Jump to content
 

gordon s

Members
  • Posts

    4,975
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Posts posted by gordon s

  1. Thanks Andy. Sadly Marc Models have now ceased trading, so the chances of getting another Quad Art set is zero unless some pop up on the 2nd hand market. I couldn’t recall seeing the 51’ coaches around KX, yet they were familiar, so probably saw them at Liverpool Street.

     

    Spent the morning packing up around 40 loco’s that were spread around ET. It was fun playing trains, but in some respects it stopped any progress as I didn’t want to lift up track sections to fit the new crossovers and double slip. Now they are packed away, I will get stuck into rebuilding the main stairwell board and then drop in the additional turnouts. Probably a month or two away as lifting anything will be off limits until everything heals up.

     

    Onward and upward...

    • Like 3
    • Friendly/supportive 12
  2. I agree in sliding off the lift, but it was more when the box is being moved around with a full complement of locos. From memory the loco lift track sections are low profile and it wouldn't take much for them to slip off sideways and crash into each other if the storage box moves moves away from the horizontal position. I bit like carrying a tray with a dozen cups of tea full to the brim without spilling anything.

     

    As I said, I'm sure the OP has it covered.

    • Like 1
  3. I like the idea of using Peco lifts as I have a couple laying around when I was experimenting with a loco cassette system. The only thing I'm not sure of is I can't see anything actually holding the locos in place within the loco lifts. Are you counting on lifting it square and level or is there something holding the loco onto the lift track?

     

    I'd shudder to think of tripping on something that's sufficient to throw the locos off the track itself and they all cascade into each other.

     

    I'm sure you have it covered.

    • Agree 1
  4. 25 minutes ago, big jim said:

    I suppose if I didn’t turn the fuel tap off it could have flooded it then? 
     

    I’ll pop and take the plug out and have a look in a sec 

     

    Flooding would have happened by continually trying to start it and the plug getting wet. The more you try, the wetter it will become. Take out the plug and turn over the engine on the electric or kick start to remove any fuel vapour in the cylinder. Dry the plug and clean it. Replace and go through the normal start procedure. With any luck it will fire again. More often than not, people flood engines by over cooling or just continuing to pump fuel in when it's nor firing.

  5. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I loved the Coffee Pots as I grew up surrounded by them at Hornby and Kings Cross. They  had a charm of their own......

     

    I saw the Standard 5 with Caprotti Valve Gear listed earlier. Pure coincidence as I was cataloging stock a day or two ago. A DJH kit built by Graham Varley and sat in a box for years, but soon to have a decoder added and the wheels will turn once more....

     

    DSCF1706.jpg.cb9fa5100799776ac86d3ac50160c11f.jpg

    • Like 16
  6. 48 minutes ago, ISW said:

    You can probably push this to 1 in 42 with newer all-wheel driven diesel locomotives on ~8-coaches. From my experience with 1 in 42 & 1 in 48 gradients, older diesels (think Airfix & Triang-Hornby or any with rubber tyres) you will be down to 5 or 6 coaches at best.

     

    So, aiming at 1 in 50 is a good idea, but with the potential to squeeze that down to 1 in 45 if it's necessary.

     

    Ian

     

    Unfortunately at 1:45 the saving is fairly minimal. It comes down from 65' to 58', so you are still looking at complete circuit around the room as a minimum. Even at 1:42 it will be 55'.........

     

    Reducing the board spacing is not really an option as you simply move the problem to one of access rather than gradient.

     

    Overall, no reason why it can't be done, but further thought is required.

     

    A helix at 1:50 with a 75mm spacing will need to be approximately 1200mm diameter and would need 5-6 complete turns.

     

  7. Has anyone consider the gradient and the length of any ramp between the two sections? Unless things have changed the separation between the two levels was 400mm and at a gradient of 1:50, which is the minimum I would consider for full length trains and diesel locomotives, you will need a run of 20m or around 65’........

     

    Original versions of ET had a similar set up, but I had to run the ramp at least twice around the room to join the two levels with similar separation.


    .....and I would still be concerned about access to the top right storage roads under the top board.

     

    • Agree 1
  8. .......and to think you could have saved all that wiring by going DCC.........:D

     

    It all looks very neat and tidy though.....;)

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    • Funny 2
×
×
  • Create New...