Jump to content
 

Recommended Posts

I went to the York Exhibition, today. There were some very nice layouts on show, some that were so good that they almost made me want to tear mine down and burn it.

 

But I haven't... yet.

 

Amongst various bits and pieces I bought a little cast whitemetal sundial on a pedestal, from Langleys, to fit in the garden of the Railway Manager's house. So, before I go and plant it in his garden, does anyone know how such a thing should be oriented? I don't want to just place it any old ways. I know that the dial is tiny and no one will really notice but I'll know that it's right (or wrong).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave, look it up on Tinternet, you are bound to find what and more you need to know, I think it's the "Gonoma" that needs to be correctly orientated.

 

Edit, there is a YouTube film on setting up a Sundial, also plenty on Tinternet, I have just looked.

Edited by micknich2003
Further infomation.
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ruston said:

I went to the York Exhibition, today. There were some very nice layouts on show, some that were so good that they almost made me want to tear mine down and burn it.

 

But I haven't... yet.

 

Amongst various bits and pieces I bought a little cast whitemetal sundial on a pedestal, from Langleys, to fit in the garden of the Railway Manager's house. So, before I go and plant it in his garden, does anyone know how such a thing should be oriented? I don't want to just place it any old ways. I know that the dial is tiny and no one will really notice but I'll know that it's right (or wrong).

 

Whilst I'm no expert, I did set one up in my garden when I lived in the UK. The 'pointy bit' needs to be pointing towards true north (rather than magnetic north). If you want to get really technical about it, the angle of the pointy bit is different depending where in the world the sundial is made/intended to be used. The angle needed for a sundial in southern Europe would be different to that needed in the Calder Vale. I think the angle needs to be the same as your latitude (I think around 54oN for you?). May be a bit overboard for a layout though! I'm sure your representation of true north with be perfect :-)

 

We tried making one with the kids I work with here in Brunei, however being almost on the equator meant the sun was almost directly overhead for most of the day, and so barely cast any shadow at all!

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I set to building the railway's carriage and wagon repair shop.

 

image.png.c5d34b4936c50539e06d11c2be056be2.png

Artists picture mounting card, reinforced at the corners with hardwood and window frames from York Modelmaking.

 

image.png.afc99b298306da82f63eaefbf013046d.png

Clad with plywood that I scribed the planks into before fitting. Small platform area added.

 

image.png.572b0ff4d5e9ea358d16184e952500d0.png

The wood was given a wash of diluted Tamiya black acrylic and allowed to dry before overpainting with green acrylic. This was then rubbed with sandpaper to give a weathered effect. A Neilson smokebox, from an ancient Nu Cast kit, has been added to be the works boiler, for driving woodworking machinery, poking out into the open. The chimney is a piece of plastruct tube that will be stayed using nylon thread once the building has its roof.

 

 

Edited by Ruston
  • Like 17
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ruston,

The employees would not like your carriage / wagon repair shop because there is only access along one side of the vehicle within.

Having adapted the goods shed at Bitton as our covered restoration shop I can vouch that having one wall very close to the track on one side is a right pia.

A very nice building but impractical for the given purpose.

 

Gordon A

 

Edited by Gordon A
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Gordon A said:

Hi Ruston,

The employees would not like your carriage / wagon repair shop because there is only access along one side of the vehicle.

Having adapted the goods shed at Bitton as our covered restoration shop I can vouch that having one wall very close to the track on one side is a right pia.

A very nice building but impractical for the given purpose.

 

Gordon A

 

"The employees'll get what they're given, and if they don't like it there's plenty o' room in t' workhouse for 'em!", as CVMR General Manager Ozias Harding was wont to say.

  • Like 1
  • Funny 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I haven't done anything to this since the previous post but I have been having some practice operating sessions. One thing that these have revealed is that Dingham couplings are unreliable on the many sharp changes of gradient. These couplings worked brilliantly on my previous layout but everything was flat and another problem is that there is no standard coupling height on the variety of stock, where everything on the other layout was standardised BR period stock, represented by RTR models.

 

So, the Dinghams are going to be replaced by 3-links. I'll need to have a whole weekend to replace the couplings on some 40 wagons and 12 locomotives - that should be fun... :mad:

  • Friendly/supportive 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Barclay said:

But 3-links look so great, you'll never look back. Probably.

I had them on a OO layout 30 years ago and still have them on my O gauge. It was just when I came back to OO that I wanted a totally hands-free system for the shunting layouts that I built. This one doesn't really have that much shunting, or at least not much on-scene, and as it's not going to be exhibited the hands-free facility isn't really needed.

 

I've found that the best way to use 3-links is to have a steel link on the end of the chain and to have it only on one end of each wagon, with all wagons facing the same way. That way the magnet on a stick doesn't try to pick up two links at once on the wagons that you're trying to couple.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 08/05/2019 at 19:12, Ruston said:

One of the mystery locomotives on the Calder Vale was Hathor, which, says Tatlock, is believed to have started out as a tender locomotive, possibly built by E.B. Wilson. Other sources say that it was built by Neilson Reid for one of the Scottish main line companies but the order was cancelled and the locomotive found its way to the CVMR. Either way she was rebuilt (possibly for the second time) by Kitson & Co. of Leeds and in the state shown was used on passenger services on the CVMR from 1891 until the end of The Great War, when, worn out, it was cut up on site at Elland.

 

The photos are probably just after the Kitson rebuild as the name plates have yet to be fitted. The livery is described by Tatlock as being a dark plum colour with red lining, red wheel spokes and cranks. She was fitted with vacuum and Westinghouse air brakes and was banned from the high level lines due to being too heavy for the wooden trestle bridge.

Nellierebuild1.jpg.1772f218668befab2d4bd0f854f64f4d.jpg

 

nellierebuild2.jpg.06b6a31a80c7592bd19453d6d0de61d4.jpg

 

Nelliebosh6-007.jpg.a377cec21d441874d9fad3f802b8740f.jpg

 

I've been away from this site for a while, so you have probably answered this... Is that excellent beast based on what I think it is based on? Outside cranks and an 0-4-2??? Really Cool!!!!!

                                                                 Chris.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Understandable not wanting them on an exhibition layout. It has been scientifically proved that it is impossible to couple or uncouple a 3 - link when someone else is watching you do it....

  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some junk has been added to the shed area.

On-shed2.jpg.4a72abd3a978ff6228f9e636824ac60a.jpg

 

Black Hawthorn on a workmans' train.

On-shed3.jpg.1bea2906ac73df01f32f0c87d1d528bb.jpg

 

The first loco to be converted to 3-links is the Neilson, which has also been in works to cure running problems. It now runs much better after taking out washers from between the frame and rear wheels.

 

On-shed1.jpg

Edited by Ruston
  • Like 19
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, micknich2003 said:

Dave, how did you get on with the Sundial?

CVMR General Manager Mr. Ozias Harding (for it is his garden in which it will reside) thinks it a complete waste of money. Mrs. Harding, however, wants a sundial and although Ozias is a tight-fisted so-and-so, he knows when not to argue with his other half and has sent a letter to the West Riding's  finest  cheapest landscape gardener asking for a quote for designing a garden and the erection of the sundial within it.

 

Basically, I haven't done anything with it as yet. I need to do the rest of the garden first.

  • Like 2
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Trouble at t'mill.

tTroubleatMill-001.jpg.f1681d21e16025136d3554ac0e73b9ad.jpg

I've started work on the last major structure, a small textile mill or dye works (as in dying wool, not manufacturing dyes) that serves to act as a view-blocker for the high level line disappearing into the fiddle yard. The part that still shows as white card will have the stairwell sticking out to the side. That is an enclosed stairwell within the walls and not a fire escape. I'd thought about having a fire escape on the side facing the tracks but I don't think such a thing would have been installed on a building like this when it was built and there was probably no health and safety legislation about having to fit one in the late Victorian/Edwardian period.

Edited by Ruston
  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I went in to the shed, after tea, and forgot what it was I'd gone in for. Somehow I pulled a kit out of the stash whilst I was in there and have just come out with this.

image.png.da5ffd58b5c94281352c8f7371b18b52.png

 

Edited by Ruston
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Ruston said:

I went in to the shed, after tea, and forgot what it was I'd gone in for. Somehow I pulled a kit out of the stash whilst I was in there and have just come out with this.

Neilson12-1.jpg.4f68fbf6a76b1571229a1a9adfb74ea4.jpg

 

Interesting - what is it?

Edit - I've seen the name of the photo in the link and that it's a Neilson. Still want to know more though.

Edited by Barclay
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Barclay said:

Interesting - what is it?

Edit - I've seen the name of the photo in the link and that it's a Neilson. Still want to know more though.

 

It's the High Level 12-inch Mineral Engine kit.

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...