Jump to content
 

Devon banks vs Lickey Incline


Recommended Posts

So looking at some Devon books got me thinking. The Devon banks are ferociously steep, 1:36 in places, and second only the Lickey Incline. Yet many photos show quite long trains , passenger and goods, ascending without assistance. I know many trains were double headed but a lot weren’t. In contrast the Lickey seems to be notorious with almost every train needing to be banked in steam days - and a fleet of banking locos, some enormous!

 

So what’s the difference? Length? Locus used? Curves? 
Just interested in the comparison. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The rules for Lickey were strict and uncompromising: any passenger train of more than three coaches was required to have banking assistance, irrespective of the power of the engine at the front end, and all goods trains had to take assistance, probably as a guard against breakaways in the days of unfitted wagons as much as the need for assistance for head-end power.

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m told there were occasional instances of train locos leaving the bankers behind on the Lickey incline. Most train loco crews were happy to get a nice push up the incline though. Galatea has been mentioned as one loco that climbed the incline unassisted after the banker had a problem.

 

There were very strict rules on train weight for all types of locos that used the South Devon banks even in the time of diesels. If the train was above the approved weight for a loco then a pilot was required. If performance was unknown then caution was used. For instance the first (and maybe only) time a blue Pullman went over the banks it was piloted by a Western.

Edited by Chris M
  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

There is quite a difference. The lickey is 2 miles continuous at 1:37. 

I don't know the South Devon banks in detail, but the gradients were not continous. Dainton varies between 1:36 to 1:57. This means the steeper bits can be "rushed". 

Still tough though.

Maybe the GW engines on the south Devon banks were better than the LMS ones on Lickey!

Ian

 

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes it is not about whether or not a train can make it up unaided, but how fast it can go.  if it is a long incline like the Lickey, say a freight train could get up unassisted at 10mph, but with a banker could manage 20mph, then you are halving the time it takes to get up the bank. And with freight trains potentially taking a long time due to slow speed this can save several minutes, which could make the difference between delaying a following train or not, as well as increasing capacity on a busy line.

Edited by Titan
  • Like 2
  • Agree 4
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
4 hours ago, ikcdab said:

Maybe the GW engines on the south Devon banks were better than the LMS ones on Lickey!

Ian

 

But the Western Region didn't make any significant changes on Lickey when they took over. Just replaced Jinties with Panniers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
4 hours ago, Titan said:

Sometimes it is not about whether or not a train can make it up unaided, but how fast it can go.  if it is a long incline like the Lickey, say a freight train could get up unassisted at 10mph, but with a banker could manage 20mph, then you are halving the time it takes to get up the bank. And with freight trains potentially taking a long time due to slow speed this can save several minutes, which could make the difference between delaying a following train or not, as well as increasing capacity on a busy line.

Worse is if something does go wrong. If a loco stalled with a train, the disruption to the service will take a considerable effort to send additional loco(s) to rescue the train.

If it takes 1/2 or an hour to facilitate a rescue, then it's probably not worth the risk.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
4 hours ago, Chris M said:

I’m told there were occasional instances of train locos leaving the bankers behind on the Lickey incline. Most train loco crews were happy to get a nice push up the incline though. Galatea has been mentioned as one loco that climbed the incline unassisted after the banker had a problem.

 

I have no idea of the answer, but I would expect that a key point about Galatea's exploit, was where exactly on the bank did the banker fail? IIRC, it was a main steam pipe failure, so it wasn't going to do any useful work, until it had been to the workshops!

If under the bridge at Broomsgrove, then doubtless the Galatea crew would have just stopped. But if it was well up the incline, then probably better to keep going.

 

The problem with a loco blasting it's way up Lickey, is that the fire would get thrown up the chimney and would require careful work by the crew to rebuild the fire.

 

Once over the top at Blackwell, there is no easy downhill run to allow the fire to recover, but a flattish, but fast run to Birmingham - the first place that a replacement loco would be available.

 

So it's perhaps doable as a once off in an emergency, but I doubt any crew would want to do such a run, as a regular feature.

  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, kevinlms said:

But the Western Region didn't make any significant changes on Lickey when they took over. Just replaced Jinties with Panniers.


Not quite - they attempted to replace the dedicated 9F with a 52xx 2-8-0. Whether it was as suitable as a banker is questionable - probably not as powerful. However that is academic as it fouled station platforms. Common sense prevailed and a 9F was retained until dieselisation - although a plan was hatched to ‘westernise’ 92079 by fitting it with a double chimney - however it was never converted. In fact no 9Fs were converted to double chimney except for the original WR handful - however the Swindon build 9Fs and final Crewe ones were double chimneyed from new (following research by Swindon which showed marginal benefits).
 

I’ve seen many photos showing the 9F, mostly 94xx panniers, but still a couple of Jinties at Bromsgrove and on the Lickey - anyone know why the Jinties were still there?  

Edited by MidlandRed
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Would there have been any steam drivers who regularly worked over both routes?

 

In RES and EWS days Barton Hill link 1 men signed Bristol to Plymouth and Bristol to Derby, so would have worked parcel trains over both routes with class 47s and 67s,

 

cheers

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
16 hours ago, Coombe Vale said:

Of course they were. The LMS only started to get decent engines under William Stanier and he was trained at Swindon.  :boast:   :jester:

The LMS and LMR had a couple of goes at testing the Lickey, so see if the severe weight restrictions could be eased. However on each occasion, the results proved that if something went wrong, it was more trouble than it was worth.

 

The other thing with Stanier, he originally tried the low degree of superheat common on the GWR, but it proved to be a failure - only resolved by using a higher degree of superheat, which had been practised on the LMSR for years. A lot to do with the type of coal, but the LMS was hardly going to 'import' more expensive coal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not entirely. The basic problem with Stanier's boilers in the early days was incorrect tube ratios, not something imported from Swindon, to which the low superheat temperatures merely added. Generally, coal quality was probably little different. The usual assumption that the GWR used best Welsh steam coal exclusively is in error; the GWR would not pay to drag coal from South Wales to , say, Wolverhampton while there was good coal to be had from Staffordshire.

 

How much of the problems with tube ratios was down to Stanier and how much to the drawing offices is not easy to establish.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprised no one has added the woodhead from wath to penistone onto this list. Officially 1 in 40, but was steeper than this in places due to subsidence from coal mines. Required 4 locos to get the coal trains up the hill.

 

And if anyone thinks the EM1 were a bit weak in the pulling power department, when the power was off, the trains used a class 47 on each end of a half rake of MGR wagons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was intrigued so had a look through the WR Freight Train Loads booklets I still have.

 

From the 'maximum loads' table, assuming a class 47 unassisted, working a fully fitted class 6 - 8 service, we have the following loads (including locomotive):-

Newton Abbot - Plymouth  725t

Plymouth - Newton Abbot 725t

Bromsgrove - Blackwell 650t

Exeter St Davids - Exeter Central 585t

 

cheers  

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good shout about St David's to Central Kevin.  That's fierce, steep, from a standing start, on a curve and the tunnel under St David's Hill.  

 

Used to love hearing the 50s open up to climb up there.  

 

Best regards and Merry Christmas folks.

 

Matt W

Edited by D826
Mixing up my Exeter streets !
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 20/12/2021 at 18:06, D826 said:

Good shout about St David's to Central Kevin.  That's fierce, steep, from a standing start, on a curve and the tunnel under St David's Hill.  

 

Used to love hearing the 50s open up to climb up there.  

 

Best regards and Merry Christmas folks.

 

Matt W

This sounds better than it looks, especially on headphones with the bass turned up !

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And Champion up the Lickey. (Which sounds like a dodgy practice advertised on some of the cards left in phone boxes round King's Cross back in the day).

 

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.

 

Matt W

 

 

Edited by D826
  • Like 1
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...