Jump to content
 

billy_anorak59

Members
  • Posts

    344
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by billy_anorak59

  1. Manchester Oxford Road - plus another two roads (at a push) : One at each end.
  2. No idea what is happening at the Wirral Transport museum - last I heard was it had been taken over by something called 'Big Heritage' - whatever that is. Looks a great place for relatively modern single and double decker buses that have tenuous links to Wirral, but if you want all inclusive transport (which includes (gasp) railway! artifacts), you're going to be well disappointed. This was the last I saw: https://bigheritage.co.uk/an-exciting-future-for-wirral-transport-museum/ Yes, all too late - as you say, the DTS cab is cut and in Wales, and the TS was cut 2 weeks ago I believe. Shame really, as the TS DID have buffers, and could have been hauled stock, although I'm not sure how any heritage line would have blown the doors open at each stop, unless the haulage had a compressor. It's buffer arrangement is seen here: All that can be hoped for is that now the DTS and TS have gone, efforts can now be concentrated on 690 and it can find a long lasting home and under cover. Preferably in its home environment.
  3. I don't think you can delete the post, but you can hide it if you want Rob? Use the more options '...' in the top right of your post and select 'Hide'.
  4. The Class 502 is preserved as a two-car unit (they could be found as 2 or 3 car when in service), so both the DMBS and DTC of that unit have cabs. Not sure where you would put the remaining DMBS of the 503 in that case? (which also has a cab) Also, the 503s have no buffing gear on the cab ends (just an automatic buckeye), so coupling would be a headache. Indeed, the lack of buffing gear may also have led to it being less than attractive as towed stock (maybe by Class 73) on a heritage line.
  5. Latest: Seems that the cab end of the DTS is to be saved. Still sad, but far better than completely scrapped. Video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YatIEPQ-a_8
  6. Probably best to see: http://www.4sub4732.co.uk/downloads/503/4Sub_TheContactor06_503_Pages.pdf Full story there.
  7. The unit that was at Tebay was not the Class 503, but the Class 502 - which is bucking the EMU trend and is doing very nicely under restoration at Burscough : https://www.class502.org.uk/
  8. A trip to from the North West to London Victoria (by car, parked at Cockfosters, LU to Victoria) to pick up my cousin, who'd been abroad somewhere. Now this was exotic - the land of the 'Night Ferry' and the 'Golden Arrow' - can't wait! On to the concourse and... oh. Row upon row of what looked like Mk1 coaches with two red rectangular lights in the middle of the corridor connections all sitting at the buffer stops. How disappointed was I ? Being used to Class 08s, 24s, 25s, 40s and 47s this was a strange land indeed.
  9. Nice final touch from Hattons with a parting email just now... I wish them well.
  10. Absolutely! One car is obviously better than none, and it means the best fittings from all 3 cars can be combined to one complete car. This unit was always going to be static, and one complete car has the same interpretation potential as all three I guess. Indeed I concur with all of your points, but I think a lot of enthusiasts don’t contribute until they can see that the project is viable, that they aren’t throwing their hard-earned money at a hopeless cause, and that project has a final outcome either as a static display (preferably under cover), or living and breathing on a heritage line. The hard part is getting the project off the ground and then getting the momentum. Because EMUs are unlikely to run that’s hard to buy into without a firm plan for its final outcome. Tough all round. I met Graham G a few times at the Coventry ERM – he came over as a nice guy, and I much respect his hard work and what he (and all the volunteers) achieved there, in what were obviously far from ideal conditions. I think what I was wittering on about previously is that there is a Wirral Transport Museum (was controlled by Wirral Council – now turned over to ‘Big Heritage’), which could have any number of Hong Kong trams and 80’s Atlantean buses, but the railway aspect is massively (completely?) neglected. So it’s not really a transport museum in its full sense (to me), when it should be. And the exhibits should be mainly pertinent to Wirral (to me). As I read it, the remaining Class 503 car will still have no home – the Big Heritage museum would be the ideal (and obvious) place for it if restored, surely, close as it is to its old stomping ground? It would be great shown in a setting (small section of station platform, doors operating, compressor sounds?), much as the remaining LOR car is displayed on its overhead structure across the water in Liverpool. But where could it be restored? I had hoped that Hooton Park could offer a restoration base, but seemingly the hangers there are full (mainly buses, lorries and caravans last time I looked). Shame. And the people to do it? I’m sure they are out there, somewhere – witness what the guys at Burscough are achieving with the Class 502. Finding them? Sorry, no answer/clue...
  11. When were you involved with it Jason? I personally reckon the rot started when the unit was split up the first time, and then when Wirral Council lost interest, probably to enjoy that other well-known Wirral icon, U-Boat U-534 (which they then cut into 3 pieces – at least the cl 503 is already in 3 pieces). I think it was the Class 503 DMBS that was then left outside at the mercy of the elements and vandals. As for the new museum, I’ll believe it when I see it – and even then, I’ll be amazed if it has any railway items of note. Positioned where proposed, it’s also going to need some pretty hefty security. For the existing ‘Wirral Transport Museum’ (closed since November 2023), read ‘Wirral Bus and Tram Museum’. However, the new ‘Big Heritage Wirral Transport Museum’ seems to be talking a good job (so far), but when things like the Class 503 are being lost, and Mersey Railway No5 ‘Cecil Raikes’ still languishes in store, I’m afraid I can’t take the vision of a truly holistic transport museum reflective of all aspects of Wirral transport too seriously. Thing is, no-one wants EMUs, do they? However historical - although the current appeal for the Class 507 seems to have a following - we'll see.
  12. Two cars of the Class 503 going for scrap - As notified on FB : https://www.facebook.com/503unit
  13. Yes - the model railway section was upstairs (turn left at the top of the stairs) : Hobbies on Tarleton Street and as I remember it:
  14. Like everyone else, I’m shocked at the news. Hattons are/were one of those constants in my life – always there. Also an indelible part of my teenage years, and I recall Saturday afternoons at the 180 Smithdown Road shop fondly in the mid to late 1970s. Football in the morning, a quick bit of lunch, a bus to Birkenhead Woodside and the Mersey Ferry over to Liverpool Pier Head, then the No 86 bus to the shop. An hour or two spent browsing (and sometimes buying!) and then home again in time for Dr Who. Got my 18th Birthday present from there (Dublo Co-Bo – brand new, sealed – still got it). I also ‘nearly’ got a pre-war clockwork Sir Nigel Gresley for £5, until Norman spotted the transaction taking place from the gloom within the shop – never knew he could move so fast! Turned out it ‘wasn’t for sale’… In recent years, Hattons was always my ‘go to’ shop, and never received anything but exemplary service from them. Very best wishes to all the staff – I hope they can all move on quickly with their livelihoods and prosper.
  15. That's the most misshapen Hellcat I've ever seen if it is! 😄 Looks like a North American T-28 Trojan to me...?
  16. Ah yes Jonesy - forgot that one... this is Birkenhead North c.1975 (apparently - seems a bit late to me) Some say it was chromatic blue, but I think that's debatable! I'm sure I've seen a 502 in that livery somewhere, but can't think where just for the moment. Edit: Just found a wraparound, 'custard dip' one too... so plenty to go at!
  17. BR Green for these units can be split into 3 variants: - Light Green (Malachite?) Dark Green ('Standard' Stock Green) Dark Green with SYP (and coaching stock roundels) Agreed - never saw them dirty. Not so much livery, but another variant would be Blue/Grey with end doors...
  18. Thanks, but the answer is probably no and no. I'm still on tension locks for most of my stock, so no infallible coupling system here! The main reason I went for a terminus with a lid was to bring back memories I have of Birkenhead Woodside (however I've compromised it here) when I was a child - I enjoy the building of scenery rather than operation to be honest. So the intention is to remove the centre section of the roof when operating steam hauled stock, and also use a good dose of DMU (and even EMU Class 503 : modellers licence here) operation to obviate the need for uncoupling . A bit of a minories the way the track plan has ended up really. Although it won't be a static diorama by any means, the main interest for me is the nostalgia and the process of construction - sorry if that upsets the operators out there, but each to their own I guess - the hobby is a broad church after all!
  19. Thanks for all your thoughts folks – most appreciated. @Hal Nail I’m hoping that the building won’t need moving once installed, but I recognise now that some sort of semi-permanent fixing might be desirable for those unforseen issues that could occur once in a while, so dowel (or threaded bar as suggested by @Nick C) would be sensible. I do like the beam front and mid-way idea though – I reckon that might give the rigidity I’m looking for, albeit with the inconvience of cutting slots in the baseboard top to accomodate them. Just to clarify the construction, these two photos show the centre removable section of roof under construction – it will be flanked at either end by a ‘fixed’ section of roof, which I’m hoping will enhance the rigidity of the walls further. On this inside shot, you can just make out the two longitudinal brass strips (like @AndrueC‘s ‘skids’) that are the foundation for the roof trusses of the removable section, at the top of the walls. I’m hoping that will brace the walls from falling in on themselves even more. The trusses themselves are slotted into gauge 1 cast track chairs at each end which are epoxied to the brass ‘skids’, so are quite firm. I don't want to add more bracing at the top of the wall, in order to maintain the 'openness' of the trainshed, as this was a feature of the actual Woodside that has inspired it. Cheers all - like I said, all appreciated, good food for thought.
  20. Thanks Jeff - a friend of mine suggested the same thing (and I might actually do that), but it's not really the problem of location, it's the keeping of everything together whilst its being built! Erm... yes...afraid so...! 😃 The walls themselves are pretty strong though - they have a central core of 4mm, with overlays of 2mm on either side, so they've ended up as a sort of mdf ply. I'm not worried about them individually - just when everything gets joined together. Cheers.
  21. No - it's a lyout that never leaves home - and thanks for your 'BTW'! Interesting! Hadn't thought of that one - thanks. However, where it is going to sit has a number of cross braces underneath the 1/2" chipboard, so may throw up all kinds of issues. They might however, support the potential insert though, so more thought/investigation on that is required. Cheers.
  22. I don’t think I’ve planned this very well. I’m a fair way into building a terminus building (‘inspired by’) Birkenhead Woodside, but half the length, half the width. It’s still big (and getting heavier) at over a metre long and about 375mm wide, and now I’m starting to look at bringing the walls and end-screen together (once detail painted and weathered), I have a niggly feeling that I have underestimated the strength needed to handle the part-completed building prior to final installation. All walls are layered mdf covered with a skin of embossed plasticard. The end wall has already been glued and screwed to a piece of chipboard which will form part of the concourse. The walls themselves will be glued (and probably dowelled) to the end-wall/concourse – the attachment points forming a sort of ‘L’-shape on both walls. Please see this amended photo of the end-wall as it stands - the ‘red’ areas will be the to-be-bonded areas. At the other ‘open’ end, I’ve contrived to brace the walls apart with a section of old bullhead rail, bent at either ends, to be epoxied into the end towers on assembly. See below showing the brace and joins on a computer-generated sketch: All well and good, but as I said, I’m getting a nagging feeling that this will still result in a rather fragile structure – especially at the bottom of the open end. So I thought I should finally ask for guidance now I’m this far along!! I can’t do anything more at roof height, as the roof will be removable during operation in order to aid access, and the base of the walls obviously need to be free of obstruction in order for the rails to pass into the shed. The other photos are included to give a perception of the size of the work in progress – everything is just lightly clamped a the moment: The only thing I can think of would be to assemble and glue the building to a piece of ply of the thinnest thickness I can get away with. It does, however, mean that the approach rails would have to slope up to the train shed in order to get over the threshold (so to speak). If I went this way, would 3mm do the job do you think? Have I answered my own question? I would appreciate comments/thoughts as to my perception that this will end up fragile (if built as originally intended), and indeed, if anyone has had a similar problem? If you did, how did you overcome it? Thanks in advance.
  23. Not sure if anyone will have the answer to this one, but on the basis of “the only dumb question is the one that you don’t ask”, here it is anyway… I’m making a model terminus which is ‘based-on’ (or more realistically ‘inspired by’), Birkenhead Woodside and will end up as a ‘sort-of’ Minories affair. Where that station had a two-span trainshed, mine will have just one (space constraints), and will be half as long. The walls are built, and I have turned my attention to the trainshed roof. Woodside seems to have had curved access ladders on each end of each roof, arcing up towards each apex, but they didn’t meet, stopping at the line of the clerestory. They did, however, seem to be able to move laterally along the roofs themselves (some photos show the same ladders in different positions) – the thing is, I can’t see any mechanism to enable this movement (rails/runners, etc), so can anyone tell me how they were attached, or how they slid? Anything welcomed. Incidentally, the magnificent Merseyside MRS model of Woodside on display in Birkenhead Town Hall seems to have omitted these features completely. It's all a bit difficult to explain in words, so a few snipped and zoomed shots may be prudent - sorry, some of them are a bit fuzzy, but the best I've got. Can anyone see something that I’ve missed? I wouldn’t have thought Woodside was unique in it’s roof access after all, but I can’t work it out – I’ll probably end up making it up like I usually do!
×
×
  • Create New...