Jump to content
 

Midland Main Line Electrification


Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium
4 minutes ago, Edwin_m said:

Quite a lot of freight uses it, but even if it comes from the MML rather than via Burton, it will be using other non-electrified lines on its journey.  So it would remain diesel unless there was some major initiative on freight decarbonisation.  

It's also a ragular diversionary route for Cross Country, plus IIRC, 1 direct Sheffield St Panras working.

 

Jamie

Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, jamie92208 said:

Once the Midland route to Sheffield is wired then there are several fill in bits that will really start to create s network. Eg, Derbt to Birmingham, Doncaster to Sheffield and then Moorthorpe to Swinton.  Cross country would then be able to run from Edinburgh to Bromsgrove under the wires.it will also be interesting to see if 'the old road' from Tapton to Rotherham is included along with Beighton Junction to Sheffield.

 

Jamie

 

Re Bromsgrove.  You'd also have to do some fill ins between Kings Norton and Barnt Green because some parts of the fast lines are not wired

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

All the way from King's Norton to Longbridge which always causes problems on the Crosscity when one of their trains fails. It would have made sense to electrify the fasts when they did Bromsgrove, but they didn't. Then there's Camp Hill which also needs the wires. 

 

What starts off as a small request soon gets larger! 

Edited by Hobby
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jamie92208 said:

It's also a ragular diversionary route for Cross Country, plus IIRC, 1 direct Sheffield St Panras working.

 

Jamie

The Cross Country trains will have to remain as diesel or bi-mode unless a lot more route is electrified, and the Sheffield to St Pancras disappears in the EMR timetable recast (may have gone already) and in any case will become a bi-mode.  So electrifying Erewash on its own won't allow any diesel workings to be converted to electric and at best will allow a bi-mode to use its diesels a little less.  The best case is probably the Nottingham to Leeds service, for which most of the non-electrified section north of Sheffield will be done if HS2 eastern leg goes ahead as planned.  

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the tendering date is Sept 2022 (at the earliest) I would suggest that this is advance planning for whatever the "Integrated Rail Plan for the Midlands and The North" turns out to be (which would seem to include MML now, according to other sources). 

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...
  • RMweb Premium
2 hours ago, great central said:

Does this suggest  that DfT is likely to make a Direct Award to EMR or to any other operator.

 

Dava

Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Dava said:

Does this suggest  that DfT is likely to make a Direct Award to EMR or to any other operator.

 

Dava

 

I think it's showing the intention to throw it open to others, presumably Abellio will put in a bid although they're not particularly popular if you read some of the comments on the unofficial EMR Twitter feed.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, great central said:

 

I think it's showing the intention to throw it open to others, presumably Abellio will put in a bid although they're not particularly popular if you read some of the comments on the unofficial EMR Twitter feed.

I think this is just a statutory thing, they have to make the market aware of the intention to extend the contract beyond the original advertised term.  Other potential bidders have the right to object, but as far as know nobody has ever done so on a rail franchise.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
14 minutes ago, ess1uk said:

just trying to work out with the announcement this morning if this means that the full MML will finally get the OLE strung up? 

 

I was hoping to find out too... I am so confused by the many 'it's on/it's off' for OLE north of the economic powerhouse that is Market Harborough...

 

I had my first trip on the MML for 2 years last week.  Was impressed by how much more robust the new OLE appears than the flimsy nonsense south of Bedford.

 

Was less impressed by the shabby, clapped out EMR meridian.  And no HST alternatives anymore, for shame.

 

<Edit>

 

Just seen on the Grauniad website:

 

'Promised upgrades include full electrification of the Midland mainline – a scheme scrapped halfway through by the government in 2017 – and of the existing TransPennine line, as well as more investment in the east coast.'

 

'promised'.... hmmm

Edited by Dr Gerbil-Fritters
  • Agree 2
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they were facing the challenge of funding HS2 and the classic lines, ploughing on with HS2 as was and not doing anything on the classic lines was potentially a greater vote loser than changing HS2 to allow borrowing of funds for another stab at large scale electrification (MML to Derby, Nottingham and Sheffield), Warrington Central route and the Stalybridge to Leeds line (plus Leeds to York which is already underway I believe).

 

I also believe the review may be a blessing in disguise, Derby and Nottingham will get a double bubble benefit, wires for the slow route to St Pancras and also HS2 services - much better than trekking to a new Midlands Parkway station at Toton in a car.

  • Agree 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
8 hours ago, Dr Gerbil-Fritters said:

 

Was less impressed by the shabby, clapped out EMR meridian.  And no HST alternatives anymore, for shame.

 

 

Thats mainly down to the fact that new trains have been ordered for delivery next year IIRC.

 

I can't find too much wrong with EMR keeping the Meridians going 'as is' in the interim - unlike a house EMR aren't going to be able to increase the selling price*.....

 

 

* yes I know they are leased....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their expected lifespan hasn’t encouraged EMR to carry out the refurbishment of the 390s which they’d committed to under the franchise award, and the condition of some of the units fully justifies the “cattle truck” designation awarded them by commuters at Corby and Wellingborough who have no choice but to use them, and who still pay the premium for Inter-City services in their season ticket costs.

 

All in all EMR have a fleet which leaves the MML with stock in probably the worst condition since the early 70s.

  • Agree 2
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, phil-b259 said:

I can't find too much wrong with EMR keeping the Meridians going 'as is' in the interim

 

Perhaps not, but they could at least clean them.  

 

The 222s really are bl00dy awful in every respect.  I have little hope the replacements will be any better.  More of those poxy Hitachi commuter units I suppose.

  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
6 hours ago, Dr Gerbil-Fritters said:

 

The 222s really are bl00dy awful in every respect.  I have little hope the replacements will be any better.  More of those poxy Hitachi commuter units I suppose.


If you mean a variant of the class 80X units used on the ECML / GWML, then yes that is what has been ordered.

 

Whatever their flaws, the 80X / IET have become the ‘standard’  UK InterCity train with nobody else (be they manufacturer or operator) looking to develop an alternative.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, phil-b259 said:


If you mean a variant of the class 80X units used on the ECML / GWML, then yes that is what has been ordered.

 

Whatever their flaws, the 80X / IET have become the ‘standard’  UK InterCity train with nobody else (be they manufacturer or operator) looking to develop an alternative.

 

Whilst they are the "standard" and are coming to the MML, there are alternatives out there which have been procured recently. The 397s from CAF for example, or the FLIRT units as on the GE area can be supplied with a 200km/h top speed.

 

Hitachi of course have an assembly plant in Newton Aycliffe, so there's political considerations to keeping it in business when choosing a type of train to build.

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...