RMweb Premium Pannier Tank Posted May 25, 2014 RMweb Premium Share Posted May 25, 2014 Yes! Forders, not Salters. I'm finding the "Reply quoting this post" facility isn't working for me and hasn't for a few weeks now. Thanks for confirming; I wasn't too sure if "Salters" was a modern term. The run round at Newton Road is now referred to as "Swanborne Siding" when in fact it is at the site of the old "Newton Longville" Signal Box which controlled entry/exit to the old London Brick Works Sidings. The old signal box was located just after the last house on left hand side of Newton Road heading towards the bridge. The original Swanbourne Sidings was located about 1 1/2 miles further west. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Oldddudders Posted May 25, 2014 RMweb Gold Share Posted May 25, 2014 Yes! Forders, not Salters. I'm finding the "Reply quoting this post" facility isn't working for me and hasn't for a few weeks now. Try this. At the bottom left of every page is "Change Theme". Click on it and opt for "RMweb 2013". That should do it for you. In 1968 I wasted some time on some sort of day-release at a college in the City. One of our lecturers described the new Swanbourne yard as a white elephant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Pannier Tank Posted May 25, 2014 RMweb Premium Share Posted May 25, 2014 In 1968 I wasted some time on some sort of day-release at a college in the City. One of our lecturers described the new Swanbourne yard as a white elephant. Swanbourne Sidings was a busy yard supplementing Bletchley Yard. It was the Bletchley Flyover that was the white elephant; although it is soon to get a new lease of life when the East / West route fully opens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Clive Mortimore Posted May 25, 2014 RMweb Premium Share Posted May 25, 2014 I have just found this on the other end of the line, Cambridge to Bedford. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TT1LM38VJT8 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Pannier Tank Posted May 25, 2014 RMweb Premium Share Posted May 25, 2014 I have just found this on the other end of the line, Cambridge to Bedford. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TT1LM38VJT8 Clive, What a great find, fond memories. Last time I travelled on that section it was fully signalled and staffed, certainly run-down look. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted May 25, 2014 RMweb Gold Share Posted May 25, 2014 Try this. At the bottom left of every page is "Change Theme". Click on it and opt for "RMweb 2013". That should do it for you. In 1968 I wasted some time on some sort of day-release at a college in the City. One of our lecturers described the new Swanbourne yard as a white elephant. Which in the case of the new Swanbourne Yard is exactly what it was but fortunately it never achieved that status as it was cancelled before much, if any, work had been done on the ground. In view of the furore over HS2 one wonders quite what the reaction would be if a yard the size of Kingmoor mechanised yard would be proposed to be built at Swanbourne nowadays? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Pannier Tank Posted May 25, 2014 RMweb Premium Share Posted May 25, 2014 (edited) Which in the case of the new Swanbourne Yard is exactly what it was but fortunately it never achieved that status as it was cancelled before much, if any, work had been done on the ground. In view of the furore over HS2 one wonders quite what the reaction would be if a yard the size of Kingmoor mechanised yard would be proposed to be built at Swanbourne nowadays? The original Swanbourne Sidings was a reasonably busy Yard supplementing Bletchley Yard until the decline in Wagon Load Trains. There were several daily Swanbourne to Willesden Freight Trains that required a reversal at Bletchley. One of the problems with Bletchley yard was that at times (when marshalling long trains) it required the Yard Shunter (12073 / 12074) to pull out of the yard into the up Cambridge Platform and then onto the Up Slow Line. Edited May 26, 2014 by Pannier Tank Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LNERGE Posted May 26, 2014 Share Posted May 26, 2014 A friend has posted some pictures of the Cambridge end of the oxford - Cambridge line.. https://www.flickr.com/photos/nicholasy/14073881797/ This point was No4 in Cambridge Goods Yard box.. https://www.flickr.com/photos/nicholasy/14073788939/in/photostream/ This portion of line carried LMS track circuit 10770. https://www.flickr.com/photos/nicholasy/14258288642/in/photostream/ 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacific231G Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 The original Swanbourne Sidings was a reasonably busy Yard supplementing Bletchley Yard until the decline in Wagon Load Trains. There were several daily Swanbourne to Willesden Freight Trains that required a reversal at Bletchley. One of the problems with Bletchley yard was that at times (when marshalling long trains) it required the Yard Shunter (12073 / 12074) to pull out of the yard into the up Cambridge Platform and then onto the Up Slow Line. Goodie, that means we can do the same in 1:87 (or 1:76) scale!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmsforever Posted May 28, 2014 Share Posted May 28, 2014 The latest edition of Rail has an extensive article all about the project,but what a convoluted process its a wonder if anything gets built in the UK these days ,also the Castlefield curve saga is in the mag as well but I wont get into that on this thread . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ess1uk Posted May 28, 2014 Share Posted May 28, 2014 The latest edition of Rail has an extensive article all about the project,but what a convoluted process its a wonder if anything gets built in the UK these days ,also the Castlefield curve saga is in the mag as well but I wont get into that on this thread . i was reading that yesterday too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eggesford box Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 (edited) First trip to the MOD at Bicester via Aylesbury and Claydon LNE JC showing some of the alterations at Bicester Between Jarvis Lane crossing and passing under the Chiltern line Fortuitous timing passing under the Chiltern line Approaching 'Gavray Junction' if you look on the far right you can see the Aldi supermarket sign hence somebodys comment that it might be called Aldi Junction The humungous structure of Tubbs lane crossing footbridge with its disabled access ramps. It is right next door to a nursery (children not plants) so they want something on the bridge to stop people looking in. Couple of shots of the train at the same location as I was required to visually check the points even though they where given back with the engineering supervisor having to come to Claydon signalbox and sign a form saying all was in order before we left there. Waiting at the stop board on the approach to Bicester London Road for the crossing attendant to lower the barriers and give us a green flag to proceed across the crossing. Crossing keeper with arms akimbo, apparently the chap with the camera is normally seen around Islip. On the approach to the MOD at Bicester and waiting for the MOD shunter. Just be thankful these pics do not come with 'aromasurround' as we are close to a sewage farm! The track has been slewed and now runs directly into the MOD for the time being instead of it being accessed from a GF off the running line Edited June 2, 2014 by Eggesford box 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ess1uk Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 i was in Bicester yesterday and thought there were a lot a people near that crossing. great pictures 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold geoff Posted July 4, 2014 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 4, 2014 I guess we will not see this brought back into use! The old swing bridge over the ‘Sheepwash channel’ at Rewley Road, Oxford. 21 June 2014. Geoff 16 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
class"66" Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 Interesting read,with nice photos too cheers neil.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher125 Posted August 19, 2014 Share Posted August 19, 2014 (edited) Though not strictly Oxford-Bletchley, on a related note.... New study supports economic case for ‘Central Section’ rail link The East West Rail Consortium has published a report into the economic benefits of reopening the central section through to Cambridge: East West Rail Central Section Conditional Outputs Statement – Explanatory Note East West Rail Central Section Conditional Outputs Statement – Executive Summary East West Rail Central Section Conditional Outputs Statement – Final Report Chris Edited August 19, 2014 by Christopher125 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
donald burke Posted October 4, 2014 Share Posted October 4, 2014 (edited) hi, my name is don burke. I am trying to find out as much information on the stretch of line between the Bletchley fly over and Winslow. If you could help it would be much appreciated. my tel number is and email is donburke@hotmail.co.uk Edited October 4, 2014 by Andy Y phone number removed - not wise to post it on the 'net! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Pannier Tank Posted October 5, 2014 RMweb Premium Share Posted October 5, 2014 hi, my name is don burke. I am trying to find out as much information on the stretch of line between the Bletchley fly over and Winslow. If you could help it would be much appreciated. my tel number is and email is donburke@hotmail.co.uk Hello Don, Which period are you interested in? Have you heard of http://www.eastwestrail.org.uk As you probably aware the Oxford Branch is currently truncated at the Newton Road Bridge? Hopefully in the next couple of years the line wiĺl be re-instated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eggesford box Posted October 5, 2014 Share Posted October 5, 2014 Just a bit of info if anyone is intending to take any photos of the trip to Bicester MOD/COD via Aylesbury and Claydon LNE Jc, it is not running this month. I think it is because they are behind with the work, not being able to work at night around Bicester and suchlike. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmsforever Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 The line was mentioned tonight on South Today evidently the Liberals have decided that a high speed line to Cambridge is needed wonder were they have been all this time with all the work going on at Oxford ,Bicester and soon Bletchley .They should check with NR as to whats going on with ideas for rail Bedford Cambridge poloticians never seem to surprise me with their brilliant ideas.By the way is the Aylesbury line northwards to be doubled? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwin_m Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 The line was mentioned tonight on South Today evidently the Liberals have decided that a high speed line to Cambridge is needed wonder were they have been all this time with all the work going on at Oxford ,Bicester and soon Bletchley .They should check with NR as to whats going on with ideas for rail Bedford Cambridge poloticians never seem to surprise me with their brilliant ideas.By the way is the Aylesbury line northwards to be doubled? The section east of Bedford to Cambridge hasn't been authorised so they do have a point of sorts. This is the most difficult bit as the former route isn't easily reinstateable and arguably isn't the best route anyway since it misses any significant population centre in between. The most useful route, but probably also the most expensive, would be to turn south onto the MML through Luton, then east via an underground station at Luton Airport to join the ECML south of Stevenage. This would serve two large towns and the airport as well as providing good interchange to two more main lines. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LNERGE Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 (edited) Any plan that uses the Cambridge - Shepreth Branch Junction is not really practical as that bit is pretty much at capacity. To follow the A428 to St Neots and then on to Cambourne is more likely, somehow picking up the old Oxford - Cambridge line into Cambridge itself. Knowing how they are around that way there will be a break of gauge just outside the city so they can keep their beloved misguided busway <g> Edited October 6, 2014 by LNERGE 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwin_m Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 Looking on the aerial mapping, at least one extra track is possible from Shepreth Branch Junction most of the way into Cambridge, although a couple of modern two-track bridges would need replacing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewartingram Posted October 7, 2014 Share Posted October 7, 2014 Any plan that uses the Cambridge - Shepreth Branch Junction is not really practical as that bit is pretty much at capacity. To follow the A428 to St Neots and then on to Cambourne is more likely, somehow picking up the old Oxford - Cambridge line into Cambridge itself. Knowing how they are around that way there will be a break of gauge just outside the city so they can keep their beloved misguided busway <g> Maybe they should just extend the busway westwards, be far better than a modern double track electric railway after all... Stewart Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacific231G Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 Maybe they should just extend the busway westwards, be far better than a modern double track electric railway after all... Stewart You could do the same instead of building HS2, you'd make even bigger construction savings if you used existing roads to take all the buses through the Nimby heartlands of the Chilterns. They don't like new infrastructure anywhere near them so should find that entirely satisfactory!! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now