MrWolf Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 I don't think that we have gone backwards since about 1977 with couplings, I don't think that we have moved forward. Every manufacturer has their own version which aren't always compatible with other makes. The alternatives are too fiddly for some people, such as my preferred 3 links and the automatic couplings are generally complicated, temperamental and expensive. Like a lot of things with working models, there has to be some compromises. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium St Enodoc Posted March 19 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 19 1 hour ago, MrWolf said: I don't think that we have gone backwards since about 1977 with couplings, I don't think that we have moved forward. Every manufacturer has their own version which aren't always compatible with other makes. The alternatives are too fiddly for some people, such as my preferred 3 links and the automatic couplings are generally complicated, temperamental and expensive. Like a lot of things with working models, there has to be some compromises. I don't disagree with your general points but my specific irritation is with the projection of the couplings beyond the headstocks. This seems to be a consequence of a) the aim to replicate as much of the prototype detail as possible without considering functionality; and b) the almost universal use of NEM coupling pockets. The grotesque result is, in my not always humble opinion, a Bad Thing. Regarding compromises, I'd like to see some compromise between producing a model that, on its own, could be displayed in a showcase and one that can perform realistically on a layout. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopher Posted March 19 Author Share Posted March 19 9 hours ago, St Enodoc said: In no way is this a criticism of you, Clive, but those photos just highlight for me how far we have gone backwards with tension-lock couplings on RTR trains. That gap between the loco and coach buffers must be about a scale three feet. Even in the good old bad old days of Tri-ang, things were better than that (all the couplings were the same height as each other, too - and they never drooped...). I agree John, and absolutely no criticism taken. It seems particularly bad with some Dapol and some Rapido rolling stock. In this photo the coach and loco are both Dapol. I started to standardise on the short straight Bachmann NEM tension lock couplers, but these still leave quite a gap with some rolling stock. Mainly because the NEM socket is quite long on the rolling stock. I could of course cut the NEM socket or shaft of the coupling and superglue it to the NEM socket. I have just bought some Hunt magnetic couplers for my BR ex LMS corridor rake. These definitely give a closer coupling, and there appears to be a variety of couplings to cater for different gaps sizes track geometry. So I think I'll start using these for my coaching stock. Thanks and Best Wishes Clive P.S I'm astounded by your great modelling on your own layout. It is a huge project. I came across an article in one of my old Railway Modellers (1980s) - which I think was one of your previous layouts. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopher Posted March 19 Author Share Posted March 19 (edited) 64XX Pannier shunting Edited March 19 by Gopher 13 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium St Enodoc Posted March 19 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 19 18 minutes ago, Gopher said: I agree John, and absolutely no criticism taken. It seems particularly bad with some Dapol and some Rapido rolling stock. In this photo the coach and loco are both Dapol. I started to standardise on the short straight Bachmann NEM tension lock couplers, but these still leave quite a gap with some rolling stock. Mainly because the NEM socket is quite long on the rolling stock. I could of course cut the NEM socket or shaft of the coupling and superglue it to the NEM socket. I have just bought some Hunt magnetic couplers for my BR ex LMS corridor rake. These definitely give a closer coupling, and there appears to be a variety of couplings to cater for different gaps sizes track geometry. So I think I'll start using these for my coaching stock. Thanks and Best Wishes Clive P.S I'm astounded by your great modelling on your own layout. It is a huge project. I came across an article in one of my old Railway Modellers (1980s) - which I think was one of your previous layouts. Thanks Clive. Yes, the original St Enodoc branch terminus. The drying shed and signal box are on the current version. 8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopher Posted March 20 Author Share Posted March 20 Collett Goods heading towards Dewchurch with a train of military equipment 14 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopher Posted March 22 Author Share Posted March 22 (edited) Variety of locos on shed including a BR 2mt, G2, ex GWR 43xx Mogul, and a 47xx lurking in the background Edited March 22 by Gopher 15 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopher Posted March 23 Author Share Posted March 23 (edited) Beware of the trains - especially the Collett Goods Edited March 23 by Gopher 10 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Nevermakeit Posted Saturday at 11:43 RMweb Gold Share Posted Saturday at 11:43 4 hours ago, Gopher said: Beware of the trains - especially the Collett Goods That monochrome version is superb! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopher Posted Saturday at 11:56 Author Share Posted Saturday at 11:56 11 minutes ago, Nevermakeit said: That monochrome version is superb! Thanks so much for the kind comment. The B&W photo does add a bit more realism to the scene Best Wishes Clive 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopher Posted Sunday at 08:22 Author Share Posted Sunday at 08:22 (edited) 15xx Pannier on a parcels trains heads towards Dewchurch Edited Sunday at 08:23 by Gopher 11 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopher Posted Monday at 08:08 Author Share Posted Monday at 08:08 Mogul at the coal stage 14 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopher Posted Tuesday at 07:50 Author Share Posted Tuesday at 07:50 The station throat with Britannia Lord Kitchener reversing onto the turntable 12 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopher Posted Wednesday at 08:56 Author Share Posted Wednesday at 08:56 (edited) 64xx Panier finished shunting at Dewchurch so heads off with the daily pick up goods Edited Wednesday at 11:47 by Gopher 19 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopher Posted 2 hours ago Author Share Posted 2 hours ago George Street, or at least the end of it. Gresley brake parked in the headshunt siding, whilst the Royal Oak receives it's weekly delivery of ale 8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now