MarcD Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 The dimensions were a movable feast one of the prototypes was slightly higher than the other two. Not sure which one it was. As it was higher it was used a little less than the other two. Marc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium 2ManySpams Posted April 15, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted April 15, 2019 30586, the one with square splashers had a higher tank filler. It was too high to be easily filled from the feed in Pencarrow Woods, hence why 30585 and 30587 tended to be used more on Wenford jobs and 30586 on Wadebridge shunting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
N15class Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 Are these of any help? I will look in my notes later and see what I've got, mostly conjuncture I think. 1 1 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Hal Nail Posted April 16, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted April 16, 2019 (edited) There is definitely an existing thread on this subject as I’ve posted a photo I took of the filler previously. I’ll find it, or the photo, when I’ve next got my laptop out. Edit: cant find the old thread - seems to have gone. Basically it was a collection of several peoples 7mm well tanks. Edited April 17, 2019 by Hal Nail updating info 1 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hayfield Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 Thanks a photo is worth a thousand words Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now