Jump to content
 

Please use M,M&M only for topics that do not fit within other forum areas. All topics posted here await admin team approval to ensure they don't belong elsewhere.

Wright writes.....


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, lee74clarke said:

Good Morning Tony

Deltic kit and DELTIC transfers found, I will deliver today or tomorrow 

 

Best Regards 

Lee

Many thanks for delivering the Dapol DELTIC kit (complete with name transfers) Lee.

 

I'll now make up the package of the kit and my modified Lima Deltic chassis for it. 

 

If anyone is interested (perhaps a younger modeller?) please PM me. If it's a genuine youngster, he/she can have the package FOC, or if someone would care to contribute to CRUK, that'll be fine. I'm not asking much...................... Either/or way, it'll be in a good cause. 

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
2 hours ago, gr.king said:

 

That fact, combined with experience, raises concerns about the behaviour of a "universal" OO W1 on the track. I imagine the coupled wheel sets will all have the customary large amount of side-play to allow the beast to negotiate wholly unrealistic curves, and there may well be no side-control on the leading bogie. Add to that the slop between wheels and rails in OO, and the huge rear overhang of the loco with no real trailing wheels, and it's a recipe for something that is free to wag from side to side like a happy dog's tail! My W1, converted from the Hornby China A4 and with fully flanged wheels throughout was tried on Little Bytham before any "steadying" influence had been added to the leading or trailing trucks, and it wagged extravagantly on a substantial train, with plenty of power on, down the long straight. 

We use one Britannia and rather a lot of Rebuilt West Countries with flanged wheels in the fixed rear trucks and they wag less than almost all other r-t-r locos I've encountered. The WCs also seem to have more grunt than most other r-t-r Pacifics (without being "got-at") - I put that down to favourable weight distribution and slightly smaller wheels as they use the same motors as most others from Hornby. That might bode well for the Thompson's.

 

They go round minimum curves of 3' and the (effectively) lengthened coupled wheelbase largely removes the need for other tweaks. We run rakes of up to 11 mainly r-t-r and Kirk kitbuilt coaches with a few specials to fill gaps. Heavier loads of all-metal kit-built stock will be more likely to provoke misbehaviour and we don't yet know if Hornby's  new big stuff will manage TW's kind of loads without modification anyway.

 

John

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Barry O said:

 

Jesse,

 

very nice - now go an get some "tubes" for it to carry......

 

(and I don't mean beer filled ones either  :jester:)

 

and now you have seen a proper railway to model.. when do you get the Princess?

 

Baz

 

Baz

You spelt Streak wrong 

  • Funny 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony Wright said:

Many thanks for delivering the Dapol DELTIC kit (complete with name transfers) Lee.

 

I'll now make up the package of the kit and my modified Lima Deltic chassis for it. 

 

If anyone is interested (perhaps a younger modeller?) please PM me. If it's a genuine youngster, he/she can have the package FOC, or if someone would care to contribute to CRUK, that'll be fine. I'm not asking much...................... Either/or way, it'll be in a good cause. 

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

No problem Tony, apologies for not having a set of flush glazing.

South East Finecast still list the set though, code SE95, list price £2.50.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been looking at carriage roofboards.

 

Sankey Scenics do a wide range, one of which is for the Flying Scotsman. The sheet also includes gangway endboards with the train title. Does anyone know, please whether the 1957 Summer Flying Scotsman and other titled trains such as the Elizabethan would have carried such end boards and, if so, what colour they would have been then?  This is for Retford. The trains already have roofboards if I recall correctly but not endboards. Because of tweaks to the formations of some trains, not all carriages in the sets are boarded at present.

 

The Flying Scotsman sheet is here.

 

The Elizabethan sheet is here.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, lee74clarke said:

No problem Tony, apologies for not having a set of flush glazing.

South East Finecast still list the set though, code SE95, list price £2.50.

Thanks Lee,

 

I've got to get some stuff from Dave at SEF, so I'll order a glazing set for DELTIC. 

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Dunsignalling said:

We use one Britannia and rather a lot of Rebuilt West Countries with flanged wheels in the fixed rear trucks and they wag less than almost all other r-t-r locos I've encountered. The WCs also seem to have more grunt than most other r-t-r Pacifics (without being "got-at") - I put that down to favourable weight distribution and slightly smaller wheels as they use the same motors as most others from Hornby. That might bode well for the Thompson's.

 

They go round minimum curves of 3' and the (effectively) lengthened coupled wheelbase largely removes the need for other tweaks. We run rakes of up to 11 mainly r-t-r and Kirk kitbuilt coaches with a few specials to fill gaps. Heavier loads of all-metal kit-built stock will be more likely to provoke misbehaviour and we don't yet know if Hornby's  new big stuff will manage TW's kind of loads without modification anyway.

 

John

 

 

Good evening John,

 

'we don't yet know if Hornby's  new big stuff will manage TW's kind of loads without modification anyway.'

 

I won't be reviewing the forthcoming Thompsons from Hornby because, having assisted the company with the models' development, it would not be right. Imagine - 'A brilliant model, one of the finest RTR locos ever!'. Response - 'You're bound to say that, aren't you, having been involved?'. Or - 'Rather disappointing, inaccurate in many areas'. Response - 'Some help you turned out to be!'. 

 

I will, however, be getting one (either the A2/2 or A2/3) as 'payment for my services'. I'll thus be able to conduct a thorough test. Since I don't need any more examples of either class, my intention is to detail/weather (maybe even renumber/rename) whichever one I receive and offer it for sale, all proceeds going to CRUK. 

 

Part of any testing will be haulage capacity. I know neither Hornby's A3s or A4s will handle the heaviest loads on LB (they just slip). To be fair, nowhere is it claimed that that's what they're made to do. It'll be interesting to see if the Thompsons will. Of course, any of my kit-built Thompson Pacifics will; I don't know if you recall when I tested Hornby's P2, that it out-pulled one of my A2/2s, hauling over 20 carriages. I couldn't let that go, so I added more weight to 60501, thus eradicating 'the shame'! 

 

I had nothing to do with the W1's development (in both of its forms), so I should be able to conduct an objective review of that when it appears. 

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, robertcwp said:

I have been looking at carriage roofboards.

 

Sankey Scenics do a wide range, one of which is for the Flying Scotsman. The sheet also includes gangway endboards with the train title. Does anyone know, please whether the 1957 Summer Flying Scotsman and other titled trains such as the Elizabethan would have carried such end boards and, if so, what colour they would have been then?  This is for Retford. The trains already have roofboards if I recall correctly but not endboards. Because of tweaks to the formations of some trains, not all carriages in the sets are boarded at present.

 

The Flying Scotsman sheet is here.

 

The Elizabethan sheet is here.

 

Thanks.

Good evening Robert,

 

From memory, 'The Elizabethan' carried an end board - black, with white lettering.

 

I've got lots of Ian Wilson's Pacific Models' coach destination boards (for ECML expresses). I'll bring these up to Retford next time (lockdown permitting!).

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, robertcwp said:

I have been looking at carriage roofboards.

 

Sankey Scenics do a wide range, one of which is for the Flying Scotsman. The sheet also includes gangway endboards with the train title. Does anyone know, please whether the 1957 Summer Flying Scotsman and other titled trains such as the Elizabethan would have carried such end boards and, if so, what colour they would have been then?  This is for Retford. The trains already have roofboards if I recall correctly but not endboards. Because of tweaks to the formations of some trains, not all carriages in the sets are boarded at present.

 

The Flying Scotsman sheet is here.

 

The Elizabethan sheet is here.

 

Thanks.

 

I happen to have, and will never personally use, the Sankey Scenics packs for The Elizabethan, Queen of Scots, The Heart of Midlothian, The Talisman and The Flying Scotsman, which I will (as one of the "Scotch Gits" as Roy used to call us) gladly donate to Retford. PM if you are interested.

Chas

  • Round of applause 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony Wright said:

Good evening John,

 

'we don't yet know if Hornby's  new big stuff will manage TW's kind of loads without modification anyway.'

 

I won't be reviewing the forthcoming Thompsons from Hornby because, having assisted the company with the models' development, it would not be right. Imagine - 'A brilliant model, one of the finest RTR locos ever!'. Response - 'You're bound to say that, aren't you, having been involved?'. Or - 'Rather disappointing, inaccurate in many areas'. Response - 'Some help you turned out to be!'. 

 

I will, however, be getting one (either the A2/2 or A2/3) as 'payment for my services'. I'll thus be able to conduct a thorough test. Since I don't need any more examples of either class, my intention is to detail/weather (maybe even renumber/rename) whichever one I receive and offer it for sale, all proceeds going to CRUK. 

 

Part of any testing will be haulage capacity. I know neither Hornby's A3s or A4s will handle the heaviest loads on LB (they just slip). To be fair, nowhere is it claimed that that's what they're made to do. It'll be interesting to see if the Thompsons will. Of course, any of my kit-built Thompson Pacifics will; I don't know if you recall when I tested Hornby's P2, that it out-pulled one of my A2/2s, hauling over 20 carriages. I couldn't let that go, so I added more weight to 60501, thus eradicating 'the shame'! 

 

I had nothing to do with the W1's development (in both of its forms), so I should be able to conduct an objective review of that when it appears. 

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

I'm sure there'll be many others who'll visit in due course with Hornby  versions.

Edited by davidw
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The list of new releases usually bring out the discussion of colour match to the original. I have just come across this section of Rail Archive where mono images have been 'colourised' using modern technology. I will let you form your own opinion if the colour is representative.

 

https://www.rail-online.co.uk/p523189878

 

Mike Wiltshire

  • Like 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
On 31/10/2020 at 11:00, Jesse Sim said:

I thought I’d show off a completed wagon. This has been sitting on the layout for a month or two now without transfers, the other day I got stuck in and finished her off. 

2EE40BE0-701E-464C-AE3D-DFB78DAF4748.jpeg

7F32358C-58D7-4C70-8DB7-72C96B832A64.jpeg

A607467C-3BAA-475D-B9A9-E5348D17876D.jpeg

 

Very nice work Jesse :). May I please ask, what material have you used for the folded tarpaulins / wagon sheets?

Edited by Chas Levin
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
23 hours ago, Dunsignalling said:

We use one Britannia and rather a lot of Rebuilt West Countries with flanged wheels in the fixed rear trucks and they wag less than almost all other r-t-r locos I've encountered. The WCs also seem to have more grunt than most other r-t-r Pacifics (without being "got-at") - I put that down to favourable weight distribution and slightly smaller wheels as they use the same motors as most others from Hornby. That might bode well for the Thompson's.

 

They go round minimum curves of 3' and the (effectively) lengthened coupled wheelbase largely removes the need for other tweaks. We run rakes of up to 11 mainly r-t-r and Kirk kitbuilt coaches with a few specials to fill gaps. Heavier loads of all-metal kit-built stock will be more likely to provoke misbehaviour and we don't yet know if Hornby's  new big stuff will manage TW's kind of loads without modification anyway.

 

John

 

 

All my Hornby A3s and A4s negotiate Gresley Jn with the flanged rear truck attached. My minimum radius is generally 36” but with Peco curved points I have short stretches of 30”. Sadly however, they won’t negotiate our club layout which has a minimum radius of 24” in the hidden section so I have to remember to swap them over before I take them for a spin at the club. In practice this means that many live with the unflanged wheels for long periods of time because I can’t be bothered to keep swapping them over and nobody notices!

  • Like 4
  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Coach bogie said:

The list of new releases usually bring out the discussion of colour match to the original. I have just come across this section of Rail Archive where mono images have been 'colourised' using modern technology. I will let you form your own opinion if the colour is representative.

 

https://www.rail-online.co.uk/p523189878

 

Mike Wiltshire

Personally I like the effect and think the end result is pretty accurate and realistic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posters often ask for a suitable starter kit for loco building and this North Eastern Kits J73 fits the bill, while at the same time offering excellent detail. Actually, any of Arthur's 0-6-0 tanks would fit the same bill.  This is the first time I have used one of High Level Models own motors, alongside their Compact+ gearbox, and it is superb. I'm posting it here as I believe Arthur still has a small number of kits available-they were out of stock for a long time.

 

Basic build details are on my thread,

 

IMG_1826.jpg.3038f46939c7c78e7dbfc208de15b43c.jpg.8f17204b7f2c9d3c41ae281680bdd28a.jpg

Edited by rowanj
  • Like 15
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
3 hours ago, thegreenhowards said:

All my Hornby A3s and A4s negotiate Gresley Jn with the flanged rear truck attached. My minimum radius is generally 36” but with Peco curved points I have short stretches of 30”. Sadly however, they won’t negotiate our club layout which has a minimum radius of 24” in the hidden section so I have to remember to swap them over before I take them for a spin at the club. In practice this means that many live with the unflanged wheels for long periods of time because I can’t be bothered to keep swapping them over and nobody notices!

Thanks. Interesting to know they'll go round the Peco curved points.

 

I've been trying to avoid using them because of my WC's etc. and including a couple on my planned layout will free up enough length for trains a coach longer than I'd feared would be the limit.

 

John

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, thegreenhowards said:

All my Hornby A3s and A4s negotiate Gresley Jn with the flanged rear truck attached. My minimum radius is generally 36” but with Peco curved points I have short stretches of 30”. Sadly however, they won’t negotiate our club layout which has a minimum radius of 24” in the hidden section so I have to remember to swap them over before I take them for a spin at the club. In practice this means that many live with the unflanged wheels for long periods of time because I can’t be bothered to keep swapping them over and nobody notices!

 

So far, I have managed to convert all my Hornby Pacifics - Clan, Duke of Gloucester, Sir William Stanier FRS, Bulleid - so that the pony trucks pivot in the traditional pattern.

 

It can be done, some more easily than others; but it takes courage to apply the piercing saw to an expensive new model!

 

John Isherwood.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, thegreenhowards said:

Tony,

 

Thanks for the help with the Speedo bracket for my A2/3. I’ve now fabricated it and some wiggly pipes as you can see below. More pictures are on my workbench thread ‘Coulsdon Works’ should anyone be interested.

 

Andy

 

8A8B2903-E0E8-40EE-B8E7-F0EB4E748910.jpeg.a7a9d238c7b2db388c2561e9dfb3b32b.jpeg

Looking good Andy,

 

Though 'wiggly' shouldn't really apply to the handrail. 

 

A couple or so (constructively-critical) points if I may? The smoke deflector (at least on this side) seems to be a bit too far inboard, leaving too wide a platform between it and the valance (the valance also appears to be bent, over the cylinder). 

 

Please alter the angle of the return crank on this side - it's 90 degrees beyond what it should be. 

 

And, those bogie wheels.............! 

 

I was very fortunate in that Graeme King himself did a Bachmann A2/King A2/3 conversion for me................

 

614563779_Locos13.jpg.8ed3c8a725afa818cf237f0e49ef1fb4.jpg

 

I supplied the donor loco, and Graeme did the conversion (beautifully-well) as part of a barter.

 

This one has a resin cab - I believe later ones have an etched cab. 

 

526966456_Locos15.jpg.ad0eaa8674b3050edac1b4bc1dfbef5c.jpg

 

I did the part patch-repainting, lining, lettering, naming and weathering. 

 

1451003229_Locos16.jpg.56ef057735745de473371ff6e403f43a.jpg

 

These three pictures of 60515 appeared in my Crowood book. 

 

60515.jpg.8acbbd8462ac8cadfc22cb9902ee5eb1.jpg

 

Please note the position of the return crank this side. I think it's correct on the other side. 

 

1971364924_60515onexpress.jpg.7f539e7ac93ac9cb74e23f99891bd659.jpg

 

The conversion was done quite some time ago. A bit more's been done on LB since I took this picture.

 

I think this method of producing an A2/3 is excellent (as you have just shown) - it's inventive, creative and requires craftsmanship. A full-blown DJH or PDK kit for the same would be much more expensive, and beyond many's abilities to actually complete them.

 

Now, of course, with the forthcoming Hornby renditions, yet anther piece of necessary craftsmanship will have been 'eroded'. No matter, you can claim yours is unique; all the better for it, I'd say.  

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

 

 

Edited by Tony Wright
to add something
  • Like 17
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Chas Levin said:

 

Very nice work Jesse :). May I please ask, what material have you used for the folded tarpaulins / wagon sheets?

Thanks mate, dried out tea bags, painted black/grey, with some string tied around. I usually just use smiths tarps as I photocopied the 10 I had into about 60.... if anyone needs tarps.... :laugh_mini:

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 3
  • Craftsmanship/clever 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, thegreenhowards said:

Tony,

 

Thanks for the help with the Speedo bracket for my A2/3. I’ve now fabricated it and some wiggly pipes as you can see below. More pictures are on my workbench thread ‘Coulsdon Works’ should anyone be interested.

 

Andy

 

8A8B2903-E0E8-40EE-B8E7-F0EB4E748910.jpeg.a7a9d238c7b2db388c2561e9dfb3b32b.jpeg

Hi Andy

Can I suggest you paint the motion bracket - it makes the valve gear look so much better. And as Tony says the lean on the left hand return crank is the wrong way.

Andrew

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...