Jump to content
 

OO gauge GWR Mogul and Prairie


Paul.Uni
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, 1466 said:

Assuming there is commonality in the mechanicals of the mogul and prairie, an improved 30 to 1 gear ratio would be welcome . Especially if the gear with a one axle  of quartered wheels were to be available as a retro fit . In other words , drop out the old and substitute one axle with new 30 to 1  for a mogul .  Different wheel size for prairie ? Full marks to Dapol for listening and learning . Implications for the Manor but I’ve already preordered an Accurascale one . More pain in the wallet!


 

 

Sorry to disappoint but whilst the wheels are the same between the Mogul and Prairie it will definitely not be a simple axle swap to change the gear ratios.  If it were only a change to the gear on the axle it would require a much larger diameter gear which would then not fit.  My money is on a different worm and pinion ratio, that way Dapol can then reuse the chassis castings from the Mogul.

Frank

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Miss Prism said:

 

They're not too bad in my view, and the same as on the Mogul. There are two inserts on the Dapol tool, one for the tall safety valve and another for the short cover. These drawings do lack a bit of side curvature, which was very subtle on the originals, and there was some variation in the originals, all being hand spun of course.

 

Don't expect the Dapol EPs to have the correct match of mechanical and cosmetic detail at this stage.

 

5190 was outshopped with a short safety valve cover (in 1934).

 

 

Many thanks for your thoughts and reassurance on the safety valve covers Miss Prism.

 

It's the 'G W R' liveried 5150 I'm focused on, and I understood she was outshopped with a tall safety valve cover. But as you say, EPs don't always have the correct combination of details. However, given it's presumably a decoration sample, I hope they've noted the incorrect positioning of the route disc (should be above the number plate not on the side shutters on 5150 in 'G W R' livery).

  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Chuffer Davies said:

Sorry to disappoint but whilst the wheels are the same between the Mogul and Prairie it will definitely not be a simple axle swap to change the gear ratios.  If it were only a change to the gear on the axle it would require a much larger diameter gear which would then not fit.  My money is on a different worm and pinion ratio, that way Dapol can then reuse the chassis castings from the Mogul.

Frank

Thanks Frank , that’s helpful. 

 

34 minutes ago, Chuffer Davies said:

Sorry to disappoint but whilst the wheels are the same between the Mogul and Prairie it will definitely not be a simple axle swap to change the gear ratios.  If it were only a change to the gear on the axle it would require a much larger diameter gear which would then not fit.  My money is on a different worm and pinion ratio, that way Dapol can then reuse the chassis castings from the Mogul.

Frank

Thanks Frank , that is helpful . I would be prepared to buy a new 30 to 1 worm and pinion by themselves to retrofit to my mogul . It is still on the 2do list awaiting conversion to EM . Your planned kit to convert to tender drive is tempting but I’d like to  conserve as much as I can from the Dapol mechanism . Please keep us updated, though , with your etched kit and your progress . Regards. Ken 

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Mmm.

I find that Dapol have either re-acted impossibly quickly to concerns about Slidebar/Crossheads, Gear ratio & Firebox glow or something went seriously wrong in Mogul land between design and production.:scratchhead:

 

As to changing gear ratio, I suspect you will need to change the motor worm, the intermediate gears and the axle gear to fit the 30:1, which with careful design might fit in the current chassis block without rework.

  • Agree 2
  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
37 minutes ago, coeurdelyon said:

Hi, Why is the chimney dreadful, it conforms to the drawing you attached so please advise where it is wrong

 

Thanks

Richard

I doesn't look like the drawing to me.

It looks more like a stovepipe with a copper cap.

Edited by melmerby
  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
4 hours ago, Miss Prism said:

I know 5190 was in lined black for a while, but is there a pic in that state with the Gill Sans British Railways lettering?
 

Perhaps a safer bet would have been 41xx series built between 1/6/48 and 31/9/49 when the unicycling lion was introduced, unless some of those carried plain black livery.  These were in the 416x range.

 

6 hours ago, No Decorum said:

The motion looks very odd to me; as if it’s either plastic or painted, not to mention the black pin or screw fixing the rods to the wheels.

A bit like an Airfix kit 61xx I built back in the day, with the motion picked out in Humbrol enamel silver.

Edited by The Johnster
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 1466 said:Your planned kit to convert to tender drive is tempting but I’d like to  conserve as much as I can from the Dapol mechanism . Please keep us updated, though , with your etched kit and your progress . Regards. Ken 

Hi Ken,

I’ve just started the build this afternoon.  If your preference is to retain as much of Dapol’s mechanism as possible then the Flexichas solution under development from Brassmasters would be a better option for you.  
It would be best to check with Dapol whether the gearing for the Prairie can readily be reverse engineered into the Mogul.  As a minimum you would need to pull the worm off the motor’s shaft and swap out the top pinion gear.  That could be anything from dead simple to almost impossible depending on how firmly the worm is attached to the motor.

Best of luck,

Frank

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As I pointed out earlier and several others after me the chimney looks totaly wrong, the front end smokebox door chimney etc are the face of a loco and the Dapol model does not look right at all, Even the old Airfix model the Chimney seemed right although the smokebox door was wrong.

 

The Dapol Chimney looks more like a cast iron chimney on a small prarie, than the wide business type found on a large prairie, it just look wrong, firebox glow or other gimicks I would rather have the proprotions correct. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi David,

Trust you are keeping well.

I have attached a couple of pictures, a 7mm scale model built from a Martin Finney kit which are regarded as very accurate and well designed, plus a picture of the Dapol decorated sample for review and obviously requires some paint corrections, but if you compare the chimneys I think you will find they are very similar. 

Thanks,

Best Richard

Martin Finney kitbuilt.jpg

6167 l.h..jpg

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Miss Prism said:

 

There's something that doesn't look right to me - have those pictures been squashed longitudinally?

 

 

Bad website design - if the browser window isn't wide enough it does indeed squish the images.

 

Either make your browser bigger, or right click on the images and select view image to get the image only - where it will be scaled instead of squished, and you can make it bigger and scroll.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
17 minutes ago, mdvle said:

 

Bad website design - if the browser window isn't wide enough it does indeed squish the images.

 

Either make your browser bigger, or right click on the images and select view image to get the image only - where it will be scaled instead of squished, and you can make it bigger and scroll.

 

 

Bad original photos IMHO

Copy image, paste into graphics program view on 40" screen - still squished, although not by as much.

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mdvle said:

Bad website design - if the browser window isn't wide enough it does indeed squish the images.

 

Either make your browser bigger, or right click on the images and select view image to get the image only - where it will be scaled instead of squished, and you can make it bigger and scroll.

 

Thanks for confirming that Dapol is certified mad.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, coeurdelyon said:

Hi Keith,

It may be the photograph, but I can assure you it is within a few thou' of the dimensions scaled off the drawing

 

Thanks

Richard

Richard,
I haven't read all the conversation, just this last part, BUT if the issue is in the photo, would it not be better to get more photo's taken that don't distort the look.
I would have thought that if pics are put up here whether they be samples or not, one would ensure they do represent what is trying to be sold, and obviously in this case from what you are saying, it appears, the pics do NOT fairly represent the model!
Just my thoughts.
Khris

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
On 26/01/2021 at 21:03, Miss Prism said:

Powerful yes, good acceleration yes, but I doubt the large prairies got above 65mph.

 

I travelled behind a few on excursions from Birmingham to Great Malvern. Not many stops, on the run through Hagley and Blakedown to the Kidderminster stop the top speed would be around 60mph.

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

They should, if not overloaded, be theoretically capable of the same speed as a 43xx, Manor, or Grange, but would rarely be required to run much above 60 or so to meet the timings on most of their normal work.  

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Les1952 said:

 

Not completely - they don't post on RMWeb.......... :)

 

But they do. Coeurdelyon, who has been posting today about the Prairie chimney in the model, is Richard Webster, development manager of Dapol and Lionheart.

  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...