Jump to content
 

What constitutes a "large layout"?


cromptonnut
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium

I don't believe there is a definition of "large" any more than there is a set length for a piece of string.

 

"Gresley Beat" would probably be considered large but is clearly able to be shifted from show to show for example.  

 

My own Penhayle Bay cannot be transported, requires only a single operator (though can be worked by up to four people simultaneously) and is a 35-metre circuit taking a couple of minutes at scale speeds.  Most of it is plain double track though it has two branches, a small goods yard and a lengthy eight-road storage / fiddle yard.  Is that "large?"   

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anything more than 4'x2' as that's all I can get away with at home :(

 

I have operated club layouts of 40'x20' single handed which I guess some may call a large layout but because it had been so well constructed it didn't feel particularly large or difficult to use.

 

When I lived in the USA however I operated on basement layouts of 60'x40' with multiple layers and thousands of feet of track and they felt really big.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have operated club layouts of 40'x20' single handed which I guess some may call a large layout but because it had been so well constructed it didn't feel particularly large or difficult to use.

 

When I lived in the USA however I operated on basement layouts of 60'x40' with multiple layers and thousands of feet of track and they felt really big.

 

pics or it didn't happen  :onthequiet:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

An interesting question...and a mixed array of counter comments..

 

i think that you have to remove the other variables and just concentrate on size if your debating what constitutes a large layout i.e. how big is it?

 

taking my own Long Line as an example of the confusions of mixing factors.. its 107ft long, is transported by 1 Land Rover, needs 7 full time operators to run properly, yet can be maintained and test ran in a 7ft x 1 ft space by myself, it encompasses nearly 3 miles of railway without any compression in signalling etc, yet has restricted train lengths to suit the cassettes.

 

operator numbers, exhibition or home, popularity, cost effective transport, scale prototype or fiction etc are all wholly different issues to size.

 

cheers Mark

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this tick the boxes? Belongs to a mate of mine its a modeled on Fassifern ,New South Wales ,3 levels of track ( i ran one of my british locos on it a few week ago but still have found it after it disappeared into one of the lower levels ! ) Its been a work in progress for a number of years features scratch built points and a lot of 3D printed buildings (not pictured ) Housed  in a 60 x 60 ' shed on his farm

post-7317-0-39347300-1393376729.jpg

post-7317-0-32643600-1393376744.jpg

post-7317-0-09072200-1393376760.jpg

post-7317-0-21666000-1393376780.jpg

post-7317-0-78215200-1393376800.jpg

post-7317-0-18513300-1393376815.jpg

post-7317-0-52195100-1393376827.jpg

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

A depiction of the ECML from King Cross to Leeds Central in 7mm which occupies a whole school building redefines large to me.

 

It's Leeds City not Central, but anyway...

 

190 miles from Kings X to Leeds, give or take a bit.

 

1760 yards in a mile, 3 feet in a yard.

 

190*1760*3= 1,003,200 (just over a million feet).

 

At 7mm scale, that's 7,022,400 millimetres, or a model that's just over 7 km long, or just under 4.5 miles in proper money.  Now that (as my wife would say), is big.

Edited by TonyMay
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

I might be running a foul of some rule here, but I once operated the layout below (link to another forum). It's the Union Pacific Green River Subdivision, and it was mostly built by a single person, it is above and beyond the most incredible layout I have ever seen. It is what I aspire to. It takes something like 25 people to operate it, including I think 3 dispatchers. Now the thread below is 100 pages or so long, I WOULD recommend looking at every page, you won't be disappointed. Be sure to check out the painted backdrop on page 15.

 

http://www.railroad-line.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=11835&whichpage=1

 

Cheers,

Nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

You know a layout is big if you;

 

need binoculars to see if the distant signal is off

 

have to have telephones as a shout wont carry that far.

 

the tea is cold by the time is gets to your end of the layout.

 

the layout has more wires than the average telephone exchange.

 

Don

  • Like 4
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • RMweb Premium

I remember visiting the home of a Mr Eames in South Derbyshire many moons ago. I think the definition must be 'if your layout, when stored, requires baseboards to be kept in every single room of your house, even the bathroom'.

This wouldn't be a Large layout, it would be suicide and or divorce!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Perhaps this would constitute a large layout. There are many "cab rides" on YouTube but on this one there is a map of the railway or railroad is the Americans call it. Not only do we see the railroad from the cameras perspective but the map is included too with a rather large dot which moves along the map as we progress along the railroad. Only the long dark tunnels are edited out.

https://youtu.be/7MEKVsxOXCw

 

Also for me what constitutes a large layout is any layout that can't be sold in one piece to a person to fit into a spare room. Most large layouts but not all end up in the skip when their owner gets too old to operate them or dies. Because they're so big they often can't be pulled apart because they were never designed to be moved or separated into sections when they were built.

Edited by faulcon1
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Early days on my continental layout. Only the basic framework, wiring, track beds and track laid at this stage and it's all under test here as the automated control (Train Controller software) is being put through its paces. So far so good ...

 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XkAoJ0xwL9s

 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fZJh57pNnPg

 

 

Cheers ...Alan

Edited by Alan Kettlewell
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

It's Leeds City not Central, but anyway...

 

190 miles from Kings X to Leeds, give or take a bit.

 

1760 yards in a mile, 3 feet in a yard.

 

190*1760*3= 1,003,200 (just over a million feet).

 

At 7mm scale, that's 7,022,400 millimetres, or a model that's just over 7 km long, or just under 4.5 miles in proper money.  Now that (as my wife would say), is big.

No Leeds Central is correct, the old Leeds terminus for ECML trains, now long since swept away in real life.

Kevin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My definition of large enough is more than 16' of scenic so it can properly fill your frame of view. You can just about fit prototype UK train lengths in that in 00 if you are keen.

 

I suspect that large is where there is no obvious compression of the prototype. For North American models that can be hard when prototype freight trains are typically 60' long in H0 - 30' in N might be more achievable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...