Jump to content
 

Please use M,M&M only for topics that do not fit within other forum areas. All topics posted here await admin team approval to ensure they don't belong elsewhere.

Wright writes.....


Recommended Posts

Another Deltic and old water crane - a North Eastern Railway one this time at Darlington, 10 July 1968. D9017 "The Durham Light Infantry" is heading north & not stopping at Darlington station. (The one at Doncaster  above is a Great Northern design).

 

2013-01-10-16-09-27.jpg.c81fe67bd3507bb880e7ecb4fdabd834.jpg

 

Brit15

  • Like 6
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Fatadder said:

Well I got my part built A4 kit yesterday, and set to work stripping it down last night.  It seems to have been built with a mix of solder and glue (the core of the body is soldered but some parts were glued on.)  One problem was that the back head had been fitted too far back (so it obscured the whole of the first side window and a gap was visible behind it looking through the front window.)  While trying to adjust the fit unfortunately the cab side broke off (which will get soldered back into position once I am happy with the fit of the back head.) 

 

Unfortunately I just cant work out how it is supposed to fit, especially as the kit didn’t come with any instructions (if any one could send me a scan of the chassis instructions it would be most appreciated, else I am cobbling it together from some Comet instructions + Tony’s photos)

 

It looks like material should have been removed from the rear of the backhead to get a good fit (marked in blue on the photos.)

 

 

Still annoyed with myself for breaking the cab side, after a glued part fell off I thought it must all be glue (so dunked it in boiling water for a while to soften before pulling to separate the parts.  The glued bits came off, but the solder stayed strong!)  On the plus side I can be confident that what is left is solid!

 

The body will be getting a bath of oven cleaner tonight to get rid of the crude coat of gloss paint and get back to bare metal along with highlighting any other areas which need work before I get started on the chassis.

 

Looks like it only has insulated wheels on one side, so will be added to the list of higher risk DCC installs…  At least there will be plenty of roof for a decoder!

 

Thanks 

Rich 

 

8C25A9EE-ED2D-4FA5-8E6F-8CD4A9A6CA54.jpeg

3657F25D-1BD9-474E-994E-FCD0C5A91269.jpeg

F22BEE21-AD9F-464E-97B7-AA1E45835F9C.jpeg

 

Fatadder

 

It looks to me as though it is more or less in the right place as it is. On Gresley pacifics the firebox base is in line with the front edge of the second side window, ie it occupies most of the leading windows.

 

Andrew 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Fatadder said:

Well I got my part built A4 kit yesterday, and set to work stripping it down last night.  It seems to have been built with a mix of solder and glue (the core of the body is soldered but some parts were glued on.)  One problem was that the back head had been fitted too far back (so it obscured the whole of the first side window and a gap was visible behind it looking through the front window.)  While trying to adjust the fit unfortunately the cab side broke off (which will get soldered back into position once I am happy with the fit of the back head.) 

 

Unfortunately I just cant work out how it is supposed to fit, especially as the kit didn’t come with any instructions (if any one could send me a scan of the chassis instructions it would be most appreciated, else I am cobbling it together from some Comet instructions + Tony’s photos)

 

It looks like material should have been removed from the rear of the backhead to get a good fit (marked in blue on the photos.)

 

 

Still annoyed with myself for breaking the cab side, after a glued part fell off I thought it must all be glue (so dunked it in boiling water for a while to soften before pulling to separate the parts.  The glued bits came off, but the solder stayed strong!)  On the plus side I can be confident that what is left is solid!

 

The body will be getting a bath of oven cleaner tonight to get rid of the crude coat of gloss paint and get back to bare metal along with highlighting any other areas which need work before I get started on the chassis.

 

Looks like it only has insulated wheels on one side, so will be added to the list of higher risk DCC installs…  At least there will be plenty of roof for a decoder!

 

Thanks 

Rich 

 

8C25A9EE-ED2D-4FA5-8E6F-8CD4A9A6CA54.jpeg

3657F25D-1BD9-474E-994E-FCD0C5A91269.jpeg

F22BEE21-AD9F-464E-97B7-AA1E45835F9C.jpeg

How much did you pay for this, Rich?

 

The construction looks utter cr@p!

 

I think you're right in that backhead was fixed too far back (you shouldn't be able to see daylight between it and the firebox). By the way, Dave Ellis will sell you any spare parts from any of his kits.

 

From memory, I can't remember how the backhead is supposed to fit, though I must have got it right (about 15 times!). 

 

199084150_SEFinecastA405.jpg.511e1c4d7f15316dd780bb55df02ca5c.jpg

 

You can just make it out through the spectacle.

 

I don't have a scanner, so the following pair are just photographs, but they might help.

 

1459681788_A4bodyinstructions.jpg.592204a3d0cac58ed8ab31ca3efb3cd2.jpg

 

1666160693_A4chassisinstructions.jpg.55c46400b8b517c7048ef522def1e68c.jpg

 

What does your recent experience show?

 

Unless you paid next-to-nothing for that A4, avoid anything like that at all costs. Though it's painful to relate, over 90% of loco kits are never finished to a 'satisfactory' standard (not my figures, but from the 'horse's mouth'). Thus, they appear all over the place in their various degrees of abject failure. The triumph of aspiration over ability!

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Tony Wright
to clarify a point
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I have a Crownline whitemetal tender kit* that has been in the to-do box for years. I would have glued it but can see the argument raised in posts above that soldering is better. However, I know whitemetal is low melt, which is why I would have chosen to glue it rather than risk melting castings.

 

I have two irons available - an Antex 16/18W model or a Maplins variable heat. As the Maplins one has no guidance as to temperature range, simply a knob to vary the heat, I would prefer to avoid it. Will the Antex be up to the job?

 

* 8 wheel for a King Arthur as a replacement for the original Hornby 6 wheel plastic one.

Edited by john new
Edit - reworded to make better sense
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, john new said:

I have a Crownline whitemetal tender kit* that has been in the to-do box for years. I would have glued it but can see the argument raised in posts above that soldering is better. However, I know whitemetal is low melt, which is why I would have chosen to glue it rather than risk melting castings.

 

I have two irons available - an Antex 16/18W model or a Maplins variable heat. As the Maplins one has no guidance as to temperature range, simply a knob to vary the heat, I would prefer to avoid it. Will the Antex be up to the job?

 

* 8 wheel for a King Arthur as a replacement for the original Hornby 6 wheel plastic one.

Good morning John,

 

An 18 Watt iron will just slightly warm up any castings. 

 

What you need is a proper temperature-controlled iron, of at least 50W. I don't now what your Maplin's iron's wattage is, but unless it's properly temperature-controlled, all it'll do is lower the temperature and the wattage at the same time. A 'proper' TC iron just lowers the temperature of the bit, but the wattage (it's power of recovery) remains the same. They are not cheap!

 

Might I suggest you obtain some spare/scrap white metal and practise your techniques on that! Ask Dave Ellis of SE Finecast if he'll sell you some malformed castings. 

 

Once you master soldering, you'll then only use glue for what it's really good at fixing - wood and plastic. 

 

Regards,

 

Tony.

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Cheers Tony. Expected the Antex to be too cool, I got the Maplins one a few years back now for a brass kit job. I think my worry with whitemetal (as opposed to brass) is that if you get it wrong you melt it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
48 minutes ago, Tony Wright said:

How much did you pay for this, Rich?

 

The construction looks utter cr@p!

 

I think you're right in that backhead was fixed too far back (you shouldn't be able to see daylight between it and the firebox). By the way, Dave Ellis will sell you any spare parts from any of his kits.

 

From memory, I can't remember how the backhead is supposed to fit, though I must have got it right (about 15 times!). 

 

Unless you paid next-to-nothing for that A4, avoid anything like that at all costs. Though it's painful to relate, over 90% of loco kits are never finished to a 'satisfactory' standard (not my figures, but from the 'horse's mouth'). Thus, they appear all over the place in their various degrees of abject failure. The triumph of aspiration over ability!

Thanks for the photos Tony, I will cross reference against that as I start dismantling. 

Once I have finished stripping the paint I think I will try and break it back down to its original components (I think I recall reading that if you stick a white metal kit in the oven at a low temperature you can melt the solder so it all falls apart?)  Thankfully the chassis hasn’t been touched, so any issues there will be purely of my own making.

 

Thankfully I didn’t pay too much more than the cost of the driving wheels (with the hope that it would be glued construction and fall apart as soon as I started stripping it down.  I have already budgeted to get some replacement parts (notably the crossheads / slide bar castings, round chassis spacers and parts 35/36 for the cut away valances).  Depending on how well I can repair the broken cab side / boiler assembly that will also be added to the list.  I.  An order will be placed later this week once I have got to the bottom of exactly what is required (I am very grateful that SEF supply replacement parts) 

 

I rather like the challenge of taking something that has been messed up and trying to turn a decent model out of it.  

 

I cant wait to see a garter blue engine on the front of a set of chocolate and cream coaches!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's been assembled with 70 degree solder, which I would expect with so many glued bits elsewhere,  a dunk in boiling water will separate the parts with no risk to the castings.

Given the lead content, choose your pan wisely. 

Alan 

  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Barry Ten said:

 

The City was completed without any alteration to the boiler details other than swapping the safety valve for a brass one, but on the Birds (and Bulldogs) the boiler bands and safety valve positions are different

 

Al

 

 

The main reason for the difference is the Bulldogs had the smaller number 2 boiler whereas the City had the larger no 4 (the same as the mogul). The ex Kitmaster boiler was always a little underscale, but still a bit big for a Bulldog.

 

Mike Wiltshire

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Fatadder said:

Thanks for the photos Tony, I will cross reference against that as I start dismantling. 

Once I have finished stripping the paint I think I will try and break it back down to its original components (I think I recall reading that if you stick a white metal kit in the oven at a low temperature you can melt the solder so it all falls apart?)  Thankfully the chassis hasn’t been touched, so any issues there will be purely of my own making.

 

Thankfully I didn’t pay too much more than the cost of the driving wheels (with the hope that it would be glued construction and fall apart as soon as I started stripping it down.  I have already budgeted to get some replacement parts (notably the crossheads / slide bar castings, round chassis spacers and parts 35/36 for the cut away valances).  Depending on how well I can repair the broken cab side / boiler assembly that will also be added to the list.  I.  An order will be placed later this week once I have got to the bottom of exactly what is required (I am very grateful that SEF supply replacement parts) 

 

I rather like the challenge of taking something that has been messed up and trying to turn a decent model out of it.  

 

I cant wait to see a garter blue engine on the front of a set of chocolate and cream coaches!

Boiling water to get it apart, as suggested by Alan.

 

Use an old pan, no longer used for cooking!

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Returning (as usual) to kits and RTR, who'd now build a brass kit to make ex-LMS Porthole stock? 

 

831917426_BachmannPortholeBRmaroonBTK39-461.jpg.c8692254dafac133a081fe99d03ce963.jpg

 

1093303497_BachmannPortholeBRmaroonFO39-476.jpg.a21ab0fe85a9d53c3c88aca891b30a34.jpg

 

At last, the long-awaited maroon examples of these splendid carriages have arrived from Bachmann. How long before we get the same livery on the Thompsons? 

  • Like 9
  • Agree 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
6 hours ago, Coach bogie said:

 

The main reason for the difference is the Bulldogs had the smaller number 2 boiler whereas the City had the larger no 4 (the same as the mogul). The ex Kitmaster boiler was always a little underscale, but still a bit big for a Bulldog.

 

Mike Wiltshire

 

The Kitmaster boiler measures 22.6mm at its widest point, and 20.6 mm at the narrowest, which corresponds to a shade over 5.6" tapering down to a shade over 5". That's not far off the stated dimensions for a no.4 boiler, as listed here:

 

http://www.gwr.org.uk/no440s.html

 

What I don't know is whether those figures are the visible outside diameter, making allowance for cladding, or the internal dimensions of the boiler without cladding. Whatever the case, I'll have to live with any discrepancy and trust that the essential character of the loco still comes through.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Tony Wright said:

Returning (as usual) to kits and RTR, who'd now build a brass kit to make ex-LMS Porthole stock?

Me .... if it was my period :preved:

 

Perhaps I will get bored in a few years (or impatince may well set in) ... but at the moment I just like building things ! Very rewarding and satisfying :declare:

 

They may not be as good as the Bachman .... but for me that's not really the point - my loco's are not as good as the venerable TW either :whistle:

Edited by Lecorbusier
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bachmann's latest Class 90 on test on LB.

 

Who needs digital sound.

 

It's a pity I couldn't link the real train noise with the running of this one.

 

More on BRM Digital........................

 

A full review will be appearing soon in BRM. 

Edited by Tony Wright
to clarify a point
  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Lecorbusier said:

Me .... if it was my period :preved:

 

Perhaps I will get bored in a few years (or impatince may well set in) ... but at the moment I just like building things ! Very rewarding and satisfying :declare:

 

They may not be as good as the Bachman .... but for me that's not really the point - my loco's are not as good as the venreable TW either :whistle:

I'm inclined to agree, but I think we'd be in a minority.

 

I'm already fiddling with these - junking those ghastly couplings, concertina gangways, a bit of weathering - that sort of thing.

 

You're right, I really am venerable (I assume you mean I'm old).

 

I'm not sure about your locos not being as good as mine. Not from what I've seen! 

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, john new said:

Cheers Tony. Expected the Antex to be too cool, I got the Maplins one a few years back now for a brass kit job. I think my worry with whitemetal (as opposed to brass) is that if you get it wrong you melt it.

Indeed you do, John!

 

How do you think I know?

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Tony Wright said:

You're right, I really am venerable (I assume you mean I'm old).

Definition of venerable

1a : calling forth respect through age, character, and attainments a venerable jazz musician

 

broadly : conveying an impression of aged goodness and benevolence encouraged by the venerable doctor's head-nodding :declare:

 

My dad was 93 last weekend .... now that is what I call OLD! :D

Edited by Lecorbusier
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

OK I wonder if anyone here can help.

 

I model BR blue era and are part way through detailing a large pile of coaches.

 

I have been using Laserglaze but I cannot get hold of any more, email nothing, phone rings out, cheque in post, no reply.

 

I need some of those brown air conditioned windows, if I could find the right plastics I could probably get them cut. Or even buy my own cutter. But I need to find out what it is to match the 7 or 8 so far completed.

 

However since they appear to be NLA what is the option for such things as window frames?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony Wright said:

Bachmann's latest Class 90 on test on LB.

 

Who needs digital sound.

 

It's a pity I couldn't link the real train noise with the running of this one.

 

More on BRM Digital........................

 

A full review will be appearing soon in BRM. 

 

Its quite disconcerting seeing something quite so modern on LB.  Perhaps when one of the OO 92s is available and an Azuma, you could replicate a recent promotional shot and line up the different generations of ECML motive power from Atlantics, through A1s, A3s, A4s, A1s, Deltics, HSTs, 92s and Azumas.  Given the ECML setting would be evocative!

 

David

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
22 hours ago, St Enodoc said:

Ah, that's about as far as I got nearly 50 years ago converting an Airfix City of Truro to a 43xx Mogul. Filling the gaps behind the splashers defeated me completely as a teenager.

The April 1961 Model Railway Constructor recommended "Plasticine, Polyfilla or Pyruma" for filling these gaps.

 

I've got a scanned copy of the article, but can't remember whether I attepted to combine the City and prairy tank to produce a mogul.

 

Dave

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Tony Wright said:

Returning (as usual) to kits and RTR, who'd now build a brass kit to make ex-LMS Porthole stock? 

 

831917426_BachmannPortholeBRmaroonBTK39-461.jpg.c8692254dafac133a081fe99d03ce963.jpg

 

1093303497_BachmannPortholeBRmaroonFO39-476.jpg.a21ab0fe85a9d53c3c88aca891b30a34.jpg

 

At last, the long-awaited maroon examples of these splendid carriages have arrived from Bachmann. How long before we get the same livery on the Thompsons? 

2026? By which time they'll be double the price of comet kits- just adding paraffin to the fire.

Edited by davidw
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
2 hours ago, Tony Wright said:

Bachmann's latest Class 90 on test on LB.

 

Who needs digital sound.

 

It's a pity I couldn't link the real train noise with the running of this one.

 

More on BRM Digital........................

 

A full review will be appearing soon in BRM. 

Dear Mr Wright

 

You seem to be in need of some of the following.

1708898244_25kvmk3a1110armheadspanrm.png.4abe0ba1a1d6b349a6ff52f3b4a1f95f.png

 

1533070052_25kvmk3a900armportalstationrm.png.422af877199e6d8ab2dc769d496d259b.png

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Funny 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...