298 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 (edited) 18 hours ago, shortliner said: Andy - thanks for that, but I'm DC - occasionally with sound via an MRC Soundbox - DCC+sound ( and decoders) are/is severely out of my comfort zone, which is why the heading includes the expression "Electrical Numpty"! Also, living the Far North, replacing wheels and axles/weights becomes a logistical nightmare. We manage with what we have. Ignore the DCC bit, the point I was trying to make is how to make the mass of the train behave like the real thing so the car has enough inertia to roll on its own. The loco drive has some degree of inertia too, so reversing polarity quickly would be fighting the flywheels, and might confuse a feedback controller. I've filmed a short video to show an uncouple on the move, TBH having tried them elsewhere I'm not convinced that Neodymium magnets produce the right field for this. Edited March 26, 2019 by 298 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortliner Posted March 26, 2019 Author Share Posted March 26, 2019 (edited) Andy - I see what you are doing, and that may turn out to be the way to go - thanks for taking the trouble. It is pointing me towards a spring loaded switch that just breaks the current momentarily whilst still moving - Thinking on... Edited March 26, 2019 by shortliner Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ejstubbs Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 On 25/03/2019 at 08:31, dhjgreen said: Yes but with multiple controllers and cab control, this could be less confusing. Not sure what's confusing about having the jiggle button next to the controller you're driving the train with. Sounds a lot more straightforward than having a jiggle button for each uncoupler (plus associated wiring & IRJs) which is what would be required if you followed the approach in your diagram. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortliner Posted March 26, 2019 Author Share Posted March 26, 2019 (edited) I don't know if this will work but, watching Andy's video triggered an idea - If I use a spring loaded, normally on, SPDT switch , to allow me (in its normal position) to drive the train over the magnet, and press the switch to momentarily break the circuit and immediately spring back, the momentary break in power may simulate the "jiggle", and cause the couplers to relax and operate - I think it is certainly worth a try and have found a supplier in Cullercoats, Tyne and Wear - who is popping some in the post to me - fingers crossed. Edited March 26, 2019 by shortliner Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortliner Posted March 30, 2019 Author Share Posted March 30, 2019 Well, folks, I have had no reply from Broadway Lion to date , so it looks as though we will not get to know his solution to the problem - Ah, well! - I had a further thought about my previous post , and think that maybe a normaly ON, push to break button may be easier than the switch - I have ordered both so we'll see. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now