RMweb Gold Dagworth Posted May 20, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted May 20, 2021 This is interesting Andi 1 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandora Posted May 22, 2021 Share Posted May 22, 2021 Leaves on the line is far more than an adhesion issue, it is a signalling issue, the leaf layer electrically isolates the wheels from the track, trains are lthen lost to the signalling system Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Northmoor Posted May 23, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted May 23, 2021 Having worked in this technical field, I can tell you without even seeing the video that it is MUCH more to do with moisture than leaves. It is also the case that the fact that it is a problem now and wasn't in the days of steam, has very little to do with sparks burning back the lineside growth. It has everything to do with the acceleration and braking rates of modern trains, where in the right (or wrong) weather conditions, the braking capability can exceed the available adhesion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halvarras Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 17 hours ago, Pandora said: Leaves on the line is far more than an adhesion issue, it is a signalling issue, the leaf layer electrically isolates the wheels from the track, trains are lthen lost to the signalling system Further to this, I have a couple of photos (not yet scanned) of brand new 158701, the first production Class 158 unit, on Swindon Stabling Point on 25/3/90 - I was very surprised to find it there. As I recall it the reason for its appearance was for an investigation into track circuit issues using the Swindon to Gloucester line, the problem stemming from a combination of the largely aluminium unit's light weight and fitting of disc brakes instead of wheel tread-scrubbing clasp brakes resulting in a build-up of insulating leaf mulch. This could hardly have improved its braking performance either. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Dagworth Posted May 23, 2021 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted May 23, 2021 8 hours ago, Northmoor said: Having worked in this technical field, I can tell you without even seeing the video that it is MUCH more to do with moisture than leaves If you had watched the video you would have seen that that is in the video. Andi 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwin_m Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 6 hours ago, Neil Phillips said: Further to this, I have a couple of photos (not yet scanned) of brand new 158701, the first production Class 158 unit, on Swindon Stabling Point on 25/3/90 - I was very surprised to find it there. As I recall it the reason for its appearance was for an investigation into track circuit issues using the Swindon to Gloucester line, the problem stemming from a combination of the largely aluminium unit's light weight and fitting of disc brakes instead of wheel tread-scrubbing clasp brakes resulting in a build-up of insulating leaf mulch. This could hardly have improved its braking performance either. Being a graduate trainee with BR Research and wanting to test some on-train equipment, I got a free ride on Lab 5 which was recording track geometry on the same route as part of the same investigation. I was subsequently a little involved with: the Track Circuit Assister (or Actuator), which was attached to the bogie and circulated a high frequency current through the wheels and rails which was found to reduce the resistance and give detection in normal conditions. the TCA Interference Detector, which could detect the signal from the TCA and short the track circuit, fitted to locations where contamination was too heavy for the TCA on its own. the One Shot Emergency Sander, a modified fire extinguisher which could dramatically improve adhesion if operated when the train needed to stop in very poor conditions, as illustrated on a memorable early morning run with the first ECS out of Salisbury one November. This was the forerunner of more sophisticated sanders now fitted to (I think) all multiple units. 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandora Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 (edited) 12 hours ago, Northmoor said: Having worked in this technical field, I can tell you without even seeing the video that it is MUCH more to do with moisture than leaves. It is also the case that the fact that it is a problem now and wasn't in the days of steam, has very little to do with sparks burning back the lineside growth. It has everything to do with the acceleration and braking rates of modern trains, where in the right (or wrong) weather conditions, the braking capability can exceed the available adhesion. I've worked in the same technical field, right up front, on some sections of line, in leaf fall season you don't even have to brake to slide, just reduce power or even just coast, the train will not roll, it will slide with the wheel's not turning at all. Leaf fall season driving that is when you really earn your pay Edited May 23, 2021 by Pandora 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Covkid Posted May 24, 2021 Share Posted May 24, 2021 4 hours ago, Edwin_m said: Being a graduate trainee with BR Research and wanting to test some on-train equipment, I got a free ride on Lab 5 which was recording track geometry on the same route as part of the same investigation. I was subsequently a little involved with: the Track Circuit Assister (or Actuator), which was attached to the bogie and circulated a high frequency current through the wheels and rails which was found to reduce the resistance and give detection in normal conditions. the TCA Interference Detector, which could detect the signal from the TCA and short the track circuit, fitted to locations where contamination was too heavy for the TCA on its own. the One Shot Emergency Sander, a modified fire extinguisher which could dramatically improve adhesion if operated when the train needed to stop in very poor conditions, as illustrated on a memorable early morning run with the first ECS out of Salisbury one November. This was the forerunner of more sophisticated sanders now fitted to (I think) all multiple units. Indeed. One shot sanders, went to two shot sanders to the current multi shot sanders, at least on voyagers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supaned Posted May 24, 2021 Share Posted May 24, 2021 10 hours ago, Edwin_m said: Being a graduate trainee with BR Research and wanting to test some on-train equipment, I got a free ride on Lab 5 which was recording track geometry on the same route as part of the same investigation. I was subsequently a little involved with: the Track Circuit Assister (or Actuator), which was attached to the bogie and circulated a high frequency current through the wheels and rails which was found to reduce the resistance and give detection in normal conditions. the TCA Interference Detector, which could detect the signal from the TCA and short the track circuit, fitted to locations where contamination was too heavy for the TCA on its own. the One Shot Emergency Sander, a modified fire extinguisher which could dramatically improve adhesion if operated when the train needed to stop in very poor conditions, as illustrated on a memorable early morning run with the first ECS out of Salisbury one November. This was the forerunner of more sophisticated sanders now fitted to (I think) all multiple units. And for all of those thing, we drivers are most grateful. Those one-shot sanders have proved their worth for me on several occasions. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now