Jump to content
 

Please use M,M&M only for topics that do not fit within other forum areas. All topics posted here await admin team approval to ensure they don't belong elsewhere.

Imaginary Locomotives


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Murican said:

In that case, maybe the LNER could have named the "I1s" after LNER predecessors. Like 'Great Central' or 'North Eastern'.

 

That was my though too. There were meant to be six.

 

So 

 

GREAT EASTERN

GREAT CENTRAL
NORTH EASTERN

NORTH BRITISH

 

Great Northern was of course accounted for, 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, scots region said:

 

That was my though too. There were meant to be six.

 

So 

 

GREAT EASTERN

GREAT CENTRAL
NORTH EASTERN

NORTH BRITISH

 

Great Northern was of course accounted for, 

As for the sixth one, would 'Great North of Scotland' work?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Another idea I fancied (inspired by a Thomas the tank engine headcanon) would be for Beyer Peacock to create a tank engine in collaboration with the Southern that attempted to fix the key problems with the LBSC E2, like with a shorter wheelbase and bigger coal bunker, and extended side tanks.

 

Think this art of Thomas himself: image.png.a23488a61545c3fc2ff73d67245a98b2.png

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think other people have mentioned an idea of an 8MT or 9MT tank engine based on the 8F and 9F respectively, but Railway Mania's Sudrian Spotlight series gave me an idea for if some railways actually converted some O8 locomotives into 2-8-4 tank engines.

 

Even beyond that, I also fancied the idea of some 4-6-4T versions of the Black Five, which would theoretically replace the 4MT tanks in an alternate timeline.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Murican said:

Also, has anyone ever tried modelling what a Standard 6MT 4-6-0 would have looked like? Or maybe had some US-built "Pershing" 2-8-0s ever seen service on BR?

Hi There,

 

I would suggest that a Std class 6 4-6-0 would look like a Std class 5 fitted with a boiler of the proportions of the LMS Royal Scot class.

 

Gibbo.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, scots region said:

the 4-8-2 was rumoured to be named 'The Great Eastern'. 

 

Apt - like Brunel's steamship, bigger than could be usefully employed at the time. 

 

1 hour ago, scots region said:

 

That was my though too. There were meant to be six.

 

So 

 

GREAT EASTERN

GREAT CENTRAL
NORTH EASTERN

NORTH BRITISH

 

Great Northern was of course accounted for, 

 

if the fifth was GNoS, then evidently the sixth would have to be HULL & BARNSLEY.

 

Or perhaps even better, the full title:

 

HULL BARNSLEY AND WEST RIDING JUNCTION RAILWAY AND DOCK COMPANY

 

Such a long locomotive deserves a long nameplate!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Going off my other ideas. If the LMS and LNER of my universe are big enough for 4-8-2s and 4-8-4s, I'd also fancy the idea of USATC steamers on BR. Or maybe some alternate history where some Russian Decapods and Pershing 2-8-0s end up stuck in the UK...

 

As for British locomotives, I also think the idea of a Colliet "Cathedral" 4-8-0 and a Bulleid 4-8-2 plans for the Merchant Navys being what's built in the end.

 

I would normally share quite a few more rail ideas, but they're include some context for larger alternate history ideas.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Compound2632 said:

Why think so big? In the British context, small is beautiful. What would a Riddles single look like?

Hi Stephen,

 

It might look a bit like this but with a higher running plate and a BR 3 tender:

 

DSCF0516.JPG.6936ee131bb67ff40a6af92fe1c508fc.JPG

 

Gibbo.

  • Like 3
  • Funny 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Going off everything that's been discussed so far, here are some ideas I had. I know some have proposed these ideas before, but chose to use some of them as is because in America where I live, bigger is seen as better.

 

- The LBSC "Remembrance" engines being 4-6-0 tender engines from the beginning. Resulting in locomotives that resemble a 4-6-0 variation of the B4X with outside cylinders.

 

- L&Y's Hughes 2-10-0 becoming a reality, alongside the GCR's Baldwin 2-10-2. In my world, they'd set precedent for larger British steamers in general, with Baldwin collaborating with Beyer Peacock to make more of the 2-10-2s.

 

- During early LMS days, the Lemon 4-8-0 is built, albeit with a running board more akin to what'd later appear on Black Fives. This same engine gets a 4-8-4T counterpart, but neither are that popular.

 

- The mid-1920s sees the construction of several 4-8-0s mainly for mineral traffic; those being the above LMS Lemons, LNER Gresley T2s, and Maunsell S16.

 

- GWR's Cathedral engines are eventually built as 4-8-0s so that they'll have better adhesion than the 4-6-2 variation.

 

- Stanier building 2-8-4T variations of the 8F, which are continued under BR to take over for GWR mineral tanks.

 

- In addition to the above, Stanier builds his planned 9P 'Admiral' 4-6-4s and 10MT 'Empire' 4-8-4s. The former largely supplements Pacifics and 4-6-0s, while the 4-8-4 takes over the fastest freights.

 

- Gresley is tasked with building first the W2 4-6-4s, then the six I1 4-8-2s to take over from most of the A Class Pacifics.

 

- The Beyer Peacock T1 Class 0-6-0Ts, a modified design of the LBSC E2 that become common on British industrial lines, and even saw service on BR and the Continent after the war on all sorts of jobs like shunting and suburban trains. The ubiquity is what inspired the Reverend Awdry to base Thomas off them.

 

- Inspired by the LNER P2 and I1 locomotives, the Southern agrees to Bulleid's original 4-8-2 vision for the Merchant Navy Class. Only they end up built after nationalization, and as a result have their Standard-esque look from the beginning. In addition, they'd also have four-wheel tenders.

 

- BR decides to build the Duke of Gloucester as a 4-8-4 with a four-axle tender in an attempt to ape the Stanier 10MTs. Otherwise, its history is the same as real life.

Edited by Murican
  • Like 3
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Murican said:

Inspired by the LNER P2 and I1 locomotives, the Southern agrees to Bulleid's original 4-8-2 vision for the Merchant Navy Class. Only they end up built after nationalization, and as a result have their Standard-esque look from the beginning. In addition, they'd also have four-wheel tenders.

 

 

Some interesting concepts there but a 4-8-2 with a 4 wheel tender takes some imagining. I take it you meant 4 axles.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Going off my ideas so far, I could not only imagine Stanier planning 2-8-2s and possibly 2-8-4s, but also Peppercorn planning his own I2 4-8-2s before Nationalization.

 

As for the idea of more American war machines staying in Britain, I had the idea that some S160s and S200s could be used by the Southern Railway for post-war goods work before nationalization.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Murican said:

- GWR's Cathedral engines are eventually built as 4-8-0s so that they'll have better adhesion than the 4-6-2 variation.

4-8-0, now there's a thought. Here's a Hawksworth style  4700 development with a front bogie to deal with (hopefully)  the nosing about above 60mph, and a King boiler to feed it some steam.

 

4700based 4-8-0.JPG

Edited by JimC
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
2 hours ago, JimC said:

4-8-0, now there's a thought. Here's a Hawksworth style  4700 development with a front bogie to deal with (hopefully)  the nosing about above 60mph, and a King boiler to feed it some steam.

 

4700based 4-8-0.JPG

 

That'll straighten the track out for you.

  • Funny 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
16 hours ago, Murican said:

- The LBSC "Remembrance" engines being 4-6-0 tender engines from the beginning. Resulting in locomotives that resemble a 4-6-0 variation of the B4X with outside cylinders.

 

This almost happened, proposals were put forward for both a tank and tender version of the class, and number 328 was originally built as a 4-6-0 tender engine, however before it left the works 327 had proved itself as a tank engine, and 328 was rebuilt. 328 was built with a tender of the same style as the K Class, and it's tender would later end up behind one of them.

 

Gary

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
16 hours ago, Murican said:

- During early LMS days, the Lemon 4-8-0 is built, albeit with a running board more akin to what'd later appear on Black Fives. This same engine gets a 4-8-4T counterpart, but neither are that popular.

 

Better when later "rebuilt" around the 2A boiler (picture from earlier in the thread, inspired by @Corbs).

 

Hornby8XF.jpg.40887c217f3ca1754adf02f65d05c5ec.jpg

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Flying Pig said:

 

Better when later "rebuilt" around the 2A boiler (picture from earlier in the thread, inspired by @Corbs).

 

Hornby8XF.jpg.40887c217f3ca1754adf02f65d05c5ec.jpg

Hi There,

 

Would you be able to do a render that puts one of these boilers onto the Std 5 frame set to see what the Std class 6, 4-6-0 mentioned above might look like ?

 

Gibbo.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
10 minutes ago, Gibbo675 said:

Hi There,

 

Would you be able to do a render that puts one of these boilers onto the Std 5 frame set to see what the Std class 6, 4-6-0 mentioned above might look like ?

 

Gibbo.

 

Sorry, no - I don't have a suitable device at home.  I'm sure someone else can oblige though.

 

As the LMS 2A-boilered engines became 7P under BR, do you see the Class 6 as a two-cylinder engine?  Would that possibly exacerbate the rear end roll of the Scots et al?

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...