Jump to content
 

DMU Photography - Away from the Three-Quarter View


Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold

Oh dear, I hope it wasn’t a brake failure. A point of interest also is that the class 104 DMBS is coupled to a Cravens DTCL. The roof vents are spaced differently on the roof and the body profile and windows are different too.
 

Best regards,

 

 Rob.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Stratford had Cravens 105 units as well as BRCW DMCs and TBSLs (originally from quad sets, according to the 1976 RCTS coaching stock book, but no DMBSs.

In the 1978 book, no BRCWs at Stratford at all, only Cravens .

In the 1980 book, Stratford still had Cravens, but also one 104 DMBS, E50595. In my copy, it has been reallocated away to Norwich in pencil (and a 104 DMC, E50588, is reallocated from Norwich to Stratford).

The 1982 book has no 104 DMBSs allocated to Stratford (but a few DMCs).

So we can probably date the photo to a fairly short period in the late 70s/early 80s.

Edited by eastwestdivide
gramar/sintax
  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, eastwestdivide said:

Stratford had Cravens 105 units as well as BRCW DMCs and TBSLs (originally from quad sets, according to the 1976 RCTS coaching stock book, but no DMBSs.

In the 1978 book, no BRCWs at Stratford at all, only Cravens .

In the 1980 book, Stratford still had Cravens, but also one 104 DMBS, E50595. In my copy, it has been are reallocated away to Norwich in pencil (and a 104 DMC, E50588, is reallocated from Norwich to Stratford).

The 1982 book has no 104 DMBSs allocated to Stratford (but a few DMCs).

So we can probably date the photo to a fairly short period in the late 70s/early 80s.

 

Found this photo of 50595+56139 at Whitemoor in September 1981 which supports your pencil transfer to Norwich

https://www.railcar.co.uk/images/6186

 

Railcar.co.uk records it paired with Cravens 56186 while at SF from 4/79 to 6/80

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
5 minutes ago, Owd Bob said:

16-10-'19. A few from the fields east of Atherton Station, Lancs' inc' an unusual for this area Green liveried 150 105.

 

A recent import to Northern from the former London Midland franchise.  The Northern franchise is a real mixture at the moment with various recently transferred units from classes 156/158/170 in debranded ScotRail livery, plus at least two class 153s in debranded GWR livery.

 

Plus this could well introduce yet another change - Northern rail could be nationalised.  - if it happens. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks 4630, there was something about that on our local telly but i just missed it. I saw another unit last week with the decals for the Ravenglass and Eskdale railway on it....they make a nice colourful change and so i'm not complaining.:pilot::D

 

2019-10-07 15.16.55-2.daisy hll.mh.jpg

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

Two more from Common Fold, Atherton looking east. I can well see why this line often gets closed and floods in this area, all can be put down to severe mining subsidence between the Engine Ln.(Nearest) and Cumbermere Ln. road bridges.

 

2019-10-21_15_08.50-1150ath.jpg

2019-10-21_14_46_55.150_142_Ath..jpg

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Mix of landscapes, rural and urban:

 

Greater Anglia 153309 approaching Sudbury 21/04/2018

 

IMG_7526.JPG.02c9c0f5a7056e45054eab3e0c52a9b8.JPG

 

Matlock 11/04/2018

IMG_7492.JPG.2c09767d5d73e30053b00abbd52c878d.JPG

 

Grindleford 26.10.2017

142014

IMG_7012.JPG.e82029ca6fcee742e01dd542d33871bb.JPG

 

IMG_7017.JPG.ce66aa3ea0c485b318e16d16cc29247c.JPG

 

15884 at Grindleford
 

IMG_7019.JPG.b4d05219f2f500d4ca058f77a46c3cd6.JPG

 

Unidentified 153 at Sheffield Station 24/10/2017

 

IMG_6976.JPG.d8584447599c762c58d168a1d478b6cf.JPG

 

Edited by ruggedpeak
Updated
  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • RMweb Gold

Mentioning York got me remembering this photograph which I took on the 11th July, 2009, at the north end of York station from platform three looking across to a 150/2 DMU formation leaving on a Harrogate and Leeds service, at 11.17, formed of 150272 and 150273 at the rear. Note the original angled swooshes of the Northern Rail livery.

 

5EDCB680-7E81-4135-BB84-928DEB145C11.jpeg.b23dc7416b396674d8a658f592431976.jpeg

 

Best regards,

 

 Rob.

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

1-1-20. Hindley. A misty and chilly new years day saw a lot more class 150's, 156's & 158's in this area now that the Pacers seem to have gone. 150 105 was smoking heck of a lot and left a trail of Blue smog behind it.

 

2020-01-01 12.29.54.jpg

2020-01-01 13.08.51.jpg

2020-01-01 12.47.57.jpg

2020-01-01 13.14.54.jpg

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

The penultimate picture above, with the unit 150 209 is interesting.

 

This was one of two early casualties, 150 212 being the other, that each lost 1 of 2 cars due to collision damage (different incidents). They both lost the same type of car, 522nn, so the two individual cars couldn't be put together as a unit as there would be no toilet.

 

So I'm curious to know what it has been paired with, as it appears to be a 2-car unit going by the livery. Or have sets been renumbered in the last 30 years so that 150 209 is not the same as the 150 209 that I am referring to?

  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dvdlcs said:

The penultimate picture above, with the unit 150 209 is interesting.

 

This was one of two early casualties, 150 212 being the other, that each lost 1 of 2 cars due to collision damage (different incidents). They both lost the same type of car, 522nn, so the two individual cars couldn't be put together as a unit as there would be no toilet.

 

So I'm curious to know what it has been paired with, as it appears to be a 2-car unit going by the livery. Or have sets been renumbered in the last 30 years so that 150 209 is not the same as the 150 209 that I am referring to?

interesting! I shall keep an eye out for it at my future outings, and report back. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 02/01/2020 at 11:32, dvdlcs said:

The penultimate picture above, with the unit 150 209 is interesting.

 

This was one of two early casualties, 150 212 being the other, that each lost 1 of 2 cars due to collision damage (different incidents). They both lost the same type of car, 522nn, so the two individual cars couldn't be put together as a unit as there would be no toilet.

 

So I'm curious to know what it has been paired with, as it appears to be a 2-car unit going by the livery. Or have sets been renumbered in the last 30 years so that 150 209 is not the same as the 150 209 that I am referring to?

 

According to TRUST 150209 is in fact made up of vehicles 57209 & 57212! Makes me wonder if in fact it is a Frankenstein's monster without a toilet.

  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Afroal05 said:

 

According to TRUST 150209 is in fact made up of vehicles 57209 & 57212! Makes me wonder if in fact it is a Frankenstein's monster without a toilet.

 

Thank you for that information. As it is a gangwayed unit, perhaps it is OK to run like that if it is paired with a unit that does have a toilet? Possibly doesn't run as a 2-car unit, only as part of a longer unit. For a long time the individual cars were placed inside 2-car 150/1 units to make 3-car units.

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...