Jump to content

Butler Henderson

Railway Bylines and British Railways Illustrated new owners

Recommended Posts

Both magazines have been sold by Irwell Press to Guideline Publications although George Reeve and Chris Hawkins remain as Design & Commercial and Editor. The only noticeable change apart from  a lack of Irwell adverts (maybe one off given the full page explanations of the change) is the addition of an 8 page Model Railway News; issue 1 comprises of reviews of recent and not so recent announcements and releases and an article on Baby Warship models notable for including a picture of Hornby 29 described as a Dapol 22.

Edited by Butler Henderson
  • Informative/Useful 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

The first isue of the Model Railway section was not a good use of 8 pages. Let's hope that it will improve in future

  • Agree 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Been down the road with a modelling mag out of that stable before - Morill still waiting to get a full year out of the subscription 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Morill was Irwell until they sold it. Then everything went wrong and a lot of people got shafted, including those putting it together.

 

  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Friendly/supportive 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A modelling section in those two publications is in my opinion completely unnecessary.

  • Agree 14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These are the two best historical prototype magazines!

I sincerely hope this isn't bad news, the LAST thing they should do is change them.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read Bylines almost since it first came out (2nd issue on...) and I was rather taken aback to see a. that it had been sold to new publishers and b. that it had a rather underwhelming modelling insert.

 

If things change for the worst, they're going to lose a long term reader!

  • Agree 1
  • Friendly/supportive 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have always loved the excellent quality of these publications. I hope the new owners can keep up up the standards set by Irwell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What would be nice is a modelling section following the theme of each magazine.  I quite fancy a Model Railway Bylines.

 

Always wanted an eclectic train set for Christmas.

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, 2mmMark said:

Always wanted an eclectic train set for Christmas.

 

Worthy of the Count himself !

 

The Nim.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The market is already overcrowded with modelling mags, so one can only conclude that they don’t have the knowledge and/or access to photographic resources to continue in the trusted vein ...... or they are desperate to attract readers, because the loyal following is too small to be sustainable.

 

I was a regular buyer of Bylines for a long time, but cut back to “the odd one every now and then”. I have a feeling that it was free access to “Disused Stations” on the web that might have made the difference. 
 

The photos often do look ‘iffy’, but I’ve always put that down to the originals not really being strong enough to take being blown-up to the sizes they are, although maybe an element of not spending enough time on the digital tweaking of contrast etc has crept in over time.

Edited by Nearholmer
  • Agree 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 16/12/2019 at 21:06, 2mmMark said:

What would be nice is a modelling section following the theme of each magazine.  I quite fancy a Model Railway Bylines.

 

Always wanted an eclectic train set for Christmas.

 


it was called MORILL 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Stephenwolsten said:

I hope the new owners improve the quality of the reproduction of photos.    They are often very grainy and washed out.

 

Whoever publishes the magazine, the photos will be a problem.  Back then, not everyone had a camera with a decent lens and used fine-grained film, correctly exposed and carefully developed and printed.  Many are snaps taken with the equivalent of a 1950s Brownie 127 or a 120 camera with a similar (4.5x6 cm) frame size on inexpensive film, processed at the local chemist and returned with enprints.  Even with a negative, to blow the image up to even a half-page size, there is going to be grain. There is only so much that can be done with Photoshop to mitigate that.

  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, enginelane said:


it was called MORILL 

 

As has already been mentioned. I still have the first few issues which showed a great deal of promise, then it all seemed to unravel.

 

 

  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

The second issues under Guidelines Publishing are out - Irwell ad has returned. The main feature of the model insert is a two page spread of Little Bytham. Slightly incongruous for Bylines!

Edited by Butler Henderson
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, enginelane said:

It’s in Brill as well. Apparently well received 

They would say that!

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought every copy of Bylines for the first 4 years and then cut back my spending. I still buy copies now and again but the industrial content seemed to have dropped until the new issue, which is a good sign.

 

On the other hand, I think the modelling pages are a waste of space. Little Bytham may be a fine layout but it's not Bylines material, nor is anything else in there. Now if the modelling content was industrial and light railways then it would definitely add to the magazine and I'm sure I would go back to buying it regularly.

  • Agree 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect that the inclusion of the "modelling" pages has more to do with gaining more advertising than a genuine desire to add modelling-related editorial matter.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The January issue of Bylines seemed oddly familiar to me when I picked it up the other day.

 

Green saddletank on cover

Lead article about the Great Orme Tramway

 

Hmmm....

 

Then it came to me, I'd been sorting through some mags to see which to chuck and amongst them was the May 2017 issue of Bylines

 

Green saddletank on  cover

Lead article about the Great Orme Tramway

 

Ok, the locos were different (0-4-0 Hawthorne Leslie called "Mary" vs 0-6-0 Robert Stephenson called "Ruth")  but you'd think they could be a bit more original.....  :jester:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For most of the historical mags (perhaps not Backtrack) I notice similar stuff coming round again after a few years.

 

It's probably more pronounced where there is a lot of colour content; every other issue of Steam Days seems to have a feature on Bulleid Pacifics in 1966.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.