John57sharp Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 First up I want to say how inspiring you all are, experts and newcomers alike, this is a great group, showing some great work, and I hope to contribute in a small corner somewhere eventually. I'm trying to get my DJLC thoughts to crystallise, so I'm going to start on here and hope something develops. I'm almost certainly going urban, and there may be some water involved if there is space, however I really like this building and would like to find out more about it, but searching on East London Junction doesn't show it up at all. Any offers? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Echo Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 I suspect it was a one-off. Maybe the GERS could help? I like the solar panel on the roof. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John57sharp Posted September 21, 2017 Author Share Posted September 21, 2017 Thats my power source for the layout! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Echo Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 The National Library of Scotland holds Ordnance Survey maps at 5 ft to 1 mile for greater London. The relevant sheet probably just shows the signal box projecting from the retaining wall That would give you a start on scaling the building. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John57sharp Posted September 22, 2017 Author Share Posted September 22, 2017 The National Library of Scotland holds Ordnance Survey maps at 5 ft to 1 mile for greater London. The relevant sheet probably just shows the signal box projecting from the retaining wall That would give you a start on scaling the building. That's a great start Echo, thanks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John57sharp Posted October 5, 2017 Author Share Posted October 5, 2017 I've had some further assistance regarding the signal cabin, thanks MRFS, but I'm now looking in more detail at my track plan. Templot won't run on my old xp devices or the Win Surface or iPad so I'm using the old style cut and paste version! This is the upper layer of my idea, basically a single line with a run around and a spur, with a couple of works sidings top left. The board is cut to the maximum size allowed for the scenic section. I'd welcome any thoughts regarding the layout, I've never really attempted anything this real before, usually I'm free form narrow Gauge or working to a plan. Cheers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold martin_wynne Posted October 5, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted October 5, 2017 (edited) The National Library of Scotland holds Ordnance Survey maps at 5 ft to 1 mile for greater London. The relevant sheet probably just shows the signal box projecting from the retaining wall BJ.jpg That would give you a start on scaling the building. Templot can load those maps directly as a tiled background guide, correctly scaled to your model scale: Using the ruler tool in Templot that building is seen on the right to be 84mm long in 4mm scale (track is EM). Or 42mm in 2mm/ft. (this image may need scrolling sideways on smaller screens) Martin. Edited October 5, 2017 by martin_wynne Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John57sharp Posted October 11, 2017 Author Share Posted October 11, 2017 Thanks Echo and Martin for your assistance. I'll have to sort out a machine to run Templot. My current thinking is below, I'm hoping to tuck the cabin in against the retaining wall on the top right hand side. This is a fictional location but somewhere in London, with a Widened Lines feel. The top level will have all the shunting, with a stabling point for the shunter and parcels or newspaper sidings top left. The lower level is shown by the pice of track, which will be a 2 track plain line gasping for air between tunnels and will allow me to run through trains. Lots of notes being scribbled on as ideas develop. Cheers John 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mim Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 Hi John, There is a way where your old XP computer could run Templot for free, which is to install a Linux operating system alongside, or instead of Windows XP, then install Wine, a windows emulator program and use that to run Templot. This is the way I run Templot. Linux is a way of getting more use out of an old computer that doesn't have the power to run more modern versions of Windows. Many people also find it easier to use once installed. I installed it on my Mum's laptop and she is a real 20th Century gal. Not a natural with computers at all! Linux comes in many flavours called distributions. Something like Xubuntu works well on older lower power machines. Installing something like xubuntu, then wine and Templot shouldn't be difficult. Depends how much in to computers you are. If you are very computer-phobic, then ignore all this. Alternatively, you may know someone nearby who can help install this. Templot has a very steep learning curve, but is excellent once you have a handle on it. Carrying on with paper templates as you are doing still works fine though. Mim Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John57sharp Posted October 17, 2017 Author Share Posted October 17, 2017 Hi John, There is a way where your old XP computer could run Templot for free, which is to install a Linux operating system alongside, or instead of Windows XP, then install Wine, a windows emulator program and use that to run Templot. This is the way I run Templot. Linux is a way of getting more use out of an old computer that doesn't have the power to run more modern versions of Windows. Many people also find it easier to use once installed. I installed it on my Mum's laptop and she is a real 20th Century gal. Not a natural with computers at all! Linux comes in many flavours called distributions. Something like Xubuntu works well on older lower power machines. Installing something like xubuntu, then wine and Templot shouldn't be difficult. Depends how much in to computers you are. If you are very computer-phobic, then ignore all this. Alternatively, you may know someone nearby who can help install this. Templot has a very steep learning curve, but is excellent once you have a handle on it. Carrying on with paper templates as you are doing still works fine though. Mim Thanks for this Mim, I'll have another look at xubuntu and wine, I really should know more about this given my 30 odd year career in IT! I've been doing some old fashioned 3D modelling today, which has revealed some areas that need more thought before putting anything down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John57sharp Posted October 25, 2017 Author Share Posted October 25, 2017 I hope some of you will be able to advise here? I created the top level plan based on A6 turnout templates, only to spot that the Easitrack kits are only B sized, and as I think I should go this way as a beginner, I have redesigned using B7 size. This means that I can't get the runaround in as I would like, though it could be done off scene. My questions then are: Which is most prototypical? This is meant to be a freight only line serving several customers somewhere in north London, including the 2 sidings top left. The line goes off scene top right and bottom left. The siding middle right will be a loco stabling point for a small shutter, probably an 08. Would the rail be flat bottom or bullhead by the BR blue era? These are straight templates, would the reality be more a gentle curve, in which case I could use the methods recently described in the Magazine? Am I missing anything obvious? Cheers in advance again John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caley Jim Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 My immediate thoughts are that the lower plan, with the other end of the run-round off-scene, would give you scope for slightly longer trains. Secondly, if you move the turnout top left to the right so that it is up against its neighbour, it gives you a wee bit more length on these sidings. As to whether it would be flat bottom or bullhead would depend on how much of a backwater it was. there are still bits of bullhead in evidence on rarely used sidings and stabling points. Of course, if you'd drawn it out with Templot, you could have nice flowing curves all through it! Just my 1p (ex 2d) worth. Jim Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mim Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 Hi John, The easitrack turnout kits are bullhead only as far as I know, so that sort of makes the decision for you. Bullhead is perfectly appropriate for grotty sidings in the blue diesel era. You can still see it on some today, decades later. It would make a nice contrast to have flat bottom, even concrete sleeper on the tracks on the low level line and bullhead wood sleeper on the top. B6 points would be shorter than B7, give you more options and are available in easitrack kits. They would also look better in a cramped set of sidings I think. Is the reason for using B7 just that B6 isn't available as an Association paper template? If you'd like some B6 templates just PM me and I'll make you some left and right B6 Templot pdf's you can print out. Can put in any curves to them you need too. Just let me know. If you went with something like the lower plan, then the off screen area to the left could be a short single track sector plate that could access the two lines of the run round loop and replace that turnout. Mim Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold bcnPete Posted October 26, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted October 26, 2017 (edited) Nice idea - makes my one turnout and siding entry look pretty dull Good luck and watching with interest Edited October 26, 2017 by bcnPete Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John57sharp Posted October 26, 2017 Author Share Posted October 26, 2017 Hi John, The easitrack turnout kits are bullhead only as far as I know, so that sort of makes the decision for you. Bullhead is perfectly appropriate for grotty sidings in the blue diesel era. You can still see it on some today, decades later. It would make a nice contrast to have flat bottom, even concrete sleeper on the tracks on the low level line and bullhead wood sleeper on the top. B6 points would be shorter than B7, give you more options and are available in easitrack kits. They would also look better in a cramped set, of sidings I think. Is the reason for using B7 just that B6 isn't available as an Association paper template? If you'd like some B6 templates just PM me and I'll make you some left and right B6 Templot pdf's you can print out. Can put in any curves to them you need too. Just let me know. If you went with something like the lower plan, then the off screen area to the left could be a short single track sector plate that could access the two lines of the run round loop and replace that turnout. Mim Thanks again Mim and Jim, I can take a hint, spent today's modelling time getting my xp netbook up and running with Xubuntu, nearly there.... will then have a crack with Templot, but if this fails, I will be taking up your kind offer Mim! The lower level will be FBR, I may even go concrete, I may even add a third rail.... I may also be getting ahead of myself! Pete, I may be over reaching, in any case your KISS approach will be successful I'm sure. Cheers all. John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John57sharp Posted February 24, 2018 Author Share Posted February 24, 2018 So after an “interesting” life period, and a battle with Windows, having given up on Ubuntu, I have now got a working version with Templot installed... this is my first take on the upper layer in Templot, grateful as ever for any feedback at all. Cheers John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caley Jim Posted February 25, 2018 Share Posted February 25, 2018 Does that vertical red line at the left hand side represent the joint between boards? If so, I would think you are asking for trouble putting a crossing right on top of it. I've got away with having crossovers split by baseboard joints, but I would be very hesitant to split a turnout that way and definitely not through the crossing. I would put a sector plate on the fiddle yard board and realign the upper track of the run round to align with it, that is assuming that there's only going to be a loco going there. That will add another inch or so onto the run round. Another 1p worth. Jim Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John57sharp Posted February 26, 2018 Author Share Posted February 26, 2018 Thanks Jim, all input welcomed. The line is only a scenic boundary, to fit into tthe DJLC dimensions, so the baseboard won’t be split there. Thanks for the advice though. Hope to get going with some actual building soon. Cheers John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now