Ruston Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 Evening all, I have just found a Cadbury's Fingers tin at the back of a cupboard and in it I discovered some things that I must have bought between 15 and 20 years ago. Among the narrow gauge stuff in the tin are two resin kits for Hudson Rugga skips, in 1:35 scale (8.7mm /ft?) and labelled Rockley Bottom Railway. ISTR that I bought them at a 7mm NGA event, probably in Loughborough. I bought them with a view to doing something that could run a truer 2ft. gauge on 16.5 track than in 7mm scale but, in the end, I stayed with 1:43.5 and went the whole way and hand-built 0-14 using Roy Link components and jigs. I just wondered if this supplier is still trading and if 1:35 scale took off at all. No locomotives were then available (which was probably why I never went anywhere with 1:35) but I now have the skills to scratchbuild them and I may do so in the future if other equipment and rolling stock is available. Also, what is the name or code (as in how we have 009 and O-14 etc.) for 2ft. gauge on 16.5 track to 1:35 scale? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp409067 Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 ..... No locomotives were then available (which was probably why I never went anywhere with 1:35) but I now have the skills to scratchbuild them and I may do so in the future if other equipment and rolling stock is available. Also, what is the name or code (as in how we have 009 and O-14 etc.) for 2ft. gauge on 16.5 track to 1:35 scale? * Back in the last century - 1992 to be precise - I began building a layout ("Portpyn") in 1:34 scale (near as damn it 9mm/ft) using 16.5mm track (scales 1ft 10ins). Whilst by no means finescale it was a very good experience and proved popular on the exhibition circuit. Later in the 1990s I built another ("St Pierre et la Rue Perrin") in the same scale/gauge combination. This too proved successful with exhibition managers and their public. The size and bulk of the models was very satisfying, especially when compared with "O16.5". I would encourage anyone tempted to work in this or a similar scale (eg. 1:35 or 1:32) to go ahead. As to what to call such work, my answer was simple - "1:34". I would suggest the assumed need for a designation like "OO9" or "O14" is a mistake. Why not simply state the scale and if anyone is interested to know more explain the actual (model) track gauge. CP 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now