RailWest Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 Having previously mention Culkerton West GF, I came across this on the web https://bid.gwra.co.uk/past-auctions/srgw10013/lot-details/4b6dd1c7-d474-4c81-9d36-a888011e8f51 This plate, and its ‘East’ counterpart, were ordered in 1917. Apart from the different wording, the ‘North’ and ‘Station’ plates at Tetbury would have been of the same style and roughly the same size – I wonder where they are now? As an aside....given that previously at some unknown date there had been an order for a plain ‘Culkerton Ground Frame’ plate, I wonder if originally there had been just one central GF at Culkerton, replaced by separate ones at each end in 1917? I’ve not found any suitable reference yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrWolf Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 The ground frame plates were either "liberated" by souvenir hunters or smashed up for scrap. I had an interesting conversation with someone years ago regarding my collection of enamel signs (long gone and occasionally lamented) where it was rightly pointed out that they were still technically the property of the oil companies and their successors. (Some even have "property of..." Printed on them.) He went on to say - What about all that railwayana, that was nationalised and is technically property of the state? That's a can of worms for sure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Chris Chewter Posted November 29, 2020 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted November 29, 2020 A quiet scene at Tetbury, before S&T come in to move the point rodding about! 14 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RailWest Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 This is a crop from a 1936 photo of Tetbury. You get quite a good view of the back of the 'cover' of the Station GF and can even just about make out the nameplate on the wall facing the track. I am told that the cover had gone by 1955. You can see more clearly now also that the rod run from the North GF did not actually go past the ES at all, and that the rod from the Station GF only came as far as the base of the water tower. However I realise that the different relative positions of the relevant points to the ES on the model will change that. 3 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Chris Chewter Posted November 30, 2020 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted November 30, 2020 The misalignment of the points does change the appearance slightly. Point rodding has been adjusted but its been made worse by points 2 & 4 also being wrong. The options were leave it as a hand worked point, put a central run as the photo above, or move the points. I decided I wasn’t ready to move the points around, so I’ve gone with Option 2. And I still maintain that Wills point rodding is extremely annoying to work with! 10 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RailWest Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Each to his own devices, of course, but....I think I would have simply taken the run from the Station GF alongside the run from the North GF (ie a short section of double run) and then turned across under point 6 direct to point 3. I'm puzzled by the seemingly spurious cranks in the two runs in the 6-foot between the main and loop lines adjacent to point 2 ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Chris Chewter Posted November 30, 2020 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted November 30, 2020 Re the run in the six foot, I was trying to avoid a double run in front of the engine shed for photographic purposes. Also I may in the future brave moving the points, and wanted the flexibility to switch things about. The spurious cranks were due to my limited understanding of the back of the Wills packet. Swapping them out for a bit of brass rod isn’t a big issue, but it’s sure not going to be more Wills rodding! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RailWest Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 17 minutes ago, Chris Chewter said: Re the run in the six foot, I was trying to avoid a double run in front of the engine shed for photographic purposes. Also I may in the future brave moving the points, and wanted the flexibility to switch things about. The spurious cranks were due to my limited understanding of the back of the Wills packet. Swapping them out for a bit of brass rod isn’t a big issue, but it’s sure not going to be more Wills rodding! Quite understood. I've not seen the back of a Wills packet (I assume we're not talking about Woodbines :-) ), but I can imagine that it might well be misleading for the uninitiated. And trying to get compensators in the 'right' place is an art in itself. But it's always good to see those who make an effort with rodding etc rather than simply ignore it as 'all too difficult'. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Chris Chewter Posted December 1, 2020 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted December 1, 2020 (edited) Decided to take a break from the point rodding. Well, I'm a bit stuck until the Wills SS91 ground frame kits turn up, so I decided to do a bit of photography instead. Unfortunately with most of the photos, something was out of focus, but I did manage to get this one which seemed alright. Edited December 1, 2020 by Chris Chewter 17 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold checkrail Posted December 2, 2020 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 2, 2020 17 hours ago, Chris Chewter said: but I did manage to get this one which seemed alright. That's a really nice pic. I like the shadow of the station building canopy. Looks like a sunny day. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Chris Chewter Posted December 2, 2020 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted December 2, 2020 I was a little bit dissatisfied with the weathering of 6417 when I took it down from the shelf yesterday, but it seems to look alright in the photos. However it appears that some of the point rodding is floating, which is a tad irritating. Looks like I need to glue and weigh it down again! 10 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Chris Chewter Posted December 4, 2020 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted December 4, 2020 I was experimenting with the layout lighting last night. The area above the goods shed is always been a bit gloomy and I think I need to move the lights to the front of the layout, rather than being fitted to the wall behind. This is with the lighting as it is And with the lighting moved to the front. Looks like I better get drilling! 10 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Chris Chewter Posted December 4, 2020 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted December 4, 2020 Ground frames corrected (after a visit to Starbucks to pick up some coffee stirrers) North Station And south (I know South isn’t a precise match against the photo, and the coffee stirrers are a bit thick, but it’s closer than what was there previously!) 15 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RailWest Posted December 4, 2020 Share Posted December 4, 2020 Looking a lot less 'shiny' now - what would we do without coffee-stirrers? Certainly "looks the part" much more now IMHO :-) Not quite sure though what is going on here:- the main part of the rod run heading towards point 4 should be continuous at the same level. Only the link piece to the crank should drop down to the lower level. 3 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrWolf Posted December 4, 2020 Share Posted December 4, 2020 Looks like I will have a lot to learn when I fit the point rodding runs to my layout. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Chris Chewter Posted December 4, 2020 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted December 4, 2020 It’s been a voyage of discovery! The Wills instructions don’t even touch details like this so it’s all valuable stuff. However, is it worth my sanity to adjust it? Perhaps a job for a day when I’m feeling very patient! 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RailWest Posted December 4, 2020 Share Posted December 4, 2020 Not quite the ideal image, but the nearest I could find without a vast amount of searching. You will have to try and 'flip' it in your mind! Clearly with the run starting at a ground-level frame much closer to the point there would be no lead-away crank and probably only the one compensator. Fortunately, being a GF rather than a SB installation, there is no need for lockbars on the FPLs, just a direct connection to the lock plunger (as you have at the moment). 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bgman Posted December 4, 2020 Share Posted December 4, 2020 1 hour ago, MrWolf said: Looks like I will have a lot to learn when I fit the point rodding runs to my layout. If you can source a copy of The 2mm Scale Association Point Rodding book its an invaluable help ( usual disclaimers ). G 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrWolf Posted December 4, 2020 Share Posted December 4, 2020 Thanks @bgman I do have a copy of that somewhere. I will have to dig it out and have another read. The engineering is easy enough, standard mechanical movement, but the way railway companies actually set everything out on the ground is what I need to understand. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Popular Post Chris Chewter Posted December 5, 2020 Author RMweb Gold Popular Post Share Posted December 5, 2020 I also moved the lighting last night as per my earlier post. It’ll be interesting to see how that affects the photographs going forwards. 20 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Chris Chewter Posted December 5, 2020 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted December 5, 2020 To test the revised lighting and to see how 6417 looks on camera, I took the opportunity for a spot of silent running on the layout today. 12 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Chris Chewter Posted December 6, 2020 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted December 6, 2020 Crew and guard take a break from the mid-day shunt. 17 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Chris Chewter Posted December 9, 2020 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted December 9, 2020 A more typical view of a 14xx on shed at Tetbury 12 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Chris Chewter Posted December 10, 2020 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted December 10, 2020 Whilst walking the field above the station, a quick look down reveals a pannier in charge of a single coach train today. 15 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Popular Post Chris Chewter Posted December 11, 2020 Author RMweb Gold Popular Post Share Posted December 11, 2020 9759 awaits the guards signal before departing towards Culkerton and Kemble. 20 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now