Jump to content
 

billy_anorak59

Members
  • Posts

    348
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by billy_anorak59

  1. 1 hour ago, 34theletterbetweenB&D said:

    Was your father interested in railway matters?

    No, not really - he was more interested in aircraft and navy - he wouldn't have had a clue what the engine was. The only time I remember him talking anything about railway was him saying how he saw a filthy black 'Mallard' at Kings Cross when traveling from camp in the RAF.

     

    Thanks for the link!

    • Friendly/supportive 1
  2. 25 minutes ago, H2O said:

    Silhouette looks like a MR 3F or 4F to me  however I'll bow to more learned visitors to this site.

     

    If you can find the distance between the visible uprights on the bridge handrails or between the cross members then you may be able to estimate the major dimensions to a reasonable degree. e.g. chimney to dome or smoke box to back of tender, if you are that determined! :-)

    Thanks.

    I was thinking maybe an NB D30 or similar? I can 'almost' make out a full splasher and half of one - as per a compound or 2P?

    I'm also not at all sure if 3 or 4Fs were commonly hauling passenger stock over that line? (not saying they didn't though!)

     

  3. On 28/03/2024 at 20:05, Halvarras said:

    And back to Reading for 47365 - sunset on two-tone green 47s? Well, not quite..........- 27th August 1976:

    760827_47365Readingnp.jpg.8ff57493d138c697ca734013eaeb91a5.jpg

     

    47 365 was in Crewe works (open day) on 24 September 1977 with dominos. Not a great picture, but as a record shot it's OK:

    47365CreweWorks240977w.jpg.df41221ce7eca7cd3c4f814c3c9e9726.jpg

    • Like 3
  4. I recently found a very small snapshot (it's about an inch x an inch) in my Mum's photograph shoe-box which was taken in about 1952 whilst my parents were on a motorbike tour of Scotland. The photo shows a train (heading south) on the approach girders of the Forth Bridge.

     

    ForthApproachC1952.jpg.bf933188cfd0daac376e610645e024a7.jpg

     

    I've scanned it as best I can, but I still can't quite make out what the loco is.

    It looks to be a 4-4-0  "D-something or other", but I thought someone on here might be able to help more positively?

     

    I realize it might be beyond identifying, but I'd just be interested if anyone can tell me what my Dad photographed some 70-odd years ago - no other reason than that, really.

  5. 14 hours ago, jbhtrams said:

    now it is presently closed and no sign of it opening in yhd near future!

     

    No idea what is happening at the Wirral Transport museum - last I heard was it had been taken over by something called 'Big Heritage' - whatever that is. Looks a great place for relatively modern single and double decker buses that have tenuous links to Wirral, but if you want all inclusive transport (which includes (gasp) railway! artifacts), you're going to be well disappointed. This was the last I saw:

     

    https://bigheritage.co.uk/an-exciting-future-for-wirral-transport-museum/

     

    13 hours ago, adb968008 said:

    but its too late now anyway, the cabs already cut off and in wales.

     

    Yes, all too late - as you say, the DTS cab is cut and in Wales, and the TS was cut 2 weeks ago I believe. Shame really, as the TS DID have buffers, and could have been hauled stock, although I'm not sure how any heritage line would have blown the doors open at each stop, unless the haulage had a compressor. It's buffer arrangement is seen here:

     

    P1050470.JPG.23424f3b4a3a9409b0669d373c086feb.JPG

     

    All that can be hoped for is that now the DTS and TS have gone, efforts can now be concentrated on 690 and it can find a long lasting home and under cover. Preferably in its home environment.

     

    • Like 1
  6. 17 hours ago, russ p said:

    Has a car of the 502 been scrapped?  I know probably easier said than done but would it not be a good idea to unite the 3 surviving mersey units to illustrate the difference between the two units

     

    The Class 502 is preserved as a two-car unit (they could be found as 2 or 3 car when in service), so both the DMBS and DTC of that unit have cabs. Not sure where you would put the remaining DMBS of the 503 in that case? (which also has a cab)

     

    Also, the 503s have no buffing gear on the cab ends (just an automatic buckeye), so coupling would be a headache.

    Indeed, the lack of buffing gear may also have led to it being less than attractive as towed stock (maybe by Class 73) on a heritage line.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  7. A trip to from the North West to London Victoria (by car, parked at Cockfosters, LU to Victoria) to pick up my cousin, who'd been abroad somewhere.

    Now this was exotic - the land of the 'Night Ferry' and the 'Golden Arrow' - can't wait!

     

    On to the concourse and...    oh.

     

    Row upon row of what looked like Mk1 coaches with two red rectangular lights in the middle of the corridor connections all sitting at the buffer stops.

    How disappointed was I ?

    Being used to Class 08s, 24s, 25s, 40s and 47s this was a strange land indeed.

     

    • Like 3
  8. 9 hours ago, 31A said:

     I loved going there when Sir Nigel Gresley was being restored; it was fascinating to be able to look down onto a dismantled A4, identify the parts lying around and seeing how it all went together, it was like seeing a 1:1 Scale kit on a workbench.  There were usually other locos from the Collection in there as well with various things being done to them.

     

    Here's a reminder for you then...

     

    P1080360cr.jpg.e13b30a1947a4596e81ec8163e51206c.jpgP1080361cr.jpg.1da14342cf1fced9b029fdb5e50b9d94.jpg

    • Like 7
    • Thanks 2
  9. 13 hours ago, Northmoor said:

    While this is sad news it is probably the best remaining outcome if it means one car is conserved.

    Absolutely! One car is obviously better than none, and it means the best fittings from all 3 cars can be combined to one complete car. This unit was always going to be static, and one complete car has the same interpretation potential as all three I guess.

     

    Indeed I concur with all of your points, but I think a lot of enthusiasts don’t contribute until they can see that the project is viable, that they aren’t throwing their hard-earned money at a hopeless cause, and that project has a final outcome either as a static display (preferably under cover), or living and breathing on a heritage line. The hard part is getting the project off the ground and then getting the momentum. Because EMUs are unlikely to run that’s hard to buy into without a firm plan for its final outcome. Tough all round.

     

    I met Graham G a few times at the Coventry ERM – he came over as a nice guy, and I much respect his hard work and what he (and all the volunteers) achieved there, in what were obviously far from ideal conditions.

     

    I think what I was wittering on about previously is that there is a Wirral Transport Museum (was controlled by Wirral Council – now turned over to ‘Big Heritage’), which could have any number of Hong Kong trams and 80’s Atlantean buses, but the railway aspect is massively (completely?) neglected. So it’s not really a transport museum in its full sense (to me), when it should be. And the exhibits should be mainly pertinent to Wirral (to me).

     

    As I read it, the remaining Class 503 car will still have no home – the Big Heritage museum would be the ideal (and obvious) place for it if restored, surely, close as it is to its old stomping ground? It would be great shown in a setting (small section of station platform, doors operating, compressor sounds?), much as the remaining LOR car is displayed on its overhead structure across the water in Liverpool.

     

    But where could it be restored? I had hoped that Hooton Park could offer a restoration base, but seemingly the hangers there are full (mainly buses, lorries and caravans last time I looked). Shame.

    And the people to do it? I’m sure they are out there, somewhere – witness what the guys at Burscough are achieving with the Class 502.

     

    Finding them? Sorry, no answer/clue...

    • Like 4
  10. When were you involved with it Jason?

     

    I personally reckon the rot started when the unit was split up the first time, and then when Wirral Council lost interest, probably to enjoy that other well-known Wirral icon, U-Boat U-534 (which they then cut into 3 pieces – at least the cl 503 is already in 3 pieces).

     

    I think it was the Class 503 DMBS that was then left outside at the mercy of the elements and vandals.

     

    As for the new museum, I’ll believe it when I see it – and even then, I’ll be amazed if it has any railway items of note. Positioned where proposed, it’s also going to need some pretty hefty security.

     

    For the existing ‘Wirral Transport Museum’ (closed since November 2023), read ‘Wirral Bus and Tram Museum’. However, the new ‘Big Heritage Wirral Transport Museum’ seems to be talking a good job (so far), but when things like the Class 503 are being lost, and Mersey Railway No5 ‘Cecil Raikes’ still languishes in store, I’m afraid I can’t take the vision of a truly holistic transport museum reflective of all aspects of Wirral transport too seriously.

     

    Thing is, no-one wants EMUs, do they? However historical - although the current appeal for the Class 507 seems to have a following - we'll see.

     

    • Like 2
    • Agree 2
  11. 19 minutes ago, Steamport Southport said:

    Hobbies used to sell proper kits and all the little bits such as wheels and buffers. ISTR the model part was upstairs.

    Yes - the model railway section was upstairs (turn left at the top of the stairs) : Hobbies on Tarleton Street and as I remember it:

    Hobbies Tarleton Street.jpg

    • Like 9
    • Thanks 1
  12. Like everyone else, I’m shocked at the news. Hattons are/were one of those constants in my life – always there.

     

    Also an indelible part of my teenage years, and I recall Saturday afternoons at the 180 Smithdown Road shop fondly in the mid to late 1970s.

    Football in the morning, a quick bit of lunch, a bus to Birkenhead Woodside and the Mersey Ferry over to Liverpool Pier Head, then the No 86 bus to the shop. An hour or two spent browsing (and sometimes buying!) and then home again in time for Dr Who.

    Got my 18th Birthday present from there (Dublo Co-Bo – brand new, sealed – still got it).

    I also ‘nearly’ got a pre-war clockwork Sir Nigel Gresley for £5, until Norman spotted the transaction taking place from the gloom within the shop – never knew he could move so fast! Turned out it ‘wasn’t for sale’…

    In recent years, Hattons was always my ‘go to’ shop, and never received anything but exemplary service from them.

     

    Very best wishes to all the staff – I hope they can all move on quickly with their livelihoods and prosper.

    • Like 8
    • Agree 1
    • Friendly/supportive 2
  13. 2 hours ago, Merseycider said:

    there was for a period BR blue, small yellow panel. I've only seen about 3 phots of the SYP jobbies

    Ah yes Jonesy - forgot that one... this is Birkenhead North c.1975 (apparently - seems a bit late to me)

    Some say it was chromatic blue, but I think that's debatable!

    M28686M-BirkNorth-1975-FB.jpg.a20af8175a72842c76276da0af122f62.jpg

    I'm sure I've seen a 502 in that livery somewhere, but can't think where just for the moment.

     

    Edit: Just found a wraparound, 'custard dip' one too... so plenty to go at!M29131M-RockFerry-FullYellow-FB.jpg.28d471e0a74ea7c03799b4896e74afc3.jpg

     

    • Like 3
  14. On 01/12/2023 at 11:48, Steamport Southport said:

    Liveries? LMS Crimson, BR Crimson, BR Green, BR Blue, BR Blue/Grey. That's five off the top of my head. 

     

    BR Green for these units can be split into 3 variants: -

    Light Green (Malachite?)

    M28690M-ColParkorNorthCr.jpg.46fb9559cb6d618ee521aceca8b790ae.jpg

    Dark Green ('Standard' Stock Green)

    503-M28687M-AllDGreen.jpg.294943a374abd4f123fd8d0a2cf5f157.jpg

    Dark Green with SYP (and coaching stock roundels)

    M28690M-ColNewBrighton.jpg.ab29267808840f8f6c62260af9c97455.jpg

     

    Agreed - never saw them dirty.

     

    Not so much livery, but another variant would be Blue/Grey with end doors...

    • Like 2
  15. 13 hours ago, DCB said:

     It looks great  but  can you really operate with the lid on...  Do you have an infallible uncoupling system? 

     

    Thanks, but the answer is probably no and no.

     

    I'm still on tension locks for most of my stock, so no infallible coupling system here!

     

    The main reason I went for a terminus with a lid was to bring back memories I have of Birkenhead Woodside (however I've compromised it here) when I was a child - I enjoy the building of scenery rather than operation to be honest. So the intention is to remove the centre section of the roof when operating steam hauled stock, and also use a good dose of DMU (and even EMU Class 503 modellers licence here) operation to obviate the need for uncoupling . A bit of a minories the way the track plan has ended up really. 

     

    Although it won't be a static diorama by any means, the main interest for me is the nostalgia and the process of construction - sorry if that upsets the operators out there, but each to their own I guess - the hobby is a broad church after all!

     

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  16. Thanks for all your thoughts folks – most appreciated.

     

    @Hal Nail  I’m hoping that the building won’t need moving once installed, but I recognise now that some sort of semi-permanent fixing might be desirable for those unforseen issues that could occur once in a while, so dowel (or threaded bar as suggested by @Nick C) would be sensible. I do like the beam front and mid-way idea though – I reckon that might give the rigidity I’m looking for, albeit with the inconvience of cutting slots in the baseboard top to accomodate them.

     

    Just to clarify the construction, these two photos show the centre removable section of roof under construction – it will be flanked at either end by a ‘fixed’ section of roof, which I’m hoping will enhance the rigidity of the walls further.

    aP1150352.JPG.d39b7e62bb8b87f8f55faa5b4f360719.JPG

     

    On this inside shot, you can just make out the two longitudinal brass strips (like @AndrueC‘s ‘skids’) that are the foundation for the roof trusses of the removable section, at the top of the walls. I’m hoping that will brace the walls from falling in on themselves even more. The trusses themselves are slotted into gauge 1 cast track chairs at each end which are epoxied to the brass ‘skids’, so are quite firm.

     

    aP1150362.JPG.8b7a85db8f3145ad48aad49bb804ba58.JPG

     

    I don't want to add more bracing at the top of the wall, in order to maintain the 'openness' of the trainshed, as this was a feature of the actual Woodside that has inspired it.

     

    Cheers all - like I said, all appreciated, good food for thought.

     

    • Like 9
  17. 1 hour ago, JeffP said:

    Could you attach a couple of cylindrical pegs pointing down, under the front corners?

    Then drill the baseboard at the appropriate place before gluing in bits of tubing to fit the pegs.

    Thanks Jeff - a friend of mine suggested the same thing (and I might actually do that), but it's not really the problem of location, it's the keeping of everything together whilst its being built!

     

    25 minutes ago, Enterprisingwestern said:

    A tad late though!

     

    Erm... yes...afraid so...! 😃 

    The walls themselves are pretty strong though - they have a central core of 4mm, with overlays of 2mm on either side, so they've ended up as a sort of mdf ply. I'm not worried about them individually - just when everything gets joined together. Cheers.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...