Jump to content
 

Show us your Pugbashes, Nellieboshes, Desmondifications, Jintysteins


Corbs
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 25/02/2020 at 22:21, TangoOscarMike said:

 

I like what you're doing here. My version of this project is way, way better than yours, but (like my charm, wit and dashing good looks) it exists only in my mind.

 

Update on Wendesday evening: Hi Sophia NSE. When I wrote the above I thought I was being funny, but in hindsight it looks a bit disrespectful. I'm sorry if it comes across like that: I really do like this on-going bash.

Don't worry, I got the humour from this. The obvious reason yours would be better is my wonky cutting of plasticard isn't in your mind :D:D

  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TurboSnail said:

Not so much of a pugbash, but they can be made into reasonable R and R1s if detailed. I've seen people make 0-4-4s out of them too.

 

 

IMG_20191129_203647.jpg

I'm planning to keep a couple as R1s with some detailing and also make an 0-4-4. I've seen elsewhere that someone made a reasonable attempt at an H using an Airfix 14xx chassis and a pony truck, which is exactly what I want to do

  • Like 3
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A bit of carving out of the insides of the worst of the bodies has it currently sitting on the 14xx chassis at what appears to be the right height although the side tanks do bulge out very slightly. Still, I'm pleased that what I'm intending is possible, also confirmed by what I read last night

IMG20200227151256.jpg.8baa757d2cb7409b0267a7046f6c5968.jpg

  • Like 9
  • Craftsmanship/clever 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sophia NSE said:

A bit of carving out of the insides of the worst of the bodies has it currently sitting on the 14xx chassis at what appears to be the right height although the side tanks do bulge out very slightly. Still, I'm pleased that what I'm intending is possible, also confirmed by what I read last night

IMG20200227151256.jpg.8baa757d2cb7409b0267a7046f6c5968.jpg

Change the chimney and the front spectacle plate and that'll be a very respectable 0-4-2T, Sophia. Good thinking. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, RedGemAlchemist said:

Change the chimney and the front spectacle plate and that'll be a very respectable 0-4-2T, Sophia. Good thinking. 

It will hopefully be my attempt at an SECR H class 0-4-4. The WKR needs a bigger tank engine for the hop pickers specials during the summer. Nellie might gain a leftover pagoda style cab...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

If going down the freelance route and can get eight wheels under it - extended bunker I presume - then a 0-6-2T would be a good mixed-traffic type. But I think that Stirling's standardisation policy on the SER in the last two decades of the 19th century is overlooked - a true model of economy with just three classes accounting for three-quarters of the line's engines.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A propos Percy, the Minitrains Baldwin 0-4-0ST wasn’t much different 

 

162D1049-32F6-4E6B-90BC-7AA479EB924B.jpeg.0bd96f04cb2b8205c42415ee665abe73.jpeg

 

I couldn’t find a picture of the prototype, but I did find THIS, with its wrap-round 270 degree saddle tank, in the spirit of “a prototype for everything”

 

73BDA18F-9EDC-4E3C-B8F0-88AFCA71A73B.jpeg.5e36f93f58e7d19f31147c0dde668285.jpeg

 

... extended saddle tanks reaching the footplate seem to have been an American practice, well established if not universal

 

014B4905-148D-4643-B326-EBBA7E3155B4.jpeg.952b322ffa2181a29817515d9a9226e0.jpeg

Edited by rockershovel
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...