Jump to content
 

New AEC GW railcar in 00


locoholic
 Share

Recommended Posts

Thought I'd put this as a separate thread. Six liveries to start with, two GW and four BR.

 

https://www.hattons.co.uk/NewsDetail.aspx?id=342

 

I must confess that every time I see that Heljan have announced a new 00 gauge model, I hope it will be the Class 120 DMU in 00, but every time I am disappointed...

 

I wonder if I will be persuaded to replace my Limby GW railcars? Or my Bachmann Class 25/3s?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess they are only doing an 00 one as they are making an 0 gauge one anyway...? As already suggested there are thousands of Lima and the better running Hornby ones around. Better perhaps to make a double car or even better something else! We all have our wish list for new RTR (Aberdare anyone?!), but I'd be surprised to see an AEC railcard on one...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The one point no-one seems to have mentioned is that Heljan have stated they will be doing this after the 0 Gauge one: what’s to stop Hornby jumping in and doing it - it’s a fair bet they could get it out even before Heljan deliver the 0 Gauge one...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The one point no-one seems to have mentioned is that Heljan have stated they will be doing this after the 0 Gauge one: what’s to stop Hornby jumping in and doing it - it’s a fair bet they could get it out even before Heljan deliver the 0 Gauge one...

 

There are no guarantees on deliveries of models these days and I would think the last thing that Hornby needs is to risk another pointless duplication just in the hope that they might steal Helena's thunder. Hornby have always said that a new top of the range model from another manufacturer boosts the demand from younger modellers for their older, cheaper versions. So we're more likely to see the ex-Lima railcar in Railroad in the 2020 range. I would certainly hope that Hornby doesn't try to outdo Heljan. The hobby doesn't need head to head competition at present, when production slots are so hard to obtain and production errors all too frequent. (CJL)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are no guarantees on deliveries of models these days and I would think the last thing that Hornby needs is to risk another pointless duplication just in the hope that they might steal Helena's thunder. Hornby have always said that a new top of the range model from another manufacturer boosts the demand from younger modellers for their older, cheaper versions. So we're more likely to see the ex-Lima railcar in Railroad in the 2020 range. I would certainly hope that Hornby doesn't try to outdo Heljan. The hobby doesn't need head to head competition at present, when production slots are so hard to obtain and production errors all too frequent. (CJL)

I suppose its always possible that Hornby already have advanced plans.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,


 


I wonder if they will develop a low profile mechanism* or a motor bogie?.


 


As has been mentioned it could be a good candidate for chassis parts depending on the dimensions.


 


*The OO Class 128 single car parcels unit with few windows had a very large chassis but could go up a 1 in 5 gradient.


 


 


Regards


 


Nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I suppose its always possible that Hornby already have advanced plans.

I'd be very surprised if they have.

 

Hornby's use of their inherited tooling (ex-Airfix and ex-Lima) has been limited to occasional re-runs but no investment in upgrades beyond replacing the tender drives on the 2P and 4F and the motor bogies on the diesels. I think that was forced on them by tightened electrical interference regulations, in any case.

 

Retooling any of the body mouldings never seems to have crossed anyone's mind, which represents a number of missed opportunities for producing very desirable models IMHO.

 

John

Edited by Dunsignalling
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be very surprised if they have.

 

Hornby's use of their inherited tooling (ex-Airfix and ex-Lima) has been limited to occasional re-runs but no investment in upgrades beyond replacing the tender drives on the 2P and 4F and the motor bogies on the diesels. I think that was forced on them by tightened electrical interference regulations, in any case.

 

Retooling any of the body mouldings never seems to have crossed anyone's mind, which represents a number of missed opportunities for producing very desirable models IMHO.

 

John

But what about what happened quite recently when Hattons announced a King......
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

But what about what happened quite recently when Hattons announced a King......

That was an upgrade to Hornby tooling that was widely considered "not quite there" already. My comments about the tooling inherited from Airfix and Lima stand.

 

Upgraded versions of the LMS Restaurant car, GW Autotrailer, B-set and Siphons would all do well IMHO. The ex-Lima BR GUV and CCT were left alone too long and Bachmann have made better versions of both. Just the inside-frame Siphon and the LMS 42' GUV left, though an absence of even "Railroad" re-runs possibly suggests the tooling might be past further use. Two more for someone else's attention? Hornby would surely have done something by now if they were ever going to.

 

Hornby have at least replaced the Lima Horsebox (and their own ex-Tri-ang effort) with an all-new model to modern standards, but it was an awful long time coming. 

 

What's already happened with the Dean Goods and the 121 "bubblecar", plus the new Terriers and Large Prairies under development elsewhere, now joined by the GW railcar, all point up the dangers of complacency.

 

John

Edited by Dunsignalling
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I suppose its always possible that Hornby already have advanced plans.

 

Reputedly Hornby do indeed have advanced plans but they would seem to be a closely guarded secret so we haven't really got a clue what figures in those plans and whether or not someone else might beat them to the pass with a particular model or they might beat somebody else.  And no doubt exactly the same can be said of other manufacturers and commissioners and of course inevitably some of those plans have indeed been beaten to the pass as we all know from several examples.

 

The lead times for model development make it inevitable that advanced plans exist and nowadays I suspect it might be almost as inevitable that accidental duplication will occur unless somebody pre-annlounces a model on a very long development lead time.  And of course when that does happen loads of folk spend all their time moaning about the delay in bringing the model to market.  Seems that whatever they do the manufacturers and commissioners can hardly be blamed for wondering at times if it really is worth doing the job ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

...Upgraded versions of the LMS Restaurant car, GW Autotrailer, B-set and Siphons would all do well IMHO. The ex-Lima BR GUV and CCT were left alone too long and Bachmann have made better versions of both. Just the inside-frame Siphon and the LMS 42' GUV left, though an absence of even "Railroad" re-runs possibly suggests the tooling might be past further use. Two more for someone else's attention? Hornby would surely have done something by now if they were ever going to.

 

Hornby have at least replaced the Lima Horsebox (and their own ex-Tri-ang effort) with an all-new model to modern standards, but it was an awful long time coming. 

 

What's already happened with the Dean Goods and the 121 "bubblecar", plus the new Terriers and Large Prairies under development elsewhere, now joined by the GW railcar, all point up the dangers of complacency...

 Complacency is an unfair charge.

 

Hornby have invested steadily in new toolings, and I would assume this has been on the basis of where they felt the best returns were likely to be obtained, which is always a judgement call. Don't all their current standard diesels represent upgrades over Lima toolings they hold? Most of the pacifics and 4-6-0s are upgrades on earlier toolings in their possession? Along the way they have pinched the premium spot in B1, Std 4, 7P and imminently LN 4-6-0s and also the 350hp/08 from Bachmann, so not exclusively one way traffic either.

 

Furthermore, no manufacturer has unlimited resources, and the newer competition really have nowhere to go other than duplication if they want some flagship popular models in their ranges, so Hornby and Heljan and Bachmann are all going to see more of this. Top spot on the 24 now with SLW, and the 25 and 66 under threat from Bach's list. Bachmann's 47, Dapol's 52, did the same on existing Heljan offerings, and these will not be the last. (Much of this has to be in the diesel sector, because it is mined out: it's duplicate or don't compete at all.)

 

Hornby did appear to sleep a little on the BR mk1s, but presumably their sales on well amortised toolings were good enough that they could long delay offering better even in the face of Bachmann's competition, while  focussing on building up a killer range of broader cariage selections.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

 Complacency is an unfair charge.

 

Hornby have invested steadily in new toolings, and I would assume this has been on the basis of where they felt the best returns were likely to be obtained, which is always a judgement call. Don't all their current standard diesels represent upgrades over Lima toolings they hold? Most of the pacifics and 4-6-0s are upgrades on earlier toolings in their possession? Along the way they have pinched the premium spot in B1, Std 4, 7P and imminently LN 4-6-0s and also the 350hp/08 from Bachmann, so not exclusively one way traffic either.

 

Furthermore, no manufacturer has unlimited resources, and the newer competition really have nowhere to go other than duplication if they want some flagship popular models in their ranges, so Hornby and Heljan and Bachmann are all going to see more of this. Top spot on the 24 now with SLW, and the 25 and 66 under threat from Bach's list. Bachmann's 47, Dapol's 52, did the same on existing Heljan offerings, and these will not be the last. (Much of this has to be in the diesel sector, because it is mined out: it's duplicate or don't compete at all.)

 

Hornby did appear to sleep a little on the BR mk1s, but presumably their sales on well amortised toolings were good enough that they could long delay offering better even in the face of Bachmann's competition, while  focussing on building up a killer range of broader cariage selections.  

I, in no way, meant to accuse Hornby of complacency across the board, but their long-standing (evident) reluctance to do anything significant with inherited tooling that is basically very good, but for relatively minor and solvable shortcomings has always puzzled me. 

 

They are presumably content with what they are making out of the unaltered models that have been re-run, but they already do suitable bogies to overcome Lima's addiction to their under-wheeled BR1, just a matter of producing an adaptor to make them fit the chassis. 

 

As you say, where main-line diesels are concerned, it's very much a case of duplicate or walk away these days. 

 

John

Edited by Dunsignalling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...