RMweb Gold The Fatadder Posted June 30, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted June 30, 2021 10 minutes ago, gwrrob said: It does look rather nice. I wonder if @Graham_Muz will let me test a sample for running when they're ready . From memory these ended up getting rebuilt into autocoaches, would be interesting to see if Kernow are going to be able to release that version in the future. Shame the railmotors had all long been withdrawn by the 40s, as I would have loved to justify one... 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Graham_Muz Posted June 30, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted June 30, 2021 Just now, The Fatadder said: From memory these ended up getting rebuilt into autocoaches, would be interesting to see if Kernow are going to be able to release that version in the future. Shame the railmotors had all long been withdrawn by the 40s, as I would have loved to justify one... Not from existing tooling I am afraid. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold gwrrob Posted June 30, 2021 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted June 30, 2021 6 minutes ago, The Fatadder said: Shame the railmotors had all long been withdrawn by the 40s, as I would have loved to justify one... Maybe so but it won't stop me buying one anyway. Too nice not to. 6 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Fatadder Posted June 30, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted June 30, 2021 2 minutes ago, Graham_Muz said: Not from existing tooling I am afraid. Shame there is no longer the annual opportunity to pick up the pre pro / livery samples from Kernow at the Taunton Members Day, converting a pre prod example into an autotrailer would have made for an interesting project... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold BMacdermott Posted June 30, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted June 30, 2021 Hello Graham Would they be these? GWR Autocoach – Wood-panelled 70ft Ex-Steam Railmotor (Diag.A26 of 1928-36) If so, they have been High Polling in The 00 Wishlist Poll for a while. Brian 4 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Mallard60022 Posted June 30, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted June 30, 2021 12 minutes ago, Graham_Muz said: The Bulleid coaches has drop buckeyes using buck eyes between coaches and screw links for coupling to locos. I fit my coaching sets with Kadee couplings between coaches in my fixed sets. Thanks Graham. On my Sets I can put SLs on the outer Brakes....if ICBA. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted June 30, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted June 30, 2021 To answer the question in the latest mini-poll. Because they ran over the N&W it has to be - L22 One thing worth pointing out is that some of the 'full Monty' Postal trains included Stowage Vans as well as TPOs so examples of both would be needed to do the job properly 2 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold gwrrob Posted June 30, 2021 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted June 30, 2021 Back to the TPO poll and put my vote in for the L22 please Brian. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ribird Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 16 minutes ago, The Fatadder said: From memory these ended up getting rebuilt into autocoaches, would be interesting to see if Kernow are going to be able to release that version in the future. Shame the railmotors had all long been withdrawn by the 40s, as I would have loved to justify one... Could always rule one Slap a shirtbutton or GWR crest on it and call it good! That's what I'm planning. Like @gwrrob said, too nice not to get! 4 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Mallard60022 Posted June 30, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted June 30, 2021 This afternoon has proven what a useful addition this Polling has been for both an ex Janner and a modeller (that's pushing it) of the other route east. Brilliant stuff when I'm feeling a bit grim. P 2 1 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold BMacdermott Posted June 30, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted June 30, 2021 8 minutes ago, The Stationmaster said: One thing worth pointing out is that some of the 'full Monty' Postal trains included Stowage Vans as well as TPOs so examples of both would be needed to do the job properly Hello Mike Indeed that is true and - on reflection - Item 2 would have been better constructed as L & M Diagrams. If anyone wants to vote for M Diagrams please do so. Brian 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold john dew Posted June 30, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted June 30, 2021 My preference is for L22 Best wishes from an extremely warm Vancouver 2 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium St Enodoc Posted July 1, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted July 1, 2021 (edited) 10 hours ago, Graham_Muz said: The Bulleid and Maunsell coaches had drop buckeyes using buck eyes between coaches and screw links for coupling to locos. I fit my coaching sets with Kadee couplings between coaches in my fixed sets. I'm more familiar with Mk1s than with SR coaches. On Mk1s the "emergency" screw couplings were kept in the brake van. In normal operation, I would expect the buckeye on the leading coach to be dropped (and the buffers extended too, of course) and the loco coupling used. I don't think you would see the screw coupling hanging down on the coach very often at all. Edited July 1, 2021 by St Enodoc 3 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium St Enodoc Posted July 1, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted July 1, 2021 2 hours ago, St Enodoc said: I'm more familiar with Mk1s than with SR coaches. On Mk1s the "emergency" screw couplings were kept in the brake van. In normal operation, I would expect the buckeye on the leading coach to be dropped (and the buffers extended too, of course) and the loco coupling used. I don't think you would see the screw coupling hanging down on the coach very often at all. I didn't have time earlier, between breakfast and work, to look in my copies of the 1960 and 1972 General Appendix but now it's lunchtime I have. There's loads of stuff about buckeyes, the vast majority of which isn't of much relevance in the model world, but the sentence I had in mind reads the same in both editions: "An emergency screw coupling with two "D" shackles of equal length is carried in the guard's compartment of of all brake vehicles fitted with automatic "Buck-eye" couplers." The rest of the text makes it clear that this applies to BR, ex-LNER and ex-SR vehicles. 2 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Limpley Stoker Posted July 1, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 1, 2021 A vote for L22 please , the best compromise! 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1466 Posted July 1, 2021 Share Posted July 1, 2021 7 hours ago, St Enodoc said: I'm more familiar with Mk1s than with SR coaches. On Mk1s the "emergency" screw couplings were kept in the brake van. In normal operation, I would expect the buckeye on the leading coach to be dropped (and the buffers extended too, of course) and the loco coupling used. I don't think you would see the screw coupling hanging down on the coach very often at all. I may be wrong , if so apologies, but thought it was the convention to use the locomotive’s coupling to couple to freight and passenger trains . I’d welcome comment from those with practical experience . 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Mallard60022 Posted July 1, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted July 1, 2021 8 hours ago, St Enodoc said: I'm more familiar with Mk1s than with SR coaches. On Mk1s the "emergency" screw couplings were kept in the brake van. In normal operation, I would expect the buckeye on the leading coach to be dropped (and the buffers extended too, of course) and the loco coupling used. I don't think you would see the screw coupling hanging down on the coach very often at all. Yes, I remember and have noted that too. Retractable Buffers on many types as well which I have actually seen a shunter engaging at Exeter Central. That must have been a heavy job? Phil 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium St Enodoc Posted July 1, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted July 1, 2021 1 hour ago, 1466 said: I may be wrong , if so apologies, but thought it was the convention to use the locomotive’s coupling to couple to freight and passenger trains . I’d welcome comment from those with practical experience . Absolutely correct - not just convention but the rule. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium St Enodoc Posted July 1, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted July 1, 2021 31 minutes ago, Mallard60022 said: Yes, I remember and have noted that too. Retractable Buffers on many types as well which I have actually seen a shunter engaging at Exeter Central. That must have been a heavy job? Phil All (I think...) buckeye-fitted stock has retractable buffers. The heavy job is lifting the buckeye when necessary. 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Dunsignalling Posted July 1, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 1, 2021 (edited) 15 minutes ago, St Enodoc said: All (I think...) buckeye-fitted stock has retractable buffers. The heavy job is lifting the buckeye when necessary. During my first week at Signal School (Southside, Waterloo) we shared a few classes with trainee guards, one of which included wrangling buckeyes, which we siggies didn't have to do unless out of curiosity.... The approved technique makes it easier/possible, but I entirely agree! A young girl on the guard course, was barely five foot and probably about seven stone, but "got it" instantly and made some beefy lads (not all of whom did) feel sheepish. However, pulling out retracted buffers, especially if they've not been moved for a while, isn't exactly a "finger-and-thumb" job, either. John Edited July 1, 2021 by Dunsignalling 2 2 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted July 1, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 1, 2021 3 hours ago, 1466 said: I may be wrong , if so apologies, but thought it was the convention to use the locomotive’s coupling to couple to freight and passenger trains . I’d welcome comment from those with practical experience . A mighty can of worms has been opened. I'll start with 1960 as that was very straightforward-ish 1. Engine/tender to passenger stock or fitted freight stock - engine/tender coupling to be used. On ex-LNER tender locos with a buckeye coupling on the tender the buckeye coupling was to be used to couple to buckeye fitted passenger carrying stock and (I don't have the ER Instructions) but I presume the LNER link coupling (on ex LNER vehicles) or the Emergency Screw Coupling on Mk1 vehicles coupling was to be used to couple to a bucye equipped tender if there was a buckeye defect 2. Engine/tender coupled to loose coupled freight vehicles - the coupling of the wagon must be used. (Note *) 3. Coupling wagons with 3 link coupling to wagons with screw couplings - the 3 link coupling must be used. 4 Attaching fitted freight vehicles to passenger trains and the adjacent couplings are of different lengths - the shorter coupling must be used. 5. Vehicles with Instanter Couplings - A. Attached to a train conveying passengers - a screw coupling must be used and only one vehicle fitted with instanter couplings may be conveyed. (Partially revised in October) 1971 B. Arttached to coaching stock train not conveying passengers - screw couplings must mst be used C. in freight trains - coupling to be in the long position in unfitted trains except when conveying cattle when it must be in teh short position. Coupling to be in the short position when the vehicle is marshalled ina fitted train or portion. WR Instruction 1950 where freight vehicles have couplings at differenmt heights the shackle of the lower coupling is to be placed over the hook of the higher coupling Note * - This was most likely done that way round for coupling strength reasons as freight trains could load much more heavily than passenger trains so a screw coupling would be subject to considerable added stress on the threads and shackle fixings. (eg. re loads - Didcot - Banbury 78XX allowed 392tons on a passenger train, 1,000 tons on a freight). It all changed in later years when 35 ton and then 50 ton (drawbar pull strength) screw couplings became available. Our experience on a test on the WR showed they would take a trailing load of 12,000. tonnes (with a mid train helper) but the drawhook wouldn't - one sheered. GWR passenger vehicles fitted with buckeye couplings were - obviously - rather different from everybody else's ideas and did not have extendable buffers - instead the buffers were folded downwards, out of use, when the buckeye couplings were in use and folded upwards to act as buffers in the normal manner when a screw coupling had to be used in an emergency (illustrations available). 1 7 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Graham_Muz Posted July 1, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 1, 2021 11 hours ago, St Enodoc said: I'm more familiar with Mk1s than with SR coaches. On Mk1s the "emergency" screw couplings were kept in the brake van. In normal operation, I would expect the buckeye on the leading coach to be dropped (and the buffers extended too, of course) and the loco coupling used. I don't think you would see the screw coupling hanging down on the coach very often at all. I agree with all you have said, I was just being a little simplistic in my reply. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted July 1, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 1, 2021 2 hours ago, St Enodoc said: All (I think...) buckeye-fitted stock has retractable buffers. The heavy job is lifting the buckeye when necessary. Extending the buffers isn't much fun either although the buckeye head is the worst part. hence various 'buckeye lifters' were tried over the years - basically a strong piece of bar to use as a lever underneath the buckeye head. but you then needed long arms to get the pin back in over the draw hook. 1 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium St Enodoc Posted July 1, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted July 1, 2021 1 minute ago, The Stationmaster said: Extending the buffers isn't much fun either although the buckeye head is the worst part. hence various 'buckeye lifters' were tried over the years - basically a strong piece of bar to use as a lever underneath the buckeye head. but you then needed long arms to get the pin back in over the draw hook. A brake stick, which you then rested on your shoulder, was the usual if slightly unofficial way that I was taught - but, as you say, easier if you were related to Twizzle. 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bgman Posted July 1, 2021 Share Posted July 1, 2021 Spotted a recce group heading up the coast earlier on my ride this morning..... 1 2 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now