Jump to content
 

LMS Semaphores


PatriotClass
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello Guys,

 

I am just working on a 3D print of LMS home signal semaphores (00 gauge) with servo drive. Just waiting for the print, I surfed a little bit around and found the picture below.

I thought LMS semaphores use upper quadrant, don't they?

Or were they different from region to region, especially on former LNWR network?

 

 

LMS Semaphores.jpeg

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Signals had a long life. That drawing does state LNWR, and that's what they are, complete with the thick, tapering, wooden post, the arms with upper and lower swages for rigidity and the circles to signify Slow or Goods lines.

  • Agree 5
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

The characteristic upper quadrant tubular post signals didn't really become very common until very late in LMS days and LMR days. The appearance of the LMS in the 30s was still largely that the pre-grouping companies, with a thin veneer of modernity. The LMS only really looked like what you think the LMS looked like in BR days!

 

If you consider that most rolling stock and infrastructure had a life expectance of 30+ years, it's hardly surprising.

  • Agree 6
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

There is a book on LMS signalling that gives you the original diagrams of the standard types of signals, complete with dimensions. Can't remember the full title, but it is very obvious which one it is! Red cover on mine, which is a modern reprint. 

 

Andy G

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

For LNWR & LMS signals, start here.........................

.

For information, drawings etc the Jack Nelson book is still probably the best book in my library, and I'm not a devotee of the Premier Line.

.

Brian R

LMS signals.jpg

LNWR portrayed.jpg

Edited by br2975
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some LNWR kit survived a lot longer than 30 years. There was a working ex-LNWR LQ starting signal beyond the end of a platform at Holyhead well into the 1980s. It was specially sized arm (short), which gave enough clearance for the train on the adjacent line to go past it when it was on. Probably closer to 100 years service in that case. Holyhead had LQ, UQ and Color Light all at the same time. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

There is a book dedicated to the subject of LNWR signalling - I don't have a copy: R.D. Foster, London & North Western Railway Signalling (OPC, 1982)

 

The photo on the front cover of L.G. Warburton's book shows a typical LMS installation using a hybrid mix of lattice post, LNWR bracket, landing, and doll components, with (vividly colourised) LMS upper quadrant arms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
21 hours ago, tynewydd said:

Some LNWR kit survived a lot longer than 30 years. There was a working ex-LNWR LQ starting signal beyond the end of a platform at Holyhead well into the 1980s. It was specially sized arm (short), which gave enough clearance for the train on the adjacent line to go past it when it was on. Probably closer to 100 years service in that case. Holyhead had LQ, UQ and Color Light all at the same time. 

 

Triggers broom signal I believe, the parts had been replaced several times over the years.

 

LNWR signals, more or less vanished by the late 1970s when the WCML power boxes displaced plenty of good condition tubular steel posted signals which were then available to replaced those that remained. Chester was - I think - the last main station to have  LNWR signals and the last went in 1977.

Some ground signals at various locations survived a little longer, Harrow had the last LNWR shunt signal which went in 1988

 

Edited by beast66606
corrected Harrow date.
  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Great information. I just caught Mr Warburton's book on the web.

So I can fit my mainline with some more modern round post upper quadrant signals and decorate the coal branch with some rusty lower quadrant LNWR types. Its also nice to see on this old picture, that lower quadrant signals due to their balance weight don't fall in "track free" position, even when the control wire breaks.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
2 hours ago, PatriotClass said:

Great information. I just caught Mr Warburton's book on the web.

So I can fit my mainline with some more modern round post upper quadrant signals and decorate the coal branch with some rusty lower quadrant LNWR types. Its also nice to see on this old picture, that lower quadrant signals due to their balance weight don't fall in "track free" position, even when the control wire breaks.

 

 

 

 

Don't forget the hybrids, LNWR posts, upper quadrant arms - a corrugated variety existed too - and the ladder refitted to the rear of the post (LNWR mounted them on the front) - (there were) lots of permutations out there.

  • Agree 2
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
2 hours ago, PatriotClass said:

 decorate the coal branch with some rusty lower quadrant LNWR types.

 

Here's two at Ellesmere Port (No.2) - the near one with the "loop" arm was off a loop line and the far one (to it's distant left) was off the dock branch - 1977

 

das00367.jpg.8c0e1afc15ebabd8d175d11dc68beca3.jpg

Edited by beast66606
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
10 minutes ago, beast66606 said:

 

Here's two at Ellesmere Port (No.2) - the near one with the "loop" arm was off a loop line and the far one (to it's distant left) was off the dock branch - 1977

 

das00367.jpg.8c0e1afc15ebabd8d175d11dc68beca3.jpg

 

Looking at the rail surfaces there, I do wonder when those two were last actually worked for a traffic movement!

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
35 minutes ago, Compound2632 said:

 

Looking at the rail surfaces there, I do wonder when those two were last actually worked for a traffic movement!

 

Probably about 5-10 years earlier, Ellesmere Port No.1 controlled a direct connection to the yard behind me / train and this was removed ca 1972, I suspect from then the sidings mostly fell into disuse.

  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
13 hours ago, beast66606 said:

Harrow had the last LNWR shunt signal which went in the late 1970s.

December 1988? I think it was the one we took out on the DC Lines Resignalling.

Just in front of the LUL train in this shot, it was worked by lever 4 at Harrow No.2 box.

 

8813_10 Harrow Siding (1024x709).jpg

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Thinking back in my railway career we had an LNWR box on the Cannock line where the signals were still virtually as they were at grouping into the 1970s. We had Midland style crossbar stop shunt signals up to the late 1970s and I think the Midland distant on the Redditch branch lasted until the 1980s. At Kingsbury Branch Sidings we had Midland wooden bracket signals to the late 1970s.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
46 minutes ago, TheSignalEngineer said:

Is the Midland signal still at Ketton? The Down Starter was still a lower quadrant about 2 years ago.

 

Yes -and that arm is definitely Triggers Broom.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
4 minutes ago, PatriotClass said:

What a beautyfull prototype picture, SignalEngineer! That one comes definitely on my modelling list. Great detail to see the mechanics too.

May I ask, what's the purpose of this lid?

Whats this.JPG

 

It's a back blinder, when the signal is cleared it moves with the arm and obscures a tell tail light on the rear of the signal lamp so the bobby knows the arm has responded to the lever.

Edited by beast66606
  • Agree 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, beast66606 said:

 

It's a back blinder, when the signal is cleared it moves with the arm and obscures a tell tail light on the rear of the signal lamp so the bobby knows the arm has responded to the lever.

All (or nearly all) companies used them, and of course they are only relevant if the signalman's view is from the back of the signal.  If he can see its face he should look for the colour of the aspect to see that it has correctly returned.  They were generally fitted even if the bobby didn't need them.  If the signal can't be seen seen from the box (curves, bridges etc might make that impossible) he would be provided with an electrical repeater.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Midland twin signal didn't made it to my modelling list, it took a direct shortcut to realisation.

Many thanks once more to TheSignalEngineer for this inspiring picture. As soon as I am at home from my holidays, I will give it an airbrush and some weathering.

Am I right that the colouring is as usual all over white?

 

See a full description of the model, and a video here at the modelling section!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...