Jump to content
 

DLT's SR Locos - Lord Nelson Craftsman Kit


DLT
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium

Completed the cab earlier today, and very pleased with the result.   The brass safety valve housing is another Markits product.

 

1190230776_IMG_5876small.jpg.f6d3a17b0c8d2b85331e7c14fec34cad.jpg

 

1148795568_IMG_5884small.jpg.348c2ca44f053eb934d68eaf1cadbc46.jpg

Edited by DLT
  • Like 14
  • Craftsmanship/clever 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

The kit includes some very nicely etched smoke deflector plates. but trying them out they look a bit on the small side.  A bit too low, they should meet the handrails, and too short at the front.

Its not a huge job to replace them, but do they look ok as they are?  (ignore the BlueTac...)

 

909283342_IMG_5886small.jpg.debe33b098a9cdfd53a9dd5b962705ac.jpg

 

1731440801_IMG_5888small.jpg.e42afdee4ee72f255efc6ac56700d9b9.jpg

Edited by DLT
  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice work Dave - I couldn't live with the deflectors myself, particularly the shortness in height and since replacement is straightforward and you have useful templates for the difficult bit to hand...

 

Adam

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, Adam said:

Very nice work Dave - I couldn't live with the deflectors myself, particularly the shortness in height and since replacement is straightforward and you have useful templates for the difficult bit to hand...

 

Adam

 

My sentiments entirely!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Is it the height or the curve that’s out? I’m looking in relation to the front handrail. This image by Charlie Verall (Flickr) makes the height look right but the curve tighter at the top? The length is also different but is the etch too long making the front  look proportionally wrong in position? Mind you there do seem to be two slightly different styles! 

LSWR H15 class 30488 Eastleigh Shed


0E41CC7D-AA38-46D1-825E-FA84DA5ECA83.jpeg.0884f9d36dd8950485440200bd479d2b.jpeg
 

image.jpeg.eb04265049e8e43eaf154d88f24bd62d.jpeg

Smugmug Railway-photography 

 

Edited by PaulRhB
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DLT said:

The kit includes some very nicely etched smoke deflector plates. but trying them out they look a bit on the small side.  A bit too low, they should meet the handrails, and too short at the front.

Its not a huge job to replace them, but do they look ok as they are?  (ignore the BlueTac...)

 

196757618_IMG_5886small.jpg.a1b9ac76f1fa2f3a67d236ec47a7b26c.jpg

 

946027264_IMG_5888small.jpg.c38f3b6b8e7407bf54200d6a5b216383.jpg

 

Definitely a tad too low, and possibly a bit short.

 

Regards,

John Isherwood.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I reckon the kit ones are the ones with the fold at the footplate line and the flat ones look different to me. I’d try and photograph the model to match the photos and compare. With these angles it’s very difficult to tell. ;) 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Thanks for your thoughts and photos guys, all a big help.  What we really need are side-on photos, but they are hard to find, and can suffer from lens distortion.

 

The plates are definitely too low and too short; at present the front section doesn't quite meet the curve of the footplate, so I think it's going to be a replacement job.

 

I've done it before, with the U-Class I built some years ago:

 

 

1446268373_IMG_2338small.jpg.c44a737c7e17f6f45c727d9e9712d715.jpg

 

Edited by DLT
  • Like 8
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Good use of blutack DLT, where would we be without it! Agree with you regarding deflectors, perhaps 1-2mm too low? I havn't checked. Did you kit come with the big 5,000 gall. tender?

 

Build is looking very good, clean and well fitted together.

 

Kind regards,

 

Richard B

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Just had a look at some collected images of H15s. Judging by the picture of 486 below the top of the deflector on the firemans side, just visable, is below the handrail level. I guess most photographers of locos were at ground level so the deflector would look level or even higher than the handrail.

 

image.png.bcb77f9eb47c22fc8d910d1a0014b439.png

 

I know that 331 is not of the original batch but same deflector fitment.

image.png.442cc7b75d8c5b80624347382edd622a.png

 

Hope the pictures help, the second image is priceless given quality of detail, is that water or paint on the print!? Count the rivets!

 

Kind regards,

 

Richard B

 

Edited by 30368
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Motor and gearbox have been assembled and installed, working on pickups now..I'll do some photos (or even a video) when its running.

Cheers, Dave.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
On 28/03/2020 at 12:58, DLT said:

Thanks for your thoughts guys, and Paul and Richard for the terrific photos, all new ones to me.

I have found one fully side-on photo, taken from a distance so there's very little wide-angle distortion.  I'm using it for scaling a lot of the detail that doesn't show up in drawings.

 

Here's the latest attempts on the smoke-plates, quite an improvement I think:

 

 

 

 

 

I've drilled holes in the footplate to give a good positive location, I'm not quite ready to solder them on.

 

Cheers, Dave.

That's a beautiful bit of work. I'm marvelling at the precision of your rivet-punching too, with no distortion visible at all - a joy to behold! I can't remember if I've asked you before about the tool you use for punching - apologies if so. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, Daddyman said:

That's a beautiful bit of work. I'm marvelling at the precision of your rivet-punching too, with no distortion visible at all - a joy to behold! I can't remember if I've asked you before about the tool you use for punching - apologies if so. 

 

Hi Daddyman,

Thanks very much.  Although the new rivets still look large compared to the etched ones!

I use a GW Models Riveter.  There has been quite a lot of discussion of it on the forum, and theres a picture of one on my narrow gauge workbench thread, halfway down this page:  DLT's Narrow Gauge Workbench

There is a thread about it here:  Riveting Tool  Its a brilliant machine, but takes a bit of getting used to.

Cheers, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, DLT said:

 

Hi Daddyman,

Thanks very much.  Although the new rivets still look large compared to the etched ones!

I use a GW Models Riveter.  There has been quite a lot of discussion of it on the forum, and theres a picture of one on my narrow gauge workbench thread, halfway down this page:  DLT's Narrow Gauge Workbench

There is a thread about it here:  Riveting Tool  Its a brilliant machine, but takes a bit of getting used to.

Cheers, Dave.

Thanks, Dave. We've been discussing its ...erm... foibles on one of Mike Edge's threads recently too. You seem to be getting the best out of it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
4 minutes ago, Daddyman said:

Thanks, Dave. We've been discussing its ...erm... foibles on one of Mike Edge's threads recently too. You seem to be getting the best out of it. 

 

Aha, which thread is that?  I would like to read it.

Thanks, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Motor and gearbox installed, and driving the middle axle.  The rear end of the motor is supported by one stiff wire from the pickup plate to the lower terminal.  Then a flexible wire from the chassis to the other terminal completes the circuit.

 

1174600591_IMG_5903small.jpg.514c3db3c7947882a9213be44b46d9a1.jpg

 

1096775650_IMG_5899small.jpg.9801dfe544806b45dbf482a32b57a18a.jpg

 

Pickup method is my usual recipe of a Copperclad PCB plate screwed to a couple of extra chassis members, with nickel-silver wire wipers acting on the backs of the wheels.  Boring and predictable (like me...) but a very effective and reliable method.

 

202054710_IMG_5906small.jpg.28d44461b07dad4caeb8157aa8024bd1.jpg

 

Cheers, Dave.

Edited by DLT
  • Like 7
  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DLT said:

Motor and gearbox installed, and driving the middle axle.  The rear end of the motor is supported by one stiff wire from the pickup plate to the lower terminal.  Then a flexible wire from the chassis to the other terminal completes the circuit.

 

827617508_IMG_5899small.jpg.3424e72884542fb6f20e01044c71de7e.jpg

 

914324127_IMG_5903small.jpg.7fe5b8e0e0879a0a0ff17d7a67ff4dd6.jpg

 

Pickup method is my usual recipe of a Copperclad PCB plate screwed to a couple of extra chassis members, with nickel-silver wire wipers acting on the backs of the wheels.  Boring and predictable (like me...) but a very effective and reliable method.

 

1128797072_IMG_5906small.jpg.7d9e093d1d79ad04701eaf58a8fbd10e.jpg

 

Cheers, Dave.

 

Dave

 

Thank you similar method but far better than my attempts and very thought provoking, especially the rear motor mount

 

Great tip

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Smooth operator, much like your work Dave, great stuff especially backed up by your videos.

Hope you and the family are keeping well, take care.

 

G

  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...