LU_fan Posted April 25, 2021 Share Posted April 25, 2021 While I am aware of the BREL International set being sold to Irish Rail after a few years in storage, I just stumbled across one coach which I've never seen before: The text on Flickr doesn't offer much information, only stating that this was the one and only coach of the set built to UIC 505 profile. Does anyone know what happened to this coach? Or simply have more info on it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BernardTPM Posted April 25, 2021 Share Posted April 25, 2021 I remember seeing in it in magazines at the time (probably Modern Railways, Motive Power Monthly or Rail) but I don't know anything else. It does look like it was the full length version as on the spec. sheet here. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
47513 Posted April 25, 2021 Share Posted April 25, 2021 This came up on another forum a while back. It was a one off demonstration coach built to continental gauge, you can see how much wider it is from the overhang beyond the conventional B4 bogies. It ended up at the GCR(N) and was eventually scrapped. It has a page on the vintage carriage register: http://www.cs.rhrp.org.uk/se/CarriageInfo.asp?Ref=3495 1 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Dava Posted April 25, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted April 25, 2021 19 minutes ago, 47513 said: This came up on another forum a while back. It was a one off demonstration coach built to continental gauge, you can see how much wider it is from the overhang beyond the conventional B4 bogies. It ended up at the GCR(N) and was eventually scrapped. It has a page on the vintage carriage register: http://www.cs.rhrp.org.uk/se/CarriageInfo.asp?Ref=3495 Yes there are some scrap-hungry bunnies at GCRN. Lots more for them to get on with. Parts of the site are like scrapyard challenge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LU_fan Posted April 25, 2021 Author Share Posted April 25, 2021 5 hours ago, BernardTPM said: I remember seeing in it in magazines at the time (probably Modern Railways, Motive Power Monthly or Rail) but I don't know anything else. It does look like it was the full length version as on the spec. sheet here. 4 hours ago, 47513 said: This came up on another forum a while back. It was a one off demonstration coach built to continental gauge, you can see how much wider it is from the overhang beyond the conventional B4 bogies. It ended up at the GCR(N) and was eventually scrapped. It has a page on the vintage carriage register: http://www.cs.rhrp.org.uk/se/CarriageInfo.asp?Ref=3495 Shame to hear it was scrapped, would've made for an interesting museum exhibit. But, being built to continental gauge, how did it move around the country? Or did it simply stay stationary until it went to the GCR(N)? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium keefer Posted April 25, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted April 25, 2021 Page about the International Train: http://www.traintesting.com/International_train.htm Thought at first it might be the 'extra' vehicle 99519 but obviously not so. Presumably some sort of 'demonstrator' in an attempt to gain overseas orders - it has a very continental look to it, including the 'rubber tube' gangway. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HGR Posted April 25, 2021 Share Posted April 25, 2021 Wasn't this one of the earlier batch of International coaches - from 1984 ? I'll have to do some trawling back through info. The first one done was a 'special' very high-spec vehicle for President Omar Bongo of the Gabonese Republic (a former French territory in Central Africa) ? Not sure how many more were made to the standard UIC '26.4 metre' spec. offering by BREL over the following couple of years if VCT says 1986 for this one. The 'International Train' done a couple of years later were the ones that were very much Mk.3 derivative, albeit with flat plug doors in place of the wrap-around sort. BREL described them as '23 m' option. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium keefer Posted April 25, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted April 25, 2021 (edited) The Gabon coach is mentioned in the linked article, stated as 1984. The distinction is also made between International Coaches and the 'International Train' which was, as you say more Mk3-based Edited April 25, 2021 by keefer Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
w124bob Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 I doubt that coach would have been sold on to a continental railway as seen, there appears to be no train heat or brake connections. Would have made a nice dormitory coach, plenty of shoulder room! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold russ p Posted April 26, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 26, 2021 8 minutes ago, w124bob said: I doubt that coach would have been sold on to a continental railway as seen, there appears to be no train heat or brake connections. Would have made a nice dormitory coach, plenty of shoulder room! Just noticed that. Is this coach just a mock up on a mk1 underframe? Seems odd to use B4s at such a late date unless it was intended for third world countries as they were then called Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted April 26, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 26, 2021 46 minutes ago, russ p said: Just noticed that. Is this coach just a mock up on a mk1 underframe? Seems odd to use B4s at such a late date unless it was intended for third world countries as they were then called I wonder? No problem over the bogies that were used as far as I can see (a good Swindon design ) but the 'Berne rectangle' definitely doesn't look right when I lighten up the picture to have a better look at it. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold rodent279 Posted April 26, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 26, 2021 59 minutes ago, russ p said: Just noticed that. Is this coach just a mock up on a mk1 underframe? Seems odd to use B4s at such a late date unless it was intended for third world countries as they were then called Too long surely? Mk1's are just over 19m long, way shorter that the 23 & 26m norms for mainland Europe. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold russ p Posted April 26, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 26, 2021 37 minutes ago, rodent279 said: Too long surely? Mk1's are just over 19m long, way shorter that the 23 & 26m norms for mainland Europe. There is that , but I wonder if its been extended. I think its some kind of mock up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwin_m Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 3 hours ago, russ p said: Just noticed that. Is this coach just a mock up on a mk1 underframe? Seems odd to use B4s at such a late date unless it was intended for third world countries as they were then called Perhaps because the B4 didn't need air suspension, which might have been difficult with said absence of brake piping? What is your reason for thinking it's a mk1? Not questioning, just wondering because the underframe is hardly visible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Joseph_Pestell Posted April 26, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 26, 2021 3 hours ago, russ p said: Just noticed that. Is this coach just a mock up on a mk1 underframe? Seems odd to use B4s at such a late date unless it was intended for third world countries as they were then called It was expected that these would mostly go to less developed countries and were made on a very modular basis so that various levels of trim could be offered. That coach does not look 23m long to me. So it could be on a Mk1 chassis as a mock-up but I don't think they were. I was lucky enough to have a visit around the works at that time and a look round the "International" rake. A pity that it did not take off but the developing countries would be more likely to buy S/H or from a lower-cost manufacturer in Romania (or similar). 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
w124bob Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 The whole thing just looks a bit "film set", gaffer tape and plywood! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Joseph_Pestell Posted April 26, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 26, 2021 10 minutes ago, w124bob said: The whole thing just looks a bit "film set", gaffer tape and plywood! I think that is just down to rather poor, faded paintwork. I recall the coaches I saw being to a good standard. I think that my trip would have been in 1984 or 1985, so the earlier coaches not the Mk3 clones. The Gabon coach is to a very different profile, presumably for metre or 3'6 gauge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold russ p Posted April 26, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 26, 2021 2 hours ago, Edwin_m said: Perhaps because the B4 didn't need air suspension, which might have been difficult with said absence of brake piping? What is your reason for thinking it's a mk1? Not questioning, just wondering because the underframe is hardly visible. Building it on a mk1 underframe would make it a lot cheaper to build even if the production ones were going to be integral construction but they could easily demonstrate proposed interiors etc The argument against mk1 underframe is on mk1s the headstock tapers out either side of the draw hook although the frames could have been extended at either end Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wickham Green too Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 There wouldn't be much point using it as a demonstrator if all you could demonstrate was the interior & exterior finish ................... "Oh yeah, structural integrity'll be fantastic - but you'll have to take our word for it 'til we get your dosh to build one for real, Guv." 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BernardTPM Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 The number of windows matches the diagram for the 26m version, so it would take a lot of work to properly extend a Mk.1 underfame for it, not to mention not a good sales point, as Wickham points out above. Perhaps the larger loading gauge and the angle of the photograph makes it look shorter than it is. B4 bogies were used under several designs of coach, so that proves nothing. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold russ p Posted April 26, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 26, 2021 2 hours ago, BernardTPM said: The number of windows matches the diagram for the 26m version, so it would take a lot of work to properly extend a Mk.1 underfame for it, not to mention not a good sales point, as Wickham points out above. Perhaps the larger loading gauge and the angle of the photograph makes it look shorter than it is. B4 bogies were used under several designs of coach, so that proves nothing. As Bob said earlier, it just looks a bit odd Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wickham Green too Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 Well ...... it IS foreign-ish ! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
w124bob Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 The more I look at it the odder it seems, UIC spec coaches tend have a much greater overhang between bogie and coach end, also recessed doors, those handles look like MFI left overs. I wonder if a freight liner flat is under all that "body work" and it's on borrowed bogies, it just seems to have no substance. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BernardTPM Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 Standard Eurofirma UIC coach - no recessed doors, similar overhang at the end (doors outboard of the bogies). More about this demonstrator here. It was a real bodyshell, but not fitted out for actual line running. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold russ p Posted April 27, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 27, 2021 Built in the days when this country still had a railway export industry, shame it didn't come to anything Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now