Jump to content
 

EBay madness


Marcyg
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Enterprisingwestern said:

 

I know I'm slow on the uptake, (no comments please!), but there are things on eBay I don't search for in the first place because they are crap and worthless to me, and I throw them away as surplus to requirements.

Somehow, following a link posted on this thread, I happened to come across things like Lima/Hornby/Oxford etc wheels and bogies, random bundles of things like tension lock type and NEM style couplings and mountings, contents of unfinished plastic/whitemetal/brass kits and lots of other amazing items, all of which I dispose of.

I know it's one mans meat etc, but it can't possibly worth the hassle of listing, posting and sorting out the items from the refuse bin?

 

Mike.

 

To be honest there’s a whole subgroup of folk that tinker and fix up old Hornby and suchlike either out of fun or financial necessity!  There’s plenty of market for these sundry spares and it’s a waste to skip them.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 5
  • Round of applause 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Ruffnut Thorston said:


In theory, it may look a bit like this...If it is complete...
There is a similarity in general character. ;)

 

37C5B4B2-3182-4688-899E-D0B78C70743E.jpeg.e5d387f1b3d6c908ab95a47370fe4823.jpeg

I have had a roof section off that self same building in my scrap box for ages! Now I know what it’s off. I actually thought it was some kind of hard landscaping item because of the rocks.

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t know if this counts as “madness” but searching for a Silver Fox dock shunter threw up the following result …

 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/313590747812

 

I don’t know if this is actually a rare model or not, but the seller hasn’t done the usual “L@@K - R@RE!!” on this and it also has a very reasonable starting bid of £30 …

 

I’m sure @Ruffnut Thorston will be able to tell us whether or not this is actually a rare item or not - I just know that I have never seen one, but that Model Rail are bringing out a version very soon!!

 

#intrigued!

 

Steve S

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

Trix isn’t my top subject. 
 

The Ruston shunter isn’t exactly rare, most came complete with a shunter’s truck.

 

FCF9F431-2329-436C-8A4C-D5FBB8642272.jpeg.db670b789ae1b405ad3a164f5cf1273b.jpeg
 

http://www.tcawestern.org/trix.htm

 

 

CE32228E-FE96-494E-94FE-86A9059212E0.jpeg.ffec94246d23fc13cc930c05f07d214d.jpeg


https://picclick.co.uk/Trix-Twin-244-3-Rail-DC-Ruston-Hornsby-184781959384.html

 

https://www.invaluable.com/auction-lot/trix-twin-3-rail-244-diesel-shunter-set-0-6-0-br-2290-c-0628719cf7#


Google image search Trix Ruston Shunter...

 

https://www.google.co.uk/search?

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Ruffnut Thorston
Google link added and tested.
  • Informative/Useful 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Trix Twin was a weird 3-rail system, designed to allow 2 locomotives to be independently controlled on one track (3 if you also had OHLE).  Looking under the shunter you can see that in addition to the conventional 3rd rail pickup, there are rail pickups on one side of the loco. 

 

image.png.1c5cd12a04ca22eb5e684fbb43ab67c5.png

 

The idea was that the 3rd rail was the common return and the 2nd pickup collected current from the independently controlled running rails.  If you wanted to run two of these shunters on one track, the second would have to face in the opposite direction to collect power from the other outer rail!

 

It makes DCC sound simple!

 

And look at the wheel standards too, they make Triang look finescale....

  • Like 3
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The outer pick ups on Trix Twin locos are able to be removed, and replaced on either side. So no real need to turn the locos.

 

The Twin system does make reversing loops, triangles (Wyes), and Turntables pretty much impossible though.

 

The M.8 in white is a manufacturing date code.

 

A decoder is in one of our books, which are not to hand just now. 

 

 

Edited by Ruffnut Thorston
Date code added
  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Ruffnut Thorston said:

The outer pick ups on Trix Twin locos are able to be removed, and replaced on either side. So no real need to turn the locos.

 

It would have been more sensible if they had pickups on both sides (through the wheels perhaps?) and a switch somewhere convenient to set to 1 or 2, rather than swapping pickups over!  Never mind.

 

I've still got some TrixTwin fibre-based track which I used as conventional track for HD 3-rail.  It used to be a complete oval, but all that's left is a couple of curves and straights.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
3 hours ago, Hroth said:

Trix Twin was a weird 3-rail system, designed to allow 2 locomotives to be independently controlled on one track (3 if you also had OHLE).  Looking under the shunter you can see that in addition to the conventional 3rd rail pickup, there are rail pickups on one side of the loco. 

 

image.png.1c5cd12a04ca22eb5e684fbb43ab67c5.png

 

The idea was that the 3rd rail was the common return and the 2nd pickup collected current from the independently controlled running rails.  If you wanted to run two of these shunters on one track, the second would have to face in the opposite direction to collect power from the other outer rail!

 

It makes DCC sound simple!

 

And look at the wheel standards too, they make Triang look finescale....

My first train set was Trix Twin. I shared it with my brother and we had a double oval of track connected by two crossovers. They used the same NMRA couplings as Hornby-Dublo so I assume they could run with H-D stock.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PhilJ W said:

My first train set was Trix Twin. I shared it with my brother and we had a double oval of track connected by two crossovers. They used the same NMRA couplings as Hornby-Dublo so I assume they could run with H-D stock.

They can.

The only TrixTwin rolling stock I have is a little tinplate 3 plank wagon which ran fine on my 3-rail layout.  I got it when my school went for a summer trip to the Keightley and Worth Valley Railway!

Everything is boxed up at the moment, but I've still got it.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, PhilJ W said:

My first train set was Trix Twin. I shared it with my brother and we had a double oval of track connected by two crossovers. They used the same NMRA couplings as Hornby-Dublo so I assume they could run with H-D stock.


NMRA is a USA standard, and I don’t believe that the PECO type coupling used by Hornby Dublo, Trix, and later Playcraft Railways was a USA standard.

 

I thought that the  NMRA standard was the  “Horn Hook” coupling, as fitted to some stock made by Tri-ang Railways for export to North America, and a version of which was the Airfix kit standard coupling...

 

1379AF0D-E69E-4423-9624-1372ABF45043.jpeg.8f32ec8c12fcd84db10c77761a300f1e.jpeg

 

0641D562-820C-4662-B74F-E4D7F4E92A0D.jpeg.6c96d72e1f959852c77ae53b2d1532ec.jpeg

 

ECC54627-D8C4-43A2-B36E-898D10907FDA.jpeg.25edfd1655761c28ce2960a8f5e38186.jpeg

 

Tri-ang Horn hook couplings. With mounting box that fits in place of the X.171 Mk3 Tension Lock coupling.

 

33B3AC7A-88BF-4E0F-8510-650C687656D6.jpeg.2e1666a0007db031c75ec88cb8a648ff.jpeg

 

82DAAF37-396B-4945-9A18-A77C970EB8E0.jpeg.197f952a3f2e17ab21431aa18f3f9ae7.jpeg

 

Edited by Ruffnut Thorston
Photos added
  • Informative/Useful 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did anyone ever manage to get the Airfix kit coupling to couple up to anything else, including other Airfix kits?

Or did we all just chuck them away as I did as a ten year old?

  • Like 2
  • Agree 4
  • Funny 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I used the dodge of dropping the hook of a tension lock coupling over the bar of the Airfix, fine if the coupling was kept in tension which it usually was with the stiff running of the Airfix kit wheelsets.  This was not perfect, and less so with the later profile of Triang tension locks which had less 'defined' hooks than the earlier stamped metal type.  You could use an earlier Triang vehicle as a converter wagon to couple Airfix kits in a train of Triang stock.

 

The same dodge could be used with the Kitmaster loop and pin couplers, which I thought were a very good coupler, and less effectively with HD/Trix buckeyes.  I complain about the lack of standardisation in modern NEM tension locks, but it is much less of a problem than it was back in the 50s and 60s when I was cuttting my teeth.  Replacing coupling that were rivetted in position was beyond me as a child.

 

The Airfix kit/Peco coupllings were a straight replacement for HD/Trix, and vice versa, but you were only replacing one coupling that was incompatible with Triang for another.  My opinion of the HD/Trix buckeye was not high, though the real issues were the result of poorly laid track rather than a congenital failure of the couping.  HD's later 'super detail' type was better, and the Airfix/Peco worked well enough In my experience, with the advantage of self centring with the little hooks connected by elastic band, though some faffing was needed to get the laccy band to the right strength.  The Triang tension lock was pretty reliable and trains rarely parted due to couping failure, even on my dodgy track!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

My attention has been drawn to some more oddities…

 

 

Words fail me… yes, really! :o

 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/194231474568?

 

Test Run??? :scratch_one-s_head_mini:

 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/203500332358?

 

 

Now then…are you quite sure that you have the right item for that R. Number? :no:

 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/133791508283?

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Funny 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
9 minutes ago, PhilJ W said:

Scratchbuilt? I daren't ask what he was scratching when he built those.


i think they have been painted using strawberry  jam

  • Funny 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I've sent a message to Rails asking what chassis is used for the two 'scratchbuilt' locomotives. If it is as I suspect Kato chassis even then they are overpriced as Kato chassis are about £25 each brand new.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, PhilJ W said:

I've sent a message to Rails asking what chassis is used for the two 'scratchbuilt' locomotives. If it is as I suspect Kato chassis even then they are overpriced as Kato chassis are about £25 each brand new.

Why are Rails selling such bin fodder may I ask ....

  • Agree 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...