RMweb Gold Accurascale Fran Posted August 31, 2021 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted August 31, 2021 11 hours ago, DBC90024 said: Hi @Accurascale Fran, will you be doing a second wave of releases of the 92, different numbers etc (ie DB/EWS 2019, GBRf 92043 etc etc) ? I am in the final stages of my layout build and short of robbing Peter to pay Fran - i am probably going to be waiting a little while :-) Kat :-) Hi @DBC90024, We certainly will do re-runs in the future should demand warrant it, but of course all this is dependant on the first batch selling out so we can see what demand is like. So, let's see how that goes first. What is announced is what the first batch will be. Cheers! Fran 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnson Street IEMD Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 Hi Fran @Accurascale Fran, Thanks for the reply, yes, i love 90s but i love other electrics too, and with a bias to DB's ones: i'll probably end up opting for a Three Beasties 92 to be fair, and get weathered like one of these two leviathons: Needless to say, I am really looking forward to seeing your 92 arrive Kind Regards Kat 1 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
YesTor Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 It has always amazed me how the 92s have managed to retain their depot plaques for so long. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnson Street IEMD Posted September 4, 2021 Share Posted September 4, 2021 (edited) Soooo, in the early hours of this morning (Saturday 4th September), GBRf's recently back in service 92032, in the newer GBRf livery, as opposed to the Europorte livery was out taking part in GBRf's 2021 mega four day railtour seeing all sorts of traction being used, 66s, 73s, 86s, 91s, 92s ... seen here ... was the 92 (032) taking over from LSL's 86101 which had ran from Acton Sidings to Crewe via Birmingham New Street, Cannock and out onto Rugeley Trent Valley and up to Crewe, at Crewe, 86101 was relieved and 92032 picked up the baton, seen below: to take the train north as far as Mossend ... There'll be more footage of this event including the 86 on my channel - which you can access through the below link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnJHJwwBox-EvXPPExBDvlA or on the ''Photos AC electrics'' pictures and videos forum on here as below Soooooo ... ultimately, you dont need mk3 or mk5 sleeper carriage stock, car transporter STVAs or even intermodals to have a Class 92 on your layout, it could be a railtours working :-) Kat@johnsonstreetIEMD :-) Edited September 5, 2021 by DBC90024 3 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shedmaster Posted September 16, 2021 Share Posted September 16, 2021 Hi, Just out of interest, wasn't there a restriction originally that meant a Class 92 couldn't couple up directly to a BR Mk1 coach? Something to do with buffer vs corridor connection clearance? Was this restriction lifted then? I worked several railtours where there would be another loco between to get round this. Cheers, Shed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnson Street IEMD Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 Whilst out to Crewe on Thursday evening to catch a Class 90 dragging a steam train, unusual, right ? this came by also ... 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
surfsup Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 On 16/09/2021 at 02:12, Shedmaster said: Hi, Just out of interest, wasn't there a restriction originally that meant a Class 92 couldn't couple up directly to a BR Mk1 coach? Something to do with buffer vs corridor connection clearance? Was this restriction lifted then? I worked several railtours where there would be another loco between to get round this. Cheers, Shed. That's not one I've heard of before (I think one may apply for the Class 70s though) but I did a rail tour from Kings Cross to Bridlington which utilised a DB92 coupled directly to the Riviera Mk1s around 2009/2010. Looking at Flickr, it seems 92s have worked rail tours with Mk1s since at least 2003. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted September 19, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 19, 2021 17 hours ago, surfsup said: That's not one I've heard of before (I think one may apply for the Class 70s though) but I did a rail tour from Kings Cross to Bridlington which utilised a DB92 coupled directly to the Riviera Mk1s around 2009/2010. Looking at Flickr, it seems 92s have worked rail tours with Mk1s since at least 2003. They also ran their initial test and trials trains coupled to Mk1 formations. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Csalem Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 I found this picture on Flickr of two Caledonian 92s on a Mark 1 test train in 2016: 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnson Street IEMD Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 7 minutes ago, Csalem said: I found this picture on Flickr of two Caledonian 92s on a Mark 1 test train in 2016: More likely a tactical move with the second 92 DIT Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium njee20 Posted September 19, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted September 19, 2021 What do you mean ‘more likely’? It was a test train to see if the changes to the ETH on the leading loco (92014) could sustain periods of high speed running. All in the link. Yes the second loco could well be there as a positioning move. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shedmaster Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 12 hours ago, The Stationmaster said: They also ran their initial test and trials trains coupled to Mk1 formations. Hi, Thankyou for your replies. I’m not sure where this came from but I suspect I was ‘told’ by a colleague back in the day when I worked with these machines. Thinking back, I could only have heard it the once, which doesn’t indicate it was common knowledge then...oh well... Cheers, Shed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DY444 Posted September 20, 2021 Share Posted September 20, 2021 7 hours ago, Shedmaster said: Hi, Thankyou for your replies. I’m not sure where this came from but I suspect I was ‘told’ by a colleague back in the day when I worked with these machines. Thinking back, I could only have heard it the once, which doesn’t indicate it was common knowledge then...oh well... Cheers, Shed. No I think you're right. I too recall there being a restriction at some point on coupling 92s to one type of coaching stock. There are plenty of pictures about of them working with Mk1s and Mk3s so it could have been Mk2s? I can't remember now what it was but there was definitely something in the early days when people were trying to get them for rail tours. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted September 20, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 20, 2021 2 hours ago, DY444 said: No I think you're right. I too recall there being a restriction at some point on coupling 92s to one type of coaching stock. There are plenty of pictures about of them working with Mk1s and Mk3s so it could have been Mk2s? I can't remember now what it was but there was definitely something in the early days when people were trying to get them for rail tours. If anything it might have been something to do with ETH. Coupling wise they are fully compatible - for obvious reasons - with UK passenger and freight stock as they were designed from the outset as multi-traffic locos. I'm not sure if I still have any of my technical information on them although I possibly have something about their current draw for the hotel load of ENS stock on the 3rd rail (where there could have been some significant problems but not down to the 92s). There were no coupling restrictions placed on them during the initial trials although that was loco testing rather than ETH testing. So overall there might well have been an ETH incompatibility or - more likely - an untested combination. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DY444 Posted September 20, 2021 Share Posted September 20, 2021 (edited) 18 minutes ago, The Stationmaster said: If anything it might have been something to do with ETH. Coupling wise they are fully compatible - for obvious reasons - with UK passenger and freight stock as they were designed from the outset as multi-traffic locos. I'm not sure if I still have any of my technical information on them although I possibly have something about their current draw for the hotel load of ENS stock on the 3rd rail (where there could have been some significant problems but not down to the 92s). There were no coupling restrictions placed on them during the initial trials although that was loco testing rather than ETH testing. So overall there might well have been an ETH incompatibility or - more likely - an untested combination. I don't think it was eth. I'm 99% sure it was something to do with the types of vehicle permitted to be positioned immediately behind the locomotive. Edited September 20, 2021 by DY444 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adamphillip Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 Surprised no one is talking about the class 92 samples being at GETS and being ran on Mr Waterman’s layout 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Accurascale Fran Posted October 20, 2021 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted October 20, 2021 3 minutes ago, Adamphillip said: Surprised no one is talking about the class 92 samples being at GETS and being ran on Mr Waterman’s layout So are we! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
atom3624 Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 Hey, did anyone notice the 92's being run on Pete Waterman's track? OK ... Seriously, what were people's opinions on their running characteristics? Al. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium James Makin Posted October 20, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted October 20, 2021 53 minutes ago, atom3624 said: Hey, did anyone notice the 92's being run on Pete Waterman's track? OK ... Seriously, what were people's opinions on their running characteristics? Al. I reckon it'd be tricky to tell before they're in real people's hands, but my base assumption is perfect running, amazing slow speed control and prototypical top speed - I've happily pre-ordered two 92s back from the launch date and have no concerns, I know they will be as good as, if not better than, the best smooth running locos out there from the likes of Bachmann or Hornby, based on how good Accurascale are with their other products and attention to detail, I don't think they'd be dispatched from the warehouse without this minimum standard! Cheers, James 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Decorum Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 I’ve spent a while looking for a video showing the 92 running at the GETS and can’t find one. Perhaps that’s why no-one is talking about it. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold McC Posted October 20, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted October 20, 2021 Not a 92, but a taste of the standards The Class 92, as well as dual working pantographs, features the same dual speaker, powerbank capacitor, helical gearing, etc. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Decorum Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 16 minutes ago, McC said: Not a 92, but a taste of the standards The Class 92, as well as dual working pantographs, features the same dual speaker, powerbank capacitor, helical gearing, etc. Thank you. I have contented myself by going to the website for a leer. Mine’s Beethoven. Another leer at my Porterbrook Deltic for good measure. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary_lner Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 Hornby Magazine do have a video of the great electric train show for subscribers at the moment going through favourite parts of the show etc and that does have some footage of both the 92s and the tpe mkvs running. Im sure the video will be on YouTube soon. The 92s weren't running on Saturday whilst I was there as a coupling needed to be located for it. But Mike did show us the 92 in his hands and the detail is very impressive and from the video it seems to perform well with a rake of ipa car carriers. But having said that I've just found a video of the EWS 92 running by itself on a video by tbroyd at the 01:41 min mark and you can just hear the sound aswell. 1 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Decorum Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 2 hours ago, gary_lner said: Hornby Magazine do have a video of the great electric train show for subscribers at the moment going through favourite parts of the show etc and that does have some footage of both the 92s and the tpe mkvs running. Im sure the video will be on YouTube soon. The 92s weren't running on Saturday whilst I was there as a coupling needed to be located for it. But Mike did show us the 92 in his hands and the detail is very impressive and from the video it seems to perform well with a rake of ipa car carriers. But having said that I've just found a video of the EWS 92 running by itself on a video by tbroyd at the 01:41 min mark and you can just hear the sound aswell. Got it! Excellent video and nice 92. Thank you. 2 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ac1874 Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 (edited) I got some snaps through the glass, looking very nice though. Disappointed that I missed them running, I spent hours watching trains go by on that layout over the weekend! Edited October 20, 2021 by ac1874 9 1 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now