Jump to content

noiseboy72

Members
  • Content Count

    627
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

461 Good

1 Follower

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    www.mgnr.uk

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. We now have 3 shows confirmed for 2020. 29 Feb - 1 Mar Lincs MRS @ Newark Showground - Semi-final layout 7-8 March Mansfield Railway Show - Semi-final layout 4-5 April Bingham MRS @ Cotgrave Miner's Welfare - Heat layout The layouts are still on display at Rocket Railways and can be viewed most Mondays and Fridays, 9-5. Further info on our website - www.mgnr.uk
  2. ...And as the team from Grantham, it's caused quite a few misunderstandings!! You can tell we were there as late entries as otherwise I think they might have put us in seperate heats.
  3. As a team captain in SF2, please give it a go, as there's real railway modelling from all 3 teams and much less fantasy. In fact in the final there's plenty of transferable skills and Whose Counting Rivets in particular produced a really good "traditional" layout with some really fun animations and effects to boot.
  4. This was how we stored our layouts prior to splitting them... The layouts survived very well with minimal damage. We've now split them and have almost finished rewiring the animations and all the track is operational. Getting them into the van in 1 piece at Fawley was "interesting"! Many thanks to the other teams and TV crew who all lent a hand. Getting them back out was a lot easier, as we had a forklift and expert operator who extracted them in a few minutes. The layouts we then put onto some old stage decks with 7' legs. A bit of bracing and we had some nice storage that was out of the way of idle hands until we had located a permanent home for them.
  5. Ahem... As the highest scoring runner up team - scoring more than the 2nd place team in Semi-final 1, we wholeheartedly agree with this suggestion I do however think the linking thing is a good idea though, as it forces you to think about the bigger picture during planning for the whole competition. WCR in particular managed to link their layouts together very successfully from a design point of view and in my opinion, this should have got them extra marks. Personally more flexibility in terms of layout size and gauge would add interest. The whole "We need to send the camera train around" thing is something of a red herring, as it could easily be adapted to larger scales and the current use of the mini-jib for the smaller scales would still give plenty of interest. As we have a couple of modellers who like O Gauge and larger, I think we could create something pretty cool given a bit of flexibility around the size and shape.
  6. From our team's perspective, Chris's wonky chimney, Phil's banana rolling stock protection device and Jonny killing the alien! We very much enjoyed seeing our layouts in various trailers and the kind comments from Steve and Kathy, particularly our heat layout.
  7. They probably weren't in stock. Hornby in particular had quite poor stock levels for some items. We found the choice of locos quite limited, but rolling stock was generally better.
  8. I think a better Bake Off analogy would be if you had planned and practised your 3 hour showstopper to be emailed on the way to the tent to be told you now only had 2 hours... The production team would have had a fair idea just how long the layout filming was likely to take, based upon previous rounds and previous years, so I guess it was a tough call to have to allow another 3-4 hours for this and would have been based on discussions with Senior Camera Bloke Sig, the mini cam guys and the senior lighting rigger. I would image that they would also have had a deadline to get out of Fawley and there was obviously a lot more rigging put in for the final as well, with lighting trusses to strike along with the rest of the kit. WCR, Sorry to see the damage to your layout. Did it come apart at the joint while it was being dragged out? I amazed at how well ours survived being moved. We managed to get both of them into the back of a Sprinter in one piece by reinforcing them across the joins and then putting the first one in, lifting it up and screwing it to the legs - positioned on the outside of the layout. Once that little trick was achieved, we slid the 2nd layout in underneath, lifting it onto the wheel arches and screwing it to the legs. When we came to remove them at the unit we stored them in, they were still in really good condition, requiring minimal work to split them back into 3 boards and subsequently reassemble them. Hopefully yours can equally be repaired.
  9. In both our heat and semi, we were short of members due to availability. In the heat neither Helen or Lucy were there on day 1 and Lucy was also absent on day 1 of the semi. Being 16, she was also limited to 8 hours on set, so wasn't there for the final golden hours each day. It is a handicap, but a self imposed one!!
  10. We exhibited our layouts at a local open day yesterday. It all went pretty well and we got to understand how to present the layouts and what guests like to see. We've got a few bits to finish off, but operationally both layouts behaved themselves. We have a couple of dates in the diary for next year but would welcome invitations to other shows. Please just have a look at our website
  11. Apparently the Surprise Surprise theme came from the Channel 5 commissioning editor himself! It stumped us during our planning and had we made it through, planned to present magic tricks - all involving the layout. Quite how that would have worked with the way the demonstrations were orchestrated, I don't know, as we would have needed interaction with the judges and presenters to make it work.
  12. Having chatted with Sarah the director and also production assistant Shannon, the shoot to show ratio was about 9-1 for the main cameras, plus all the mini cam and time lapse. Each director works with an editor on a single episode, deciding what stories to tell, concentrating on the winning team and any emerging problems or team strife that might occur. The rough edit will normally be longer than the requested programme length and will then be tightened up to fit. After that it will be colour graded and finalized so that it matches the other programs. Things can change even after the edit is finalized. In the programme introduction Kathy is shown discussing an infraction of the rules, but whichever episode this was from appears to have been re-edited and that scene removed. The late change in the rules seems to have led to all the layouts being less finished than the teams would have liked, which might be why the final judging put more emphasis on the 3 layouts as a whole. Disappointing I'm sure, but still massive congratulations to the winners and all involved.
  13. Was it just me, or did the demos tonight feel really rushed? Looking at Kathy's photos, we missed loads of detail and seemed to concentrate as much on the previous layouts as we did on the ones just built. I feel the episode should have been at least 15 minutes longer, given there were 4 teams in the final.
  14. It must have been so crowded and hot in there for the final, particularly when the rest of the layouts arrived. I'm looking through Kathy's photos now, as I find that gives a better representation of progress and some of the details the TV show misses.
  15. I gather a box of goodies arrived from Bachmann... The series final was filmed in late June from memory.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.