very narrow confines behind the layout.

     

    20240417_141420.jpg.0b46437d4e9d872220450d9857094a15.jpg

     

    20240417_141423.jpg.afa1f6932634161f05f884d401108dbc.jpg

     

    20240417_141435.jpg.91ddccee5f3d8b644b354f6919e0b935.jpg

     

    20240417_171437.jpg.16acbf9bbad621fac56280b27abb76d8.jpg

     

    20240417_171449.jpg.66060dce8d575d17c23a2927b55b5fc3.jpg

     

     

    • Like 9
  7. 1 hour ago, G-BOAF said:

    For some reason I thought the booklet was only for the sound decoder. but I presume the non-sound decoder is basically set up to operate the non-sound functions in the same way. That makes sense.

     

    The same occurred with the class 92: Accurascale standardised the function keys between the sound and non-sound variants, it's just that pressing those functions that would have worked sounds will do nothing on the non-sound locos.

    I have been remapping quite a few different sound decoders for locomotives from different manufacturers to help my memory a bit without having to consult the list sheets all the time. That's just a personal preference, but, as you  said, it makes sense, especially when dealing with the same type of locomotive.

  8. 3 minutes ago, JSpencer said:

     

    Thanks. very useful as my sharpest curves are 26in radius. Oddly I use Kadee #20 on my class 33s (except those on push pull work which use Roco style). It avoids removing pipe detail.

     

    That's really funny, because I actually do use Kadees on my class 33/1s that are used exclusively for the push-pull work (the rest retain tension locks). Unfortunately, those are the very few class 33s from Heljan that don't suffer any coupling droop, so I had to introduce a downward bend in the shafts of the Kadees.

    • Like 1
  9. 38 minutes ago, JSpencer said:

     

    Thanks for the consist settings. That is indeed something I'm looking at for a full boat train. Great video.

     

    Thanks also. 😊

    I don't know if this will be relevant to your mode of operating, but for ease of consisting, and standardisation, I equip all of the Bachmann units with Kadee #20 couplings at the cab ends. If your curve radii are a little easier than my minimum 3rd radius, you may be able to reduce the gap by using #19s.

    • Like 1
  10. And hot on the heels of fitting sound into the class 52, I have now done a Hornby class 50, 50 045, the one that featured in the last video I posted. This one has an 8-pin interface, but the speaker wires are pre-attached to the decoder, so soldering a speaker to them is not really a challenge at all. Speaker choice this time was a double iPhone speaker from Roads and Rails, and the sound quality from it is very good. The ESU/SWD sound file has some very good sounds and also a few rather naff sounds. There is a very thin, reedy spool down from the turbos at some points, and the top end thrash is a little inconsistent, but the spooling up sounds and thrash are really evocative.

    I had to cut away part of the fan mechanism's housing to fit the speaker in easily.

    Seeing as these are unlocked files, I may be able to do a few edits and tweaks further down the track. For the time being, it will do nicely.

     

    20240415_175129.jpg.c6aabc55b955c6f27413abc08dfb6df9.jpg

    • Like 4
  11. Continuing my drive to replace non-sound decoders with sound ones over time and as funds allow, I have fitted a LokSound 5 DCC decoder to my Dapol class 52, D1030 ' Western Musketeer', and loaded the free ESU/SWD class 52 sound file onto it. I tried an Accurascale Accurathrash speaker in it, which meant breaking away the moulded speaker well along one side to get it to fit. However, the result was a tad underwhelming, so the next step was to look up Roads and Rails fitting guides to see what they had used: a 25mm square x 7mm deep speaker was duly substituted, and that sounds somewhat better. I can't say it sounds the best it could, yet.

    I'll persevere with this one for a while, and if I don't think it cuts the mustard, I'll try a pair of them in series next - they are 4 ohm impedance speakers. I did tweak the bass and treble settings, which helped the sound quality as well.

    20240415_155747.jpg.c69db5dc21c435748f9a1e028eec88af.jpg

     

    20240415_161453.jpg.9f9d0863218cf6f11563514fdf2742bc.jpg

     

    • Like 5
  12. Thanks for the review. They are still lovely looking units, and the livery applications are still well done by Bachmann.

     

    I would draw your attention to the original units actually did have a space for fitting a speaker - there is a removable section of seats in the middle of the powered car in all of the variants, right from the first releases.

    I was seriously considering getting one of the SWT 3 CEPs or NSE 4 CEPs but in the end, plumped for a non-sound jaffa cake 4 CEP, which has all the good and bad features you have highlighted in your unit. Like you, the expense is just too great at present to buy two or three of these units in one hit. I did post a video on YouTube of the refurbished unit running with an original blue/grey unit and a jaffa cake MLV.

    I have never been impressed with previously available sound files for the SR EMUs in general, so your comments regarding Bachmann's sounds are of great interest to me. Is there a chance you could post a video to demonstrate the sounds at all?

    All of my current 4 CEPs and MLVs have Lenz Standard + decoders (v1 and v2) fitted, and all will work happily together in consists without any adjustments having been made, although I do alter the inertia/momentum settings on all of them: I standardised long ago on CV3 = 25 and CV4 = 18.
     

     

     

    • Like 3
  13. I decided to do a bit of troubleshooting and a minor overhaul of a Network South East class 50 (Hornby 50 045 'Achilles'). It was intermittently shorting on left hand curves and any slight humps in the track, but not consistently, plus there was a hint of bearing shriek coming from somewhere inside. I traced the short to a pickup wire having dropped off the bogie tag and touching the chassis just occasionally. To fix that I had to dismantle one of the bogies, which also meant I could lubricate it properly. It also resulted in much swearing until I realised the wire was caught up inside the chassis and left a little short at the bogie end. I fixed it once, then fixed it again!

     

    I oiled the motor end bearings and the worm drive bearings as well, then put it all back together, and this time it ran beautifully. While I was working on oiling the bearings, I removed the fan drive belt but left the fans in place. I suspect they were responsible for a bit of drag on the motor drive shafts and also for the bearing noise. There's no sound in this one, so it runs very quietly.

    The Mark 2 coaches are mixture of Bachmann Mk 2A and Accurascale Mk 2Bs, and the magnetic close coupling can be seen to good effect here.

     

     

     

    • Like 6
  14. 32 minutes ago, maico said:

    I had enough reward points at Accurascale to get a free pre-programed Deltic Lokpilot decoder. Can I reset it to ESU factory standard via an F no. for use elsewhere or is it locked?

    Thanks.

     

    The LokPilot would not be locked. If you have the facility to do so, you should save the settings for possible reuse later on. 

    Only the sound file on a LokSound would be locked to that decoder's serial number, but even so, you would be able to reblow it with someone else's sounds. You just would npt be able to restore it to the factory sounds later.

  15. I decided to do a bit of troubleshooting and a minor overhaul of a Network South East class 50 (Hornby). It was intermittently shorting on left hand curves and any slight humps in the track, but not consistently, plus there was a hint of bearing shriek. I traced the short to a pickup wire having dropped off and touching the chassis just occasionally. Long story short, I put it all back together, and it ran beautifully hauling my NSE rake of mixed Bachmann Mk 2A and Accurascale Mk 2B coaches. The effectiveness of the magnetic close couplings can also be seen here. The train ran continuously for several minutes without fault, but I only videoed one complete circuit.

     

     

    • Like 3
  16. 20 minutes ago, JhornG201 said:

    I note from the specs that the lighting is directional. I’m assuming therefore that this is a straight re-run and no changes are being made so head and tail lights are independently controlled? 

     

    Andy's first post shows it as being an 8-pin interface, so I would hazard a guess and say you would be correct.

    • Like 1
  17. 19 hours ago, Roy Langridge said:

    I think all the time people argue that poor models are ok the drive to do better is diminished.

     

    The 45, people argued that the flat sides were ok, they are not. The 25’s cab shape and doors are incorrect. The 18100 has beading missing, the PWM was badly designed and assembled. 
     

    All this, but you still get some saying there is nothing wrong. Or do some modelling. I am not against doing modelling, but at today’s prices the base model should be correct. 
     

    Roy

     

     

    I'm not entirely agreeing with you, but also partially agreeing.

    I still have several of the original Bachmann class 24s and 25s. The cab shapes have long been a source of dissatisfaction, of course, and they were criticised for that. It took a long time and some competition before Bachmann launched the current models. On the plus side, the mechanisms were streets ahead of the old Hornby model with its ringfield motored model, and the running qualities are still well up to current standards. Later, lights were added but no visible improvements were made to the shape. There was a minor improvement to the relief on the side hatches. Also on the plus side, several of the Bachmann models were bought with sound at bargain prices - pretty well a sound decoder and speaker with a £20 locomotive thrown in.

    Heljan's model is an improvement on Bachmann's 25, but I don't find the cab front convincing enough to buy one at present day prices, I'll stick with the old Bachmann ones for a bit longer. SLW really shook thinks up ... at a substantial price, but well worth it for the vast improvement in accuracy and quality, plus a new standard in sound reproduction. I bought two of the class 24/0 locos with sound. However, I can't see me buying the SLW 25s, beautiful as they are, unless I can sell most of my Bachmann class 25s to fund one or to SLW versions.

    For the time being, for all their visual faults, I am prepared to accept them because they are still very decent runners. It's the art of compromise, and everyone has their own variations on how much compromise they will accept.

     

    Bringing this back to the class 47, I still have a couple of the original tubby Duff Heljan 47s and also the 57s. Again, the running qualities are superb, and I don't mind the appearance as taken from viewing distance on my layout. They don't sit so well against the earlier Bachmann class 47s, which have their own faults. I'm not entirely convinced by the current Heljan frontal appearance on the new 47s. It is so typical of Heljan: they are very hit and miss with their models, with some like the Hymek being very acceptable even now, yet others missing the mark to varying degrees, some quite badly, others very nearly right.

    I am not buying a new Heljan 47 or 57, much as I like the superb looking finish on the NSE 47. 

    • Like 1
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  18. First go with the control panel for the upper level: I rerouted the Dapol signal wires and buttons and drilled the necessary holes to mount them. A couple of holes didn't quite line up properly because of the makeshift arrangement I used, but the principle is great. I had in mind that this first attempt would be expendable, at least for the laminated diagram. I can very easily print another and laminate it, and use this one as the guide to get all the holes in exactly the right places. That will eliminate a few wrinkles in the laminated diagram. I'll also find a way to mount the diagram on the acrylic a little more firmly.

    Eventually, after a lot more wiring, there will be metal studs for point control in the diagram as well, plus a few more signals - whether they be semaphore or colour light is yet to be determined.

     

    20240413_120951.jpg.9c02b27b2c81a4ddc382311bfe375e66.jpg

     

    20240413_120956.jpg.65292ce7afccbea652f53005adda9b8f.jpg

     


     

    • Like 3
  19. 10 hours ago, dj_crisp said:

     

    That's interesting. Did you use the standard coupling with the magnetic coupling? When i tried the supplied magnetic coupling i had a much larger gap whereas yours looks great on the straight.

     

    I didn't change the pockets and just used the supplied magnetic couplings straight out of their packet. Initially I used some Hornby short magnetic couplings which also worked well but left a very small gap on the straights. What didn't work with the Hornby couplings was the Bachmann to Accurascale join: the levels of the pockets were different and I had to mix the coupling lengths as well. Accurascale do supply alternative pockets which are set further back, but I haven't experimented with those at all.

     

    20240405_110217.jpg.8a7172cc616ea49866590965665a7f85.jpg

    • Like 1
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  20. I have been using the Accurascale supplied magnetic couplings on the Accurascale Mk 2Bs, and Hunt couplings on the two Bachmann Mk 2As that are currently forming my West of England rake. The Hunt couplings with a combination of lengths are now forming the connection between the Bachmann and Accurascale coaches. The set has been running like this for a few days now with no problems to report. The corridor connections are touching on the straight sections.

    20240405_110103.jpg.71719c3311bdf2d6a850c78b16e17f46.jpg

    20240405_110202.jpg.7bbc3e60308a17f922215c3afa1b85c4.jpg

    20240405_110212.jpg.5d17361d9511dd1c424784eb0d55ea6a.jpg

     

    20240405_110222.jpg.c2d24bcf83229122692c1a11eeb137e2.jpg

     

    20240405_112126.jpg.b5931ce8b19e7bbfed6bf67c02346d17.jpg

     

    • Like 8
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  21. With the BRMA meeting due at my house in less than a fortnight, I am continuing to tidy the room up and complete small improvements, while all the time trying to ensure that nothing will stop the trains from running on the day.

    I have tweaked how the track sits on the revamped viaducts, keeping an eye on the very tight clearances at the curved end of the Wills viaduct. I removed a short section of the wall capping and filed a slight downwards slope on that end of the wall, but I will have to do something better with it later on. For the present, everything clears it properly. I also adjusted the rail lengths to eliminate a couple of excessive gaps at the joints.

     

    20240407_003136.jpg.f3c32dbcf8a0e872a8871c5d0d9a4fed.jpg

     

    20240407_003145.jpg.92aa5273315fbea95bc9c0c3669c4bb6.jpg


     

    On the other end of the layout, I have added more railings alongside the goods yard to protect the main lines. I have used some modern key clamp style fencing, which is bright safety yellow, but I will eventually paint it all in a more neutral grey or silver-grey to suit the 1960s, which is basically what the layout is intended to represent. For the modern image stuff I'm currently running, the yellow is correct.

     

    20240409_150926.jpg.58d9020ab6d06188b7d80b65b0b867c2.jpg

     

    20240409_150815.jpg.93e7cd43ca98f184d57d011428fa880a.jpg

     

     

    Also in the last couple of days, I have printed out a track diagram for the upper level control panel, laminated it, and cut a section of acrylic sheet to mount it on. While there is no way I'll have any of the point motors wired in and connected for a while, I will be able to mount the Dapol signal control buttons in the panel. At present, they are hanging loosely off the edge of the layout below the running lines to the left. With the Underground control panel, I mounted the laminated sheet behind the clear acrylic, but that was prone to collecting the swarf from drilling the holes for the point control between the laminated sheet and the acrylic sheet. This time, I intend to mount the laminated printed sheet outside of the acrylic, so the acrylic being clear becomes a little academic; it's there purely for support.

    UpperLevelDiagramReadytoMount.jpg.b266671d131d093a4583880644280131.jpg
     

    • Like 7
×
×
  • Create New...