Jump to content
 

Great Central Railway Class 5A - LNER J63


 Share

Recommended Posts

I am very grateful for Mike pointing out that I had the ashpan sides the wrong way around because it’s an easy fix (already done) and it was a detail that I was struggling to find. The GA I have only show’s an outline for the ashpan and all the photos I have the detail is lost in the gloom.

 

I had forgotten to take photos of them before fitting so taking them off to swap them around gave me the opportunity to do so.

 

I measured the space where they were to fit and cut a strip of a sheet of 10thou nickel 30.5mm wide. From this strip I cut two pieces each 17mm long. This left a piece approx. 30mm long and I measured 5mm up from each opposite end and then cut the piece diagonally across.

 

I wasn't sure that I have described that clearly so I knocked up a sketch in paint.

 

51041189992_84a5cf8108_m.jpg
 
Once I had all the parts cut out, I placed each bottom edge in my hold and fold approx. 1.5 mm in and gave it as slight bend and then solder them together in handed pairs to give each ashpan side as below.

 

51041146887_7a6736d29e_b.jpg
 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I haven’t had much workbench time in the last couple of weeks or so but when I have I have been slowly working on the chassis of the Class 5A fitting the pickups and getting it to run. The latter being a bit of a trial.

 

In order to make it so that the motor and pick ups can be removed without having to unsolder anything I made a frame spacer from a spare out of another kit and screwed a piece of Vero board to it

 

51111040143_d42bb63399_b.jpg

 

51111899815_5f5918c959_b.jpg

 

51110871794_3d68a7f30f_b.jpg

 

This is where the fun began,  despite it running lovely when the motor was connected directly as soon as I added pickups in to the equation the rods started jamming at every turn which in turn forces the compensation beams up and down to one extreme or the other. This caused more than a few mutterings. One thing that I noticed was that in retaining the Dereck Mundy Crankpins at the rear albeit in a modifified form on the centre axle the thick boss was still causing issues by pushing the coupling rods in to an open-ended wedge shape. I had dismantled one side with the plan to carefully extract the crank pins and turn the bossed down on my Unimat SL. Life intervened and I bought a Unimat 3 early last week, so having collected it from Driffield on Tuesday, I did them on that instead.

 

51110871829_5e79103fed_c.jpg

 

It now runs much better on the rolling road but I am sure that once I get some weight in it and on a test track it will be fine. The rollers on my rolling road are set a lit far apart and sometimes that introduces a bit of a waddle which doesn’t help when trying to resolve running problems. – Prompted by typing this, I found and added some small washers which have taken out some of the side play on the rollers and running has improved already.

  • Like 2
  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

If running is forcing the compensating beams up and down as you say it's either a quartering issue (very unlikely with Slater's wheels) or the rods don't match the axle spacing. If you were using the Slater's crankpins with the idiotic loose bushes I would have said to back the nuts off and secure them with threadlock but you don't appear to be using them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel so much better when I read that skilled builders such as yourself have these issues! I tend to think its just my models .  Watching this with interest . I have not built a loco with outside valve gear yet - its next on my challenge list!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JeffP said:

Sorry to hear your problems.

Both of those soldered joints look dry soldered to me too.

Did you clean the copper tracks before attempting to solder?

 

Sorry Jeff, the problems were mechanical not electrical the soldered joints are fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Michael Edge said:

If running is forcing the compensating beams up and down as you say it's either a quartering issue (very unlikely with Slater's wheels) or the rods don't match the axle spacing. If you were using the Slater's crankpins with the idiotic loose bushes I would have said to back the nuts off and secure them with threadlock but you don't appear to be using them.

 

Thanks Mike,

 

Some of it I am sure was caused by the bosses on the crank pin and some by excessive side play on the middle axle plus the sloppiness of my rolling road. Hopefully all of these are now sorted and once the upperworks are complete it will be a happy little bunny.  I don't recall having the same problems with my own but I built it a good few years ago so I may have forgotten. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Shez said:

I feel so much better when I read that skilled builders such as yourself have these issues! I tend to think its just my models .  Watching this with interest . I have not built a loco with outside valve gear yet - its next on my challenge list!

 

Hi Mark,

 

Do you have a particular loco in mind with outside motion?

If you are looking for something North Eastern, the B16/1 has very simple outside motion if you didn't want go go all out on walschaerts on the first go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rob Pulham said:

 

Hi Mark,

 

Do you have a particular loco in mind with outside motion?

If you are looking for something North Eastern, the B16/1 has very simple outside motion if you didn't want go go all out on walschaerts on the first go.

 

Its going to be a GCR "Immingham"  4-6-0 - (Gladiator kit)  so Stephenson link motion. One of my GCR  "Mexborough" engines in remembrance of my great uncle Bill Massey, driver at said shed. My father also worked there for a short time in the early 1950s in the shed offices.  (Couple more locos to build first though!)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

When I put the wheels and rods on mine, I was astonished at how little "slop" there was in the various holes and bearings and fully expected a tight spot here or there but I was very pleasantly surprised that it all ran smoothly first time. The clearances in the wheel bearings and the fit of the coupling rods, connecting rods and the piston rod in the cylinder are all less than I am used to in 4mm scale. I would think it would only take a hole in a bush to be marginally off centre to create problems.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shez said:

 

Its going to be a GCR "Immingham"  4-6-0 - (Gladiator kit)  so Stephenson link motion. One of my GCR  "Mexborough" engines in remembrance of my great uncle Bill Massey, driver at said shed. My father also worked there for a short time in the early 1950s in the shed offices.  (Couple more locos to build first though!)

 

Got you, I have only a couple more GCR locos in the pile, an F1 and a B2 (destined to be Sir Sam Fay).

 

For my sins I recently bought a couple more J21's ones a rescue job which came with wheels and the other is an original 07/George Norton kit. It means that I now have 3 J21's to build at some point. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't have enough J21s!  Got to do at least one in original Worsdel green.   Like the sound of Sir Sam Fay.  My great uncle's take on the B2 s were they were much better engines than their reputation suggests. Then he was biased to anything GCR.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

While awaiting more building materials I had some time in the workshop over the last couple of days and this has allowed the Class 5A to move much nearer to completion. All the etch parts are now on the body with just the balance weights to fit to complete all the etched  parts.
From there I moved onto the castings, at the beginning Brian and I discussed the castings and since they were pretty poor (certainly when compared to the castings that came with my kit a few years earlier) and we replaced as much as we could but retained the Chimney, dome and Smokebox door. The dome and the smokebox door did clean up and don’t look too bad now but the Chimney when I examined it closely had some holes in the flare at the base. I filled them with lowmelt and reshaped the flare. This means that I will have to use epoxy to stick it on as I don’t want to risk any heat undoing the work on the flare.

 

51122718976_f7c5860331_b.jpg

 

51122462864_7628c7a5d0_b.jpg

 

The castings after clean up

 

51122718016_c003d36c06_b.jpg

 

Cab interior details

 

51122147832_b5b0874c77_b.jpg

 

51125076956_073f1c622e_b.jpg

 

51125885775_488aabefa3_b.jpg

 

51124986438_c2e281fe01_b.jpg

 

The Safety valves are from Laurie Griffin and they too had a prominent mould line across the top which required a bit of works to remove but still infinitely better than the reject whitemetal offering. I understand that this kit is now with Iain Young of Sans Pariel/CSP and that he intends to remaster all the castings. The kit will benefit greatly from that, I think.
 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Amongst the castings in the kit were what I originally thought were a couple of Ross Pop safety valves but it turns out that they were in fact the lids for the sand boxes either way they were not great. 

 

What a great opportunity to make something meaningful with the new lathe, thinks I.

So, I turned up a pair of sandbox lids

 

51130042839_958af58072_c.jpg

 

51130078724_b62fb7f127_b.jpg

 

Finally, one with the obligatory 5p piece for scale

 

51130043004_307886e240_b.jpg

 

I have to confess that these were my second attempt. The first pair were okay but I hadn’t quite worked out how to make the two identical so there were some slight discrepancies in size – probably not really noticeable at this small size but I knew I could do better so I did.

 

After making the first two sandbox fillers I turned (if you will pardon the pun) my attentions to the oilers. While buying other castings I had bought some oilers for the side of the smoke box and a set for the footplate.

 

Having examined the ones on the footplate more closely in the photos I realised that the castings would be correct so I turned up a pair of those too. They were very similar to make, aside from I drilled these 0.8mm to take a piece of nickel rod to mount them. 

 

I could have left a turned stem on the oilers but I need to be able to bend it so I reasoned that rod would be better for bending as I thought a turned stem would be likely to break off.

 

51129965316_ebe610ff0a_b.jpg

 

And again, with the 5p piece

 

51130042704_5dcc8921e5_b.jpg

 

The collets and chuck were invaluable and this type of thing really satisfies my urge to make things…
 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of sessions this weekend, have seen most of the brass castings and the backhead finished and secured in place.

 

Prior to doing that I had to make a cab floor or rather the front section of the cab floor because my replacement backhead fell through the section that’s not provided in the kit when I tried it in place.

 

51140244709_24b9922c6c_b.jpg

 

I added a couple of 2mm wide strips to the edges of the cab splashers and then soldered the additional cab floor to that which brought it to the same height as the rest of the cab floor.

 

After making the floor it gave me another option to secure the backhead so I made the back head and the cab gauges removable to ease the job of painting.

 

51138758987_72e8a41496_b.jpg

 

51139648348_59e3c44e33_b.jpg

 

I folded a small piece of 10thou nickel into a U shape with a short leg to the front and drilled a hole for a 10ba nut. The idea of the U shape is to add a bit more strength to what is relatively thin sheet.

 

51140538215_d1b42f38ed_b.jpg

 

51139433506_60f57e334d_b.jpg

 

51139433576_cf0d64b9ef_b.jpg

 

I added a short length of tube in the corner of the cab front and splasher and the tail of the pipe from the gauge locates into it with the back of the dial fitting over the peg where the vacuum ejector pipe enters the cab. Not strictly prototypical I am sure but it means that after painting a small dab of glue will secure it in place.

 

A few general shots of the smokebox details which is where most of it seems to be on this loco.

 

51138758252_29dccf2dc1_b.jpg

 

The clack valve is one of Jim McGeown’s from his most useful sprue of Clack and elbow castings as is the vacuum ejector elbow on the other side.

 

The lubricators on the smokebox are Laurie griffin and the small pipe and fitting is scratch built from tube, rod and scrap etch.

 

51140537415_aa40b122b9_b.jpg

 

51138757572_69e7727958_b.jpg

 

The rather nice turned whistle came with the kit and is without doubt the best fitting supplied.

 

Still to fit are vacuum pipes and the whitemetal fittings – buffers, dome and chimney, then balance weights and some lead in the side tanks before track testing.

The end is most definitely in sight.

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

I had some Milliput out for making some modifications to some axlebox ready to make some castings of them. I needed a miniscule amount so it seemed a shame to waste the reast of what I mixed so I filled the back of the balance weights for the Class 5a.

 

They still need a little tidying up but they do look a bit better than just an etched skin.

 

51151200699_73cf572567_b.jpg

 

When I did my J63 I had some etched washers that were just the right size to make the front windows into opening ones by sticking them either side of soe glazing material and wrapping a strip of brass around them.

I wondered if I was able to turn a couple with a proper recess rather than a wrap-around overlay, now that I have a little more confidence with the lathe. I ordered a 3.5mm boring tool and when it arrived, I thought I would have a go.

 

I cut a length of brass rod and turned a section of it down to the required width and then drilled progressively bigger holes in the end until I reached 5mm in diameter. Then I tried the boring tool ad had a gotcha moment. The tool might be 3.5mm wide but it’s also 3.5mm deep and it wouldn’t fit when trying to centre it in the hole for cutting…. In order to get the tool in I would need a bigger hole than I wanted.

 

I scratched my head for a bit and then had a rummage thought the box of tools that came with the lathe. One of them had been ground with boring holes in mind but the corner of the cutting edge was chipped so while it would cut, I didn’t get a square edge to the bottom of the hole.

It was at this point that I remembered that I had bought a mini bench grinder from Lidl about 3 years ago and it was sat on a shelf under my bench.

 

Out it came and I had my first go at grinding a cutting tool for the lathe. Light touches soon restored the missing bit of tip and I now see what Ian meant when he said a sharp tool makes a lot of difference to how it cuts.

While I had it on the bench, I reground a couple more tools that had dings out of the edges too.

 

51150410551_c949424876_b.jpg

 

51150645033_d9372272c2_b.jpg

And one with the obligatory 5p for scale.

  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The build slowed down a little when I realised that the chimney casting had the flare cast lopsided. This meant that when you had the chimney sat on vertically on the smokebox there was more flare at one side than the other. I tried to reshape it with bars rolling it over a former the same size as the smokebox but I couldn’t improve it much.

After some discussion with Brian, I emailed Laurie Griffin and Andy Beaton to ask them if they had anything suitable in their ranges that might do (as long as it looked right it wouldn’t matter which loco it was originally designed to fit). Sadly the nearest we got to was an LNER standard chimney from Laurie.

The next step was to ask fellow Guild member Mike Hopkins who has been posting some excellent stuff on the Guild forum where he has been designing in 3D then printing waxes and having them cast in brass.

I supplied Mike with a drawing a couple of days ago and he went away to draw it up.

 

Below are some photos of the wax prints prior to removing the supports and sending them away for castings. Photo’s copyright of Mike and posted with his kind permission.

 

51164959856_76e807148e_h.jpg

 

51166050860_aaa9d1a46f_h.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

The final part of the build while awaiting the chimney casting was how to fit the cab windows.

I drilled each one top and bottom and added a pivot pin.

 

51168928037_7f86e007a7_3k.jpg

 

51170693190_89a1e10b1a_3k.jpg

 

After thinking about bits of tube etc. I realised that I could add some bottom ‘hinges’ in the form of pipe type bracket and do the same at the top but only solder one tab so that the bracket could be eased back to make the window unit removable for painting.

 

51170692895_508303e8ea_3k.jpg

 

 

A few shots as she stands awaiting her chimney. I also added lead to the side tanks and as I suspected she now runs quite smoothly on the rolling road. I will continue to run in while awaiting the chimney and when the weather improves, I will dig my test track out of the shed and test run around curves.

 

51170692620_d5f67eb1b8_3k.jpg

 

51170383104_1a489c6241_k.jpg

 

51168928267_1b567f5257_3k.jpg

 

51170693845_25cd20d670_k.jpg

  • Like 2
  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Very nice Rob.

 

I have made little progress on mine but she is now a runner, having had pick ups added.

 

When driving from the back axle, I got some binding in the coupling rods and came to the conclusion that the road and axle centres were slightly out on the etches. It was fixed easily by opening out the coupling rod holes slightly.

 

I have been in touch with Mike Hopkins about a new chimney for mine, as my casting in the kit is the same as yours in being lopsided.

 

I will just suggest one alteration if I may. I think you have the vacuum pipe at the front a bit high up. It should be more like the one at the back.

 

Cheers

 

Tony

Edited by t-b-g
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, t-b-g said:

 

 

I will just suggest one alteration if I may. I think you have the vacuum pipe at the front a bit high up. It should be more like the one at the back.

 

Cheers

 

Tony

 

Thanks Tony,

 

I hadn't noted that, I will consult photo's and move it down a bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I had a long morning finishing of some fencing at the back of the house yesterday so modelling took a back seat. I did however manage to do some test running of the Class 5A on my rather rough and ready test track which it passed with flying colours.

I took a video of the slow running. It's only just over a minute don't fall asleep.

 

https://youtu.be/5qOrTJtpFdo

Edited by Rob Pulham
Trying to get Youtube link to work
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
24 minutes ago, Rob Pulham said:

 

 

I had a long morning finishing of some fencing at the back of the house yesterday so modelling took a back seat. I did however manage to do some test running of the Class 5A on my rather rough and ready test track which it passed with flying colours.

I took a video of the slow running. It's only just over a minute don't fall asleep.

 

https://youtu.be/5qOrTJtpFdo

 

I don't think anybody could ask for anything better than that in terms of slow running. Very sweet indeed!

  • Thanks 1
  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...