MRDBLUE17 Posted October 9, 2020 Share Posted October 9, 2020 On 08/10/2020 at 16:19, Pylon King said: I agree in theory interference should be an issue ,surprisingly it appears to be the opposite with high voltage towers now regularly feature these antennas. I also have a 1:76 scale L6 400kV pylon in the collection feature them . I’m glad you shared a photo of the Bachmann model as I had spotted that recently as it fits one of my layout plans next to the signal box and agree it’s rather good. The Pylon is excellent, was that scratch built? Very nice linking to the back scene too. all the best Mark 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmrspaul Posted October 9, 2020 Share Posted October 9, 2020 On 08/10/2020 at 16:19, Pylon King said: I agree in theory interference should be an issue ,surprisingly it appears to be the opposite with high voltage towers now regularly feature these antennas. I also have a 1:76 scale L6 400kV pylon in the collection feature them . That model marries into that very nice backscene really well. They are nice models. Paul 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pylon King Posted October 9, 2020 Share Posted October 9, 2020 (edited) 4 hours ago, MRDBLUE17 said: I’m glad you shared a photo of the Bachmann model as I had spotted that recently as it fits one of my layout plans next to the signal box and agree it’s rather good. The Pylon is excellent, was that scratch built? Very nice linking to the back scene too. all the best Mark It’s a great Bachmann model and certainly saved many hours in having to scratch build one , I visited a couple of telecommunications stations to research their layout and design . It would be great to see these being featured on RMWEB layouts . Regarding the 1920’s PL1 pylon , yes this was scratch built from the original engineers drawings /plans , these structures are generally overlooked in the modelling world. Edited October 9, 2020 by Pylon King 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWT442 Posted October 11, 2020 Share Posted October 11, 2020 Not seen any mention of it, but the HKA's are out. I picked up 3 of them from Hampshire Models the other week, quite a decent looking bit of kit and a rake of them would look very impressive. A full NP set behind a Dapol 59 would be quite something! One thing that does let them down a bit is the couplings IMO. The HTA's and BRA/BYA's of old managed to have working body mounted knuckle couplings, as well as the option of standard tension locks. Considering the majority of HKA's are 'inners', so have no buffing gear and only knuckle couplings, it's a shame that it's only bogie mounted tension locks that are provided. The gap between them if run as 'inners' is absolutely massive and just looks so wrong. A bit of a cop out considering how much these cost and that it was doable over 15 years ago on similar wagons I've used #17 Kadees for the inner wagons, which does bring the gap down but is still quite big. I might look at trying some Kadee drag boxes mounted to the body, but I'm a bit loathe to take a knife to a £60+ wagon! The weathering on the ex-NP wagon is quite well done though, and the DB ones certainly grab the eye. My trio are to be run as part of a mixed aggregates train, so join the 6 Cavalex PGA's I've got. Some of the weathered ex-RMC JGA's will complete the rake, which is based on the short lived, and ad-hoc, aggregate service that ran from Acton to Eastleigh around 2017. Andy. 7 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz9284 Posted October 12, 2020 Share Posted October 12, 2020 11 hours ago, SWT442 said: Not seen any mention of it, but the HKA's are out. I picked up 3 of them from Hampshire Models the other week, quite a decent looking bit of kit and a rake of them would look very impressive. A full NP set behind a Dapol 59 would be quite something! One thing that does let them down a bit is the couplings IMO. The HTA's and BRA/BYA's of old managed to have working body mounted knuckle couplings, as well as the option of standard tension locks. Considering the majority of HKA's are 'inners', so have no buffing gear and only knuckle couplings, it's a shame that it's only bogie mounted tension locks that are provided. The gap between them if run as 'inners' is absolutely massive and just looks so wrong. A bit of a cop out considering how much these cost and that it was doable over 15 years ago on similar wagons I've used #17 Kadees for the inner wagons, which does bring the gap down but is still quite big. I might look at trying some Kadee drag boxes mounted to the body, but I'm a bit loathe to take a knife to a £60+ wagon! The weathering on the ex-NP wagon is quite well done though, and the DB ones certainly grab the eye. My trio are to be run as part of a mixed aggregates train, so join the 6 Cavalex PGA's I've got. Some of the weathered ex-RMC JGA's will complete the rake, which is based on the short lived, and ad-hoc, aggregate service that ran from Acton to Eastleigh around 2017. Andy. looks great mate. Unfortunately the NP HKA's never worked behind the NP 59. When NP 59s hauled the wagons they were JMA's and had different bogies. When the JMA's were re-bogied and re-coded HKA's the 59's were in EWS livery 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWT442 Posted October 12, 2020 Share Posted October 12, 2020 9 hours ago, daz9284 said: looks great mate. Unfortunately the NP HKA's never worked behind the NP 59. When NP 59s hauled the wagons they were JMA's and had different bogies. When the JMA's were re-bogied and re-coded HKA's the 59's were in EWS livery D'oh, of course they were! Would still look good, if incorrect! Andy 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold adb968008 Posted October 13, 2020 RMweb Gold Share Posted October 13, 2020 (edited) 23 hours ago, daz9284 said: looks great mate. Unfortunately the NP HKA's never worked behind the NP 59. When NP 59s hauled the wagons they were JMA's and had different bogies. When the JMA's were re-bogied and re-coded HKA's the 59's were in EWS livery i wonder how many people rushed to buy them based on the theory of running with an NP 59 ? I noticed this version disappeared very quickly from the shelves, which I thought was a little odd. Ive gone for DB with a few weathered NP to stand out in the rake. Edited October 13, 2020 by adb968008 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lyneux Posted October 18, 2020 Share Posted October 18, 2020 You can always buy my bogies from my Shapeways shop if you want LTF-25s to go underneath them and make them into JMAs: Guy 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
black and decker boy Posted October 18, 2020 Share Posted October 18, 2020 11 minutes ago, lyneux said: You can always buy my bogies from my Shapeways shop if you want LTF-25s to go underneath them and make them into JMAs: Guy I was looking at these last night but it said ‘not for sale’. I didn’t try to buy so no ideas if let’s you. The Colin Craig wheels don’t seem to be available now, assume any 2mm dia axle wheel set will work? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lyneux Posted October 18, 2020 Share Posted October 18, 2020 (edited) I just checked, and they are still showing as for sale: https://www.shapeways.com/product/68BXCJK2W/ltf25-np-v0-6-2-pairs-4-bogies-oo-scale I noticed that the similar LTF-25 that was used under the ARC JHAs is showing as not for sale. I'll try to correct this. Shapeways have undergone a few changes to their printing constraints over the years that these have been available and it looks like they have disabled them for some reason. Regarding Colin's wheels, they were Keen-Maygib 10.5mm disc wheels (available from the EMGS stores IIRC). You can still get the brake disc etches from Stenson Models to go with them. Please PM if you have any questions on them or if you want me to have a go at stretching them to EM for you! Cheers, Guy Edited October 18, 2020 by lyneux 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now