StanierBlack5 Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 The more that I'm learning about building my first layout, the more confused I become, I would really appreciate your guidance with regards to the following: Theoretically, if I had two oval tracks one inside the other, each having their own separate bus wire and connected together via two sets of electrofrog points (to enable a loco to change from one track to the other), to keep the two districts separate would I need to use nylon insulating rail joiners between the two sets of points? I forgot to mention that my layout will be DCC. Please see the attachment and many thanks in advance. Roger Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete the Elaner Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 I would put the nylon rail joiners exactly where you have indicated. That is how I have separated my power sub-districts. I have not had an issue, nor did I expect one. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talltim Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 (edited) On that size of layout you don’t really need multiple power districts. However, DC or DCC, single or multiple power districts, you would need to insulate as per your diagram Edited February 10, 2020 by Talltim Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Joseph_Pestell Posted February 10, 2020 RMweb Gold Share Posted February 10, 2020 Thanks for raising this topic. I am a DCC newbie but helping someone to lay track on a DCC layout. The layout concerned will be rather more complex and I had been wondering about this issue of multiple districts and where the isolating rail joiners would be needed. As I understand it, once all the districts are turned on, operation of the locos is unaffected as they pass from one district to another. But if a short (or other problem occurs) in one of the districts, at least it does not shut down the whole layout. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanierBlack5 Posted February 10, 2020 Author Share Posted February 10, 2020 Thank you both for your quick replies. Talltim, trying to keep my question simple is the reason for mentioning two separate ovals, my layout will have two main lines (one up and one down), two goods lines (up and down) plus a six road carriage sidings and a smaller five road wagon sidings, all together I'll be using 28 sets of points at this point in time! Later I will be adding a turntable, shed and coaling plant etc., the layout base is 9' x 8'. Joseph, I too am a beginner and am loving building my layout which at the moment has stalled as I am awaiting stock of the iP Cobalt Digital point motors coming in to stock, meanwhile I'm still mentally building it and getting help from this very good forum. Thanks again fellas! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigP Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 (edited) -- Edited February 1, 2021 by bigP Deleted Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanierBlack5 Posted February 11, 2020 Author Share Posted February 11, 2020 Hi bigP, Yes, in the diagram District #1 would be the top line and District #2 would be the bottom one. Yes, I have one command centre (NCE Power cab) and no power booster. Thanks for the digital Cobalt info and it now looks like it's going to cost heaps for 24 points! bigP, many thanks for your input. Roger Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John ks Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 When deciding on power districts is easy at the construction stage to put in to many power districts Depending on the size of the main lines it might be wise to divide each one into multiple power districts. Loco facilities & Yards could also be separate power districts The drawings show several ways to feed the power districts 1 While this is the simplest fault finding is very difficult &, short circuit protection is provided by the Booster 2a Fault finding is a little easier ie disconnect wire from terminal strip until fault goes away 2b Fault finding is easiest, just turn off switches until the fault goes away 3a Short circuit protection & fault finding are provided by the circuit breakers 3b & c Similar to each other but “b” uses less breakers & switches to aid fault finding 4a Shows an extra booster connected to the system All these circuits show only one wire from the booster to the track, the second wire is a duplicate of the first wire If you decide to put switches between the booster & the track then you only need to switch one wire One advantage of switches is you can turn off parts of the layout With 3 or more sound engines idling in the background I find the silence is deafening when I turn off the layout John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ron Ron Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 2 hours ago, StanierBlack5 said: ....Yes, I have one command centre (NCE Power cab) and no power booster. Hi Roger, Being a bit cheeky and pedantic, you do have a power booster! What you have there with the PowerCab is a Command Station and a Booster. The PowerCab is unusual in that the system's Command Station and tiny Booster are contained within the PowerCab handset itself and not in an external box of electronics. However, on a more pertinent note, I agree with what's already been said about dividing your layout up into manageable sections, primarily for better handling of shorts and for easier fault finding. It may be worth considering one (or more) of the short circuit protection devices (circuit breakers) described by others, so that you can split the layout's single Power District, into two or more sub-districts, each protected by circuit breakers. Further division using simple switches, as described by John ks above, would be worthwhile insurance for fault finding as well. As John demonstrate, there are many ways to skin this cat. Of course none of this is necessary at all.......until the day you get an annoying short circuit or electrical fault that proves difficult and time consuming to trace and rectify.... .....or not necessary at all.....apart from the times when you get increasingly frustrated at the whole layout shutting down because of a local short on a small section of the layout, that ordinarily shouldn't affect running elsewhere (e.g. on a separate loop of track). Cheers Ron . 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete the Elaner Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 22 hours ago, Joseph_Pestell said: As I understand it, once all the districts are turned on, operation of the locos is unaffected as they pass from one district to another. But if a short (or other problem occurs) in one of the districts, at least it does not shut down the whole layout. Mine is 3 sub-districts all run from 1 booster through separate circuit protection devices. 1 of the sub-districts is isolated, but there is a crossover between the other 2. Running a train between these 2 is a non-event. I forget they are passing from 1 sub-district to another. It provides me with 2 benefits: If a short occurs (usually a loco passing the wrong way through a point set incorrectly), only 1 power district cuts out, which makes finding the fault much faster. Although it looks unlikely, if in future I do use more current than my booster can supply, I can add a second or third booster. Unlike upgrading from a 5A to 10A system, the wiring still only needs to take 5A because you are splitting across separate circuits. 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigP Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 (edited) -- Edited February 1, 2021 by bigP Deleted Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ron Ron Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 2 hours ago, bigP said: ......If you are using circuit breakers then you might want to consider feeding your cobalts through a separate channel on the circuit breaker...... In other words, an Accessory Bus....a separate branch off the Power Bus output from the DCC system. The Accessory Bus doesn’t need to be fed through a circuit breaker though, as it’s rather pointless (doh !!! ). Therefore a two channel circuit breaker could provide for 2 sub-districts, each with their own track bus, plus a separate accessory bus. Likewise, a four channel circuit breaker could provide for 4 sub-districts plus an accessory bus. Ron Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigP Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 (edited) --- Edited February 1, 2021 by bigP Deleted Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanierBlack5 Posted February 14, 2020 Author Share Posted February 14, 2020 Many thanks for all your replies and advice, I now have a lot more to think about before I go any further. Thanks also to the internet and top forums like this one now that the digital age is truely with us, back in the day with DC, I'm sure that building a layout was not as complicated for beginners like me. Than you all and Cheers, Roger Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete the Elaner Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 1 hour ago, StanierBlack5 said: back in the day with DC, I'm sure that building a layout was not as complicated for beginners like me. 'Back in the day with DC', I accepted poor running to be normal. I am now much more demanding about how well my models run (especially at slow speed). I am sure others are the same. The complexities are chosen by many to make things more reliable. You could compare this with cars. In the 70s, most had carburettors, point/condenser ignition & manual chokes. All of these needed adjusting: chokes as the engine warmed, points & carburettors as they wore & clogged up. We just accepted all these as being normal. Now we just get in, turn a key & the engine runs perfectly from cold every time due to more complex electronic systems. These may be more difficult to fix, but they go wrong far less often & are much less hassle when working properly. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold MalcT Posted February 15, 2020 RMweb Gold Share Posted February 15, 2020 (edited) On 12/02/2020 at 19:49, bigP said: No, I mean a separate channel out of the circuit breaker, not a dedicated accessory bus. The Cobalt Digital IP has in-built switching of frog polarity. So, if you get a short across the frog powered by one, down goes that Cobalt, and anything attached to the same sub-bus. If that ‘sub-bus’ is an accessory bus connected to the command station without circuit protection, we’ll down goes the CS too. Unless of course you try more wiring though switches 4, 5, & 6, or don’t use the Cobalt for switching frog polarity at all, then as you you say, use an accessory bus. However, if the latter then you need to spend more money on something else to switch those frogs. Paul. The Cobalt P Digital requires track power to switch the frog polarity. I have all mine powered by a separate accessory bus using switches 1 and 2. You then use switches 4 and 5 with feeds from the track (or track bus) and switch 6 for the frog polarity. A short occurring (i.e wrongly set point) will only affect the track bus, not the accessory bus, hence the reason why no circuit breaker is needed on the accessory bus. Edited February 15, 2020 by MalcT Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium newbryford Posted February 15, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted February 15, 2020 26 minutes ago, MalcT said: The Cobalt P Digital requires track power to switch the frog polarity. As does any point motor or switch connected to a point tiebar. Even a Peco solenoid with built in switch requires track power to alter the frog polarity. Or an analog controlled Tortoise or Cobalt requires track power to be switched for electrofrogs. One thing that seems to be oft overlooked - and for that reason adds to the "mystique" of DCC - frog switching is not a unique feature of DCC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigP Posted February 15, 2020 Share Posted February 15, 2020 (edited) -- Edited February 1, 2021 by bigP Deleted Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanierBlack5 Posted February 22, 2020 Author Share Posted February 22, 2020 I rather like the look of 'John ks' submission, using the diagram '2b' ... "Fault finding is easiest, just turn off switches until the fault goes away." My question is a simple one, what kind of switch do I require and does this one fit the bill: Single Pole Toggle Flick Switch 15A 250V AC ? Please excuse my ignorance but it is the very reason why I joined the forum, to obtain expert advice and help. Many thanks, Roger Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dungrange Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 I'll be interested in the views of others, but I plan to do something similar but use double pole switches, so that I'll be cutting the power to both rails and not just one. I see nothing wrong with using a switch rated at 15 Amps, but I'd have thought that something with a lower current rating would also suffice as it's unlikely your section will draw that much power. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Bucoops Posted February 22, 2020 RMweb Gold Share Posted February 22, 2020 Regarding power breakers I've heard good things about the "DCC Specialities PSX" - is that still a decent choice to protect your controller/booster? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanierBlack5 Posted February 22, 2020 Author Share Posted February 22, 2020 As always, thanks for your input. This is where I am right now; at the Festival of Railway Modelling held at the Doncaster Racecourse a couple of weekends ago, I spoke to Digitrains (Lincoln) where I purchased a CP6 Circuit Protector - not a circuit breaker. I intend incorporating this (together with the appropriate switches) into the diagram 2B supplied by 'Johns ks' and am wondering what type of On/Off switches to use. Many thanks in advance. Roger Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John ks Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 I use switches like these https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/5-PIECES-DPDT-10-Amp-Toggle-Switch-with-On-Center-Off-Position-Heavy-Duty-/151310003710 at the main control panel & switches like these https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/10PCS-Mini-Latching-Toggle-Switch-DPDT-2-Positions-ON-ON-AC-6A-125V-6-Pin-New/264151947179?hash=item3d80aed7ab:g:ua8AAOSwrQ5cRIS3 at the local control panels Part of the reason my layout ended up like this is that most of the wiring is leftover from when it was DC block controlled. The first 2 boosters in the drawing show how my layout is wired If you are using a single Booster then the first switch past the circuit breaker is not necessary With multiple boosters it can help with fault finding but is not necessary. The third drawing shows both rails switched & the switches ringed in yellow are optional John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Enterprisingwestern Posted February 23, 2020 RMweb Gold Share Posted February 23, 2020 11 hours ago, StanierBlack5 said: As always, thanks for your input. This is where I am right now; at the Festival of Railway Modelling held at the Doncaster Racecourse a couple of weekends ago, I spoke to Digitrains (Lincoln) where I purchased a CP6 Circuit Protector - not a circuit breaker. I intend incorporating this (together with the appropriate switches) into the diagram 2B supplied by 'Johns ks' and am wondering what type of On/Off switches to use. Many thanks in advance. Roger If I'm reading the blurb correctly, then a cheaper way to do the job of the CP6 is to buy some 1amp fast blow fuse and wire them up in line? Presumably it can be done with electronic components, so what is the equivalent of fast blow glass fuse maybe with auto or manual re-set combined? Mike. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanierBlack5 Posted February 23, 2020 Author Share Posted February 23, 2020 Thanks again for your input. Mike, yes you're reading the blurb correctly, although more costly than using auto rear light bulbs I think the CP6 looks better. Thanks John for more diagrams for my collection, I've attached my diagram although not too professionally drawn as my printer/scanner stopped working last week but it shows what I now have in mind for my layout. Cheers, Roger 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now