RMweb Premium DRS Crewe On A Mission Posted February 10, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted February 10, 2019 11 minutes ago, KDG said: Good spot Danny and Yes Tor too. I do hope this is corrected on the production models. I'm prepared to do much to fettle models, but correcting livery errors is beyond my skill set, and I shouldn't have to , so that would put me off buying any EWS liveried ones. Shame. Would Hattons like to add anything to this? I have to say that I am disappointed. Considering that these images are on the Hattons website on the product pages for these models it does not look hopeful that the inaccuracy has been noticed by anyone at Hattons and instead only by some members of RMWeb, thus even if Dave noticed these comments now it's most likely too late to do anything about this error. Even more of a shame because I usually do not model EWS/DB although I was considering making the exception by buying some of these 66s. Unfortunately I won't be now unless this basic error can and is corrected. What's even more frustrating and even more concerning is the fact that Bachmann can accurately replicate some of the most complex liveries on their Class 66s including GBRf 709, 718, 720 and 721 and Dapol can produce the also complex DRS Swoosh liveried Class 68s and now the TPE livery on the Class 68. But yet one of the basic liveries that the Class 66 carries can not be correctly produced by Hattons. I agree, it would be nice if Dave could clarify if this error along with the other errors that have been mentioned on the previous pages can be and will be corrected? If anyone is confused by what I mean with regards to the EWS yellow band on 66005, take a look at the above image that I have attached. Zoom in on the image and focus to the left hand side of the image. It can be clearly seen that the yellow band is nearly or completely level with the cab window and not 3/4mm below as replicated on the Hattons model. Thank you in advance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Hattons Dave Posted February 10, 2019 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted February 10, 2019 Good evening everyone, Thank you to you all for showing such enthusiasm for the Class 66 project. As mentioned, these are still first painted samples which have had feedback regarding multiple changes to be made passed over to our factory. The livery on the EWS version is due to be revised and we will have further samples (of multiple liveries) to check once the changes have been made. I hope this helps. Cheers, Dave 7 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDG Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 Thanks Dave that's encouraging to hear 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDG Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 (edited) ! Edited February 17, 2019 by KDG Duplicate post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium DRS Crewe On A Mission Posted February 10, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted February 10, 2019 Thanks for the clarification Dave. Hopefully the errors have been corrected and we will see some further livery samples soon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
YesTor Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 (edited) 7 hours ago, DRS Crewe On A Mission said: Just noticed something, that I don't think has been picked up yet, so I thought that I would post. Usually I am not as eagle eyed as this, which would suggest that I if I have noticed it that others may have and may do too. Just searched on Flickr for a photo of EWS 66005. Then comparing the photo to the current two photos of the Hattons model on their website it can be clearly seen that the yellow band that begins next to the cab window is not aligned correctly at the right height on the Hattons model. On the loco in reality the yellow band appears to be exactly level with the bottom of the cab window but on the Hattons model the yellow band appears to be a good few millimetres below the bottom of the cab window. Enough of a distance to make it noticeable. I would estimate on the model that the yellow band is around 3/4mm lower than where it should start. Agreed, and in fact appears to be common to all of the Hatton's samples in EWS & Euro Cargo livery, so clearly not a 'glitch' with that single sample model. It's really difficult to tell if the gold band is not quite broad enough, or simply printed slightly too low, or is in fact at a very slight angle at the loco's No. 2 end (left hand end when viewing the side-on photos), as if you look at the side-on photos and look at the opposite end (No. 1 end/ right end) this appears fine? Whatever the reason something doesn't look quite right. edit: I've just spotted Dave's reply above, so I guess they're onto it! Edited February 10, 2019 by YesTor 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
YesTor Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 Maybe it's just me, but interesting to note that the three-door side of the low-emission bodied version doesn't appear to have been photographed anywhere. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
YesTor Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 2 hours ago, DRS Crewe On A Mission said: Dapol can produce the also complex DRS Swoosh liveried Class 68s... Well, Dapol got it right the second time around, hehe 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium DRS Crewe On A Mission Posted February 10, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted February 10, 2019 12 minutes ago, YesTor said: Agreed, and in fact appears to be common to all of the Hatton's samples in EWS & Euro Cargo livery, so clearly not a 'glitch' with that single sample model. It's really difficult to tell if the gold band is not quite broad enough, or simply printed slightly too low, or is in fact at a very slight angle at the loco's No. 2 end (left hand end when viewing the side-on photos), as if you look at the side-on photos and look at the opposite end (No. 1 end/ right end) this appears fine? Whatever the reason something doesn't look quite right. edit: I've just spotted Dave's reply above, so I guess they're onto it! 5 minutes ago, YesTor said: Well, Dapol got it right the second time around, hehe Completely agree. As you say it could be any one of the three options you mention as to why it just doesn't look right. Hopefully it can be corrected before they are produced. Very true and the further DRS liveried 68s have been correct too, so all is good. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
YesTor Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 (edited) Returning once more to the GBRf logo and number font and hopefully this side-on comparison will help in illustrating that the font used for both livery variants is in fact of similar weight... cheers Al Edited February 12, 2019 by YesTor 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ghost of IKB Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 It's a positive thing that there are some very knowledgeable folk on here that can provide constructive feedback and help Hatton's produce the best model they can. On the other hand sometimes criticism can become rather over the top nitpickery. Having seen the samples I can say that I think they look great, and in case one or two people are having thoughts of cancelling orders because there's a miniscule discrepancy somewhere, just remember that by the time it's running on second radius code 100 narrow gauge track using tension locks to pull it's under length train, the size of the light clusters will be the last thing you need to worry about. 4 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pharrc20 Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 Hatton's now have the livery samples on display in the shop cabinet and jolly nice they looked at first glance. I know from previous comments there are tweaks needed to the liveries etc. HTH Paul 7 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium DRS Crewe On A Mission Posted February 16, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted February 16, 2019 4 minutes ago, pharrc20 said: Hatton's now have the livery samples on display in the shop cabinet and jolly nice they looked at first glance. I know from previous comments there are tweaks needed to the liveries etc. HTH Paul Thank you for the photo. They look even better in person than they do on the website. Hopefully they will look even better with the livery amendments. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob D2 Posted February 17, 2019 Share Posted February 17, 2019 (edited) 14 hours ago, The Ghost of IKB said: It's a positive thing that there are some very knowledgeable folk on here that can provide constructive feedback and help Hatton's produce the best model they can. On the other hand sometimes criticism can become rather over the top nitpickery. Having seen the samples I can say that I think they look great, and in case one or two people are having thoughts of cancelling orders because there's a miniscule discrepancy somewhere, just remember that by the time it's running on second radius code 100 narrow gauge track using tension locks to pull it's under length train, the size of the light clusters will be the last thing you need to worry about. One mans nit picking is another mans precision. I don’t mind it if it produces something great. and you can bet your right arm those models won’t look right at all if there is a glaring font error on the writing - it’ll stand out like a sore thumb Edited February 17, 2019 by rob D2 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob D2 Posted February 17, 2019 Share Posted February 17, 2019 14 hours ago, pharrc20 said: Hatton's now have the livery samples on display in the shop cabinet and jolly nice they looked at first glance. I know from previous comments there are tweaks needed to the liveries etc. HTH Paul Ooohhh, did they let you touch them ? Sniff them even !? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
159220 Posted February 17, 2019 Share Posted February 17, 2019 16 hours ago, The Ghost of IKB said: just remember that by the time it's running on second radius code 100 narrow gauge track using tension locks to pull it's under length train, the size of the light clusters will be the last thing you need to worry about. Odd statement, you appear to be missing the spot where the hobby is now - 100% spot on detail - just look at other models in development - details, details and fanatical attention to detail! If one is to follow your logic then - the Hornby 66 with a nice livery finish at a distance looks good, the Bachmann 66 must look great?! Glad you are not running a model manufacturing company as the standards in detail that are now coming out of China is staggeringly amazing. Look at the outfits who do not compromise on detail (Accurascale, RealTrack, RevolutioN etc), which demonstrates how spot on perfect the Chinese factories can get things, when attention is paid by the project manager. I suspect, no, I expect the Hatton's 66s to be nothing short of perfect in terms of detail. The Chinese factories are more than capable and by all accounts Hattons Dave shall see the project through to a glorious finish. The point of samples, is to analyse them and make a list of adjustments, no doubt having the 3rd eye of RMWeb only benefits the project manager. 1 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold BigDee Posted February 17, 2019 RMweb Gold Share Posted February 17, 2019 It’s all about attention to detail, especially the price we are paying! 1 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pharrc20 Posted February 17, 2019 Share Posted February 17, 2019 3 hours ago, rob D2 said: Ooohhh, did they let you touch them ? Sniff them even !? Lol there were only 3 staff on when I popped in to collect my order and a few in shop being served or waiting so I didn't ask them but I'm sure they might have opened cabinet up if I had asked. Paul 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob D2 Posted February 17, 2019 Share Posted February 17, 2019 They should have a hattons collectors club.....that way , if you know the secret rhyme....they may open the mystical cabinet for you... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Boar Fell Posted February 17, 2019 Share Posted February 17, 2019 18 hours ago, pharrc20 said: Hatton's now have the livery samples on display in the shop cabinet and jolly nice they looked at first glance. I know from previous comments there are tweaks needed to the liveries etc. HTH Paul We must have almost crossed paths Paul, I was having a good look at the 66s too about midday. Must say the look good, may end up with a 'wing mirror' fitted Shed at some point. Wild Boar Fell 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pharrc20 Posted February 17, 2019 Share Posted February 17, 2019 2 hours ago, Wild Boar Fell said: We must have almost crossed paths Paul, I was having a good look at the 66s too about midday. Must say the look good, may end up with a 'wing mirror' fitted Shed at some point. Wild Boar Fell Must have missed you not sure what time it was visited shop but must have been around 1230 as was back over moneyspinner bridge haha by about five to 1 heading for Runcorn shopping. Cheers Paul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pharrc20 Posted February 17, 2019 Share Posted February 17, 2019 3 hours ago, rob D2 said: They should have a hattons collectors club.....that way , if you know the secret rhyme....they may open the mystical cabinet for you... I'll try the five notes from Close Encounters of the Third Kind next time see if that works 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium DRS Crewe On A Mission Posted February 18, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted February 18, 2019 Hi Dave, Just glancing at GBRf 66740 on your website and it says that it will be named "Sarah" in the description but the images show that their are no nameplates fitted. Just thought that I would let you know in case this had slipped through the net. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium DRS Crewe On A Mission Posted February 18, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted February 18, 2019 Hi Dave, I am just examining the Colas orange on the models of 847 and 848. To me the orange on the models looks slightly too dark. On the locos in reality the orange looks lighter and not as thick and heavy. I am convinced that the orange on the models is close but not correct. Has this error already been noticed and therefore will we see it corrected on the next livery samples? Thank you very much in advance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam1987 Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 I was lucky enough to see these in the flesh at the weekend, and they look superb. Well done Hattons Liam Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now