RMweb Gold TomE Posted August 13, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted August 13, 2016 There doesn't appear to be a dedicated thread for this release, so I thought i'd post a few thoughts and photos for those interested. I first placed my order for this model way back in March 2012 just after the model was first announced, so it's been a wait of 4 1/4 years for it to reach the market, which I think is the longest gestation period of any of the recent Fairsh models. Hopefully the days of us waiting this long for models are coming to an end, but it does beg the question, was it worth the wait? Yes, would be my answer! The 'olde Farish' 4MT was not a bad model, however it was very much a product of it's time. A die cast body with soft detail, solid wheels and unpredictable performance pegged it firmly in the Poole era, and despite a slight refresh by Bachmann not long after the takeover of the Farish range, it was really showing its age. The new model blows it clean out of the water in every aspect, from fine detail down to smooth controllable performance straight out of the box, for my example anyway. I thought it would be interesting to compare the 4MT with the Fairburn Tank. Announced after but released some time before the 4MT. Unlike the prototype however, there appears to be virtually no similarity between the models, continuing Bachmann's long held policy of producing bespoke chassis for the class being modelled. My example will eventually become 80150, long time Barry resident until it's move to the Mid Hants a couple of years ago. Hopefully it will return to steam at somepoint in the future, however I suspect that project will make the wait for the model seem short in comparison! Tom. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bon Accord Posted August 13, 2016 Share Posted August 13, 2016 I bought 80027 (an ScR loco) from Harburn Hobbies yesterday and I too have been thoroughly impressed so far . I'm a recent entrant to N gauge, a diversion of interest that would never have happened without the incredible transformation in detail levels and running qualities in recent years, particularly since the Bachmann takeover of Farish and Dapol raising their game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roy L S Posted August 13, 2016 Share Posted August 13, 2016 Mine are on order from my local shop, I am keenly awaiting their arrival based on all that I have seen and heard so far. As to length of wait, I think we waited longer for the Ivatt 2-6-0 but wasn't the wait worth it! Roy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pH Posted August 13, 2016 Share Posted August 13, 2016 I bought 80027 (an ScR loco) from Harburn Hobbies yesterday. 80119 was a Scottish Region engine too, even if only for its last 18 months before being withdrawn. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold TomE Posted August 13, 2016 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted August 13, 2016 As to length of wait, I think we waited longer for the Ivatt 2-6-0 but wasn't the wait worth it! Ah yes, the Ivatt. I would say that the one benefit of that wait was we ended up with a loco drive mechanism rather than the tender drive it would probably have had if released on the original schedule. In that respect the wait was worth it, and my personal experience is that the loco drive models are far superior in performance to the tender drive, although I know some might disagree. Tom. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
msw2009 Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 Excellent pictures, thanks Tom E - it looks a lovely model. Good idea to compare it with the Fairburn - they do look quite different. Have always preferred the smoother sides and boxier profile of the 4MT. Hopefully my local shop, Great Eastern Models, will have 80119 delivered this week. Mark Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Nig H Posted August 14, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted August 14, 2016 There doesn't appear to be a dedicated thread for this release, so I thought i'd post a few thoughts and photos for those interested. I first placed my order for this model way back in March 2012 just after the model was first announced, so it's been a wait of 4 1/4 years for it to reach the market, which I think is the longest gestation period of any of the recent Fairsh models. Hopefully the days of us waiting this long for models are coming to an end, but it does beg the question, was it worth the wait? Yes, would be my answer! The 'olde Farish' 4MT was not a bad model, however it was very much a product of it's time. A die cast body with soft detail, solid wheels and unpredictable performance pegged it firmly in the Poole era, and despite a slight refresh by Bachmann not long after the takeover of the Farish range, it was really showing its age. The new model blows it clean out of the water in every aspect, from fine detail down to smooth controllable performance straight out of the box, for my example anyway. I thought it would be interesting to compare the 4MT with the Fairburn Tank. Announced after but released some time before the Unlike the prototype however, there appears to be virtually no similarity between the models, continuing Bachmann's long held policy of producing bespoke chassis for the class being modelled. My example will eventually become 80150, long time Barry resident until it's move to the Mid Hants a couple of years ago. Hopefully it will return to steam at somepoint in the future, however I suspect that project will make the wait for the model seem short in comparison! Tom. Hello Tom, I'm wondering if my 2FS conversion kit for the Fairburn can be used for the standard 4MT too. Can you tell if the wheelbase and valve gear dimensions are the same on both types, or where the differences are? Nig H Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold TomE Posted August 14, 2016 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted August 14, 2016 Hello Tom, I'm wondering if my 2FS conversion kit for the Fairburn can be used for the standard 4MT too. Can you tell if the wheelbase and valve gear dimensions are the same on both types, or where the differences are? Nig H Hi Nig. I've just done a rough measure up of the 4MT and Fairburn and both wheelbase and valve gear dimensions appear to be identical. Tom. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Higgs Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 Hi Nig. I've just done a rough measure up of the 4MT and Fairburn and both wheelbase and valve gear dimensions appear to be identical. Tom. From the photos I have seen, Fairburns have fluted rods whereas BR Standards have plain. EDIT: or perhaps not. Photos of 80002, 80007, 80052 and 80072 seem to have fluted rods. Later numbers e.g. 80080 onwards have plain. So it looks like it could be usable for early build 80xxx. Wikipedia seems to have the definitive answer: Initially built with fluted coupling rods, these caused problems on other classes and from 80079 plain section coupling rods were substituted. Chris Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold McRuss Posted August 14, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted August 14, 2016 Can anyone tell me what kind of 6pin chip could be inserted, one that is widely used 6pin chip or one similar to the one used in the 3F Jinty? Markus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold TomE Posted August 14, 2016 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted August 14, 2016 Hi Markus. It takes a normal 6pin chip, not the version with the pins at 90 degrees as used in the 3F. I've put a Zimo MX621N in mine and there was plenty of room to spare. Tom. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roy L S Posted September 1, 2016 Share Posted September 1, 2016 Finally got my two today. I can only endorse what others have said, what absolutely fantastic models. It is hard to find fault at all. Both run like proverbial sewing machines and have a level of detail and finish that is truly exquisite. I really don't know what Bachmann can do to raise the bar further but I'm sure they will find a way! Roy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Crepello Posted September 2, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted September 2, 2016 Finally got my two today. I can only endorse what others have said, what absolutely fantastic models. It is hard to find fault at all. Both run like proverbial sewing machines and have a level of detail and finish that is truly exquisite. I really don't know what Bachmann can do to raise the bar further but I'm sure they will find a way! Roy Maybe to fit those fiddly coupling hooks like Dapol do! Plus to include some Dapol couplings in the box, though I can't see that happening! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
acourtrail Posted September 2, 2016 Share Posted September 2, 2016 I might consider getting one, but, has anyone who has bought the new Standard 4MT tank had one with the "Fairburn wobble"? I was wondering if this model had the same problem as the chassis looks similar, and the problem with the Fairburns might be present in the 4MT too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom J Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 No 'Fairburn Wobble' on my 80119 which arrived from Widnes today. Thank goodness. There is a distinct difference in the amount of movement in the radius rod and expansion link between the two sides of the loco but it runs smoothly and tracks straight. After a really dispiriting run of 'duds' in one way or another it looks like I've got lucky! Finally I have a Std 4MT tank and an Ivatt 2MT mogul - the two locos I wrote to Bachmann to ask them to make when I was about ten years old! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevelewis Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 A quick |digital query on the 2-6-4T I am experiencing a slight problem with the digital running of the loco, firstly I would add the loco runs fine without any problems on analogue, However when digitized it runs smoothly on speed steps 1 to 4 accelerating smoothly but on step 5 it speeds up unrealistically. remains at the same speed thro step 6 then slows at speed step 7 to what it should have been had it accelerated smoothly from step 4. Thereafter it accelerates smoothly through the rest of the speed step range . I have a lot of digital experience spanning the last 20 yrs, so I have tried a few things to rectify the problem, including decoder resets and adjusting the relevant speed step cvs for steps 5 & 6 to different values, these had no effect whatsoever, I also checked for on board capacitors but none located UNLESS any one has any info as to where any may be located?? The decoder in question is a Gaugemaster DCC28 Now this is the big BUT I have tried the loco with 3 of these decoders with exactly the same results!! I slipped one into a Farish EMU it worked perfectly!! So it would appear that there may be something with the loco not quite right The question of Coreless Motors also arises. Any views most welcome Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevelewis Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 Maybe to fit those fiddly coupling hooks like Dapol do! Plus to include some Dapol couplings in the box, though I can't see that happening! Well they could include some Bachmann USA N Gauge Knuckle Couplings ( providing they had NEM fittings) but I don't suppose that will happen either!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold TomE Posted March 21, 2017 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted March 21, 2017 A quick |digital query on the 2-6-4T Hi Steve. I can't comment on the Gaugemaster chip i'm afraid as I've never used them, but mine has a Zimo MX621N in it and I've had no issues like those you describe, in fact the running on DCC is better than DC in my case. Tom. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevelewis Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 Hi Steve. I can't comment on the Gaugemaster chip i'm afraid as I've never used them, but mine has a Zimo MX621N in it and I've had no issues like those you describe, in fact the running on DCC is better than DC in my case. Tom. It is a rather strange occurance, my immediate thoughts were capacitor interference, however non have been located in the loco, at the moment I have no alternative decoder brands to hand to test the loco with although I have to order some in the next few days to digitize some Heljan 00-9 L&B 2-6-2s coming my way hopefully. The only other thing which come to mind which comes to mind is an issue I had with a Haskins 0n30 Australian ' Puffing Billy' 2-6-2T which was Coreless Motor fitted and that demonstrated similar problems, I have used loads of Gaugemaster decoders and never had any problems,, the fact that I tried the decoder which was fitted to the 2-6-4T today in another loco to test it and it workded fine seems to indicate the fault does not lie with the decoder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveArkley Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 This is the third post I've seen in the last couple of weeks reporting problems with GaugeMaster chips and coreless Farish locos. The conventional wisdom is to disable DC (analogue) on the chip and if you have a Railcomm enabled controller disable Railcomm there too. Feedback from those who have tried this is that it solves the running problems which were being experienced. Worth a try! Cheers Dave Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevelewis Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 This is the third post I've seen in the last couple of weeks reporting problems with GaugeMaster chips and coreless Farish locos. The conventional wisdom is to disable DC (analogue) on the chip and if you have a Railcomm enabled controller disable Railcomm there too. Feedback from those who have tried this is that it solves the running problems which were being experienced. Worth a try! Cheers Dave Thanks Dave 20 years of messing around with digital and I completely ignored my own knowledge!! I will give it a go tomorrow!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevelewis Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 UPDATE...... i disabled analogue control on the decoder (the DCC28) absolutely no difference made to the speed surge around speed steps 5 & 6 etc. Next move was to do decoder swap between a known decoder which happened to be in a ROCO H0e Co Co electric loco and the DCC28 in the 2-6-4T The decoder from the Roco loco is a Bachmann standard 6 pin ( the cheaper ones now apparently no longer listed) the 2-6-4T ran perfectly!! I inserted the DCC28 into the ROCO and ' low & behold ' that works perfectly. So it remains a bit of a mystery, the strange thing being that the eratic running in the 2-6-4 occured withh THREE deifferent Gaugemaster DCC28s! I still lean towards suspecting coreless motor glitches , but keeping an open mind on that, I have another Farish Coreless motored loco arriving soon so I will be able to see what occurs with that one. Apologies if this has caused a bit of thread drift but thought it may be of interest to users One thing I would like to add as a general comment, I bought my first N Gauge back in the Dark Days when all that was available in UK outlne was Lima n & Minitrix ( the Minitrix was quite good we wont mention Lima) Graham Farish had not moved into N Gauge but Peco saw the potential and along came the PECO Jubilee 4-6-0 which was a real game changer I Bought the very first one to be sold in Manchester, from the Bassett-Lowke shop there, quickly followed by 2 or 3 more (£8.50 They cost ... half a weeks wages!!) I never fail to be very impressed by what we have today in N Gauge, the sector has taken A giant leap forward in the last few years, long may it continue. PS............................. I will now leave the Bachmann decoder in the 2-6-4T!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed-farms Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Not sure what the cause is but I read on the N Gauge Forum that someone had the same problem with a Farish Fairburn and a Gaugemaster chip, suffice to say so far I have only used Bachmann chips in Farish models and Gaugemaster chips in Dapol as its what they both seem to like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.