srihaggis Posted December 25, 2017 Share Posted December 25, 2017 Happy Christmas all. Perhaps an odd day to be looking for advice but could do with it none the less. 1. When it comes to programming loco addresses (4 digit address), some people adopt 4 of either the first 4 or last 4 numbers of the printed loco number as it's address. What is the most common, first or last? 2. Going off the above, in the example of a Voyager, example 220021, the 4th or 1st number is a Zero. What is best practice because my controller doesn't like Zero as the first number in address. 3. What CV number is it that identifies the decoder manufacturer? I'm using the digitrax superchief if that makes any difference... Many thanks & hope you all got what you were after from the big red man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John ks Posted December 25, 2017 Share Posted December 25, 2017 My personal choice is the first 2 & last 2 digits, so 220021 becomes 2221 there will always be problems when you try to shorten a 5 or more digit loco number examples with my system Locos 220021 & 220121 both become 2221 or 47012, 47112 & 47312 all become 4712 using the first 4 digits 220021 & 220023 both become 2200 Although using last 4 digits 220021 & 220023 become 0021 & 0023, which at first glance looks OK but I am fairly sure if you try to access a long (4 digit) address(like 0021) on Digitrax, Digitrax drops the leading zero's and you end up with accessing the short (2 digit) address 21 I believe some systems will allow 0021 as a long address & 21 as a short address John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil S Posted December 25, 2017 Share Posted December 25, 2017 (edited) Generically I use first 2 and last 2 but sonetime the obvious solution is to omit a central 0... in this way long distance recognition is improved... BR class members are usually the first pair and then the last pair ...although when Sub- classes are involved the middle digit may be considered significant. Similarly with BR steam numbering.. except GW are 4 digits , and other regions had a prefix. Many modelled locos have a 0 in the middle or end if needed to omit. For green diesels ie D or E- prefix there are usually only 4 digits. Using Multimaus handsets also allows 5 character names (toggle between modes). Problem areas to avoid are 100_127 as these may be 2 or 4 digits (4 with xpressnet). I have few conflicts with my large stock... .1,. 4, and 13 being most common Where I have more than 1 in a class then the sub class or last digit may be needed. Edited December 25, 2017 by Phil S Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium newbryford Posted December 25, 2017 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 25, 2017 (edited) There is no standard for addressing. As long as you use the same standard for your collection. Whatever you use you will probably end up with a conflict or repeated number. Using the last four of 37112 and 47112, or the first two and last two of 47012 and 47112 for example. I generally use last four digits and simplify the units. My 220 is 4 and my 221 is 5 as they have four and five coaches. There is no perfect system but at the end of the day as long as you know which is which. Lenz doesnt bother if you use leading zeroes 0004 or just 4 but the likes of NCE will treat them as two different addresses. A short address goes up to 127. Some addresses in some systems are also "reserved" for consisting Cheers Mick Edited December 25, 2017 by newbryford Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
srihaggis Posted December 25, 2017 Author Share Posted December 25, 2017 Thanks for the tips chaps - some interesting combinations to go by. Never gave 220021 a thought with 0021 being simplified to 2-digit address as 21. Doh! Though that said the idea about 220(4) & 221(5) is a good idea too, I only have 1 of each so providing nothing else gets in the way it should be all good fun. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAF96 Posted December 25, 2017 Share Posted December 25, 2017 (edited) I use first two and last two. CV7 and 8 identify the decoder version and manufacturer. The manufacturers code listing is available in various places including on the NMRA site. Some software packages will decode these numbers for you. Rob Edited December 25, 2017 by RAFHAAA96 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevelewis Posted December 25, 2017 Share Posted December 25, 2017 (edited) I have been digital for around 20 years now I tried to work out some sort of clear system using loco or unit running numbers but after a year or so it became complicated and confusing as the volume of stock grew. So now I use my own simple system, I started at 1 then went throught the numbers sequentially ( omitting 3 of course) along with this I provide myself with a hard copy of all locos & units on the layout by type and running number if there is more than one of the same type ( EG BR(S) **EMUs then some form of further identification such as SYP or No SYP etc is included) against each one the digital address is noted. I have used this system for years and it works for me ( and any other colleague that drives the trains!!) **As the EMUs are the most prolific items on the main layout a further quick identifier of visual recognition is used, by re spraying the roofs of some cars with a lighter or darker hue of grey, to individualise the complete set, making visual identification easier eg '4-CEP SYP 2 dark roofs' address 0119 Edited December 25, 2017 by Stevelewis Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ron Ron Posted December 25, 2017 Share Posted December 25, 2017 (edited) The NMRA list of decoder manufacturer ID's is here..... https://www.nmra.org/sites/default/files/standards/sandrp/pdf/appendix_a_s-9.2.2.pdf These are the NMRA assigned manufacturer ID numbers that will be found in CV8. . Edited December 25, 2017 by Ron Ron Ron Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tractor_37260 Posted December 26, 2017 Share Posted December 26, 2017 Full 5 digit TOPS tags/addresses can be used on the Roco Multimaus ie Dxxxx or 47xxx etc and it also works particularly well with Biff's sound files... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianjeffery Posted December 26, 2017 Share Posted December 26, 2017 I have been digital for around 20 years now I tried to work out some sort of clear system using loco or unit running numbers but after a year or so it became complicated and confusing as the volume of stock grew. So now I use my own simple system, I started at 1 then went throught the numbers sequentially ( omitting 3 of course) along with this I provide myself with a hard copy of all locos & units on the layout by type and running number if there is more than one of the same type ( EG BR(S) **EMUs then some form of further identification such as SYP or No SYP etc is included) against each one the digital address is noted. I have used this system for years and it works for me ( and any other colleague that drives the trains!!) **As the EMUs are the most prolific items on the main layout a further quick identifier of visual recognition is used, by re spraying the roofs of some cars with a lighter or darker hue of grey, to individualise the complete set, making visual identification easier eg '4-CEP SYP 2 dark roofs' address 0119 This is what i do too.... I number each train from 4 upwards and print out a sheet of paper listing the numbers and trains. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Fatadder Posted December 26, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 26, 2017 For one layout I just use the number on the side of the loco, DCC having been designed for GWR numbers. For my ‘modern’ layout with TOPs numbers I use the first and last two digits of the number, so using the class number and the locos number. (for units I use the first 3 and last digit of the number on the same principle.) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick G Posted December 26, 2017 Share Posted December 26, 2017 1. When it comes to programming loco addresses (4 digit address), some people adopt 4 of either the first 4 or last 4 numbers of the printed loco number as it's address. What is the most common, first or last? I am different I use the last 3 digits for my diesel fleet it's easy, 37405 is 405, 47749 is 749, easy! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold RFS Posted December 26, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 26, 2017 My Southern Region layout is based c. 1960. SR Diesel and Electric locos and multiple units are a doddle as they all have 4-digit numbers.For steamers I use the last 4-digits of the cabside number. However, if that results in a loco with a leading zero, I replace it with the first so that I always have 4-digit numbers to avoid confusion. So 30023 becomes 3023 and 70004 7004 etc. It means I can always tell the loco's DCC number from its real number. Not had any clashes yet, but 2-BIL 2019 was a near miss with Standard 3 tank 82020 (digital address 2020)! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Neal Ball Posted December 26, 2017 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 26, 2017 I am different I use the last 3 digits for my diesel fleet it's easy, 37405 is 405, 47749 is 749, easy! Thats what I do as well! - Last 3 numbers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold RFS Posted December 26, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 26, 2017 Full 5 digit TOPS tags/addresses can be used on the Roco Multimaus ie Dxxxx or 47xxx etc and it also works particularly well with Biff's sound files... But that can't be stored in the decoder as its DCC address which cannot be more than 4 digits. Some DCC systems allow you to also assign a name to a loco which is what you are describing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dungrange Posted December 26, 2017 Share Posted December 26, 2017 An interesting collection of numbering conventions driven partly by what stock people own. As a post-TOPS modeller, my intention when I switch to DCC (hopefully next year) is to use the last two digits of the TOPS code and the last two digits of the locomotive / unit number. Therefore, 66068 would become 6668 and 158703 would become 5803. 220021 would therefore become 2021. However, this is principally determined by the actual stock that I own. I have a lot of Class 158 units and may in future need more than 158x offers. However, not having any Class 58 locomotives, means that I can use 58xx largely without conflict as most Scotrail Class 158 units have a 7 as the omit digit. I realize that I could use 15xx instead, but this would present possible conflicts with my Class 156 units. Of course, the flaw in any such system will be what address to give to DCC coaches, such as the new Mark 2f coaches that Bachmann are producing. I may also add the ESU lighting bars to some of my existing coaches as well for consistency, which means that they will require a DCC address. I suspect that I'll end up allocating these sequential numbers starting at 100 (so that consists can be allocated numbers starting at 1). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tractor_37260 Posted December 26, 2017 Share Posted December 26, 2017 But that can't be stored in the decoder as its DCC address which cannot be more than 4 digits. Some DCC systems allow you to also assign a name to a loco which is what you are describing Agree any DCC address is a max of 4 digits, but on a Multimaus the "tags" can be 5 digit alpha-numeric , and used to scroll through the loco stack. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ron Ron Posted December 26, 2017 Share Posted December 26, 2017 Agree any DCC address is a max of 4 digits, but on a Multimaus the "tags" can be 5 digit alpha-numeric , and used to scroll through the loco stack. Other systems allow a larger number of alpa-numeric characters to be used for Loco naming. e.g. Hornby Elite = 8 characters, Bachmann Dynamis and ESU ECoS = 16 characters, Loco Z21 = ? etc, etc. It still leaves the conundrum of what 4 digit method is used to set decoder addresses, but on many of those systems it's usually academic if loco selection is more easily achieved through the user interface (e.g. by scrolling, loco photos, easily accessible roster lists, search function etc.). . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butler Henderson Posted December 26, 2017 Share Posted December 26, 2017 (edited) On the Multimaus I use a description of the loco for those wherever possible i.e Blk08 Grn08 (Black class 08, Green Class 08) . For the CV programming the last 4 digits of the cabside number. Edited December 26, 2017 by Butler Henderson Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
srihaggis Posted December 27, 2017 Author Share Posted December 27, 2017 Some more interesting options here. Particularly liking Dungrange's idea of last 2 of the tops and last 2 of the unit id. Having spent a bit of time with some techhy people who maintain a 153/6/8 fleet the other week, it transpired from hearing them chat amongst them selves that they simply refer to them as a 3,6 or 8, so I adopted that for numbering (followed by the last 3 of the unit). Fortunately my small amount of steam, pre tops and southern region stock is very small so nothing has clashed, yet, but there have been some very close clashed with diesel locos by using the last 4 digits, e.g. 37xxx, 47xxx, 57xxx, 67xxx. Though I am now tempted to go down the route of starting from no4 upwards with the printout because some of my locos won't let me assign a 4 digit address for some odd reason, both factory sound models. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
citadel12003 Posted December 27, 2017 Share Posted December 27, 2017 Interesting to learn how others have worked out their 4 digit numbering system for locos and dmu's etc. I started out with the TOPS 5 digit number and used the first two numbers followed by the last two numbers. I soon found a clash (37506 & 37906) and could see the possibility of more in my fleet, if I ever get around to chipping them all. So I decided to drop the 2nd digit of the 5 digit TOPS number, and 2nd & 3rd for any 6 digit number on the basis that the missing numbers were much less "important" for identification. Then I remembered about the several class 08 shunters I had. For them I simply dropped the leading zero - simples. Has now worked so far for me. Happy modelling, Tom Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed-farms Posted December 28, 2017 Share Posted December 28, 2017 I always remove the middle number so 40141 is 4041 - however my dad who was a spotter in the 1950's uses the numbering system he had then when talking about locomotives which is to remove the first digit so 40141 would be 141 to him. This does cause some problems as we both have a model of (4)5593 Kolhapur, so mine would be 5593 as its LMS crimson and his is 45593 but he remvoes the first digit so they clashed. We then changed his model to be 4559 removingthe last number but I have a model of 45659 Drake which should be 4559 (mine is middle number remember) so this one became 5659. All sounds confusing but with ESU's ECoS the locos have a 16 character name in the database so they all get a name that matches the loco which is easier to find then remembering a loco's chip number. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shibushe Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Happy Christmas all. Perhaps an odd day to be looking for advice but could do with it none the less. 1. When it comes to programming loco addresses (4 digit address), some people adopt 4 of either the first 4 or last 4 numbers of the printed loco number as it's address. What is the most common, first or last? 2. Going off the above, in the example of a Voyager, example 220021, the 4th or 1st number is a Zero. What is best practice because my controller doesn't like Zero as the first number in address. 3. What CV number is it that identifies the decoder manufacturer? I'm using the digitrax superchief if that makes any difference... Many thanks & hope you all got what you were after from the big red man Having got fed up with 2/4 digit addressing and getting in muddle in my early days of DCC. I adopted my own system. More so as the stock increased. So Steam is divided into two numbered sections with short numbers. IE 1 to 6 omitting 3. then 6 to 11. etc. The Diesels. Start at 20 to 25. 26 to 30 etc. All on a master list pinned to the wall. Next to each Loco is what decoder is fitted and what CVs are set to what. It works for me, I either button press or scroll the roster. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete the Elaner Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 I effectively have 2 fleets, LMS & TOPS. My LMS stock all has 4 digit running numbers so I use these for the addresses. For my TOPS stock, I have used the last 4 digits. I don't know of a way I can modify the loco numbers to DCC addresses without clashes & still maintaining the ability to identify them by their running numbers. I guess I may eventually have clashes, but that is when I will start needing a lookup table of some sort. My APT-E does not fit into any of these, so I numbered it 1972, the year of its build. I also keep a small folder for my sound-fitted models because it is the only way I will remember all the functions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
34theletterbetweenB&D Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 For BR steam locos, most of us can just lop off the leading regional digit, and use the 4 digit number of whatever of the big four previously numbered the locos. When there is a running number it seems a shame not to use it, simple and effective. A little renumbering to eliminate the occasional clash by an off-region visitor or BR loco is very simple. It will be interesting to see if future alternative control systems offer more flexibility than four digits, by design. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now