Jump to content
 

A new e-mag for the micro layout enthusiast


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • RMweb Gold

I've just seen Dispatch 1 in the other thread - all excellent and inspiring layouts. Thanks for putting it together Ian.

 

I was never sure whether Carl included fiddle yards and traversers within his "3-4 square feet" principle. Does anyone have thoughts on this?

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
41 minutes ago, Mikkel said:

I've just seen Dispatch 1 in the other thread - all excellent and inspiring layouts. Thanks for putting it together Ian.

 

I was never sure whether Carl included fiddle yards and traversers within his "3-4 square feet" principle. Does anyone have thoughts on this?

 


One of my favourite of Carl’s designs from his Micro-Layout Gallery, and which was based on a model of an engine terminal built by American modeller E.L.Moore, is stated as needing “a cassette or extension” in order to be operational.  This suggests to me that the space needed for a removable cassette could be added to the 4 sq. ft.

 

Other designs in the gallery include a hidden track within the 4 sq. ft.

 

I’m not sure that would extend to a larger traverser or fixed fiddle yard though.  Of course, one advantage of American shortline railroading (ideally suited to the micro-layout concept) is that there’d often only be one train a day, so room to hold multiple consists wasn’t needed.  Other, smaller, estate-type operations (Carl’s “Square-foot Estate” Gn15 layout springs to mind) might have only had one train to run anyway.

 

Hope that helps, Keith.

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Mikkel said:

I've just seen Dispatch 1 in the other thread - all excellent and inspiring layouts. Thanks for putting it together Ian.

 

I was never sure whether Carl included fiddle yards and traversers within his "3-4 square feet" principle. Does anyone have thoughts on this?

 

Mikkel:

four square feet is the scenic area. Fiddle yards and whatever train storage system you use to make the layout operation do not count towards that limit.

I hope that helps 

Ian

  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LBRJ said:

Only found out about this today, and now I have briefly read through both issues, I must say I am very impressed with it :)

I hope you'll consider subscribing then. The perk of being a subscriber is that you get access to the issues a week before everyone else. 

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
13 hours ago, Mikkel said:

I've just seen Dispatch 1 in the other thread - all excellent and inspiring layouts. Thanks for putting it together Ian.

 

I was never sure whether Carl included fiddle yards and traversers within his "3-4 square feet" principle. Does anyone have thoughts on this?

 


As a further twist, some of Carl’s Micro Layout designs used hidden traversers or Sector plates to move stock around the layout - not as storage (“Carl’s Exports” Shoebox had a Sector plate, while his “Baby Grand Central” had a hidden traverser).

Edited by Keith Addenbrooke
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Interesting thoughts, gents. I asked because if the fiddle yard or traverser doesn't count, the operational scope of micro layouts opens up significantly. For example, an earlier incarnation of one my layouts (a goods depot) allowed this shunting puzzle - the blue bit is the actual  layout, the rest is a FY on a separate board:

 

image.png.2a9c998500e2b79bcfeaea14f065fcca.png

 

 

On other layouts I have had even more of the operation off-scene. I personally like that, one reason being that you then avoid having to cram the scenic section full of track, which tends to make small layouts look even smaller.

 

But I'm guessing that some will find it is not really a micro-layout then. One rule of thumb could be that an FY/traverser should not be larger than the layout. However that would still allow for a layout which effectively is 2x4 sq feet... 

 

Edited by Mikkel
To clarify
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Hi Jim,

 

Yes, that's how it later developed, as seen below. This was the traverser Mk1, another more sturdy one has since appeared.

 

 

 

Anyway, back to the Dispatch. I was quite taken by Bob's "Book End" micro.  Whatever next. Bog Roll? :)

 

Edited by Mikkel
  • Round of applause 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I’ve only just spotted this thread and had a quick look at your online magazine. I was a big fan of Carl Arendt and his original website and I’m thrilled that you have produced something in the same spirit. It’s made my day!
All the best

Max

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 16/08/2021 at 16:34, Max Legroom said:

I’ve only just spotted this thread and had a quick look at your online magazine. I was a big fan of Carl Arendt and his original website and I’m thrilled that you have produced something in the same spirit. It’s made my day!
All the best

Max

Thanks Max. 

I'm glad you like it. If you've anything you'd like to submit, that would be great.

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...