Jump to content
 

Gaugemaster Collection - OO Scale Class 33 Locomotives


Gaugemaster Controls
 Share

Recommended Posts

A couple of us ‘of a certain age’ here fondly remember the local scene of the late 1980s. Two of the more distinctive locomotives that passed us here at Ford from time to time on the Brighton to Cardiff Central trains were 33008 ‘Eastleigh’ in its BR Green livery and 33025 ‘Sultan’ with its light grey roof.

When we were given the chance to replicate these two items, we jumped at the chance, especially when our friends at Heljan agreed to apply the most subtle of weathering to really capture the locomotives in the condition they were most frequently seen when passing our offices.

 

GM4240101.jpg.df3b8a0adaf6b17fefbc35333ec5acf2.jpg

 

GM4240101 33008 Eastleigh Full Yellow Ends Lightly Weathered
Only £119.95

 

 

GM4240102.jpg.54098239bf84ca89ea19a14d824fd445.jpg

 

GM4240102 33025 Sultan BR Blue Grey Roof Lightly Weathered
Only £119.95

 

Class Profile:
Hugely capable and versatile mixed traffic machine built for the Southern Region, but seen further afield from the mid‐1980s. Class 33/0 is the standard variant employed on freight and passenger work both singly and in pairs.

Built by: Birmingham Railway Carriage & Wagon Co., Smethwick
Number built: 86
Number series: D6500‐85 (33001‐065)
Service Career: 1962 onwards
Region: Southern
Purpose: Mixed traffic
Status in 2018: Active/15 preserved

Model Features:
DCC Ready (8 Pin Socket)
Working Lights
Sprung Buffers
Sound Readyd

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you confirm if this is the latest tooling of the Heljan 33/0? I cannot understand how the RRP is £120 when the previous 2 batches and forthcoming batches of 33/0s have been RRP at £139/£149, and they're not limited editions.

Edited by SouthernMafia
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • RMweb Gold
On 28/12/2019 at 09:37, adb968008 said:

I recall 33008 seemed to have 365 different versions of its livery, including the cantrail, but did it have a curved at one side and square at the other ?

Yes it did. In mid 1986 before the cab windows went to white. I think the cantrail was changed later in 1986 but the livery above is correct. I do not know if the cantrail was the same on both sides. I have seen photos which show the different treatment of the stripe at each end as depicted on the model in photo above.

 

Just to elaborate further. The cantrail stripe was like this earlier in 1986 prior to the application of the white body side white stripe. It remained like this for a short time. At the some point around the time the cab windows started to go white it change. Definitely 365 versions of the livery. I suspect the livery of the model was only around for a very short period of time, possibly only weeks.

Edited by BR Blue
More info added
Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BR Blue said:

Yes it did. In mid 1986 before the cab windows went to white. I think the cantrail was changed later in 1986 but the livery above is correct. I do not know if the cantrail was the same on both sides. I have seen photos which show the different treatment of the stripe at each end as depicted on the model in photo above.

 

Just to elaborate further. The cantrail stripe was like this earlier in 1986 prior to the application of the white body side white stripe. It remained like this for a short time. At the some point around the time the cab windows started to go white it change. Definitely 365 versions of the livery. I suspect the livery of the model was only around for a very short period of time, possibly only weeks.

Hi BR Blue. They have got the cantrail stripe on this wrong - there plenty of pictures of it online to show. It did have the cantrail stripe from the 1st version of green it carried but not like on the model - the errors are the way Heljan have turned the stripe up over the cab doors - both ends on the model are different and both are incorrect.

Steve

 

Edit: As I said in my earlier post, Lima did get it right on both it's versions of 33008.

Edited by steve1023
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I see what you are saying. I had thought I saw a picture just after the application of the body side stripe.  Having gone through a few books I cannot find it now needless to say. So apologies, I must be mistaken. I have found pictures online prior to the stripe being added but any with the stripe on flickr, are as you say, different to the model. I am planning on bringing the model forward in time a bit as to how it was when I saw it. That means changing the cab window colour so I will be amending the stripe too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

May I ask, which version are you thinking of doing? 

 

The annoying thing for me is the shot in post 1 of 33025 with orange stripe is perfect for my desired renumber to 33027, however the production version has turned up without the stripe at all so lost sale there.

Edited by steve1023
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, 43110andyb said:

Just received my order through the post and very happy at a first glance.  What I am struggling with is any photos (as mentioned above) in its ‘as sold’ livery. I’m guessing there will be some out there somewhere! 


http://www.class33crompton.co.uk/Crompton33008more.htm

 

some on that link, it carried stripe and no white windows for a very limited time it appears.

Edited by Gtucker72
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Version 1 was plain green body, full yellow ends, grey roof and orange cantrail stripe. Released from Eastleigh works June 86. Lasted about 1 month.

Version 2 was as above but added the white body stripe (this is the version Heljan have done) - also lasted roughly a month.

Version 3 added white cab window surrounds to the above - maybe lasted 2 months.

Version 4 was the big change - small yellow panels, white body stripe all the way round too look like the original green livery. This lasted to around 1990 ish when it was replaced by departmental grey, then dutch and then.....

Version 5 which was similar to version 4 but with subtle differences, namely 1990's mods such as roof pod, headlights, incorrect TOPS style number font and initially it had a very thin red stripe at the bottom of the white body stripe although ISTR this being later removed. This was sometime in 1992 and it remained in this livery until it had the bodywork overhaul at Cranmore a couple of years ago.

 

Dates are approx. as I remember.....

Steve

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Received my Eastleigh today. Now I understand why none of the sellers have taken their own photos to advertise them. They are the old body and chassis with the latest bogies. I am not happy. Likely to be returned.

Why are Heljan still using this body moulding, I guess that explains why it is so cheap!

Cheers.

  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Griff,

Sorry, I mean the original body with wrong profile roof and cab front windows spacings wrong. The newer body was corrected from the original but added new mistakes, a few being roof engine hatch has both rivets and catches, horn covers in place instead of removed showing the horns (for later period), a revised roof area at the exhaust that can do the first type from new but replaces this with an insert to look plain but shows the joins, etched body side grilles and etched cab front steps. The chassis has much more pipework details and the bogie sides have been corrected with more detail.

Cheers.

Edited by Lyddrail
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 26/12/2019 at 12:33, SouthernMafia said:

Can you confirm if this is the latest tooling of the Heljan 33/0? I cannot understand how the RRP is £120 when the previous 2 batches and forthcoming batches of 33/0s have been RRP at £139/£149, and they're not limited editions.

 

I did have my suspicions...the price point is the give away.

Just glad they haven't done Eastleigh in the version I wanted if it's the old tooling!

Like you, baffled why it's still being used.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Disappointing.  A really nice finish, but the roof shape puts me off completely, so I have returned mine.

 

Clearly we all have much bigger things to worry about currently, but let's hope for better things from the forthcoming Heljan-branded release (ref 3442)  which  appears to be priced similarly to the rest of the revised shaped 33/0s and a general release rather than a ltd edition.  However, wise never to assume - we shall see in due course, no doubt. Stay safe everybody.

 

Best wishes, Paul

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine arrived today.  I guessed at that price they were old bodies, but hoped otherwise.   They are good enough for me for £100 with free postage, would struggle to get that on ebay even for the old ones.  I have lots of 33/2's, a handful of 33/1's and only two dodgy 33'0s before these two so they will add to the collection.

 

Guess they are using up old stock at the Heljan factory.  Very odd though, probably a logical story that has been poorly communicated, but given world events I am not surprised.

 

All in all, I am happy and will keep them.  Finish looks excellent so goes a long way to hiding the obvious balls up.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • RMweb Gold
On 30/03/2020 at 20:24, steve1023 said:

Version 1 was plain green body, full yellow ends, grey roof and orange cantrail stripe. Released from Eastleigh works June 86. Lasted about 1 month.

Version 2 was as above but added the white body stripe (this is the version Heljan have done) - also lasted roughly a month.

Version 3 added white cab window surrounds to the above - maybe lasted 2 months.

Version 4 was the big change - small yellow panels, white body stripe all the way round too look like the original green livery. This lasted to around 1990 ish when it was replaced by departmental grey, then dutch and then.....

Version 5 which was similar to version 4 but with subtle differences, namely 1990's mods such as roof pod, headlights, incorrect TOPS style number font and initially it had a very thin red stripe at the bottom of the white body stripe although ISTR this being later removed. This was sometime in 1992 and it remained in this livery until it had the bodywork overhaul at Cranmore a couple of years ago.

 

Dates are approx. as I remember.....

Steve


 

As a kid spending summers around Westbury in the late 1980’s, this is the version I remember most commonly around that time...

 

(link, not mine).

33-33008-1987-03-05-Waterloo-z.jpg


I have my Lima 33008 reflecting this style since that time.

I do remember seeing this on services to/ex Bristol many times, it was a regular, often daily around this time.

 

Though I do remember mods to this livery thinking they had spoiled it, as to my mind this was 33008 at its best.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
On 25/01/2020 at 21:37, steve1023 said:

Nope, I believe both ends are wrong. IIRC Lima did get it right.

 

On 29/03/2020 at 13:12, 43110andyb said:

Just received my order through the post and very happy at a first glance.  What I am struggling with is any photos (as mentioned above) in its ‘as sold’ livery. I’m guessing there will be some out there somewhere! 


The livery in this photo looks to me very like the as sold version 33-33008-1986-07-19-Bournemouth-z.jpg

 

On 27/03/2020 at 20:49, steve1023 said:

The annoying thing for me is the shot in post 1 of 33025 with orange stripe is perfect for my desired renumber to 33027, however the production version has turned up without the stripe at all so lost sale there.


I’ve bought 33025 because it hasn’t go the orange cantrail stripe!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, brushman47544 said:

 


The livery in this photo looks to me very like the as sold version 33-33008-1986-07-19-Bournemouth-z.jpg

 


I’ve bought 33025 because it hasn’t go the orange cantrail stripe!

The livery is the same as the model. The way the orange cantrail stripes turn up from the body over the cab door is wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...