Jump to content
 

Please use M,M&M only for topics that do not fit within other forum areas. All topics posted here await admin team approval to ensure they don't belong elsewhere.

Wright writes.....


Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium

I have to admit that my choice of camera was always dictated by my job as a field geologist back in the 1970s.  Much as I would have liked a medium format camera it would have been impractical.  First the weight (considering I also had to carry rock samples in my rucksack) but also the risk of damaging it.  For example, my relatively new Nikon F2, which I still have, was dunked in an Indonesian river many kilometers from civilization in 1975.  I whisked it out and quickly removed the film and dried everything I could there and then with a handkerchief.  Very little water actually got inside the camera and its only electric connections were between the lithium battery holder (in the camera body) and the rather fancy pentaprism light meter head.  As everything came apart for easy cleaning, etc., I was soon able to load a new roll of film and carry on with my day's work.  The camera still works today even though I have never had it serviced.

 

I could not have done the same with my last film camera, its successor the F5.  And I once ruined a Fuji digital camera by tipping a glass of water over it.  Lesson learned, do not put glass of water and digital camera on the same bedside table!

 

Elaborating on the deterioration of my 1970s and earlier slide collection, a tropical fungus (so I was told) is particularly fond of gelatin even in the layers inside a transparency.  I kept my Kodachrome slides in the yellow plastic boxes they came in and this did help to keep the fungi at bay, but 8 years in the tropics without air-conditioning did mean that many slides were ruined.  The Ektachromes in cardboard boxes, as well as the "best" baby photos foolishly kept in a carousel were the most badly damaged.

 

The good news, of course, is that those slides worth keeping have been scanned.  But even here there are troubles looming.  First, my scanner, a very nice Nikon LS2000, only has a SCSI interface, second, Nikon no longer support the software (I use Vuescan now) and who knows how and when the images will last.

 

What I have done is to back up everything to a hard drive and now have elected to use iCloud as well, as an off-site backup.

That fungus (or one of its cousins) was/is fond of VHS video tapes as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Branchlines LBSCR six-wheeled van is now in primer, and next to it this week's project, a Collett bow-ended Ocean Mails van from the Comet kit.

 

attachicon.giflbsc3.jpg

 

Alastair

 

Evening Alastair,

 

It's just not a proper model railway unless you have an ancient six wheel van.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The pins are made by Pony # 25202 and they're available from Reticulate Fabrics, 11 Blackhall Yard, Stricklandgate, Kendal, Cumbria LA9 4LU. Tel: 01539 729947. E-mail:hello@reticulatefabrics.co.uk  www.reticulatefabrics.co.uk

 

Hi Tony

Slight correction to the name in the email address and link you gave - its 'Reticule' rather than "Reticulate"

Rodger

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Branchlines LBSCR six-wheeled van is now in primer, and next to it this week's project, a Collett bow-ended Ocean Mails van from the Comet kit.

 

attachicon.giflbsc3.jpg

 

Alastair

Nice!

Leave 'em in primer and you could have a "Ghost Train" set.....

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Always turn to this thread for some inspriation Tony.

 

On my bench at the moment, EM gauge Comet chassis and high level gearbox with later Hornby Fowler tank body as the lining is much better.

 

Needs a pin/nut and bolt for the crosshead at the moment.

 

post-27-0-62896500-1503563264_thumb.jpg

 

And need to model the pipework under the cab too.

 

post-27-0-98193100-1503563316_thumb.png

  • Like 13
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

attachicon.gifBallyconnell Road 01.jpg

 

This picture was taken with a full-frame Nikon Df using a 55mm Micro lens. 

 

I've included it, not for its photographic merit, but because of its modelling merit. It's Irish broad gauge 3mm scale, where just about everything has to be made by the builder. This loco even has working inside motion! 

 

 

Ballyconnell Road featured in one of my MRJs a year or so back and I would agree with everything Tony has said about it - fantastic modelling of an unusual prototype.

The loco is the work of Mick Rawlings and does indeed have working inside motion. What makes it even more remarkable is that Mick doesn't have a workshop bulging with machine tools. He has a Proxon minidrill and stand and the normal selection of hand tools. He has done me an article on how he built this loco using what I refer to as kitchen table technology which will appear in a future MRJ.

 

Jerry

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Always turn to this thread for some inspriation Tony.

 

On my bench at the moment, EM gauge Comet chassis and high level gearbox with later Hornby Fowler tank body as the lining is much better.

 

Needs a pin/nut and bolt for the crosshead at the moment.

 

attachicon.gifIMG_9334.JPG

 

And need to model the pipework under the cab too.

 

attachicon.gifIMG_4247.PNG

If you are modeling 42343, note the Stanier bevel rim wheels on the trailing bogie.  Gibson do them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

The good news, of course, is that those slides worth keeping have been scanned.  But even here there are troubles looming.  First, my scanner, a very nice Nikon LS2000, only has a SCSI interface, second, Nikon no longer support the software (I use Vuescan now) and who knows how and when the images will last.

 

 

When I first went digital, end of last century (always wanted to write that!), I used a Acer also with a scsi interface. I did manage to find a SCSI to usb adapter in later times, an Adaptec usb2xchange,

 

post-12706-0-06134800-1503567732.jpg

 

but when the Acer failed I tried going back to an old technique used to copy negs and slides, photographing them. Although the Acer had batch scanning it was still a slow process, but using a standard digital camera makes it very quick. Handy when you have many thousands of images to copy/scan.

 

In the past this was mainly done using dedicated equipment made for the task and some is still around, but I made my own copy stand from mount board lit using a small lightbox as the light source. To copy 35mm stock you do really need a macro lens with 1:1 magnification. They also mainly have a flat field and accounts for why they were often called 'copy' lenses in past times. I used a 100mm macro with my old Pentax 35mm, but with my current Canon 600D the 60mm macro gives the same result since it is a smaller sensor format.

 

post-12706-0-01400200-1503568169.jpg

 

The results are actually mainly better than I got from scanning whatever software I used, Vuescan etc. This is mainly because scanning copies the stock material where as photography copies the image not the base stock it's on, a subtle difference. Negs images do of course need reversing, but quite easy to do in such as photoshop as is adjusting any colour issues in levels.

 

Izzy

Edited by Izzy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Many years ago I owned a Nikon slide copier but part exchanged it when I bought my F5. Originally I used a standard lens mounted backwards on the camera, again using Nikon accessories including bellows between back of lens and front of slide copier. Living in Singapore meant I got very good deals from a shop on Dhoby Ghat because all our office visitors would ask me to get them the Best Price. My equipment cost me dealer cost plus 2% markup.

 

Anyway, I never got acceptable results and the process was expensive, I was literally copying slides, not scanning them.

 

A really good Macro lens is essential, my Micro Nikkor 60mm is the best lens I have ever bought. Flat field and 1:1 and not too close to the subject.

 

I really should use it more often.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the feedback on Sighting Boards.  

Apologise for the delay in thanks but the day after I posted I lost my internet connection and have only got it back today.  Also had to go and bring back my Camper Van that had failed on the way back from meeting up with the children in Revelstoke (Canadian last spike town).  Good news was that it broke down on the way back just after the 1/2 way point.  So 4 days and 3200 km it is back and being got ready for winter storage.  Now back to modelling and building my station stop unit

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let folks know that I've been able to retrieve the 'lost' images. I say 'I've', but it's really Ian Wilson who did it. Talking to both him and Andy York today it looks like the card is dodgy. I'll get another. 

 

post-18225-0-46616300-1503607856_thumb.jpg

 

It would have been a pity to lose images like this. It'll be appearing in BRM most likely in the autumn. 

Edited by Tony Wright
  • Like 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

The other week it was naval battles in the North Sea, this week the merits of various esoteric cameras in the film era and memories of dark rooms and infra red lighting ..... this thread has endless fascination, especially when we also get first rate railway modelling! Many thanks to all.

 

John Storey

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let folks know that I've been able to retrieve the 'lost' images. I say 'I've', but it's really Ian Wilson who did it. Talking to both him and Andy York today it looks like the card is dodgy. I'll get another. 

 

attachicon.gifStaly Vegas 10.jpg

 

It would have been a pity to lose images like this. It'll be appearing in BRM most likely in the autumn. 

 

By gum that's a grim grey industrial town - the tunnel looks particularly "scary" to walk (run!!!) through. Nicely modeled though.

 

Brit15

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still remember London in the 70s, many of the buildings were black not this colour. This included Parliament, St Paul's etc. presumably because they had never been cleaned since the Clean Air Act. Look much nicer now though Big Ben will be very quiet for some time unless on radio 4!

 

The approach to Liverpool Street was so black it was difficult to work out the colour of the brick work, have no idea if it is still like it? This was the era where my brother would be asked to paint pub ceilings 'nicotine' colour when pricing up jobs so staining wouldn't be a problem (He is a surveyor).

 

Martyn

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I still remember London in the 70s, many of the buildings were black not this colour. This included Parliament, St Paul's etc. presumably because they had never been cleaned since the Clean Air Act. Look much nicer now though Big Ben will be very quiet for some time unless on radio 4!

 

The approach to Liverpool Street was so black it was difficult to work out the colour of the brick work, have no idea if it is still like it? This was the era where my brother would be asked to paint pub ceilings 'nicotine' colour when pricing up jobs so staining wouldn't be a problem (He is a surveyor).

 

Martyn

 

I would agree with you that model railways don't get how silky black soot encrusted building could be. However, I still find the above modelling pleasing from an aesthetic point of view, even if it is an interpretation rather than a dead copy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would have been a pity to lose images like this. It'll be appearing in BRM most likely in the autumn. 

 

Tony

 

What an atmospheric model!  It immediately reminded me of the walk along the canal from Wolverhampton Low Level to Stafford Road shed.  Back in the late 1950s the canal had yet to be regenerated and many of the canal side buildings were falling into disrepair or just plain falling down.  But the model actually doesn't show any dereliction so perhaps I am taking things too far?

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't a wartime soldier from the USA say it was a pity Manchester Townhall was built from coal....So black was it. 

 

I took the blackness on everything and the soot laden air for granted as a young man. Many of the very early 1950's movies on Channel 81 (Talking Movies) show this all too clearly where the end of a road is lost in mist. This ready-made moodiness must have been a godsend to British movie makers. I think PPC's 'Dirty Black' would be useful for spraying (diluted) on buildings and especially stone walls. Stone seemed to readily absorb soot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last time I was back up north, it still looked like that!

Nah, it looks like this now.

 

http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/14686056.jpg

 

Original, there would have been a myriad of golden hues to the stone work. Unfortunately, the cleaning process removes this as well as the soot, leaving such buildings a sickly yellow colour verging on beige.

Edited by Headstock
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...