Jump to content
 

Conversion kit for Airfix 4F to Maunsell Q


Recommended Posts

 

 

 

I was a little concerned about the coupling rods provided in the SEF chassis kit, so tackled those next.  The instructions showed two possible ways of assembling them, neither of which were options that I would ever consider, so I elected to articulate them with a rivet, though halving them on the centre wheel has also worked well for me.   Before that there was a lot of filing, and looking at the photos a little more would be beneficial despite checking width and thickness with a vernier.  Trying to photograph shiny things is definitely overrated!

P6210259.JPG.d43aaa3eaed5a447fb9e298bf844d8ca.JPG

It was not actually true that lamp irons are not catered for in the kit.  A perusal of the parts list revealed that some 1mm wide strips on the fret, two of them with 90° angles were intended to be fitted as lamp irons, though they were not otherwise mentioned in the text.  A trifle wide for that I reckon, but there was plenty of admirably thin strip on the fret, and that was used instead.  The top centre lamp iron looked vulnerable, so that was made from steel staple for robustness.   The top step really is level, but the top right iron is slightly higher than the left top one, so I will have to fire up the soldering iron again before attaching the rear to the tender tank with Epoxy perhaps later today.    Once the rear and sides are epoxied on, I will need to think about the fire iron bridge across the coal hole, nothing for that in the kit!

Edited by Steve Smith
  • Like 3
  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Now looking a lot more like a Maunsell 3500g tender!

P6250263.JPG.cb0328ec49b574e23d2a7d57e7bb1d40.JPGP6250262.JPG.596cf8ea6731d174dde9edaaffe666cb.JPG

 

The top eyes for the handrails were added to the sides and then sides and ends were epoxied on.  As noted before the fit of parts is very good.  Once the white metal castings were added it was clear that there was room between floor and sides for reinforcing pieces in .015" N/S and these were duly epoxied in.  The bottom hole for the long handrail was soldered on as a separate strip - much more control over position than trying to drill the running plate.

The top hole for the short handle next to the steps should be in line with the floor which is the correct height.  Was generally impressed with the castings which needed very little cleaning up.  For the tender at least the filler casting was the runt of the litter being badly out of register and requiring the hinge and strap detail to be added in brass as per the preserved Q.

P6250264.JPG.a5437788f60b124b79d6f587dfd3f6b4.JPGP6250266.JPG.ee41d079554df350bc41f3e24301ee97.JPG

 

Next the Airfix 4F body was eviscerated.  Agreeably messy, but not too difficult as the plastic is amenable to a craft knife for those places where a razor saw simply won't go.   The instructions warn that the firebox must be removed last as the assembly becomes very fragile, even more so in my case because I also had to narrow the Airfix running plate to match the changes I made to the Crownline running plate earlier.  I'm not keen on the resulting generally pointless layer of plastic underneath as it is likely to get in the way of any soldering, so will probably fit smokebox+boiler and backhead+floor as separate assemblies which will mean that I can move the smokebox 1mm further forward to where I think it should be in relation to the running plate - at the expense of padding the back of the firebox to fill the resulting gap.  ...Interesting times!

Edited by Steve Smith
Restore as many photos as possible...
  • Like 3
  • Craftsmanship/clever 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

P6280276.JPG.4f091507ac3b7aa0416c6789fa21f88a.JPG126804808_cabroofCAD.jpg.185639466ec65483a72d4d4ca7a4b474.jpg

This dear reader is the blob of white metal that Crownline provide to delicately balance on the oh so thin cab front and sides - it seemed probable that I could improve on it.  The whole etch had already been scanned and loaded into QCAD at the correct size, so I started by tracing the outline of the top of the cab roof.  Fortunately, the cab front was full scale height and the right shape.   From this trace I was able to calculate the width of the roof which I then drew in CAD adding the lines of zigzag rivets marked on close to where the roof ended at each side.  Crucial to the Maunsell 'look' is those rivets and the overhang at the front, so this was allowed for too.  Once drawn up it was printed out and UHU'd to a piece of .010" N/S sheet.  This piece had to be large enough to mount in my GW Models riveting tool.  The material was set squarely in the mount and the tip was manoeuvred to the first rivet from where I knew the offsets for rivets that side.  This process was repeated for the other side.   Even though the 2mm anvil was used those are bigger rivets than they really should be.   The roof was then cut out leaving spare material at each side to manipulate the tighter curves each side.  The initial bend was formed via a broom handle and the tight curves each side formed in a toolmakers parallel clamp.  

P6280270.JPG.e6a5f024a13dfe88d4df8b83079399f9.JPGP6280267.JPG.4bf40a951fe4926e2c8d5ae15891e506.JPG

Once the correct shape was formed a strengthening rib was fitted between where the handrails will mount, and then the rain strips added in 0.45mm wire.  Final step was form the half etched rivets on the front and to assemble the cab sides to the front and then to solder the roof to the front and sides.  The cab front was not quite symmetrical and needed a small amount of 'fudging' to get a reasonable fit.

P6280272.JPG.dad6a1e16409b97cb047e6a779e203af.JPG

The Airfix 4F backhead intrudes far too far into the cab, but my research today suggests that it is a much closer match to the Q than a Q1 backhead would be.  The screw reverser and that strange little platform under it will need to go.  There's no shelf over the fire hole as there should be, and the regulator is the wrong shape.   The plan is to just give it a little makeover and set it further into the cab.   I reckon either firebox+backhead+boiler surgery next or I make a start on the loco chassis.  The fire iron bridge is made, but that will have to wait for the next tender instalment.

 

Edited by Steve Smith
Restore as many photos as possible...
  • Like 1
  • Craftsmanship/clever 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this is embarrassing!   In the back of my mind I was a little uncomfortable that the SEF chassis could be suitable for Q and 22xx and not say Q and LMS 4F.  When I eventually offered the SEF fret up to the Eastleigh weight diagram in Russell I finally remembered that the SEF Q was one of the Wills Bodyline kits intended for a proprietary chassis with a slightly compromised wheelbase.   Any compromise in this respect is faithfully carried forward into the excellent SEF etched chassis kits, or they wouldn't fit their Bodyline bodies.  The Crownline kit on the other hand is intended for the Airfix 4F which is a sound choice having the required 8'0"+8'6" wheelbase and an SEF FC-159 chassis kit (LMS 4F) has now been ordered.  I did consider the Comet chassis with it's undercooked brake gear and slots for springing, but prefer the flat top and plain cutouts of the SEF chassis with its meatier brake gear. 

 

If anyone is interested in my FC-202 chassis with coupling rods made up and filed down then let me know.

 

On the plus side I have concluded that the length of running plate in front of the smokebox on the Crownline kit does match that on the Eastleigh weight diagram (which looks like a Q), and can also report that the beautifully moulded white metal firebox is a lovely sliding fit between plastic boiler and etched cab.

 

  • Like 1
  • Friendly/supportive 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

A colleague also building a Q who read my previous post offered his Crownline chassis up to his SEF body with predictable results.  A chassis swap has been arranged!   The power of RMWeb, and what should be a happy ending!

 

Edited by Steve Smith
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

As I had the wrong chassis I proceeded to separate the cab floor + backhead from the boiler + smokebox and in the process was able to discard the flimsy remains of the Airfix running plate.  As threatened in one of my earliest posts, the Crownline running plate was shortened by 1mm at the rear and the rear drawbar beam soldered on with a piece of angle to strengthen it.

 

P7040259.JPG.ae0d009ca5ec9b43a94941614d4f625e.JPG

 

The backhead on the Q is extremely shallow whilst that on the Airfix 4F protruded well into the cab.  First the back was sawn off the backhead to make the slim version pictured and this was then separated from the floor and all 4F'ness was removed each side at the bottom as on a Q you can see the cab front each side at the base of the backhead.  This was glued at the front of the cab onto a reworked Airfix floor, that might yet be replaced with a lead floor/drag box.   What remains is pretty innocuous and could almost pass for a Q backhead.  Floor and backhead are removable for detailing as the backhead will need manifold plumbing added each side at around chest height.   It's possible that an L1 backhead might be suitable as it seems that the Q boiler was derived from the L1 boiler.

P7040261.JPG.a1e2167cd1d6a40f7fe6088ca0d25cd8.JPG

 

The boiler needed a mysterious cutout at the rear filled in, and I elected to rebuild the Airfix smokebox saddle as I somehow convinced myself that it would be a 'better job' that way.  Unencumbered by the remains of the running plate, the smokebox and boiler can now be fitted from the top - much better.  The Q boiler is actually very slightly tapered, something I thought I might be imagining in photos.  The diameter on the model should be just over 1mm less at the leading end, something that will certainly never be true for this model!

P7040269.JPG.412b18330d2ed9ebb9c2d8f24241c076.JPG

The firebox was tackled next, and this was soldered up with low melt.   Surprisingly, this skinny waisted firebox did not have clearance for the Mashima 1420 motor that I've earmarked for it, and a lot of hollowing out was required.   When compared with the cab, and the Eastleigh weight diagram the firebox sat 1mm too low, so a couple of N/S strips were soldered in to lift it the correct amount.    At the front the skinny frame overlays were reinforced in front of the smokebox, epoxied in place then soldered at the front to properly secure them.

    

The 4F chassis has arrived very promptly from SEF, and I'm just awaiting the arrival of the Crownline chassis so that I can make a decision on how best to proceed.  In the meantime I will work on a means of securing the saddle to the running plate at the correct height, and on emphasising the puny etched bolts for the cylinder fixing.  This last might well need to be via a jig to drill them out and replace them with wire DLT style.

Edited by Steve Smith
Restore as many photos as possible...
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Progress of sorts is being made.  Last week's job was to enhance those cylinder bolts.  A jig was made that landed 0.5mm holes on the half etched rivets - so far so good, yet 0.5mm wire when fitted appeared too small.  Instead of pondering the matter, I rather hastily decided that 0.7mm wire would be just the thing, so opened up all the holes fitted the wires and soldered them in before snipping the middle sections out.   Upon mature reflection, I think they're a little on the heavy side, but there's no going back now!  

P7200284.JPG.dc92390739fc74531e4ebbd1165d6fdc.JPG

 

I wasn't at all convinced by the appearance of the Crownline valance with the cab in place.  Some analysis of the cab of a Q confirmed to me that the valance of the Crownline running plate was a bit light at 1mm, both the cab photograph analysed in QCAD and the Eastleigh weight diagram suggested 1.5mm would be much closer, so after some appropriate procrastination, I went ahead and replaced the etched valance with milled angle section.  I did have some 1.5mm x 1.5mm angle, but this was way too flimsy when I tried to form the required bends for the narrowing of the running plate.  Amongst other useful brass sections inherited from the late great Bob Alderman were four lengths of 3mm x 2mm milled brass channel.  This was of a heavier section than the angle, and a suitable length was filed down to 3mm x 1.5mm channel, then split down the middle with a fret saw before it was cleaned up ready for fitting.  Three notches were filed in the vicinity of the bends, the bends formed and the lengths were fitted and soldered in -  this has made for a much stronger and stiffer running plate.  This is one of those unusual cases where a 0.5mm error is 33% out spoiling the proportions.  The valances ended up slightly short at the front end but this actually helped with fitting the fillets to the buffer beam which are now much closer to the correct size - I could even use the gap to locate the fillet which was filed as triangle plus leg as filler for the gap.  The 1.5mm milled angle will be perfect for the straight valance on the tender, but that's for another day.

P7200280.JPG.13798d5a4500ee8a8a720cf858a11f85.JPG

P7200283.JPG.df96c1c00cc63ab8b21c6c3cbc236070.JPG

 

30539 is going to be the identity of my engine.  This was a Bournemouth engine from 1955 until withdrawal in 1963, and as this had a Lemaitre chimney (not provided in the kit), one was ordered from PDK via snail mail with cheque - how quaint!   The chimney duly arrived in the post about a week later.  It's a lost wax casting and there's quite a lot of material to remove from the middle to form any sort of appropriate hole.  This afternoon's little task was to fit the smoke box wrapper and pose the body with chimney and dome in place.  As per the instructions the wrapper was annealed by dangling it in front of a blowlamp and then dunking it in cold water when judged hot enough.  This worked extremely well on the grade of brass used, and I was able to form the exact curve required on some 15mm copper pipe.   The smokebox looks to be too far forward, but there is a bit of fitting to do at the back of the firebox that will allow me to move the smokebox back slightly to where it probably needs to be.  The smokebox wrapper is covered in half-etched rivets, but they are quite subtle compared with my own slightly crazed efforts.

 

Before going too much further I will need to adapt the body to the SEF 4F chassis, although the rear turned spacer on the 4F chassis will be moved forward so that it can double up as a mount for the tender drawbar.  

 

 

 

Edited by Steve Smith
Restore as many photos as possible...
  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

P7240278.JPG.b2b0790001fb05702c14a451fdcd85f3.JPG1754433795_QClassSmokeboxFront.jpg.d41872f671668ee0f38b8385410cc1cc.jpg

First up an insane amount of time was spent tracing the front of the smokebox and trying to determine where the handles for the valve cover panels needed to be.  Although the smokebox wrapper appears to be aligned correctly at the back, the overlap at the front varied from just enough to hide the half etched smoke box front at the top, to enough room for a reinforcing piece at the bottom to accept the handles.  Therefore it was a design for a putative reinforcing piece that ended up being printed out, UHU'd to some .010" N/S sheet and put in the GW Models rivet press to mark out the positions by manoeuvring the embosser to the first spot, then using offsets for the rest.     The reinforcing piece was then fretted out, drilled, soldered to the Crownline half-etched smokebox front, tapered with a file to fit the reducing wrapper overlap.  It was then drilled through from the back to put the holes in the right place on the front.  The handles were formed in a jig and soldered in.  Although 0.3mm wire was used, they are overscale - artistic impression and all that!   The smokebox door (not fastened yet) is a nice casting with a few gaps round the edges, but does seem a fraction large, and perhaps a little flat - hopefully detailing it will bring it to life.  The cast whitemetal covers for the piston rods have not been fitted yet.

P7240285.JPG.f9178e540d370643ee81ddd22e01ebf6.JPG

Next task was to start adapting the body to the chassis.  With none of the Airfix 4F running plate now remaining there was nothing at the rear that could support a chassis, so I added a piece of .020" nickel silver sheet that exactly fitted the cab holding it in the correct position in relation to the rear splashers.  This has served to further stiffen the running plate.  The new plate in the cab floor meant that the Airfix backhead and floor had to lose a lot more weight to make room for lead packing between the N/S sheet and the much thinned Airfix cab floor. 

At the front the original N/S support for the smokebox saddle that had the hole was replaced with a stouter version in .020" N/S.  At the base of the smokebox saddle the mount for the Airfix mounting screw was removed and the resulting void filled with sheet lead. 

P7240279.JPG.105c0a528038357be592c80722689a4a.JPG

With the cab and smokebox now positioned correctly, there was now insufficient room for boiler and firebox to fit between them.  Since the firebox was known to be short by about 1mm, it was the boiler that was shortened until everything fitted.  As mentioned before the Crownline running plate was scale length and I opted to reduce it by 1mm so that the gap at the back of the cab was correct.  The missing 1mm is within the firebox, with all other items being extremely close to the Eastleigh Weight diagram drawn size - impressive for a mere conversion kit!    The Lemaitre chimney should be noticeably shorter than the dome, and that is clearly not the case, and it is likely that a slice will need to be taken out of the chimney.  I also suspect that the firebox slopes up very slightly to meet the boiler when drawings show it level.  Luckily the boiler appears to have a matching slight rise to meet the firebox - more glorious filing!  Interestingly, given that the firebox was raised 1mm, the seam on the side of the firebox now lines up with the double line of rivets on the cab front - just as it should.

 

 

 

Edited by Steve Smith
Restore as many photos as possible...
  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

for a  cheap and simple  conversion the Golden Arrow Models resin bodies for Q and its  tender are designed to  fit on the Hornby 4F (and work for both the old tender d rive and the more modern loco drive.

 

See my effort attached.1466262315_305478.jpg.8c55e616ba5b6efe9189f9938a16942c.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

In what was for me at least a fairly productive couple of days, the 4F chassis has been adapted for the Q and attached to the body for the first time.  This is not what Crownline envisaged for their kit, so what follows is not intended for the more sensible amongst you.

P7270292.JPG.a8f372b26078aad0d504f2baff952678.JPG

This is the modified side view.  Before the hornblocks were cut out I fitted a Romford wheel to set the cast Crownline brake block/frame units in the correct position for me to drill through the holes provided for the sandboxes into the 4F frames (see below).  This picture shows the sandboxes wonkily dry fitted in those holes.  The front and rear of the frames were modified to look more like a Q and the centre leaf springs removed as these should be coil springs.  An extra slot for a spacer was added above the rear wheelset as an anchor for the motor/gearbox, and as the centre pivot for the equalisation at the rear.  A hole for the twin beam pivot was made between the front wheelsets, and the frame extended at the front.  All this, other than the frame extension and hornblock removal, was accomplished with the frames soldered together at each end.

 

P7270289.JPG.ba64dcce16a4ffac8fd38c091b520d90.JPG

 

Next problem was that the EM spacers provided were not really wide enough - especially for an engine where the frames show above the running plate.   I settled for a shade under 15mm, so had to cut my own spacers including the one that is slotted to allow room for the gearbox driving the centre axle.   At this pretty standard EM Gauge width the 00 gauge turned spacers needed no less than three .020" washers each side to pad them out.  Each flat spacer has had a 10BA nut soldered to it, that was then tapped through for extra securing capacity - and because I could.    The running plate had a couple of .020" N/S pieces added to locate the chassis on the centreline of the body, and these were then drilled and tapped 8BA to secure chassis to body.  Lastly to help conceal the different width of frames above and below the running plate, strips were soldered in underneath between the splashers to fill the gap.  Subsequently, I realised that this is really not a problem visually with the boiler fitted and blocking the problem viewpoints.   Also shown is one of my twin equalising beams that have been calculated to give the correct running height - we shall see!

 

P7270296.JPG.0e8ab1f11e85b01cd6472004e8a83d41.JPG

A glimpse into the bowels of the beast with chassis fitted to running plate.  Also shown for completeness are the Crownline cast brake gear/frame inserts intended for the Airfix loco chassis that got a passing mention above.    Now completely off-piste as far as manufacturers instructions go, I'm desperately trying to think of everything I need to do to it before soldering it all up and fitting the High Level hornblocks!  

 

Incidentally the problem with the sloping firebox mentioned in my last post is because the top of it has a very slight twist, the solution for which will be a bath in boiling water and a much more 'informed' second assembly attempt.  It is level on the other side!  

 

 

 

Edited by Steve Smith
Restore as many photos as possible...
  • Like 1
  • Craftsmanship/clever 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 19/06/2021 at 23:00, Steve Smith said:

 

In other developments I phoned SEF/Squires about my missing chassis kit and this time the boss picked the phone up.  It turns out that the FC-106 Q Class specific chassis has been replaced with a generic FC-202 chassis suitable for Q Class and Collett 22xx.   That chassis kit was in stock and arrived the next day.   It will need some changes to suit the Q, particularly the coupling rods which are of a slightly exaggerated fish belly type and only nominally correct even for the 22xx - they'll need to be straight for the Q, and that's a lot of filing.  Also not entirely sure how I feel about ending up with what looks a lot like a GWR 22xx loco chassis under my LMS 4F conversion to a SR Q Class.  :-/

Its more like a GWR King chassis under a Q class. I think the King is the only loco which has that Triang wheel spacing  The Wills 22XX has an horribly inaccurate wheelbase, 8ft + 8ft 3" instead of 7ft 3" + 8ft 3" and and with its elongated boiler completely fails to capture the character of the 22XX  as does the 56XX (GEM?)  The Generic (Triang chassis is only 1mm out for the 4F being 8ft + 8ft 3" instead of 8ft + 6". 

It's amazing how a simple conversion from an Airfix 4F became such an almost total scratch building exercise.

It's so important to get a good drawing, not sure how Ian Beattie's drawings became so inaccurate when he was able to measure the actual locos he was  admittedly working in a pre CAD era but even so the errors just leap off the page.

 

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 28/07/2021 at 06:19, DavidCBroad said:

 

It's amazing how a simple conversion from an Airfix 4F became such an almost total scratch building exercise.

 

 

 

The Crownline Conversion Kit is tantamount to a complete etched loco body and tender kit - even built as per instructions.  It was the huge potential the many parts shown in the photographs of the Ebay listing that attracted me to it, as I had never considered it as an option before.  Whilst I have scratchbuilt the roof and coal hopper the rest of the kit has been used as is or adapted to be stronger, easier to build or just to look more like the prototype.  I would describe this as 'kit bashing', a still honourable but for me at least a more time efficient pastime than full scratch building!

 

I am conscious that was has become a full on EM Gauge finescale loco build doesn't fit well in the Modellers Questions part of RMWeb, so will continue the build elsewhere, and will post a link here when I've sorted out a new home for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As it's still relevant to the Crownline conversion - I did rebuild the firebox and found that the beautifully cast firebox front was wedge shaped being thicker at the top than the bottom.  This threw the firebox top out.  I straightened anything that wasn't true and re-assembled it all square using low melt, and it's looking much better now - and no Milliput needed this time.  The handrail holes are definitely too high although the seams on firebox and cab front still align.  The 'boiler band' on the firebox remains overscale against photos - despite being further reduced.    I filled the holes in the boiler with Milliput and then attended to the over tall  Crownline supplied Lemaitre chimney.  After studying photos I came to the conclusion that the rim was overscale with too much chimney above, and also that there should not be any sort of flare at the base.    After lots of filing at both ends and turning on a mandrel in my cordless drill it's shorter and 'good enough' for me to move on.  This is the state of play for the move to the new thread.

P8010280.JPG.a2280673b584fe7b40e19ff84d5eb11b.JPG

The saga will continue here:

https://www.westernthunder.me.uk/threads/q-class-in-em-gauge-from-the-crownline-conversion-kit-for-the-airfix-4f.9822/

Edited by Steve Smith
Restore photos
  • Like 2
  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello John,

This is my first loco build blog, so an experiment for me that I'm enjoying and finding helpful for motivation.  I had began to get the impression that my twin beam compensated EM chassis was getting a cool reception here - I could be wrong of course!   My new build thread on Western Thunder can be viewed*  when not logged in and so should be visible to all here.  I will blog the chassis build there, and then I may return to assemble and detail the Crownline body if there's support for it here.   

I have a number of interesting unfinished projects that have stalled (all Southern and EM) that I then plan to blog to completion, these include a Rebuilt River U Class, a W Class and Downside with the large tender.  So this is all part of me working out where it would be best for me to do that!

 

*Alas, it turns out that any pictures will be thumbnails only.

Edited by Steve Smith
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Steve Smith said:

Hello John,

This is my first loco build blog, so an experiment for me that I'm enjoying and finding helpful for motivation.  I had began to get the impression that my twin beam compensated EM chassis was getting a cool reception here - I could be wrong of course!   My new build thread on Western Thunder can be viewed*  when not logged in and so should be visible to all here.  I will blog the chassis build there, and then I may return to assemble and detail the Crownline body if there's support for it here.   

I have a number of interesting unfinished projects that have stalled (all Southern and EM) that I then plan to blog to completion, these include a Rebuilt River U Class, a W Class and Downside with the large tender.  So this is all part of me working out where it would be best for me to do that!

 

*Alas, it turns out that any pictures will be thumbnails only.

 

Steve

 

Firstly I find threads far better than blogs, simply you can follow the whole build in one go which is what you have done. Many of us are interested but may not either contribute or leave likes etc. There is a large group on here just interested in RTR, but also many who are interested in kit/scratch building. For me I am building a couple of EM gauge chassis and at the moment more interested in making removable brake gear. Also I have just bought a set of 0-4-0 frames just to get a set of Gibson hornblocks to work (I am OK with other makes).

 

I am also interested in Southern locos, though I am somewhat confused why some are kit bashing a Q class when the Wills version comes up s/h cheaply on auction sites. But with a big "BUT" I have recently bought some loco etches to take the best from both an etched and a whitemetal kit, to make a far better looking hybrid model, you seem to have taken this further

 

I first came across this idea when buying a second hand Wills (non Finecast) P class kit, it had the Branchlines chassis kit along with the etched body detailing kit. This now has the best of both worlds and I guess could be further enhanced with some brass turnings

 

Keep up the good work, its very interesting and informative 

  • Like 2
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

P8080291.JPG.ef941f5d6d1bdd52916f6123ad8cce25.JPG

The Q is now on some gash Romfords for fettling the suspension and drive unit.    The hornblock cutouts  had to be fully opened up (with hornblocks fitted)  to get just enough travel (+/- 0.5mm).   The body was then raised 0.5mm on the chassis to get the correct ride height.  The wheels are nicely centred on the splashers with just enough clearance - two different manufacturers getting it right - or at least equally wrong!    The tender needed to go up another 1mm to match the loco ride height, and then as with the loco I replaced the valance with some 1.5mm angle this time cut down from some 1.5mm x 3.0mm channel section from my Robert Alderman milled brass section stash.  In the slightly fraught process of removing the old valance I caught the end of one of the leaf springs with the iron.  😞

 

P8080292.JPG.fb025910e1960f546c5d9fa46b3e4c48.JPG

A comparison of the Crownline etched tender rear with the back of my Bachmann N Class tender as modified with coal hopper.  This loco once had a bulky Tsunami sound chip and speaker fitted, and as a result I've just noticed that the hopper still isn't fastened down properly.   Having endured two EM Gauge conversions, and a sound chip fitting and removal, the lining has suffered badly. 

Edited by Steve Smith
Restore photos
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
On 30/12/2021 at 22:33, Steve Smith said:

One super smooth Greyhound, almost ready for the paint shop and raring to go for a test run on Beaminster Road tomorrow:

PC300314.JPG.7b78c1958999dd1cbe2b931d56ae7a07.JPG

 

Before I go back to the Q I have some unfinished business with a Hornby T9.  

Hornby T9 in EM Gauge using Perseverance Chassis

 

How hard can it be to convert a Hornby T9 to EM gauge using a Perseverance chassis?  Well, not easy if the gearbox you're trying to use is just a fraction too tall for the twin beams and hornblocks to do their stuff!   I shall use the Multi-box for something else (it was borrowed anyway), and use the more compact HLK Roadrunner instead.   With the lessons learned from the Wills T9 this really should be a 'quick win'.  :rolleyes:

 

 

 

Steve

 

Any updates please ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

For 4mm scale drawings of Southern locomotives and tenders I recommend “Southern Locomotives to Scale” published by D Bradford Barton Ltd with drawings by Ian Beattie.

The Q class is covered and also the L1 class, both favourite candidates for conversion and upgrading.

I consider the book to be a must for all like minded SR modellers.

 

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

363428904_HattonsCrownlineKB182_3139905_Qty1_1.jpg.c7b7622ede85c0c82bd185ee9cad0c89.jpg

This is a Q Class that Hattons were offering that looks to me to be a conversion of the Airfix 4F that has followed the Crownline instructions to the letter - including retaining tender drive.   A nicely finished loco that is a credit to the builder.

2005247820_HattonsCrownlinekitKB182_3139905_Qty1_ruler.jpg.2615f32e38c29fd2de7393abd2f11305.jpg

Work on my own conversion has restarted following collection of the finished Wills T9, starting with drawing up and fretting out some suitable brake hangers and blocks for the loco plus guard irons all round.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Quick update after some work on the undergubbins. 

2022-06-30_20-19-15_687.thumb.jpg.b605fe4130d63d517331a740ad124b8f.jpg

The brake hangers and blocks were traced from the Ian Beattie drawing in CAD and fretted out.  The flat bar stretchers are similar to the one I made for the rear drivers of my T9.  The hanger brackets were cut from some brass channel using a jig to place the hole consistently, set the size and that little angle.  The central pull rod is the SEF 4F one doubled up for robustness.  Once soldered together, I was able to cut the top wires and remove the brake gear assembly, as it just hooks into the holes in the frames.   The white metal sanding gear is just sat in the locating holes, the front one being rebated as it overlapped the hanger bracket.   The holes for the fillers align with the boxes, so that's a win; but the fragile sand pipes will be replaced in PB with some representation of the cocks.  The sharp crease in the smokebox wrapper should be a gentle curve, and a bit of filler should achieve that, and in fitting the guard irons front and rear I must have knocked that rear step.

2022-06-30_20-15-09_20.jpg.351e9df686825481ae72ebff56495c29.jpg

The motor is a Mitsumi that was originally fitted in a specially adapted MultiBox with 53:1 gearing in my Black Motor.  This was deemed a tad sluggish for excursions on South Junction, and I'm hoping that this motor and gearbox (driving the middle axle) will work better with 40:1 gears substituted. 

 

 

 

Edited by Steve Smith
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...