Jump to content
 

West Highland Line V4, a 1980's West Highland Line layout


young37215
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold

Having gained the confidence that the weathering stripping process works with the SK yesterday, today I stripped two more of the weathered coaches that need a tidy up. Once dry, BCK 21269 got replacement numbers, some passengers in second class only (I refuse to have any first class passengers) and a Springside tail lamp. CK 16201 was also stripped and when dry, renumbered as 16200 because I did not have any 16201 transfers left, second class passengers and a tail lamp was also added.

 

BCK 21269 before cleaning with a messy renumbering job.

 

2115242854_Coachrenumbering023.JPG.fb5762daddadc0bc5f1ba69d9c0ce866.JPG

After, clean body sides and fresh number. Hopefully a little matt varnish will secure the transfers and hide the old scratches.

82932941_170520002.JPG.358d6bf36e84b15cdfd79039f909b952.JPG

 

Rear of the BCK, I have taken to removing the top 3 steps on the left as these had largely been eradicated by the early 1980's. A bit of work sanding these down and then covering with a light weathering is still required.

1046452021_170520005.JPG.eeb889c9a5465ec13caabce6648e89a5.JPG

 

16201 before and after

2122360635_Finalcoachrenumber004.JPG.c87fec7668b924b69b4da1b417cb8825.JPG

343066778_170520014.JPG.0b095878db3ff2afe38d290f84a3bc67.JPG

 

Feeling brave after the progress with the coaches I decided to try cleaning 37022 which had been heavily weathered several years ago. Originally The Class 37 Loco Group's 37003 which has the cantrail dividing bars, I had incorrectly renumbered this as a Vulcan built loco which I want to correct and renumber as an RSH centre headcode, ex South Wales loco although I have not decided which of 190,191 or 192 it will be. Currently I have a heavily weathered version of 192 which does not have the cantrail bars which will also get a cleaning bath and a swap of nose ends with ex 022 creating a split headcode Vulcan and a RSH centre head code loco. I would prefer nose ends without bufferbeam skirts but you can't have everything. 

 

37022 went into the LA fluid and cleaned up very well. A couple of very small bits of weathering remain but I am happy to leave as it will get re-weathered once renumbered. Otherwise the loco is virtually back to its factory finish. There was minor collateral damage in that one of the windscreen wipers went down the plughole when being rinsed off and was quickly followed by one of the handrails off of a drivers door. Several handrails came loose but only one found freedom, hopefully making a replacement should not be too difficult. If anyone has a spare windscreen wiper for a class 37 please let me know.

 

2094956963_170520009.JPG.7112b7179b26f59c6e5550ad68921cfb.JPG

191646437_170520016.JPG.2739275cda0b6c3fd22de4362c901096.JPG

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

"I refuse to have any passengers in 1st Class !" ......what, not even one of us (dis)honest 2nd Class citizens, trying to pull a fast one ....and being duly sent back to the masses by the guard ?? :rolleyes:

Edited by 03060
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
23 hours ago, 03060 said:

"I refuse to have any passengers in 1st Class !" ......what, not even one of us (dis)honest 2nd Class citizens, trying to pull a fast one ....and being duly sent back to the masses by the guard ?? :rolleyes:

 

It is an unatural dislike on my part which I can indulge in on the basis it is my railway! Alternatively it can be attributed to the canny Scots and their reluctance to spend unnecessarily. Just for the record of course I never knowingly travelled in the wrong class of travel or without an appropriate ticket. :mocking_mini:

 

On a slightly more serious note, running trains will now take a back seat for a few days as I have lifted Fort William station onto my work bench. This will see point motors fitted, the track weathered and ballasted with the station platform height reduced by 3 or 4 mm to a more prototypical level before embedding it into the ballast. The last train to run for the immediate future was 37012 on an Oban to Glasgow service seen arriving from differing angles at Crianlarich. 

 

1786874928_165020004.JPG.0551d414a7959672987725487aea8908.JPG

1380340540_165020005.JPG.2e36819fd69c489f0e4f97480e4c998d.JPG

1278972380_165020006.JPG.307acaf3cbc3f257fe6e5237fdcab7c0.JPG

1698620590_165020007.JPG.d023c123f65ede462b7d90a70dbff172.JPG

1118493275_165020009.JPG.56691662fe7437b30aa91fc78eebe631.JPG

553134987_165020011.JPG.13816edb1335d653a17b21b164854345.JPG

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

A quiet day with just a little bit of activity with my renumbering project. What was 37022 has been cleaned and the nose ends swapped to a centre head code style to become 37192. The existing 37192 has been cleaned and swapped its centre head code nose with 37022’s old one to become 37111. Now I have the correct RSH and Vulcan bodyshell's on each loco.

 

Detailing is still incomplete and new Railtech numbers are awaited prior to a light weathering to finish. Despite the missing bits, the new locos are beginning to take shape. I do like the effects of not totally removing the old weathering which gives the effect I recall of a loco that has been through the wash but is not totally clean. This creates a useful starting point for a little more dirt to complete them but nowhere near the previous amounts.

 

CC8181CD-26E2-42C8-9B7F-9CC475FDE3D4.jpeg.71306f4d8d140f85bb7b405beffc2b98.jpeg

 

D87679A3-8C8A-4254-9E87-6847BA66A29D.jpeg.c60b59e3f7022b1bd9014fdda2e63bb7.jpeg

F238DD46-D361-4061-8E0F-F9E3FC20600E.jpeg.347b261eedae7f4ffbdbd27b822899cf.jpeg

C19D6A26-E2B9-40F0-8180-5987B8527CD5.jpeg.2b3d9827971f1e204e9171904270972d.jpeg

Edited by young37215
  • Like 5
  • Craftsmanship/clever 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Well none of you reading this thread were paying attention to my school boy error in the previous post. Look at the pictures again and you will note that the split headcode loco has air horns on the roof and on its nose end whilst the centre headcode loco has no horns at all! This has blown my plans to model one of the old South Wales, RSH built steam heat locos that migrated north in the early 80's using the split headcode body shell and centre headcode nose end. Irrittatingly there is no model available with both cantrail dividers and roof mounted air horns so I will have to fabricate my own cantrail dividers if I am to do one of 37184, 188, 190,191 or 192. I know others have done this but I am not keen on the thought. 

 

I now need to find suitable locos that I can renumber the two locos.  37085 is currently favourite for the split headcode with cantrail dividers (it is the only choice given I already have 37081) and 37175 for the centre headcode. I already have a version of 37085 but the loco does not have cantrail grills dividers so I am thinking this gets renumbered as well, probably as 37022.   

 

On the basis that the class 37 fleet totals 16 and given all of my current faffing, I have made a commitment to myself that it should not grow further! 16 is enough locos to run the WTT and that's before I think about the 2 x 20 and 3 x 27's at my disposal. I have however bought a bodyshell for a centre headcode 37 and a non motorised chassis to create a dummy loco to run as a double header. I have not decided on a renumber for this as yet, I fancy one of the Eastfield NB ones to provide some excitement when it gets a passenger train outing. A little more research is required to determine which one I go for. 

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
24 minutes ago, young37215 said:

Well none of you reading this thread were paying attention to my school boy error in the previous post.

 

:blush:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning & enjoying reading about your layout.  Not sure if you have solved the gravel question - I used sharp sand for platform gravel, possibly a touch golden, & was able to make lovely tyre marks as the glue set.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
18 hours ago, duncan said:

Good morning & enjoying reading about your layout.  Not sure if you have solved the gravel question - I used sharp sand for platform gravel, possibly a touch golden, & was able to make lovely tyre marks as the glue set.

 

I think it highly likely that sand would be good from a size perspective but I doubt that it would be available in the pinky brown colour found on the WHL and I do'nt fnacy the task of colouring whatever I use as gravel. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, young37215 said:

 

I think it highly likely that sand would be good from a size perspective but I doubt that it would be available in the pinky brown colour found on the WHL and I do'nt fnacy the task of colouring whatever I use as gravel. 

Look up glasspebbles.co.uk. They do sand in 70 different colours

Cheers

David

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I had a look earlier to today at the various sand options at glasspebbles.co.uk where they have a couple of colours that look close to that I seek. My concern is that the available sizes are 0.2mm and 0.5mm which are described as like icing sugar and granular sugar respectively. Based upon these descriptions I estimate that these are much the same as the Geoscenics n guage ballast and dust which I already have. On the basis that 1KG only costs a few £, I will order a bag of 0.5mm sand and see how it looks in reality. Whilst the finer material is probably more accurate for scale, it looks wrong and is difficult to work with. My expectation is that the larger material will be similar to the Geoscenics n guage ballast but, hopefully, I will be proved wrong. 

 

I also managed a little time working earlier. I have become distracted from the planned work on Fort William by the effectiveness of the LA Totally Awesome for cleaning up badly weathered rolling stock and am currently sorting out various minor issues with a number of coaches. Whilst watching an Everard Junction video I learnt that Bachmann Mk2 BFK's are under size compared against the Mk1and when I looked closer this was quite noticeable. A gasket made by a hole punch through 1mm plasticard and cut to shape is placed on top of the bogie raising the height of the BFK to nearer that of the Mk1. A simple enough task that takes just a few minutes and is very effective.

 

I must get my focus back on Fort William!  

 

Bachmann Mk1 comapred against a Mk2

337054899_240520006.JPG.afaa243de5d86be28b8523d5f23ea5fa.JPG

gasket made in a few minutes out of 1mm plasticard

 

1866861043_240520020.JPG.1aab5edef79c4339d6b3cf56e883e5e9.JPG

The gasket sits on top of the bogie which simply screws back into place

1496832386_240520021.JPG.e6365d4f38865cc914d206d510c24521.JPG   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 2
  • Craftsmanship/clever 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
On 22/05/2020 at 17:36, young37215 said:

Well none of you reading this thread were paying attention to my school boy error in the previous post.

 

Perhaps we were paying attention but are just too polite to mention it...….

 

…… but then again...….  :whistle:

 

  • Funny 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

More procrastination and delays to Fort William's development. Partly due to my awaiting some deliveries but mostly down to a loss of focus and my attention drifting to a recently conceived re-numbering programme. As it stands to day 37022 will become 37085, 37085 will become 37111 and 37192 will become 37175 once Steve at Railtech sends me the new transfers. There will be nose end swaps for all 3 locos and new oval buffers for 37175.  Fortunately I have a few sets of the Hornby Class 50 buffers which will fit 37175's chassis a treat.

 

On WHL3 I had begun to remove loco tension lock couplings and replace them with wire hoops. This freed up space for Bachmann snowploughs whch utilise the tension lock mounting and created space to allow detailing of the bufferbeams. Derailments were infrequent and those that ocurred did not seem to be caused by the wire loops. This changed when I began WHL 4 and I found that the wire loop fitted locos had a much higher rate of derailment. It was invariably the first coach or wagon behind the loco that was derailing and when I reverted to tension locks the derailments reduced significantly which seemd to confirm it was a problem with the wire hoop couplings. I have no idea why the change arose, the tightest curvature is Peco 2nd radius which was the same as WHL3 and there is a lot less of it on WHL4!

 

Only 37039 (pictured below) retains the wire hoops because they are heavily glued in place and I do'nt fancy trying to cut them out. Unfortunately this means that 37039 remains more prone to causing derailments than other locos which is frustrating. I want to find an alternative to the tension locks and have seen one or two options where the width of the wire hoop is much wider thus allowing greater side to side movement on the tension lock of whatever is being pulled. I have not got my head around the wider loops and where they slot into the bufferbeams as yet and would appreciate any photographs showing examples of this that I might try out.    

 

In summary, the revised programme of works at present has grown to: 

  • Fort William station. Completion of electrics, point motor fitting, track weathering and ballasting 
  • Ongoing coach refurbishment of poorly weathered coaches  
  • Renumbering of 3 class 37's

So much for more golf and less modelling!

 

600861362_250320036.JPG.a465e6f0ef9af96f7ebaf44f72f41267.JPG

 1587517322_250320037.JPG.d2d028e940005948970aff0792ea01c0.JPG

Edited by young37215
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same problem with home made write couplings similar to yours, coincidentally on a West Highland layout now dismantled. I played around with them for hours and eventually got them to work. I do think though looking at yours if it was wider i suspect the problem would go away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
12 hours ago, Dougjuk said:

By all means get back to some golf but its important that the layout is ready when I am allowed to get over and do some driving.  

 

 

There will be lots of time for driving once you have finished 'Dremelling' smooth the coach ends where about 120 or so steps have been removed but the coach end panels have not been smoothed off yet!

 

The picture below shows a wider wire style loop and I will be trialling something similar. I would love to find a solution for replacing the tension locks that works as it makes detailing so much easier and I can add snow ploughs which were such a common feature of locos on the WHL.

 

37111 Pro Re-spray Biffo DCC Sound Commision

 

  • Like 1
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm currently weighing up Sprat and Winkle vs Kadee magnetic couplers. I like the idea of the Kadee's  but as they fit into the NEM socket this does mean that you can't mount the snowploughs here. However in reality the snowploughs were mounted on the loco chassis rather than the bogies. Also I believe it was practice to remove the centre section of the ploughs in the summer. No idea why due to the extra workload and if anyone knows why I'd be very interested, and if I'm wrong corrected. However, as nice as chassis mounted ploughs look off scene sections of my layout will have "trainset curves" so potentially this could cause problems.

The Sprat and Winkle couplings reauire a lot more work as they are kits you have to put together and then mount to the stock. However the wide loop that you have pictured is still very subtle on the loco. Keeping the tension lock couplings isn't really an option for myself as I have a terminus layout and want to avoid hand of God operations. Much less of a problem for yourself. My coaches will be in fixed rakes using close couplings which I particularly like as there is also no slack to take up on departure. 

I'll be really interested to see what you go for but I do think that large loop if painted black would look pretty good and solve most of your wants and needs. 

Checking this thread for daily updates is really interesting. So not to much golf please Rob ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just having another look at that photo it looks to me (although I could be wrong) that the ploughs are mounted to the chassis. Which prompted the thought that if the ploughs were mounted to the bogie via the NEM socket would they foul on a chassis mounted wider wire loop? Just a thought. 

Over to you Sir.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

In terms of snowploughs I would much prefer to hang them from the chassis rather than the bogie as Bachmann's normal ploughs work. It is not just the radius of curves but also the likelihood of damaging any detailing with a plough swinging around on a chassis. The same can be said for tension lock couplings hence my desire to find a better solution. Whilst I have seen some people modify the Bachmann ploughs and hang them from the bufferbeam, I have found that there is limited space to do this. PH Designs do a folded aluminium set of ploughs designed to hang from the bufferbeam but I have not summond up the courage to try these yet.

 

Yesterday I did a little airbrush work. I had intended to do more but in a clumsy moment I managed to drop a full tin of Humbrol enamel paint on to the carpet which meant I spent more time cleaning the carpet than I did airbrushing. Having looked this morning I seem to have done an OK job on the cleaning although the loft stinks of white spirit. The Humbrol paint was for two aluminium hoppers which needed a darker grey. Fortunately there was enough paint left over to complete a coat on them and they are now a good match for the rest of the hopper fleet. 

 

Hoppers waiting paint, I shall stick to the larger Railmatch bottles in future as they are easier to work with!

2138616688_270520016.JPG.751183817759cf2d661156552603b098.JPG

 

Duly painted, there is a small imperfection on one of the wagons which I am not concerned about 

1286153890_270520017.JPG.bcdc608051b5765b729f9b87cebda710.JPG

 

1908369721_270520019.JPG.070ba760c9410c36ea723d490792bee8.JPG

 

Reunited with their chassis

1136292576_270520025.JPG.0b8eb3cdf81d9ed0d7ca39bb18706180.JPG

Old and the new, the hopper to the left is in the original colour applied 20 years ago and weathered, the one to the right is newly painted and unweathered. 

 

1200551252_270520026.JPG.54cf6e43cd3562fc315458f9115a8efd.JPG

 

 

   

  • Like 4
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, young37215 said:

*snip*

 

Yesterday I did a little airbrush work. I had intended to do more but in a clumsy moment I managed to drop a full tin of Humbrol enamel paint on to the carpet which meant I spent more time cleaning the carpet than I did airbrushing. Having looked this morning I seem to have done an OK job on the cleaning although the loft stinks of white spirit. The Humbrol paint was for two aluminium hoppers which needed a darker grey. Fortunately there was enough paint left over to complete a coat on them and they are now a good match for the rest of the hopper fleet. 

 

*snip*   

Rob,

 

I can imagine the problems on the carpet:angry:. I'm not a fan of those Humbrol tins either:bad:. They are hard to open and the simple act of using the paint usually causes it to become clogged on the rim of the tin.

 

I watched a YouTube channel (about repairing horse drawn wagons actually) and he never shakes a tin of paint. Keep the paint off from the lid and rim if at all possible. He only stirs his paint, and has a special funnel that fits on the tin rim to keep the paint clear of it.

 

At least you successfully airbrushed the wagons, and they do look good. I haven't summoned the courage to even take my airbrush set out of its box:laugh:. It's been there for over 2-years. It's only a cheap one from Aldi, so I expect to have to buy a better airbrush in the future, but it will probably do for my early practising - whenever that occurs. Out of curiosity, which airbrush are you using?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Ian

 

The Humbrol tin was well stirred before gravity added to my stirring! I agree that the tins are cumbersome and the collection of paint in the rim has always been an inconvenience. Dropping the tin only adds to amount of paint in the rim, I shall dispose of it and the few other Humbrol tins once I am satisfied that the hoppers are complete. What irritates me more than anything is that I invariably place newspaper under the work bench when I am painting despite having never had an accident before. The one day I did'nt put the paper down is the day I drop the paint. 

 

My airbrush is an Iwata Neo bought at Warley a couple of years ago after speaking for a few seconds with George Dent . His words of wisdom were do'nt expect a cheap airbrush to perform well, if you are going to buy one make it a decent one. I paid £200 for the brush, a compressor and some cleaning items from Eileens who had a show offer on. It took me several months to build up the confidence to use it and only after I had read Dent's book Airbrushing for Railway Modellers. I recommend that you spray some track with sleeper grime or similar to get familiar because, in my experience it is virtually impossible to get this wrong and you will quickly get the feel of how the brush delivers paint.  My only advice is to make sure your paint is well thinned before you start, like many others I find a 50/50 paint thinner mix works well.

 

I managed to get some focus yesterday and started on Fort William where I connected all remaining track and 4 of the 6 points to the power BUS. I soldered about 20 joints in total, it never fails to surprise me how many joints are required. I also managed to connect a couple of point motors albeit without doing the frog wiring. I was also able to review Wednesday nights airbrusing where I matt varnished the blue area on the sides of several of the recently cleaned coaches. There is room for improvment but overall I am quite pleased, the new coach number transfers are clearly sealed and the scratches are much less visible than before. 

 

It's a golf day today so limited modelling time and little likelihood of progress. 

 

BCK before cleaning and varnishing, scratching is clearly visible

1570801558_165020033.JPG.205bb151fb04fa7fe58aa1c313ba9d54.JPG

BCK after work, the varnish reduces the visibility of the scratching beneath the toilet window

1612661642_270520022.JPG.e23b164f4cea41209f178dc3d1e35011.JPG

SK cleaned, renumbered and varnished

 

85223004_270520027.JPG.fc791276e407bdd662668c00b676a089.JPG

1692459618_270520028.JPG.82e788a8822f28f2a4a6c36d1c585f8d.JPG

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by young37215
  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, young37215 said:

*snip*

 

SK cleaned, renumbered and varnished

 

85223004_270520027.JPG.fc791276e407bdd662668c00b676a089.JPG

 

Rob,

 

According to my RCTS coach books your SK was M24023 from 1976 to 1980. It only made it to Scotland in 1981. Bogies are correct (B1) and is a good choice being dual heated.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

My reference guide for stock numbering is my 1982 Platform 5 Coaching Stock book. I use Railtech transfers where, in addition to their BR Blue Scotrail passenger code 3094 product, I had a custom set of numbers of Cowlairs allocated stock made up based on my P5. There are plenty of transfers left to allow me to clean and renumber a further 5 poorly weathered coaches.

 

I usually manage to find a left field summer project which allows me a little modelling time as and when I feel the need. This year and in addition to the ongoing weathering removal programme, I have started removing the top 3 of the 5 steps on each of the mark 1 coach ends. I am not certain when these got removed but they were history by the time of my early 1980's era. It is a simple enough task but in total it is a bit of a faff as I have 24 Mk1's which at 6 per coach totals 144 steps. These are removed using a sharp scapel balde which is then sanded flat using my cheap utility tool. A blast of paint either by airbrush or by hand to cover the work and weathering as required completes the job. So far I have removed the steps from half of the fleet so there is plenty of work left for Doug and his Dremel. 

 

The bog standard Bachmnann Mk1 coach end

643198960_290520004.JPG.c82ed6f2b5508522f5d756344c3660aa.JPG

Steps removed by scalpel leaves a rough finish

1376648634_165020030.JPG.38da999dedc4f00b79e08f89ee79d272.JPG

Steps area sanded flat

1016841184_290520002.JPG.a99f4bad1f5106794c1999098970745c.JPG

Finished coach end

1495459425_270520024.JPG.4459d3a08e9ec721778fe6f26477b01c.JPG

A cheap utility tool is perfect for this job (the sweet tin full of drill bits, not chocolate)

409703255_290520001.JPG.7b316fbd2619203f5cf596fbfffaa134.JPG 

Edited by young37215
  • Like 1
  • Craftsmanship/clever 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, young37215 said:

I usually manage to find a left field summer project which allows me a little modelling time as and when I feel the need. This year and in addition to the ongoing weathering removal programme, I have started removing the top 3 of the 5 steps on each of the mark 1 coach ends. I am not certain when these got removed but they were history by the time of my early 1980's era. It is a simple enough task but in total it is a bit of a faff as I have 24 Mk1's which at 6 per coach totals 144 steps. These are removed using a sharp scapel balde which is then sanded flat using my cheap utility tool. A blast of paint either by airbrush or by hand to cover the work and weathering as required completes the job. So far I have removed the steps from half of the fleet so there is plenty of work left for Doug and his Dremel. 

 

The bog standard Bachmnann Mk1 coach end

 

Steps removed by scalpel leaves a rough finish

1376648634_165020030.JPG.38da999dedc4f00b79e08f89ee79d272.JPG

 

 

Rob,

 

Instead of using a scalpel knife, why not use some side-cutters (Xuron or similar) to remove the surplus steps. The side-cutters will leave a much neater, and possibly flush, cut thus reducing the painful sanding process. If space precludes Xurons, then some straight nail cutters would do the job.

 

  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...