Jump to content
 

Recommended Posts

All,

there's being a number of conversations in other peoples threads about various aspects of Cemflos over the last few months eg,

 
 
So rather than continue to hijack those threads,  I thought I'd start a new one. The main driver behind this is three colour photographs that has recently appeared on Flickr of the down Cliffe-Uddingston Cemflos passing on the freight lines behind Newcastle Central.

 Beside the train being hauled by a Peak as opposed to the more normal class 40 there is all sorts of other interesting content in the photos. The Western Region Brake and buffer ride heights for instance. Looks like the photographs were taken in June1965.

 

Here you go. What do you think? Mike I hope you have medical assistance and plenty of tissues nearby?

 

24511439936_673a7c00b4_c.jpg

 

23910813243_bea7fc3b16_c.jpgCliffe -Uddingston Cement trains by Tony Lambert, on Flickr[/url]Cliffe -Uddingston Cement trains by Tony Lambert, on Flickr

 

The Front Brake Van.

24429326682_1598fa54ef_c.jpgBR 20Ton Brake Van by Tony Lambert, on Flickr[/url]BR 20Ton Brake Van by Tony Lambert, on Flickr

 

I suppose now that I've written that up somebody will tell me they are already being discussed elsewhere. :dontknow:

 

P

Edited by Porcy Mane
  • Like 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

All,

there's being a number of conversations in other peoples threads about various aspects of Cemflos over the last few months eg,

 
 
So rather than continue to hijack those threads,  I thought I'd start a new one. The main driver behind this is three colour photographs that has recently appeared on Flickr of the down Cliffe-Uddingston Cemflos passing on the freight lines behind Newcastle Central.

 Beside the train being hauled by a Peak as opposed to the more normal class 40 there is all sorts of other interesting content in the photos. The Western Region Brake and buffer ride heights for instance. Looks like the photographs were taken in June1965.

 

Here you go. What do you think? Mike I hope you have medical assistance and plenty of tissues nearby?

 

24511439936_09af5a72a0_o.jpgCliffe -Uddingston Cement trains; Hopper Cemflo by Tony Lambert, on Flickr

 

23910813243_725e853ced_b.jpgCliffe -Uddingston Cement trains by Tony Lambert, on Flickr

 

The Front Brake Van.

24429326682_e9b04467a0_b.jpgBR 20Ton Brake Van by Tony Lambert, on Flickr

 

I suppose now that I've written that up somebody will tell me they are already being discussed elsewhere. :dontknow:

 

P

 

My observations :-

 

upper photo - to my eye - definitely blue on yellow for the long panel;

 

LA 277 - quite possibly all subsidiary lettering in black; though the background to the commuted charge CC and star appears to be blue as opposed to the black of the NON POOL panel;

 

straight discharge pipes on the later LA 277, together with revised suspension and solebar strengthening plates;

 

the 1/507 brakevan B955229 appears, in later life, in PB's photo archive.

 

I am sure there are many other things to note - but that'll do for now.

 

Regards,

John Isherwood.

Link to post
Share on other sites

....

 

Are there any drawings available for these anywhere. I have searched but not come up with anything yet.

 

....the basic Rolling Stock Library outline diagram should be available on the Barrowmore MRG site.

 

Have a look at page 53. Remember it is always better to cross check dimensions shown on these diagrams where possible.....

 

http://www.barrowmoremrg.co.uk/BRBDocuments/BRPOWagons1Issue.pdf

 

I have a 1964 Eastern Region Freight Trains Load Book of the type issued to guards at this time. Special mention has been written into the spaces under class 4 trains of the Cliffe to Uddingston working of these wagons..."brake at each end, roller bearing, 32 light alloy wagons via Ferme Park, D15/6 loco (1550 HP class 3 loco)". Class 4 trains running at 55mph had to have a minimum 90% of the wagons fully braked....brake vans had to be fully fitted or piped & gauged only and must have a wheelbase of 15ft or more.

 

I last worked a rake of these from Ditton (ex Widnes) back to Earles sdgs via Weaver jcn & Northwich in the mid eighties driving 45034 when secondmanning Dennis Morton of Buxton shed. 50 mph 'vacuum passenger' braking/brake rate selector position. Have a picture somewhere taken in Ditton yard....I'll look it out...picture found but it was of the engineers trip which took us to Ditton from Guide Bridge and doesn't show the cement tanks. The rake of Cemflos just happened to be stabled there and we volunteered to take them back to Earles....not a regular sight though via Northwich as they used to run via Lymm in the booked working.

 

Here is one that I took at Chinley at a similar time   https://www.flickr.com/photos/43564631@N08/4569699681/in/album-72157622730543368/

 

Dave

Edited by Torr Giffard LSWR 1951-71
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

....

 

 

....the basic Rolling Stock Library outline diagram should be available on the Barrowmore MRG site.

 

Dave

Try http://www.barrowmoremrg.co.uk/Prototype.html , then look for Diagrams of PO Wagons Volume 1, and scroll through to PC001A. Bear in mind that this is a Weight Diagram, and is simply an outline sketch with some leading dimensions given. It is possible to create a reasonable scale drawing using these, and a selection of photos, as a starting point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try http://www.barrowmoremrg.co.uk/Prototype.html , then look for Diagrams of PO Wagons Volume 1, and scroll through to PC001A. Bear in mind that this is a Weight Diagram, and is simply an outline sketch with some leading dimensions given. It is possible to create a reasonable scale drawing using these, and a selection of photos, as a starting point.

 

 

....

 

 

....the basic Rolling Stock Library outline diagram should be available on the Barrowmore MRG site.

 

Have a look at page 53. Remember it is always better to cross check dimensions shown on these diagrams where possible.....

 

http://www.barrowmoremrg.co.uk/BRBDocuments/BRPOWagons1Issue.pdf

 

Dave

Thanks Dave and Brian its a good start anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that Paul has a serious thread started how long till we all go seriously off topic....

I like the torpedo vents on the guards van Paul, they look just like the low profile ones I've just done.

LOL

 

Dave Franks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it does. Considering how few colour photos there are of rolling stock in the 1960s fascinating that this brake van managed to be recorded twice and at such distances apart! http://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brbrakediag507/eca654ab

 

Back on topic, my Cemflos are at http://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/cemflo A copy of the diagram is at the end, although issued for a specialist suspension.

 

Paul

Edited by hmrspaul
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice the two different suspensions used in the same train in virtually identical wagons. The first has aux rubber suspension and the original solebar, the other has continental style/uic long link suspension with the late solebar re-enforcement. Did these variations mix, or did the solebar change at the same time as the suspension?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And a crash scene, but not Thirsk.

https://flic.kr/p/beu9UK

 

The crash scene is at Uddingston at the junction for the Bellshill line south east of Glasgow, only about a mile away from the Bluecircle depot.

And the off topic fact is, that my local model shop is only a hundred yards from the scene, mostly aircraft and R/C cars though and also not forgetting the Tunnocks factory nearby too.

 

Dave Franks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it does. Considering how few colour photos there are of rolling stock in the 1960s fascinating that this brake van managed to be recorded twice and at such distances apart! http://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brbrakediag507/eca654ab

 

Back on topic, my Cemflos are at http://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/cemflo A copy of the diagram is at the end, although issued for a specialist suspension.

 

Paul

 

The numerically subsequent 1/507 B955230 was also a PADDINGTON RU :-

 

post-2274-0-81468600-1454254645_thumb.jpg

 

post-2274-0-73982700-1454254660_thumb.jpg

 

post-2274-0-03430300-1454254676_thumb.jpg

 

(If anyone claims copyright of the above photos, and objects to them being posted here, I'll remove them).

 

Regards,

John Isherwood.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Smashing photos!

 

The first one is of a Gloucester built vehicle. The more you look, the more variations you come across in the GRCW solebar stiffeners. The works photo of the first-built shows none, other photos show a pair of rectangular plates, this one shows a pair of winged plates, while what I previously thought standard is a single long plate pierced by two elliptical holes. I wish I could find a scaleable broadside view of one of those! Anyone got views on whether these plates are inset flush with the solebar flanges, or welded to the outside tip of the flanges? The latter would be easier, needing only fillet welds.

 

The second shot is of a Metro-Cammell built vehicle with its single long plate stiffener pierced by a series of circular holes. The suspension was revised to a UIC pattern for the M-C builds, and it was wear in the links, associated with the abrasive loads, that was identified in the accident report as the root cause of the 1967 derailment.

 

The Nim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

....the Thirsk derailment was a trigger point for the revised suspension. The whole fleet was grounded for a while.

 

Dave

 

Smashing photos!

 

The more you look, the more variations you come across in the GRCW solebar stiffeners. The works photo of the first-built shows none, other photos show a pair of rectangular plates, this one shows a pair of winged plates, while what I previously thought standard is a single long plate pierced by two elliptical holes.

 

The second shot is of a Metro-Cammell built vehicle with its single long plate stiffener pierced by a series of circular holes. The suspension was revised to a UIC pattern for the M-C builds, and it was wear in the links, associated with the abrasive loads, that was identified in the accident report as the root cause of the 1967 derailment.

 

I think the poor ride qualities of these wagons were well known by manufacturers and BR from day one. I can't remember the source but I have read about the alloy underfame twisting on the Gloucesters and that lead to the  gusseting of the solebars and the subsequent adoption of UIC double link on the Met cams. With the Thirsk derailment (the last in a series with cemflos) involving unfortunate fatalities and with all the subsequent press coverage that heightened public awareness,  that led to a polarisation in trying to find a solution. The solution was eventually the design of a new wagon type.

 

This pic from the LNER forum shows the gusseting on Gloucesters:

http://lner-encyclopedia.com/forums/download/file.php?id=2113&sid=5ee5062db099fbb6848690a0963c8aad&mode=view

 

and there are these excellent images. Apologies if you have seen them already.

http://lner-encyclopedia.com/forums/download/file.php?id=2112&sid=5ee5062db099fbb6848690a0963c8aad&mode=view

 

http://lner-encyclopedia.com/forums/download/file.php?id=2114&sid=5ee5062db099fbb6848690a0963c8aad&mode=view

 

http://lner-encyclopedia.com/forums/download/file.php?id=2118&sid=5ee5062db099fbb6848690a0963c8aad&mode=view

 

P

 

Edit

Just to say that APCM  had started using Depressed Centre V tanks prior to Thirsk.

Edited by Porcy Mane
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that Paul has a serious thread started how long till we all go seriously off topic....

I like the torpedo vents on the guards van Paul, they look just like the low profile ones I've just done.

LOL

I'll allow you to get away with that thinly veiled attempt at subliminal marketing just because, 1) Dia. 1/507 Brake vans were an integral part of the Cliffe Uddingston ECML traffic, 2) The trains destination was in your locale and the product it carried allowed the building of a better Scotland, 3) Your'e a canny Scott with direct North East lineage, 4) You may consider casting a white metal line of heritage cast iron & concrete 4mm lamposts, 5) I constantly drag your threads off topic, 6) You've offered to take the team out for an Indian!

 

 

My moneys is on Paul's fixation with lamp posts...

 

How dare you suggest I have a fixation on street furniture, fixtures and fittings. Present you evidence. (In another thread if you please).

BTW. I once photographed these two curvaceous beauties.

post-508-0-81991900-1454265789.jpg

If it wasn't for the building of your kitchen the nearer of these two absolute stunners, might still survive!

Tenuously on topic, as these lamposts were daily threaded by successions of Conlat L's, Covhops, Presflos and probably the odd singleton Cemflo.

 

AARGhhhhhhh! I'm off again. Note to self, Write out 1000 times, "I must not drag my own topic, off topic".

 

P

 
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The numerically subsequent 1/507 B955230 was also a PADDINGTON RU :-

 

 

(If anyone claims copyright of the above photos, and objects to them being posted here, I'll remove them).

 

Regards,

John Isherwood.

There was a batch of these vans which had such writing. Some more are given in Gent E (1999) British Railways Brake vans and ballast ploughs. Pub. By HMRS 92pp. ISBN 0 – 902835 – 16 –5. Here is another http://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brbrakediag507/e1ca69721

 

Paul

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Small world.  The poster of the photos is a good mate of mine.  He and two other pals, both now sadly gone, were on the train following the one hauled by DP2 before it hit the cemflows - they were meant to BE on that train, but missed it.  They would have been in the first coach hanging out of the windows.....close call.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The poster of the photos is a good mate of mine.

 Tell him what a smashing job he did when taking them. Thank him for posting them up. The sight of them made me go all of a quiver.

 

P

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...