Jump to content

Phil Bullock

RMweb Gold
  • Content Count

    6,615
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Phil Bullock

  1. Many thanks! SO have now cut the Male JST off and wired on some patch leads which will connect directly to the Switchpilot servo. Now when I connect the + and -ve servo leads the servo powers up and moves randomly.... but as soon as I connect the orange signal wire it goes back to sleep and wont respond. Grrrrr.....
  2. The LMR also liked to use pairs of locos on Royal Trains for insurance.... 216 and 233 were the select pair late 60s/early 70s, but photos of double headed 40s not that common.... IIRC the MU connections on Peaks gave trouble too.... and they did plenty of freight work on both the MML and NE/SE route, once the hordes of Brush 4s appeared they were both second string power on both ECML and WCML
  3. Probably because the EE4s only delivered around 1600 HP at the rail whereas a transient effort from a Duchess - which they were to replace - could get somewhere nearer 2900 rhp when climbing the Northern fells with 13 coaches or more - a challenge the Peaks were less likely to encounter.
  4. Not at all! Fun in true sense.... easy to fit and will perform well.
  5. And it cant have been easy to get the bag from steam age water columns in to them either. The WR option was better .... filler was behind a body side grille which hinged open on Warships
  6. Only this one....! https://www.hattons.co.uk/202410/djh_model_railway_kits_k79_ln_class_9f_2_10_0_92079_br1g_tender_in_br_black_pre_owned_kitbuilt/stockdetail.aspx
  7. Have you seen the Derby Sulzer web site? Not comprehensive but it does give clues
  8. Cheers Mike - cracking as you say!!! The rest of the pictures on that thread are too.....
  9. Yes indeed Mike - a cracking shot as you say! along with the rest of them...... Good to see the bars are not all straight and that theres a heavier load on the leading wagon to reduce the risk of derailments Many thanks for highlighing.....
  10. Yes there was traffic for which that was needed.... An AB peak used to work the Tunstead - Margam Limestones from 68 using CBAs - AB only. Down our neck of the woods the paradox I have only just realised is that Freight - mainly tankers and liners in addition to the Tunstead - were AB before the Class 1s. Therefore you were more likely to see a beaten up VB loco on the Class 1s and a nice shiny ex works AB loco on freight.... ALthough a significant number of Brush 4s were built with dual brakes ....254 IIRC in traffic by 1967 .... so the Peaks were playing catch up.... and 37s were also getting AB and working in pairs on tanker trains from S Wales refineries from 68....
  11. Evening Clive and welcome to this chat. Would be nice if it were that simple .Peaks had OHLE flashes when built see https://www.derbysulzers.com/45122.html - but they probably did acquire a few more. Any 45/46 was likely to work under the wires from 67 onwards when Birmingham New Street was electrified - but prior to that there was Woodhead of course.... Take a look at the attached database for details of the locos we have modelled - BFYE livery no certainty and even getting air brakes was no guarantee that the bodyside footsteps would be plated - see 78. Makes for interesting modelling! Cheers Loco details.xlsx
  12. This looks like chapter and verse on the Lickey bankers... http://lickeyincline.blogspot.com/2011/03/large-engines-on-lickey-incline-1956.html
  13. And massive thanks to you and the team for all the work that made it work so smoothly Andy
  14. And postie delivered this to Churchdown (No not Churchward!) yesterday Can only echo what @BoD has said.....
  15. Ha ha I dont think so Mike although these O gauge models are d*mn impressive! SWMBO isnt ruling out something in the garden so we will have to see when patio gets done after lockdown
  16. You'll have fun with that ! Did you go for the fuel tank speaker installation?
  17. Have just acquired one of these - with no paperwork! There are a couple of loose bits in the box - wonder if someone would be kind enough to point me in the right direction please? Initial thoughts were storm sheet supports.... Many thanks
  18. Glad to hear that worked for you! Accurascale 37 on order here too So if you are prepared to consider the price tag the SLW Class 24 is the Rolls Royce....if you want something to tinker with a 26 or 27 from Heljan - look at installing the DC KIts speaker tanks for cracking results.. https://www.dckits-devideos.co.uk/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=427&search=class+27+fuel+tank Second loco in video New Bachmann 24/1 is good but benefits from speaker being changed - 25 a bit old in tooth, they and Heljan are releasing new ones so possibly worth waiting for that if you want a 25 Cheers
  19. Phil Bullock

    Dapol Class 22

    So back on topic .... I mentioned back up the thread that we were looking at creating D6336 and D6342 from the later batch D6336 first - heres progress to date, am happy that the basic furniture is now OK.. Headcode boxes and all existing furniture removed - all detail sanded down. New boxes sited lower are extreme etchings Class 37 filed down to make the frames thinner and mounted on microstrip. New doors fabricated from plasticard. Time to move on to other furniture....
  20. Strange isnt it Rob - I would say the same about Humbrol. If I had a fiver for every can that I have only managed to use once and which has then clogged and gone in the bin I would be a rich man! Thats with me clearing the nozzle after use, shaking until my hand falls off, standing in a bowl of hot water, mumbling incantations etc I havent mastered air brushing yet but my son James has - no doubt that is the most controllable and least wasteful.
  21. Thanks both - that makes sense! You have to wonder if the logic was documented as it did seem to get forgotten... https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/3256128268
  22. But surely the point is - with the exception of Saltley's stoker fitted locos that were a bit of a special stud for Carlisle duties - that the other regions didnt get the double chimney locos. It might have been interesting to see them on the GC runners or the GN ..... two operations that required predictable and consistent loco performances.
  23. So that meant 30000 for Southern and LMS starting at 40000 - but the LMS had already tried to address duplicate numbers on locos inherited from other Companies at the Grouping by adding 10000 so it made sense to use the 50000 series for them - although not consistently, as ex LNWR Claughtons were allocated the 459xx - 460xx series but were all withdrawn before new numbers were applied - likewise ex LNWR 0-8-0s which ended up in the high 48xxx - 49xxx series. Perhaps because their numbers did not duplicate other LMS built locos?
  24. Was it an attempt to reduce the number of turns on which bankers were needed up Ebbw Vale? I know the Consett turns were banked - how about Brymbo?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.